Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D9 / Latvia / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D9 Contaminants in seafood |
Member State | Latvia |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology |
Report date | 2013-04-30 |
Report access | MSFD10TI_20130430_215739.xml |
BAL- LV- AA- 001, BAL- LV- AA- 002, BAL- LV- AA- 003, BAL- LV- AA- 004, BAL- LV- AA- 005, BAL- LV- AA- 006, BAL- LV- AA- 007, BAL- LV- AA- 008, BAL- LV- AA- 009, BAL- LV- AA- 012
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D9 |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_a |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_b |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_c |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_d |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_e |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_f |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_g |
9.1.1-indicator 9.1A_h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D9
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
D9C1
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method used |
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
The BAL-LV environmental objective to achieve or maintain GES is defined in accordance with the desired environmental status as defined by good environmental status descriptors. Consequently, the desired objectives for the marine environment were defined on the basis of qualitative characteristics in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/477 / EU and related indicators with quantitative values. The quantitative values of the indicators were determined using trend analysis and historical data. The Marine Environment Initial Assessment Report Technical Annex “Good Environmental Status Criteria, Indicators and Assessment for the Gulf of Riga and the Baltic Sea” provides an explanation of the methods for quantifying the quantified targets for the marine environment.
|
Description [Targets] |
Kaitīgās vielas zivīs un citās jūras veltēs, ko izmanto pārtikā, nepārsniedz līmeņus, kas noteikti Kopienas tiesību aktos vai citos saistošos noteikumos.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
GES tiek sasniegts tad, ja konstatēto piesārņotāju faktiskie līmeņi nepārsniedz maksimālo reglamentēto koncentrācijas līmeni.
|
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
|||||||||
Reference point type |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Not appropriate |
Baseline |
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Not appropriate
|
Proportion |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Assessment method |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Pašam mērķim metodika nav izstrādāta. Ir atsevišķi indiviudālie indikatori, kam šobrīd ir metodika, bet visam indikatoru kopumam nav viena metode, kas novērtētu, vai mērķa ir sasniegts. |
Development status |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
expected to be operational by 2018 |
Type of target/indicator |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Timescale |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
99-9999 |
Interim or GES target |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
GES |
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Regional level
|
Physical/chemical features |
|||||||||
Predominant habitats |
|||||||||
Functional group |
|||||||||
Pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|