MS/Art8/2018/D4/Poland/Baltic Sea — Marine Information System for Europe

Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Poland / Baltic Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2018-10-15
GES Descriptor	D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems
Member State	Poland
Region/subregion	Baltic Sea
Reported by	Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection
Report date	2020-01-28
Report access	ART8_GES_PL_kor_URL.xml

Polish marine waters (BAL-POL-MS-001)

Simplified table

GES component	D4	D4	D4
Feature	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem
Element	Apex predators	Apex predators	Apex predators
Element code	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPredApex
Element code source	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM
Criterion	D4C1	D4C2	D4C4
Parameter	Other	Abundance	Other
Parameter other	Abundance		Abundance
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative	Appearance of grey seal at all haul-out areas during monitoring period and moulting	Abundance increase by 10% in comparison to previous year	Number of feeding females, offspring or pregnant females reaching at least 5% of the population
Threshold value source	Other (specify)	Other (specify)	Other (specify)
Threshold value source other	rdsm.gios.gov.pl/index.php/pl/konsultacje-spoleczne/informacja-o-konsultacjach	rdsm.gios.gov.pl/index.php/pl/konsultacje-spoleczne/informacja-o-konsultacjach	rdsm.gios.gov.pl/index.php/pl/konsultacje-spoleczne/informacja-o-konsultacjach
Value achieved upper		283.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit	Other
Value unit other	Appearance of grey seals at haul-out
Proportion threshold value	100.0	100.0	100.0
Proportion value achieved	100.0	100.0	100.0
Proportion threshold value unit	% of population achieving threshold value	% of population achieving threshold value	% of population achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Parameter achieved	Yes	Yes	No
Description parameter		Parameter ‘Population trends and abundance of grey seal’ indicated an improving trend from year to year (2011-283%, 2012-78%, 2013-24%, 2014-37%, 2016-183%) except 2015 (-14%), but the average annual abundance increased by 10% in comparison to previous year in the period 2011-2016 that means good environmental status.
Related indicator	Distribution of grey seal	Population trends and abundance of grey seal	Reproductive status of grey seal
Criteria status	Good	Good	Not good
Description criteria
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description criteria	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.
Assessments period	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4

Polish part of Opensea Bornholm Basin (L2-SEA-007-POL)

Simplified table

GES component	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4
Feature	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem
Element	Apex predators	Apex predators	Deposit-feeders	Filter-feeders	Apex predators	Apex predators	Primary producers	Sub-apex demersal predators	Apex predators
Element code	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsDepFeed	TrophicGuildsFilFeed	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPrimProd	TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem	TrophicGuildsPredApex
Element code source	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM
Criterion	D4C1	D4C1	D4C1	D4C1	D4C2	D4C2	D4C2	D4C3	D4C4
Parameter	Other	Other	Other	SPP-C	Other	Other	Biomass	Size distribution	Other
Parameter other	Abundance in breeding season	Abundance in wintering season	B-index		Abundance in breeding season	Abundance in wintering season			Abundance in breeding season
Threshold value upper	75.0	75.0	3.18	3.18	75.0	75.0	0.6	0.8	75.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Helsinki Convention		Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	50.0	89.0	2.7	2.7	50.0	89.0	0.93	0.1	50.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit	Other	Other			Other	Other			Other
Value unit other	percentage	percentage			percentage	percentage			percentage
Proportion threshold value	100.0	100.0			100.0	100.0			100.0
Proportion value achieved	100.0	100.0			100.0	100.0			100.0
Proportion threshold value unit	% of population achieving threshold value	% of population achieving threshold value			% of population achieving threshold value	% of population achieving threshold value			% of population achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	No
Description parameter	% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000	% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000			% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000	% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000			% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000
Related indicator	Abundance of Waterbirds in the Breeding Season	Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season	Multimetric zoobenthos index B	Multimetric zoobenthos index B	Abundance of Waterbirds in the Breeding Season	Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season	Diatom/Dinoflagellate index	Large fish index	Abundance of Waterbirds in the Breeding Season
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good
Description criteria
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good
Description element	For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.	For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.			For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.	For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.			For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.
Integration rule type criteria	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description criteria	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Bornholm Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.
Assessments period	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4

Polish part of Opensea Gdansk Basin (L2-SEA-008-POL)

