Member State report / Art11 / 2014-2020 / D2 / Netherlands / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2014-10-15; 2020-10-15
GES Descriptor D2 Non-indigenous species
Member State Netherlands
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by Rijkswaterstaat
Report date 2014-10-16; 2020-11-17
Report access
2014 data
2020 data
Monitoring programme Monitoring programme name
MP_D2
Monitoring programme Reference existing programme
Monitoring programme Marine Unit ID
Q4e - Programme ID
ANSNL-D2
Q4f - Programme description
The Cabinet views this MSFD Monitoring Programme as a guiding component of the approach to ensure a good status of the marine environment in the Dutch part of the North Sea. The MSFD Monitoring Programme has been drawn up in accordance with Article 11 of the Directive. It details the actual monitoring of the 32 indicators outlined in the Marine Strategy Part 1. Based on the measurement data, the Monitoring Programme provides insight into: 1. The status of the indicators, thereby indicating the extent to which an environmental target is achieved (MSFD, Art. 10), in order to facilitate the ongoing assessment and periodic updating of the environmental targets (MSFD, Art. 5) in order to maintain or reach good environmental status. 2. The effectiveness of the programme of measures to be implemented under the MSFD. Although the Monitoring Programme focuses primarily on the 32 indicators from the Marine Strategy Part 1, it also uses, for the purpose of interpreting the results, a number of supporting parameters that are included as standard during sampling (such as temperature, acidity, conductivity, salinity and dissolved oxygen). For the purpose of the next assessment of the environmental status in 2017-2018 and assessments thereafter, use will also be made of the information resulting from monitoring for research or from other statutory frameworks and policy areas. This includes information from national monitoring under the Bathing Water Directive in the area of microbial pathogens, shipping intensity monitoring (including fishing vessels) for the purpose of shipping traffic safety and bathymetric information obtained from hydrographic measurements. In determing spatial and temporal distribution of the monitoring, natural variation is taken into account as well as the possibilities to distinguish changes from natural variability. Important parameters for climate change and ocean acidification, such as temperature and pH are incorporated in the regular monitoring programmes. Data on fish and shellfish is collected under the Common Fisheries Policy. Economic data is collected by Statistics Netherlands (abbreviated as CBS in Dutch). CBS supplies the required data following receipt of a specified request for information. Thus, the requirements of MSFD Art. 8 are met and the indicative list of elements included in MSFD Appendix III is incorporated. In this way, the MSFD Monitoring Programme provides a solid basis for updating the Marine Strategy during the second implementation cycle of the MSFD. This begins by updating the initial assessment (MSFD Art. 8) and describing the good environmental status (MSFD Art. 9), environmental targets and indicators (MSFD Art. 10) in 2018, and continues through to the adjustment of the existing programme of measures (Art. 13) in 2021. References: -More information on the rationale for the balance between monitoring of state/impact, pressures, activities and measures: MS II paragraph 2.3 (DPSIR –model) -MS II Annex 4
Q5e - Natural variability
  • ExpertOpinion
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate data
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Established methods
N
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Q5d - Adequacy for assessment of GES Q5d - Adequate capacity
Y
Q5f - Description of programme for GES assessment
a,b) In the art 9 and 10 report in 2012 the Netherlands has opted for a general description of GES under art 9 and a further elaboration of the targets and associated indicators under art 10. These targets and indicators cover all criteria from the Commission Decision as far as they are considered relevant for the Netherlands part of the North Sea. Therefore, they also cover the information requirement for the assessment of the descriptors and targets. See paragraph 9.2.7 of the Marine Strategy II for a detailed description of how the targets and the information required to describe GES, via the elaboration of an information strategy, functional requirements and a monitoring strategy, are translated into the monitoring plan. Additional information will be available from the monitoring associated with licensing of import of shellfish and from the monitoring that is developed for the Ballast water management convention. c) The monitoring will provide data that can be used to assess trends and will provide information for determination of distance from GES. d) The nature of the data collected will make it difficult to differentiate whether the appearance of new species is due to natural processes or due to human activities. Differentiation is done based on a standard list for determining whether a new species is alien or indigenous. e) The MSFD Monitoring Plan will be updated annually in a digitally amended supplement based on the latest developments and insights in the area of indicator definitions and measurement methods, for example as a result from (sub) regional coordination within OSPAR.
