Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-M / Poland / Baltic Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Member State | Poland |
Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
Reported by | Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection |
Report date | 2020-01-28 |
Report access | ART8_GES_PL_kor_URL.xml |
Polish marine waters (BAL-POL-MS-001)
GES component |
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
D1-M
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Small toothed cetaceans
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Seals
|
Element |
Phocoena phocoena |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Halichoerus grypus |
Element code |
137117 |
137080 |
137080 |
137080 |
137080 |
Element code source |
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Element 2 |
|||||
Element 2 code |
|||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||
Element source |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
Criterion |
D1C1
|
D1C1
|
D1C2
|
D1C3
|
D1C4
|
Parameter |
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Mortality rate / Mortality rate from fishing (F)
|
Abundance
|
Fecundity rate
|
Distribution (spatial)
|
Parameter other |
|||||
Threshold value upper |
|||||
Threshold value lower |
|||||
Threshold qualitative |
Abundance increase by 10% in comparison to previous year |
Number of feeding females, offspring or pregnant females reaching at least 5% of the population |
Appearance of grey seal at all haul-out areas during monitoring period and moulting |
||
Threshold value source |
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
Other (specify)
|
||
Threshold value source other |
rdsm.gios.gov.pl/index.php/pl/konsultacje-spoleczne/informacja-o-konsultacjach
|
rdsm.gios.gov.pl/index.php/pl/konsultacje-spoleczne/informacja-o-konsultacjach
|
rdsm.gios.gov.pl/index.php/pl/konsultacje-spoleczne/informacja-o-konsultacjach
|
||
Value achieved upper |
170.0 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||
Value unit |
(number of) individuals
|
percentage
|
Other
|
||
Value unit other |
Appearance of grey seals at haul-out
|
||||
Proportion threshold value |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Proportion value achieved |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
||
Proportion threshold value unit |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
% of population achieving threshold value |
||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Parameter ‘Population trends and abundance of grey seal’ indicated an improving trend from year to year (2011-283%, 2012-78%, 2013-24%, 2014-37%, 2016-183%) except 2015 (-14%), but the average annual abundance increased by 10% in comparison to previous year in the period 2011-2016 that means good environmental status. |
||||
Related indicator |
|||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Good |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
By catch, as an indicator of pressure, is based on the number of animals found dead by fishermen in nets. The data is collected by the Sea Fisheries Institute - National Research Institute in Gdynia (MIR-PIB). By-catch refers directly to the trends calculated from data for the last 10 years. Since 2006, there has not been recorded a single case of by-catch of the harbour porpoise. Additionally in Poland, from 2011 to 2016, a total of 22 porpoise reports from by-catch were recorded (data from 2011-2015 based on the WWF report, data from 2016 based on SMIOUG data). It has been assumed that by-catch at the level of one individual is a significant threat to the porpoise population in this region (Harkonen et al. 2013, HELCOM 2017d). Since there are no threshold values agreed on a regional level the assessment of criterion D1C1 was not assessed. |
In HELCOM, pressures on mammals regarding by-catch were not parametrized as indicators. Since 2006 4 individuals of grey seal caught in 2011-2016 were reported (MIR-PIB 2017). This can be attributed to a small number of reported, caught animals in relation to the high fishing effort. The number recorded in the report is in contrast to the available data collected in the WWF/SMIOUG database (www.fokarium.pl) - in the period 2011-2017 more than 200 dead seals were found on the beaches, some of which had traces indicating the possibility of by-catch. In the case of porpoise, the by-catch was defined as a critical threat to the species, in particular for the Baltic Sea population. Since there are no threshold values agreed on a regional level the assessment of criterion D1C1 was not assessed. |
|||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Description element |
|||||
Integration rule type parameter |
Not relevant
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description parameter |
In a single year assessment of each indicator the rule OOAO was applied straightforward, i.e. if a single indicator was assessed subGES, the entire annual assessment was subGES. In the case of multiyear (2011-2016) assessment, GES was assessed if all the annual results of indicators were GES or only less than 20% of results were subGES. If more than 20% of annual results of indicators were in subGES status, the overall assessment was subGES. |
In a single year assessment of each indicator the rule OOAO was applied straightforward, i.e. if a single indicator was assessed subGES, the entire annual assessment was subGES. In the case of multiyear (2011-2016) assessment, GES was assessed if all the annual results of indicators were GES or only less than 20% of results were subGES. If more than 20% of annual results of indicators were in subGES status, the overall assessment was subGES. |
In a single year assessment of each indicator the rule OOAO was applied straightforward, i.e. if a single indicator was assessed subGES, the entire annual assessment was subGES. In the case of multiyear (2011-2016) assessment, GES was assessed if all the annual results of indicators were GES or only less than 20% of results were subGES. If more than 20% of annual results of indicators were in subGES status, the overall assessment was subGES. |
In a single year assessment of each indicator the rule OOAO was applied straightforward, i.e. if a single indicator was assessed subGES, the entire annual assessment was subGES. In the case of multiyear (2011-2016) assessment, GES was assessed if all the annual results of indicators were GES or only less than 20% of results were subGES. If more than 20% of annual results of indicators were in subGES status, the overall assessment was subGES. |
|
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||
GES extent unit |
|||||
GES achieved |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Description overall status |
In HELCOM, pressures on mammals regarding by-catch were not parametrized as indicators. They are presented in the descriptive form. In Poland, 22 reports of harbour porpoise caught in fishing nets were submitted in 2011-2016. |
||||
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|