Simplified table

GES component	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4
Feature	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem
Element	Deposit-feeders	Filter-feeders	Primary producers	Secondary producers	Sub-apex demersal predators
Element code	TrophicGuildsDepFeed	TrophicGuildsFilFeed	TrophicGuildsPrimProd	TrophicGuildsSecProd	TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem
Element code source	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM
Criterion	D4C1	D4C1	D4C2	D4C3	D4C3
Parameter	SPP-C	SPP-C	Biomass	Size distribution	Size distribution
Parameter other
Threshold value upper	3.18	3.18	0.6	10.2	0.7
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Helsinki Convention	Helsinki Convention
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	1.33	1.33	0.75	14.0	0.14
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend	Deteriorating	Deteriorating	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating
Parameter achieved	No	No	Yes	Yes	No
Description parameter
Related indicator	Multimetric zoobenthos index B	Multimetric zoobenthos index B	Diatom/Dinoflagellate index	Zooplankton mean size and total stock	Large fish index
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good
Description criteria
Element status	Not good	Not good	Good	Good	Not good
Description element
Integration rule type parameter	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant	Not relevant
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description criteria	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Gdansk Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Gdansk Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Gdansk Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Gdansk Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Gdansk Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.
Assessments period	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4

Polish part of Opensea Eastern Gotland Basin (L2-SEA-009-POL)

Simplified table

GES component	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4	D4
Feature	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem	Shelf ecosystem
Element	Apex predators	Apex predators	Deposit-feeders	Filter-feeders	Apex predators	Apex predators	Primary producers	Sub-apex demersal predators	Apex predators
Element code	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsDepFeed	TrophicGuildsFilFeed	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPredApex	TrophicGuildsPrimProd	TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem	TrophicGuildsPredApex
Element code source	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view	Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/	Species (D3) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=357	Species (D1) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/biodiversity/n2000birds/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM	HELCOM
Criterion	D4C1	D4C1	D4C1	D4C1	D4C2	D4C2	D4C2	D4C3	D4C4
Parameter	Other	Other	SPP-C	SPP-C	Other	Other	Biomass	Size distribution	Other
Parameter other	Abundance in breeding season	Abundance in wintering season			Abundance in breeding season	Abundance in wintering season			Abundance in breeding season
Threshold value upper	75.0	75.0	3.18	3.18	75.0	75.0	0.5	0.7	75.0
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)	Helsinki Convention		Birds Directive (79/409/EEC)
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper	59.0	82.0	2.86	2.86	59.0	82.0	0.97	0.14	59.0
Value achieved lower
Value unit	Other	Other			Other	Other			Other
Value unit other	percentage	percentage			percentage	percentage			percentage
Proportion threshold value	100.0	100.0			100.0	100.0			100.0
Proportion value achieved	100.0	100.0			100.0	100.0			100.0
Proportion threshold value unit	% of population achieving threshold value	% of population achieving threshold value			% of population achieving threshold value	% of population achieving threshold value			% of population achieving threshold value
Trend	Unknown	Unknown	Improving	Improving	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Deteriorating	Unknown
Parameter achieved	No	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	No
Description parameter	% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000	% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000			% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000	% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000			% of the considered species making up a species functional group do not decline by more than 30% (20% in species laying only one egg per year) compared to a baseline during the reference period 1991-2000
Related indicator	Abundance of Waterbirds in the Breeding Season	Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season	Multimetric zoobenthos index B	Multimetric zoobenthos index B	Abundance of Waterbirds in the Breeding Season	Abundance of waterbirds in the wintering season	Diatom/Dinoflagellate index	Large fish index	Abundance of Waterbirds in the Breeding Season
Criteria status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good
Description criteria
Element status	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Not good	Good	Not good	Not good
Description element	For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.	For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.			For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.	For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.			For bird species only benthic feeding birds were used in the assessment of D4, hence the results reflect only the state of benthic feeding functional group of waterbirds in wintering and breeding season. The overall status of element is based on OOAO principle.
Integration rule type parameter	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description parameter	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.	All Elements (trophic groups) were assessed separately for different Ecosystem elements. Only for Apex predators (benthic feeding birds) there was more than one parameter within criterion and in this case OOAO principle was used to produce the overall assessment of the element.
Integration rule type criteria	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Integration rule description criteria	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.	Integration was not fulfilled at the descriptor level, but for seals criteria were integrated by one-out-all-out method.
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Description overall status	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.	The overall status of food webs could not be assessed, because it was impossible to draw conclusions on the energy flow between the three selected trophic guilds in the open waters of Eastern Gotland Basin, which were analyzed. The list of indicators characterising all the levels of the trophic web was inadequate, e.g. there is no indicator on planktivorous fish. Additionally, the obtained assessment results reflect mainly anthropogenic pressures and not the factors influencing productivity at particular trophic level.
Assessments period	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016	2011-2016
Related pressures	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed	Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence Eutrophication Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) Hydrographical changes Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) Input of microbial pathogens Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events Input or spread of non-indigenous species Physical disturbance to seabed Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4	PL_Target_D4 PL_Target_D4C1 PL_Target_D4C2 PL_Target_D4C2_Dia/Dino PL_Target_D4C3 PL_Target_D4C4