Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D10 / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D10 Litter
Member State Portugal
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
Reported by DGRM
Report date 2021-03-03
Report access ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml

Part of Extended continental shelf (AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Great_Meteor)

GES component
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Element
Litter in the environment
Element code
PresEnvLitter
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
Criterion
D10C1
Parameter
Amount on seabed
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
low risk level if pressure from human activities is reduced
Threshold value source
National
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
1.3
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
Value unit other
number of items per hectare
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Description criteria
Element status
Good, based on low risk
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
Assessments period
2012-2018
Related pressures
Related targets

Part of Extended continental shelf (AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Josephine)

GES component
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Element
Litter in the environment
Element code
PresEnvLitter
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
Criterion
D10C1
Parameter
Amount on seabed
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
low risk level if pressure from human activities is reduced
Threshold value source
National
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
5.7
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
Value unit other
number of items per hectare
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Description criteria
Element status
Good, based on low risk
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
Assessments period
2012-2018
Related pressures
Related targets

Azores Subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-AZO)

GES component
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Litter and micro-litter in species
Element
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Cloth/textile
Cloth/textile
Glass/ceramics
Glass/ceramics
Glass/ceramics
Paper/cardboard
Paper/cardboard
Paper/cardboard
Processed/worked wood
Processed/worked wood
Rubber
Rubber
Undefined
Undefined
Undefined
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Artificial polymer materials
Other litter/ micro-litter
Other litter/ micro-litter
Other litter/ micro-litter
Other litter/ micro-litter
Element code
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
TEXTILE
TEXTILE
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
PAPER
PAPER
PAPER
WOOD
WOOD
RUBBER
RUBBER
UNDEF
UNDEF
UNDEF
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
ARTPOLY
LitterOther
LitterOther
LitterOther
LitterOther
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Calonectris borealis (Cory, 1881)
Calonectris borealis (Cory, 1881)
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1978)
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1978)
Calonectris borealis (Cory, 1881)
Calonectris borealis (Cory, 1881)
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1978)
Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1978)
Element 2 code
1348497
1348497
137205
137205
1348497
1348497
137205
137205
Element 2 code source
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C1
D10C2
D10C2
D10C3
D10C4
D10C3
D10C4
D10C3
D10C4
D10C3
D10C4
Parameter
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on coastline
Amount on seabed
Amount on water surface
Amount on coastline
Amount on water surface
Other
Other
Other
Other
Parameter other
weight of litter items in digestive system
weight of litter items in digestive system
weight of litter items in digestive system
weight of litter items in digestive system
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
5836.0
20054.0
67.4
50.0
4385.0
133.0
8692.0
3.6
41.0
1664.0
3.8
504.0
5.6
218.0
4385.0
7.0
4362.0
6.3
255.68
1221950.0
0.251
11.7
0.36
0.067
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Other
number of items per square kilometre
Other
Other
number of items per square kilometre
Other
number of items per square kilometre
number of items per square kilometre
Other
number of items per square kilometre
number of items per square kilometre
Other
number of items per square kilometre
Other
number of items per square kilometre
Other
number of items per square kilometre
number of items per square kilometre
number of items per kilogram of dry weight
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Value unit other
items/100m
items/10 km²
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
items/100m
number of items per square Kilometer
individual Gram per 1000 grms
individual Gram per 100 cm
individual Gram per 1000 grms
individual Gram per 100 cm
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
Cold, J.
