Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D6 / Lithuania / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats |
Member State | Lithuania |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Environmental Protection Agency |
Report date | 2020-06-09 |
Report access | ART9_GES_LT-04-08-corrected-06-03.xml |
GES component |
D6
|
D6C1
|
D6C2
|
D6C3
|
D6C4
|
D6C5
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
||||||
Features |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
GES description |
For each habitat type that is adversely affected by physical disturbance causing changes in its biotic and abiotic structure and functions (e.g. changes in species composition and relative abundance of species, disappearance of highly sensitive, vulnerable and key function species, changes in siz...
|
Extent of adverse effects of physical disturbance on each habitat type in each assessed area. The condition is assessed according to the indicator "Area of soil dumping (sanding) and sand excavation area in the habitat".
|
For each habitat type that is adversely affected by physical disturbance causing changes in its biotic and abiotic structure and functions (e.g. changes in species composition and relative abundance of species, disappearance of highly sensitive, vulnerable and key function species, changes in siz...
|
Extent of adverse effects of physical disturbance on each habitat type in each assessed area. The status is assessed according to the indicator "Size of bottom trawling area in the habitat"
|
The species composition and relative abundance of macrofauna communities reach values indicating that the increase in nutrients and organic matter does not cause adverse effects. The indicator is assigned to criterion D5C8.
|
||||
Determination date |
201304 |
201304 |
202002 |
202002 |
201304 |
||||
Update type |
Modified from reported determination |
Modified from reported determination |
New determination |
New determination |
Same as last reported determination |
||||
Justification for non-use of criterion |
Seabed loss includes effects due to changes in the seabed substrate or morphology and the extraction of the seabed substrate, after which the natural properties of the seabed can only be restored by additional measures, as they are not restored in the course of natural processes. During the asses...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
Due to the lack of data, a comprehensive assessment has not been carried out. Monitoring is planned for 2020-2023. Indicator in the HELCOM region under development. However, it is tentatively estimated that the extent of habitat type degradation due to anthropogenic pressures does not exceed a certain proportion of the natural size of the habitat type in the assessed area.
|
||||
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements |
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
The spatial extent and distribution of pressures associated with physical disturbance to the seabed within the predominant seabed habitat types were assessed. Impacts assessed: bottom trawling, excavation and burial, sanding to replenish beaches. The size of the physical disturbance area in squar...
|
Due to the lack of data, a comprehensive assessment has not been carried out. Monitoring is planned for 2020-2023. Indicator in the HELCOM region under development. However, it is tentatively estimated that the extent of habitat type degradation due to anthropogenic pressures does not exceed a certain proportion of the natural size of the habitat type in the assessed area.
|
Not all habitat types are subject to macrozoobenthos monitoring, and the existing network of stations does not allow for spatial assessment of habitat status everywhere. Due to the lack of data, the assessment is not comprehensive according to the criteria.
|