Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D11 / Poland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D11 Energy, incl. underwater noise |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | National Water Management Authority |
| Report date | 2015-11-20 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20160226_150132.xml |
BAL-PL-AA-27, BAL-PL-AA-33, BAL-PL-AA-35, BAL-PL-AA-35A, BAL-PL-AA-36, BAL-PL-AA-38, BAL-PL-AA-38A, BAL-PL-AA-62, BAL-PL-MS-001
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D11 |
11.1 |
11.1.1 |
11.2 |
11.2.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D11
|
D11C1
|
D11C1
|
D11C2
|
D11C2
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
|
Method used |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
Description [Targets] |
The achievement of noise level which does not cause injuries on marine biota by developing measures with focus on reducing sources and noise magnitude and by setting marine protected areas, including the designation of non-activity and buffer-zones. |
||||
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
|||||
Reference point type |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Baseline |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Proportion |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Assessment method |
Method of assessment is strictly connected with the knowledge which will be reached only during monitoring programmes. |
Method of assessment is strictly connected with the knowledge which will be reached only during monitoring programmes. |
Method of assessment is strictly connected with the knowledge which will be reached only during monitoring programmes. |
Method of assessment is strictly connected with the knowledge which will be reached only during monitoring programmes. |
Method of assessment is strictly connected with the knowledge which will be reached only during monitoring programmes. |
Development status |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Type of target/indicator |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Pressure |
Timescale |
2020-12 |
||||
Interim or GES target |
Interim |
||||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
The achievement of the purposed target for underwater noise is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
The monitoring of the purposed indicator for underwater noise is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
The monitoring of the purposed indicator for underwater noise is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
The monitoring of the purposed indicator for underwater noise is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
The monitoring of the purposed indicator for underwater noise is compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements. |
Physical/chemical features |
|||||
Predominant habitats |
|||||
Functional group |
|||||
Pressures |