Q5g - Gap-filling date for GES assessment
By2014
Q5h - Plans to implement monitoring for GES assessment
In 2014, the OSPAR commission established the rate of new introduction of exotic species (number of new exotic species per annum) as a common indicator, supplemented with data on the implementation of management measures on the route and spread of exotic species. This indicator will probably contribute to the OSPAR Intermediate Assessment in 2017. Presently, the indicator is being tested. If necessary, and depending on when this process will yield results, the Monitoring Plan will be adjusted for indicator (18) the number of new invasive exotic species per annum in 2015 or 2016. Port sampling data collected for the purpose of the Ballast Water Management convention also provide additional data and information on alien species.
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Environmental target
2
Q6a -Relevant targets Q6a - Associated indicator
2
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_SuitableData
Y
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6b_EstablishedMethods
N
Q6b - Adequacy for assessment of targets Q6d_AdequateCapacity
Y
Q6c - Target updating
Y
Q6d - Description of programme for targets assessment
See 5f
Q6e - Gap-filling date for targets assessment
By2014
Q6f - Plans to implement monitoring for targets assessment
See 5h
Q7a - Relevant activities
  • Aquaculture
  • Shipping
Q7b - Description of monitoring of activities
Annex 4 of the Marine Strategy part 2 shows the DPSIR relations between ecosystem elements/descriptors, pressures and activities, as well as how the pressures and activities and their effects are monitored. Annex 3 of the Marine Strategy part 2 gives the relation between elements from the MSFD Annex 3 and the MSFD monitoring programme.
Q7c - Relevant measures
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate data
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Established methods
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate understanding of GES
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Adequate capacity
Y
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses activities and pressures
N
Q7e - Adequacy for assessment of measures Q7d - Addresses effectiveness of measures
Y
Q7d - Description of monitoring for measures
The monitoring programme renders quantitative information on the abundance and characteristics of non-indigenous in the Netherlands part of the Greater North Sea. This information gives insight in the effectiveness of current and future measures.
Q7f - Gap-filling date for activities and measures
By2014
Q8a - Links to existing Monitoring Programmes
  • Ballast Water Management Convention
  • CFP-DC-MAP
  • Habitats
  • OSPAR
  • TWSC
  • WFD
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme ID
Reference sub-programme Sub-programme name
Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme ID
Q4g - Sub-programmes Sub-programme name
Non-indigenous species - abundance and/or biomass
Q4k - Monitoring purpose
Q4l - Links of monitoring programmes of other Directives and Conventions
Q5c - Features Q5c - Habitats
  • SeabedHabitatsAll WaterColumnHabitatsAll
Q5c - Features Q5c - Species list
  • FishAll
Q5c - Features Q5c - Physical/Chemical features
Q5c - Features Q5c - Pressures
  • IntroNIS
Q9a - Elements
Q5a - GES criteria Relevant GES criteria
  • 2.1
  • 2.2
Q5b - GES indicators Relevant GES indicators
  • 2.1.1
  • 2.2.1
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species distribution
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population size
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species population characteristics
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Species impacts
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat distribution
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat extent
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (physical-chemical)
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat condition (biological)
Q9b - Parameters monitored (state/impact) Habitat impacts
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure input
Q9b - Parameters monitored (pressures) Pressure output