Rodríguez, Y., Pham, C.K., 2017. Marine litter. MAR J. Wat. Bull. 116, 448-453. DOI: 10.1016/j. Marpobul.2017.01.018), others are of Master?s thesis (Cyr, H. 2018. The impacts of longlines on dep-sea sponges in the Azres. Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation EMBC . Pp.28) and internal reporting (Foundation Rebikoff-Night 2018. Final marine litter monitoring report. PAMA), delivered as part of the project ?Marine EIXO Monitoring Fund?, part of the Azores Marine Strategic Environment Programme (PERAMA). 6 visuals were used for image collection (ROV SP, ROV Luso, Hopper Camera, Lula 500 and 1000). All dives have been subdivided into linear transects of 100 m, resulting in 1 950 sampling units. All wastes exceeding 5 cm were considered. As regards the spatial distribution of litter, items were found in the vast majority of the listings. The use of data prior to 2013 is due to the fact that it never experienced any kind of analysis due to a lack of dedicated projects. For this category an average of 661 items/km² was calculated in a universe of 1 950 sampling units of 100 m transects.
The results for the water column with regard to the composition, abundance and distribution of litter were obtained over a period of 4 years between 2015 and 2018. In total 2228 transects across the archipelago and the abundance of items of litter (items items/km²) were evaluated per year and grouped by category. The methodology was defined as part of the ?floating marine litter monitoring? programme, as part of the Action Plan on Marine Litter in the Azores, and is based on the use of observers on board of tuna vessels with a regional pole and line included in the POPA Programme. Observations were made mainly during May to November, limiting them to spring and summer stations, and data collection was the realisation of visual transects of 10 minutes, 6 times a day from 2 to 2 hours (Chambault, P., Vandepere, F., Machete, M., Lagoa, J.C., Pham, C.K. 2018). Distribution and composition of netting macro litter off the Azres archipeclake and Madeira (NE Atlantic) using Opportunstiic surveys. Marine Environmental Research. Volume 141, October 2018, Pages 225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.09.015.). Floating litter more than 2.5 cm (MSFD-TSGML. 2013. Guidance on monitoring of marine litter in European Seas ? a guidance document within the Common Implementation Strategy for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive EUR-26113 EN. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports JRC83985.) was recorded by the observers at a height of 8 m above sea level, within an observation strip of 50 m per side (i.e. a fixed width of 100 m). Whereas the number of titles is high, making it difficult for them to be individually examined, they were grouped into cells of 10 km²
Cold, J.
Rodríguez, Y., Pham, C.K., 2017. Marine litter. MAR J. Wat. Bull. 116, 448-453. DOI: 10.1016/j. Marpobul.2017.01.018), others are of Master?s thesis (Cyr, H. 2018. The impacts of longlines on dep-sea sponges in the Azres. Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation EMBC . Pp.28) and internal reporting (Foundation Rebikoff-Night 2018. Final marine litter monitoring report. PAMA), delivered as part of the project ?Marine EIXO Monitoring Fund?, part of the Azores Marine Strategic Environment Programme (PERAMA). 6 visuals were used for image collection (ROV SP, ROV Luso, Hopper Camera, Lula 500 and 1000). All dives have been subdivided into linear transects of 100 m, resulting in 1 950 sampling units. All wastes exceeding 5 cm were considered. As regards the spatial distribution of litter, items were found in the vast majority of the listings. The use of data prior to 2013 is due to the fact that it never experienced any kind of analysis due to a lack of dedicated projects. For this category an average of 11 items/km² was calculated in a universe of 1 950 sampling units of 100 m transects.
Cold, J.
Rodríguez, Y., Pham, C.K., 2017. Marine litter. MAR J. Wat. Bull. 116, 448-453. DOI: 10.1016/j. Marpobul.2017.01.018), others are of Master?s thesis (Cyr, H. 2018. The impacts of longlines on dep-sea sponges in the Azres. Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation EMBC . Pp.28) and internal reporting (Foundation Rebikoff-Night 2018. Final marine litter monitoring report. PAMA), delivered as part of the project ?Marine EIXO Monitoring Fund?, part of the Azores Marine Strategic Environment Programme (PERAMA). 6 visuals were used for image collection (ROV SP, ROV Luso, Hopper Camera, Lula 500 and 1000). All dives have been subdivided into linear transects of 100 m, resulting in 1 950 sampling units. All wastes exceeding 5 cm were considered. As regards the spatial distribution of litter, items were found in the vast majority of the listings. The use of data prior to 2013 is due to the fact that it never experienced any kind of analysis due to a lack of dedicated projects. For this category an average of 136 items/km² was calculated in a universe of 1 950 sampling units of 100 m transects.
