Member State report / Art14 / 2022 / D1-M / Poland / Baltic Sea

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 14 Exceptions (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2022-10-15
GES Descriptor D1 Mammals
Member State Poland
Region/subregion Baltic Sea
Report date 1900-01-01
Report access 363

Marine reporting units
  • BAL-POL-MS-001
  • BAL-POL-MS-001
Region subregion
Baltic Sea
Baltic Sea
Exception code
PL-E08
PL-E09
Exception old code
Exception name
Non-achievement of GES with regard to Descriptor D1 ""Biodiversity - Mammals""
Non-achievement of GES with regard to Descriptor D1 ""Biodiversity - Mammals""
Exception type
Art. 14(1)(a)
Art. 14(1)(e)
Exception reason
Action needed by another Member State(s);Action needed by another non-EU state(s)
Other(e)
GES achieved
2050
Relevant pressures
  • Continuous low frequency sound
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Impulsive sound in water
  • Continuous low frequency sound
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Impulsive sound in water
Relevant targets
GES component
  • D1-M
  • D1-M
Relevant features
  • Small toothed cetaceans
  • Seals
Justification description
Even though no GES indicators have been agreed regarding Harbour Porpoise, the Eastern Baltic population of Harbour Porpoise is on the HELCOM Red List as critically endangered (CR) and the Wester Baltic population as vulnerable (VU). It is therefore quite clear that whatever GES indicators are eventually adopted, the current status of the species does not correspond to good environmental status. Since the Harbour Porpoise is a species that uses large tracts of the sea as its habitat, conservation measures by a single state are highly unlikely to be effective in the current situation of the species. Consequently, although Poland in its updated PoM has adopted measures dedicated to the conservation of the Harbour Porpoise, these measures on their own will not solve the problem. Other Baltic Sea States (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Russia, Sweden) and/or the European Union should put in place similar or complimentary measures.
After decades of almost complete absence, the Grey Seal has become a regular presence on the Polish coast. In recent years, the haul-out site at the mouth of the Vistula river has been hosting well over 200 seals each spring. However, births of young seals are very rare. It is thought that disturbance by humans may be a major factor contributing to lack of reproductive success. The updated PoM includes a measure consisting in the establishment of a protection zone around the houl-out site in order to remedy the situation. However, even if the measure proves to be a success, it will most probably take longer than until 2027 for the colony to reach reproduction rates coressponding to GES.
Spatial scope geographic zones
Transitional waters (WFD);Coastal waters (WFD);Territorial waters;EEZ (or similar)
Transitional waters (WFD);Coastal waters (WFD);Territorial waters;EEZ (or similar)
Mitigation
Measures ad hoc
Further information
https://chronmorze.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Projekt-aPOWM_23.08.2022.pdf
https://chronmorze.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Projekt-aPOWM_23.08.2022.pdf