Q9b - Parameters monitored (activity) Activity
Q9b Parameters monitored (other) Other
Q41 Spatial scope
Q4j - Description of spatial scope
Marine Unit IDs
  • ANSNL
Q4h - Temporal scope Start date- End date
-
Q9h - Temporal resolution of sampling
Q9c - Monitoring method
Q9d - Description of alteration to method
Q9e - Quality assurance
Q9f - Quality control
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - Proportion of area covered %
Q9g - Spatial resolution of sampling Q9g - No. of samples
Q9i - Description of sample representivity
Q10a - Scale for aggregation of data
Q10b - Other scale for aggregation of data
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data type
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access mechanism
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data access rights
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - INSPIRE standard
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c Date data are available
Q10c - Access to monitoring data Q10c - Data update frequency
Q10d - Description of data access
Descriptor
D2
Monitoring strategy description
The principal purpose of the MSFD monitoring programme is to review the progress that has been made towards achieving good environmental status prescribed for each criterion in the Marine Strategy Part I (2018). This review is based on established indicators. The monitoring can also be used to evaluate the environmental targets defined for each descriptor. The environmental targets are operational in nature and are linked to specific actions and/or measures in the Marine Strategy Part 3. The effects of individual measures cannot generally be linked directly to environmental status or the criteria. Monitoring data can, however, indirectly give an indication of the effectiveness of measures. The monitoring (methods, spatial and temporal coverage) aims to achieve sufficient statistical confidence in the assessment. The risk of not achieving GES or deterioration from GES is addressed in the Marine Strategy, Parts 1 and 3. The European Commission requests that the electronic reports explain how the DPSIR cycle is monitored and to which part of the cycle the monitoring surveys are linked. The MSFD monitoring programme helps to generate better insight into the relationships between the use of the sea and the marine ecosystem. This can be accomplished by monitoring pressures and the underlying activities (D1C1: incidental bycatch, D2: non-indigenous species, D3C1: fish mortality, D5: eutrophication, D6C1/D6C4: physical loss of seabed/habitats and D6C2: fisheries intensity and sand extraction, D8 and D9: pollutants, D10: litter, D11: underwater noise), and by monitoring species and habitats (D1: biodiversity (with the exception of D1C1), D3C2: spawning stock biomass, D4: food web, D6C3/D6C5: habitats ) and hydrographical characteristics (D7). The numerous relationships between the various elements of the marine ecosystem are complex, and many are still not known. Consequently, it is often only possible to give an indication of the impact of specific activities on the marine ecosystem. Experts generally derive DPSIR relationships from the monitoring of pressures/activities and of species and habitats (from the MSFD monitoring programme), in combination with data derived from permits and research programmes. However, some surveys have been established to measure pressures and their effects and/or to learn more about the effectiveness of measures. In designing the monitoring survey for benthic animals (habitats), the Netherlands explicitly took account of the need to
Coverage of GES criteria
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014
Gaps and plans
The Netherlands takes a pragmatic approach, whereby there are no monitoring surveys specifically set up for D2 and the assessment is based on data collected for other purposes. Hence, strictly spoken, there are no gaps in the MSFD monitoring programme. Because all available observations are used for the assessment, the full scale of the monitoring effort is not known. As a result, firm quantitative judgements of the introduction rates of non-indigenous marine species might be more difficult to substantiate.
