Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D10 / Poland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D10 Litter |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | National Water Management Authority |
| Report date | 2015-11-20 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20160226_150132.xml |
BAL-PL-AA-27, BAL-PL-AA-33, BAL-PL-AA-35, BAL-PL-AA-35A, BAL-PL-AA-36, BAL-PL-AA-38, BAL-PL-AA-38A, BAL-PL-AA-62, BAL-PL-MS-001
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D10 |
10.1.1 |
10.1.2 |
10.1.3 |
10.2.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D10
|
D10C1
|
D10C1
|
D10C2
|
D10C3
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
|
Method used |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
Description [Targets] |
Reducing the amount of newly emerging or solid waste deposited in the marine environment from various sources, to levels that ensure the correct functioning of the ecosystem, taking into account its natural resilience or the complete elimination of newly emerging waste. |
||||
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
|||||
Reference point type |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Baseline |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Proportion |
-7777 |
-7777 |
-7777 |
-7777 |
-7777 |
Assessment method |
Not known |
Not known |
Not known |
Not known |
Not known |
Development status |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Type of target/indicator |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Timescale |
2020-12 |
||||
Interim or GES target |
Interim |
||||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
Target is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
Indicator is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
Indicator is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
Indicator is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
Indicator is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
Physical/chemical features |
|||||
Predominant habitats |
|||||
Functional group |
|||||
Pressures |