The lack of samples from the water, sediments and biota matrices makes the degree of confidence of the evaluation low. Despite this, the contiguity of area A2 with area AT, suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental Status.

The lack of samples from the water, sediments and biota matrices makes the degree of confidence of the evaluation low. Despite this, the contiguity of area A2 with area AT, suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental Status.

The lack of samples from the water, sediments and biota matrices makes the degree of confidence of the evaluation low. Despite this, the contiguity of area A2 with area AT, suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental Status.

The lack of samples from the water, sediments and biota matrices makes the degree of confidence of the evaluation low. Despite this, the contiguity of area A2 with area AT, suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental Status.

The lack of samples from the water, sediments and biota matrices makes the degree of confidence of the evaluation low. Despite this, the contiguity of area A2 with area AT, suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental Status.

The lack of samples from the water, sediments and biota matrices makes the degree of confidence of the evaluation low. Despite this, the contiguity of area A2 with area AT, suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental Status.

The absence of biota samples does not allow for an assessment of Good Environmental Status. However, the contiguity of the area A2 with the area AT suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental State with a degree of confidence in the low assessment.

The absence of biota samples does not allow for an assessment of Good Environmental Status. However, the contiguity of the area A2 with the area AT suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental State with a degree of confidence in the low assessment.

Significant acute pollution incidents have not been detected, although incidents have been identified with sporadic spills of hydrocarbons and/or other substances.

Significant acute pollution incidents have not been detected, although incidents have been identified with sporadic spills of hydrocarbons and/or other substances.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. The absence of samples from the water, sediment and biota matrices means that the degree of confidence of the valuation is low. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. The absence of samples from the water, sediment and biota matrices means that the degree of confidence of the valuation is low. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. The absence of samples from the water, sediment and biota matrices means that the degree of confidence of the valuation is low. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. The absence of samples from the water, sediment and biota matrices means that the degree of confidence of the valuation is low. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. The absence of samples from the water, sediment and biota matrices means that the degree of confidence of the valuation is low. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. The absence of samples from the water, sediment and biota matrices means that the degree of confidence of the valuation is low. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (B1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater cannons may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea B1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material. The absence of biota samples does not allow for an assessment of Good Environmental Status. However, the contiguity of the B2 area with the area AT suggests the occurrence of Good Environmental State with a degree of confidence in the low assessment.

Existing anthropogenic pressures are mainly associated with atmospheric and maritime transport. Also the transport of contaminated particulate matter from estuarine and coastal areas into the deep sea areas of the ocean, combined with sediment dynamics, background morphology (e.g. the existence of underwater guns), and oceanographic and climate processes, may also constitute anthropogenic pressure. In the case of Area B2, although part of it is contiguous to an area where GES was not reached (BT1.2), areas located along the axis and in the rearmost part of the underwater guns may suffer from some contribution of contaminated sediment. These potentially contaminated areas account for less than 10 % of the assessment area. It should be noted, however, that the effect of these anthropogenic pressures is significantly lower than in subarea BT1.2 as a result of greater distance to contamination and dilution by particulate matter contaminated marine material.

Significant acute pollution incidents have not been detected, although incidents have been identified with sporadic spills of hydrocarbons and/or other substances.

Significant acute pollution incidents have not been detected, although incidents have been identified with sporadic spills of hydrocarbons and/or other substances.