Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D4 / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D4 Food webs/D1 Ecosystems |
Member State | Portugal |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Bay of Biscay & Iberian Coast |
Reported by | DGRM |
Report date | 2021-03-03 |
Report access | ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml |
Part of EEZ continental waters (ABI-PT-AA-CONT_A)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
All trophic guilds |
All trophic guilds |
Fish community |
All consumers |
All consumers |
All trophic guilds |
All trophic guilds |
Apex predators |
Apex predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Fish community |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
FishCommunity |
ConsumersAll |
ConsumersAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
FishCommunity |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Biomass
|
catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
Catches
|
catches
|
Catches
|
Catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
tonne
|
percentage
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
percentage
|
Value unit other |
Kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Deteriorating |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Criterion evaluated by the distribution of the trophic molecular spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic groups based on the abundance of scientific surveys
Since the trophic bio-spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the method of assessment was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the abundance observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
Criterion assessed by the distribution of biomass trophic spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic levels based on commercial landings
Since the trophic spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the evaluation method was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the catches observed at the beginning of the 1989-1999 series available with the distribution of the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
The reference limit for the Large Fish Indicator, used in the evaluation of this D4C3 criterion in support of criterion D4C1, is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
Criterion evaluated by the distribution of the trophic molecular spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic groups based on the abundance of scientific surveys
Since the trophic bio-spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the method of assessment was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the abundance observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
Criterion assessed by the distribution of biomass trophic spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectra?) from all trophic levels based on commercial landings.
Since the trophic spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the evaluation method was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the catches observed at the beginning of the 1989-1999 series available with the distribution of the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
The reference limit for the Large Fish Indicator, used in the evaluation of this D4C3 criterion in support of criterion D4C1, is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the group all the consuming species.
Included: APEX Predactors, sub-apex dactors, sub-apex peditors and planktivres (not including secondary producers, primary producers, the seams of assets and plans)
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the group all the consuming species.
Included: APEX Predactors, sub-apex dactors, sub-apex peditors and planktivres (not including secondary producers, primary producers, the seams of assets and plans)
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the so-called tertiary species group where top predators are included.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the so-called tertiary species group where top predators are included.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative of the target group of consumer species.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative of the target group of consumer species.
|
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of the scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
Part of EEZ continental waters (ABI-PT-AA-CONT_B)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
All trophic guilds |
All trophic guilds |
Fish community |
All consumers |
All consumers |
All trophic guilds |
All trophic guilds |
Apex predators |
Apex predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Fish community |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
FishCommunity |
ConsumersAll |
ConsumersAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
FishCommunity |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Abundance
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Biomass
|
catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
Catches
|
catches
|
Catches
|
Catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
the method of assessment was based on the comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the lines observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017.
|
the method of assessment was based on the comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the lines observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017.
|
if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status
|
it is accepted that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status
|
it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
|||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
tonne
|
percentage
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
percentage
|
|
Value unit other |
Kilogramme per hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Deteriorating |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Criterion evaluated by the distribution of the trophic molecular spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic groups based on the abundance of scientific surveys
Since the trophic bio-spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the method of assessment was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the abundance observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
Criterion assessed by the distribution of biomass trophic spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic levels based on commercial landings
Since the trophic spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the evaluation method was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the catches observed at the beginning of the 1989-1999 series available with the distribution of the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
The reference limit for the Large Fish Indicator, used in the evaluation of this D4C3 criterion in support of criterion D4C1, is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
Criterion evaluated by the distribution of the trophic molecular spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic groups based on the abundance of scientific surveys
Since the trophic bio-spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the method of assessment was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the abundance observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
Criterion assessed by the distribution of biomass trophic spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectra?) from all trophic levels based on commercial landings.
Since the trophic spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the evaluation method was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the catches observed at the beginning of the 1989-1999 series available with the distribution of the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
The reference limit for the Large Fish Indicator, used in the evaluation of this D4C3 criterion in support of criterion D4C1, is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the group all the consuming species.
Included: APEX Predactors, sub-apex dactors, sub-apex peditors and planktivres (not including secondary producers, primary producers, the seams of assets and plans)
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the group all the consuming species.