The results for the water column with regard to the composition, abundance and distribution of litter were obtained over a period of 4 years between 2015 and 2018. In total 2228 transects across the archipelago and the abundance of items of litter (items items/km²) were evaluated per year and grouped by category. The methodology was defined as part of the ?floating marine litter monitoring? programme, as part of the Action Plan on Marine Litter in the Azores, and is based on the use of observers on board of tuna vessels with a regional pole and line included in the POPA Programme. Observations were made mainly during May to November, limiting them to spring and summer stations, and data collection was the realisation of visual transects of 10 minutes, 6 times a day from 2 to 2 hours (Chambault, P., Vandepere, F., Machete, M., Lagoa, J.C., Pham, C.K. 2018). Distribution and composition of netting macro litter off the Azres archipeclake and Madeira (NE Atlantic) using Opportunstiic surveys. Marine Environmental Research. Volume 141, October 2018, Pages 225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.09.015.). Floating litter more than 2.5 cm (MSFD-TSGML. 2013. Guidance on monitoring of marine litter in European Seas ? a guidance document within the Common Implementation Strategy for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive EUR-26113 EN. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports JRC83985.) was recorded by the observers at a height of 8 m above sea level, within an observation strip of 50 m per side (i.e. a fixed width of 100 m). For this category an average of 0.0 itens/10 km² was calculated with 100 % samples (n
Cold, J.
Rodríguez, Y., Pham, C.K., 2017. Marine litter. MAR J. Wat. Bull. 116, 448-453. DOI: 10.1016/j. Marpobul.2017.01.018), others are of Master?s thesis (Cyr, H. 2018. The impacts of longlines on dep-sea sponges in the Azres. Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation EMBC . Pp.28) and internal reporting (Foundation Rebikoff-Night 2018. Final marine litter monitoring report. PAMA), delivered as part of the project ?Marine EIXO Monitoring Fund?, part of the Azores Marine Strategic Environment Programme (PERAMA). 6 visuals were used for image collection (ROV SP, ROV Luso, Hopper Camera, Lula 500 and 1000). All dives have been subdivided into linear transects of 100 m, resulting in 1 950 sampling units. All wastes exceeding 5 cm were considered. As regards the spatial distribution of litter, items were found in the vast majority of the listings. The use of data prior to 2013 is due to the fact that it never experienced any kind of analysis due to a lack of dedicated projects. For this category an average of 1 items/km² was calculated in a universe of 1 950 sampling units of 100 m transects.
The results for the water column with regard to the composition, abundance and distribution of litter were obtained over a period of 4 years between 2015 and 2018. In total 2228 transects across the archipelago and the abundance of items of litter (items items/km²) were evaluated per year and grouped by category. The methodology was defined as part of the ?floating marine litter monitoring? programme, as part of the Action Plan on Marine Litter in the Azores, and is based on the use of observers on board of tuna vessels with a regional pole and line included in the POPA Programme. Observations were made mainly during May to November, limiting them to spring and summer stations, and data collection was the realisation of visual transects of 10 minutes, 6 times a day from 2 to 2 hours (Chambault, P., Vandepere, F., Machete, M., Lagoa, J.C., Pham, C.K. 2018). Distribution and composition of netting macro litter off the Azres archipeclake and Madeira (NE Atlantic) using Opportunstiic surveys. Marine Environmental Research. Volume 141, October 2018, Pages 225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.09.015.). Floating litter more than 2.5 cm (MSFD-TSGML. 2013. Guidance on monitoring of marine litter in European Seas ? a guidance document within the Common Implementation Strategy for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive EUR-26113 EN. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports JRC83985.) was recorded by the observers at a height of 8 m above sea level, within an observation strip of 50 m per side (i.e. a fixed width of 100 m). For this category an average of 0.0 itens/10 km² was calculated with 99.5 % samples (n
Cold, J.
This is all items of litter found within each cell per category and year.
Cold, J.
For the characterisation of the seabed in the Azores archipelago, according to criterion D10C1, the data on macrolitter (> 5cm) are represented by the number of litter items per km² observed in the image records made between 2008 and 2018 in the archipelago?s central group, specifically at Condor, Canal Faal-Pico, Mon?Ana Cabeço do Luis. These dives correspond to a total background distance of 196 km, with a sample of about 1 km². Parts of these data have already been published (Pham, C.K., Gomes-Pereira, J.N., Isidro, E.J., Santos, R.S., Prato, T. 2013. Abundance of litter on Condor seamount (Azres, Portugal, Northeast Atlantic). Deepsea, II Top. Stud. Oceans. 98 (2013), p. 204-208.
Cruz, M.J. Establishing a basis on marine litter in the Azres: Technical report Horta, Faial, Portugal. IMAR-MARE, Department of Oceanography and Fisheries of the University of the Azores: 119 pp.). For this category an average of 0.40 itens/100m was calculated, with 82 % of the samples (n
For the characterisation of the seabed in the Azores archipelago, according to criterion D10C1, the data on macrolitter (> 5cm) are represented by the number of litter items per km² observed in the image records made between 2008 and 2018 in the archipelago?s central group, specifically at Condor, Canal Faal-Pico, Mon?Ana Cabeço do Luis. These dives correspond to a total background distance of 196 km, with a sample of about 1 km². Parts of these data have already been published (Pham, C.K., Gomes-Pereira, J.N., Isidro, E.J., Santos, R.S., Prato, T. 2013. Abundance of litter on Condor seamount (Azres, Portugal, Northeast Atlantic). Deepsea, II Top. Stud. Oceans. 98 (2013), p. 204-208.
This is all items of litter found within each cell per category and year.
Monthly monitoring was carried out for micro-litter in the coastal zone for two years (February 20156-March 2018) as part of the AzorLipt project (Pham, C.K.
Information on the presence of micro-litter in the water column is reduced to Faial, and was collected as part of the LEXAZ project. During one year, monthly plankton were held between July 2017 and October 2018 with two caps of 200 microns (Kova? Vir?ek, M., Palatius, A., Koren, ?., PETERLIN, M., Horvat, P., Kr?an, A., 2016. Means a combination of samples on the sea surface and sample analysis. J. Vis.Exp. (118), e55161). Four coastal zones were selected around the island of Faial: Porto Pim Bay, Almoxarie beach, waste treatment plant (in the parish of Praia do Norte) and Fajã da Praia do Norte. Six replicates with an average distance of 115 ± 35 m have been made at each sampling location and in each month. For the time being, only the fraction of marine litter ? 1 mm could be analysed. The results obtained for the average were 80622 waste items/km² sampled. The number of observations under this figure was 38, which represents 83 % of the collected data. 46 samples were analysed in total and the litter items collected were between 1.1-5 mm.
For as long as there are no published data on litter intake in marine birds in the Azores. However, they have been working to collect juvenile fish (Calonectris borealis) which do not survive at the breeding season. Carros are a marine migratory bird, which every year remains in the Azores archipelago. The agrass is considered to be the most abundant sea bird in the archipelago, and this region is home to around 75-80 % of the species of this species during the breeding season. A total of 399 juveniles were analysed for three different seasons between 2015 and 2017 and collected throughout the archipelago during the months of October and November, for the most part, coinciding with the removal of the juveniles of nests. The presence of litter was investigated by way of dissection of the birds (Van Franker J.A. 2004. Save the North Sea Fulmar-Litter-EcoQO Manual Part 1: Collection and distribution procedures. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterraport 672, examining separately two organs of the digestive system: The enterpreneurship and gizzard. The litter items considered in this study were above 1 mm. The average was 0.008 g lixo/1000g individual, with 81 % of the samples being less measured than the average figure. In total 399 cargros were analysed, and the size of the collected litter items had > 5 mm.
Matiuddi, M., deLucia, G.A., Silvestri, C., Darmon, G., Tomás, J., Pham, C.K., Camdda, A., Vandepere, F., Claro, F., Kaska, R., Daffina, R., Pisapia, M., Genta, D., Sözbilen, D., Tsangaris, C., Chaeb, O., Moussier, J., Loza, A.L., Miaud, C., I.C. Data Collection on Marine Litter in Sea Turles and thesauri for Good Environmental Status. J. Vis. EXP. E59466, doi:10.3791/59466.2019). The average was 1.288 g lixo/100cm individual, with 85 % of the samples being less measured than the average figure. In total, 13 turtles were analysed, and the size of the collected litter items was > 5 mm.
For as long as there are no published data on litter intake in marine birds in the Azores. However, they have been working to collect juvenile fish (Calonectris borealis) which do not survive at the breeding season. Carros are a marine migratory bird, which every year remains in the Azores archipelago. The agrass is considered to be the most abundant sea bird in the archipelago, and this region is home to around 75-80 % of the species of this species during the breeding season. A total of 399 juveniles were analysed for three different seasons between 2015 and 2017 and collected throughout the archipelago during the months of October and November, for the most part, coinciding with the removal of the juveniles of nests. The presence of litter was investigated by way of dissection of the birds (Van Franker J.A. 2004. Save the North Sea Fulmar-Litter-EcoQO Manual Part 1: Collection and distribution procedures. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterraport 672, examining separately two organs of the digestive system: The enterpreneurship and gizzard. The litter items considered in this study were above 1 mm. The average was 0.023 g lixo/1000g individual, with 68 % of the samples being less measured than the average figure. In total 399 cargros were analysed, and the size of the collected litter items had <
Matiuddi, M., deLucia, G.A., Silvestri, C., Darmon, G., Tomás, J., Pham, C.K., Camdda, A., Vandepere, F., Claro, F., Kaska, R., Daffina, R., Pisapia, M., Genta, D., Sözbilen, D., Tsangaris, C., Chaeb, O., Moussier, J., Loza, A.L., Miaud, C., I.C. Data Collection on Marine Litter in Sea Turles and thesauri for Good Environmental Status. J. Vis. EXP. E59466, doi:10.3791/59466.2019). However, the average obtained was 0.014 g lixo/100cm individuo, with 77 % of the samples being less measured than the average figure. In total, 13 turtles were analysed, and the size of the pieces of litter collected had <
Related indicator
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Unknown
Not assessed
Description criteria
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
In the Azores, for records of arence hangs or other types of injury caused by marine litter, there is no standardised and targeted collection solely for these cases, in order to make an assessment for D10C4. However, such occurrences are not uncommon. Through the registers carried out as part of the network of the islands of Cetaceans of the Azores (Raca) and of maritime tourist activities (such as whale watch, diving, etc.), there are often situations in which marine litter is struck in cetaceans, but also in sea turtles (for the most part Caretta caretta). However, the collected data could suggest the above-mentioned turtle species as possible bioindicator for marine litter monitoring in this region.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
In the Azores, for records of arence hangs or other types of injury caused by marine litter, there is no standardised and targeted collection solely for these cases, in order to make an assessment for D10C4. However, such occurrences are not uncommon. Through the registers carried out as part of the network of the islands of Cetaceans of the Azores (Raca) and of maritime tourist activities (such as whale watch, diving, etc.), there are often situations in which marine litter is struck in cetaceans, but also in sea turtles (for the most part Caretta caretta). However, the collected data could suggest the above-mentioned turtle species as possible bioindicator for marine litter monitoring in this region.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
In the Azores, for records of arence hangs or other types of injury caused by marine litter, there is no standardised and targeted collection solely for these cases, in order to make an assessment for D10C4. However, such occurrences are not uncommon. Through the registers carried out as part of the network of the islands of Cetaceans of the Azores (Raca) and of maritime tourist activities (such as whale watch, diving, etc.), there are often situations in which marine litter is struck in cetaceans, but also in sea turtles (for the most part Caretta caretta). However, the collected data could suggest the above-mentioned turtle species as possible bioindicator for marine litter monitoring in this region.