Related targets
  • ANSNL-D2T1
Coverage of targets
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014
Related measures
  • ANSNL-M006 - 'Voorwaarden aan vergunningverlening ter voorkoming van de verspreiding van niet-inheemse soorten'
  • ANSNL-M007 - 'Beheer Natura 2000-gebieden (niet-inheemse soorten)'
  • ANSNL-M042 - 'Verordening preventie en beheer invasieve soorten'
  • ANSNL-M043 - 'Tegengaan verspreiding soorten via ballastwater'
  • ANSNL-M044 - 'Uitvoering protocollen voor vrijstellingen na inwerkingtreding Ballastwaterconventie'
  • ANSNL-M045 - 'Uitvoering van Hull Fouling Guidelines tegen aangroei niet-inheemse soorten op scheepshuiden'
Coverage of measures
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014
Related monitoring programmes
  • ANSNL-D02-Sub1
Programme code
ANSNL-D02-Sub1
Programme name
Non-indigenous species - from specific sources
Update type
Modified from 2014
Old programme codes
Programme description
Monitoring must provide insight into the number of non-indigenous species that are introduced into the Dutch section of the North Sea in each six-year planning period. To establish the effectiveness of regulatory and other measures, it is important to ascertain the route by which these species have been introduced (the pathway approach). In view of the small chance of their discovery at the introduction stage and the lack of options for intervention if non-indigenous species are discovered, the Netherlands currently opts for assessment on the basis of the best available knowledge. All observations of non-indigenous marine species in the Dutch North Sea are considered together, including those from sources other than regular monitoring surveys. The regular monitoring surveys include the biological measurements by Rijkswaterstaat (MWTL: macrozoobenthos and phytoplankton) and for the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (WOT: macrozoobenthos and fish). An additional feature compared with 2014 is the additional use of project-based monitoring (construction of wind farms, impact of beach nourishment) and well-documented observations by the public (divers and beach working groups of the Dutch Natural History Society (KNNV), for example). The MWTL benthos monitoring is carried out once every three years; the monitoring of phytoplankton is conducted annually, as are the WOT-Shellfish and CFP-Fisheries monitoring. For further details, see D6 (macrozoobenthos), D1C6 (phytoplankton) and D3 (fish). The MSFD monitoring is linked to developments in OSPAR and any changes that ensue from the European Regulation on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species (EU 1143/2014) and the Ballast Water Management Convention (2017).
Monitoring purpose
  • Effectiveness of measures
  • Pressures in the marine environment
Other policies and conventions
  • Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation
  • OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme
Regional cooperation - coordinating body
  • OSPAR
Regional cooperation - countries involved
NL
Regional cooperation - implementation level
Agreed data collection methods
Monitoring details
The MWTL (benthos and phytoplankton), the Statutory Research Tasks (SRT) for shellfish and the monitoring of fisheries for the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) are the regular monitoring surveys used to detect non-indigenous species in the Dutch section of the North Sea. Project-based monitoring (construction of wind farms, impact of beach nourishment) and well-documented observations by the public (divers and beach working groups of the Dutch Natural History Society (KNNV), for example) are also used. The MWTL benthos monitoring is carried out once every three years; the monitoring of phytoplankton is conducted annually, as are the SRT-Shellfish and CFP-Fisheries monitoring.
Features
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
Newly introduced non-indigenous species
Elements
  • Not Applicable
GES criteria
D2C1
Parameters
  • Incidence
Parameter Other
Spatial scope
  • EEZ (or similar)
Marine reporting units
  • ANS-NL-MS-1
  • L1.2
Temporal scope (start date - end date)
2014-9999
Monitoring frequency
Other
Monitoring type
  • In-situ sampling coastal
  • In-situ sampling offshore
Monitoring method
  • OSPAR CEMP Guideline: Common Indicator - Changes to non-indigenous species communities (NIS3) (Agreement 2018-04)
  • Other monitoring method
Monitoring method other
All observations of non-indigenous marine species in the Dutch North Sea are considered together, including those from sources other than regular monitoring surveys. The regular monitoring surveys include the biological measurements by Rijkswaterstaat (MWTL: benthos and phytoplankton) and for the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (WOT: benthos and fish). An additional feature compared with 2014 is the additional use of monitoring of specific projects (construction of wind farms, effects of beach nourishment) and of well-documented observations by members of the public (including divers). The MSFD monitoring is linked to developments in OSPAR and any changes that ensue from the European Regulation on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species (2014) and the Ballast Water Management Convention (2017).
Quality control
Every six years, the Netherlands assesses the rate of introduction of non-native species based on the best available knowledge. All available observations of non-native marine species (including from regular monitoring) are considered together (GIMARES,2017). All available data are assessed using a method developed by GiMaRIS. GiMaRIS uses ISO 9001 certified working methods. Reference: https://www.noordzeeloket.nl/publish/pages/138273/non-indigenous_marine_species_in_the_netherlands.pdf
Data management
Marine Information and Data Centre
Data access
Related indicator/name
Contact
https://www.informatiehuismarien.nl/uk/secundaire-navigatie/contact/
References