Included: APEX Predactors, sub-apex dactors, sub-apex peditors and planktivres (not including secondary producers, primary producers, the seams of assets and plans)
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the so-called tertiary species group where top predators are included.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the so-called tertiary species group where top predators are included.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative of the target group of consumer species.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative of the target group of consumer species.
|
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
Part of EEZ continental waters (ABI-PT-AA-CONT_C)
GES component |
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
D4
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Shelf ecosystem
|
Element |
All trophic guilds |
All trophic guilds |
Fish community |
All consumers |
All consumers |
All trophic guilds |
All trophic guilds |
Apex predators |
Apex predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Sub-apex demersal predators |
Fish community |
Element code |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
FishCommunity |
ConsumersAll |
ConsumersAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsAll |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredApex |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
TrophicGuildsPredSApexDem |
FishCommunity |
Element code source |
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
|
Element 2 |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
||||||||||||
Element source |
National |
National |
ICES |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
National |
ICES |
Criterion |
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C1
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C2
|
D4C3
|
Parameter |
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Biomass
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Biomass
|
catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
Catches
|
catches
|
Catches
|
Catches
|
Proportion of Large (biomass) fish
|
||||
Threshold value upper |
||||||||||||
Threshold value lower |
||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
||||||||||||
Threshold value source other |
||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
||||||||||||
Value unit |
Other
|
tonne
|
percentage
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
Other
|
tonne
|
percentage
|
Value unit other |
Kilogramme per hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
kilogram/hour
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold value |
||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
||||||||||||
Trend |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Improving |
Stable |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Description parameter |
Criterion evaluated by the distribution of the trophic molecular spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic groups based on the abundance of scientific surveys
Since the trophic bio-spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the method of assessment was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the abundance observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
Criterion assessed by the distribution of biomass trophic spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic levels based on commercial landings
Since the trophic spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the evaluation method was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the catches observed at the beginning of the 1989-1999 series available with the distribution of the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
The reference limit for the Large Fish Indicator, used in the evaluation of this D4C3 criterion in support of criterion D4C1, is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
Criterion evaluated by the distribution of the trophic molecular spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectrotic Spectra?) from all trophic groups based on the abundance of scientific surveys
Since the trophic bio-spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the method of assessment was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the abundance observed at the start of the available series 1989-1999 with distribution in the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
Criterion assessed by the distribution of biomass trophic spectrum of biomass (?Biomass Spectra?) from all trophic levels based on commercial landings.
Since the trophic spectrum of biomass is a distribution rather than a traditional metric, the evaluation method was based on a comparison of the distribution of the trophic spectrum between the catches observed at the beginning of the 1989-1999 series available with the distribution of the most recent period 2007-2017. Details available in the scientific report supporting Descriptor D4.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
There is no reference threshold for Marine Trophic Level. It is scientifically recognised that if the trend of this indicator is decreasing it may indicate a deterioration of the environmental status. It is also acknowledged in this assessment that if the statistical trend of this indicator is increasing or constant indicates good environmental status.
|
The reference limit for the Large Fish Indicator, used in the evaluation of this D4C3 criterion in support of criterion D4C1, is not established for Portuguese waters. In this assessment it is accepted that if the statistical trend of the historical series available is constant or increasing, good environmental status
|
|
Related indicator |
||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Contributes to assessment of another criterion/ele |
Description criteria |
||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description element |
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the group all the consuming species.
Included: APEX Predactors, sub-apex dactors, sub-apex peditors and planktivres (not including secondary producers, primary producers, the seams of assets and plans)
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 2.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the group all the consuming species.
Included: APEX Predactors, sub-apex dactors, sub-apex peditors and planktivres (not including secondary producers, primary producers, the seams of assets and plans)
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the so-called tertiary species group where top predators are included.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 4.0 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative for the so-called tertiary species group where top predators are included.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative of the target group of consumer species.
|
Trophic biomass and catch of species with trophic level (TL) ? 3.25 have been grouped to evaluate D4C2. This TL assembly threshold was considered representative of the target group of consumer species.
|
||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule description parameter |
||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Integration rule description criteria |
||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
||||||||||||
GES extent achieved |
||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
||||||||||||
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Recognising that further scientific and technical progress is necessary to determine reference thresholds for the environmental assessment of this descriptor, it is admitted in this assessment, that the reference period for determining good environmental status in each of the D4 criteria varies. This assessment period has been established on the basis of a scientific assessment of the availability of the data and the requirements of the statistical methodology.
|
Assessments period |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
2012-2017 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |