Member State report / Art10 / 2012 / D4 / Poland / Baltic Sea
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 10 Environmental targets (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2012-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region/subregion | Baltic Sea |
| Reported by | National Water Management Authority |
| Report date | 2015-11-20 |
| Report access | MSFD10TI_20160226_150132.xml |
BAL-PL-AA-27, BAL-PL-AA-33, BAL-PL-AA-35, BAL-PL-AA-35A, BAL-PL-AA-36, BAL-PL-AA-38, BAL-PL-AA-38A, BAL-PL-AA-62, BAL-PL-MS-001
Feature [Target or Indicator code] |
D4 |
1.7 |
4.1 |
4.2.1 |
4.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GES descriptor, criterion or indicator [GEScomponent] |
D4
|
D4C1
|
D4C4
|
D4C3
|
D4C2
|
MarineUnitID |
|
|
|
|
|
Method used |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
In all sub-basins the same approach for setting targets was applied. For all indicators 5-class classification scales were developed, similarly to FWD approach of high, good, moderate, poor and bad status. The target=GES border was set at the border between Good and Moderate status. Indicators are set in Commission Decision. |
Description [Targets] |
Achievement by 2020 of the state where the anthropogenic pressure does not cause adverse effects on the environment and all components of marine foodwebs are in natural and stable conditions providing natural levels of abundance and diversity of its components |
||||
Threshold value [TargetValue] |
|||||
Reference point type |
Not applicable |
TargetReferencePoint |
TargetReferencePoint |
TargetReferencePoint |
TargetReferencePoint |
Baseline |
Not applicable
|
Background levels
|
Background levels
|
Background levels
|
Background levels
|
Proportion |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Assessment method |
Current level of indicator is compared with reference value and the result is classified in a 2-class scale – GES – subGES |
Current level of indicator is compared with reference value and the result is classified in a 2-class scale – GES – subGES |
Current level of indicator is compared with reference value and the result is classified in a 2-class scale – GES – subGES |
Current level of indicator is compared with reference value and the result is classified in a 2-class scale – GES – subGES |
Current level of indicator is compared with reference value and the result is classified in a 2-class scale – GES – subGES |
Development status |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Further development needed (expected to be operational by 2018 if adopted) |
Type of target/indicator |
Impact |
State |
State |
State |
State |
Timescale |
2020-12 |
||||
Interim or GES target |
GES |
||||
Compatibility with existing targets/indicators |
Targets are compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements |
Targets are compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements |
Targets are compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements |
Targets are compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements |
Targets are compatible with all objectives to which Poland is committed in the frame of national, regional and international agreements |
Physical/chemical features |
|||||
Predominant habitats |
|||||
Functional group |
|||||
Pressures |