Despite the progress made, with the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects, no trends or thresholds could be established for any of the categories due to the short time frame of these projects, which make it impossible to assess the Good Environmental State for this criterion.
In the Azores, for records of arence hangs or other types of injury caused by marine litter, there is no standardised and targeted collection solely for these cases, in order to make an assessment for D10C4. However, such occurrences are not uncommon. Through the registers carried out as part of the network of the islands of Cetaceans of the Azores (Raca) and of maritime tourist activities (such as whale watch, diving, etc.), there are often situations in which marine litter is struck in cetaceans, but also in sea turtles (for the most part Caretta caretta). However, the collected data could suggest the above-mentioned turtle species as possible bioindicator for marine litter monitoring in this region.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s).
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s).
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s).
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s).
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s).
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
The item was not assessed because the information was found insufficient to characterise and assess the different criteria or because no threshold was defined which would allow the assessment of the criterion (s)
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
Proportion of litter categories in good status
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
2016 to 2019), also led by the IMAR/Okeans team, which sought, inter alia, to understand the amount of marine litter in the coastline and in the marine funds of the Azores between 2016 and 2019 and to study the intake of marine species. The work carried out in the framework of the AZORLIT and LEXAZ projects is part of the ?Action Plan for the marine litter of the Azores (PALMA)? coordinated by the DRAMs. The collection of data for garbage on the surface of the water column and seabed was also possible thanks to the POPA programme (Azores Fisheries Observer Programme) and the INDITIC project (Implementation Of Indicators Of Marine Litter And Biota In Regional Sea Conventions And Marine Strategy Framework Directive Areas) and the work carried out by the Rebikoff Foundation, in the collection of seabed images on the channel Faial-Palo.
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
In the first assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) in the Azores sub-dividend, the need to obtain data enabling, not only to characterise the impacts of marine litter on marine ecosystems, was identified, but also to assess its evolution over time. In spite of the progress made during the first cycle in acquiring data to assess the current status of the subdivision of the Azores for marine litter, due to the absence of thresholds for the descriptor and the criteria, it is still not possible to assess GES. The assessment of the presence of macro- and microscopic litter in marine species (ceguro, Calonectris harbour turtle Caretta caretta) was based on the results of the AZORLIT project (Establiishing the baseline on Marine Litter in the Azres) (2015-2016). This project was funded by the Gallia Foundation and implemented by Dr Christopher Pham?s work at the IMAR/Okeans of the University of the Azores, with the collaboration of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Regional Directorate for Sea Affairs (DRAMs), the Azores Observatory (WCO), the Regional Environmental Directorate (DRA) and the Islands Natural Park (PNI) through the work of the nature staff. The AZORLIT project was continued with the LEXAZ project (CORCO01-0145-FEDER-00053
Assessments period
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
2012-2018
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Micro-litter in the environment
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Micro-litter in the environment
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Litter and micro-litter in species
Related targets
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • Meta-AZO16
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15
  • D10AZOM1
  • D10AZOM2
  • Meta-AZO15

Madeira subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-MAD)

GES component
D10
D10
D10
Feature
Litter in the environment
Micro-litter in the environment
Litter and micro-litter in species
Element
Litter in the environment
Microlitter (all)
Other litter/ micro-litter
Element code
PresEnvLitter
All_Microlitter
LitterOther
Element code source
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Undefined
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
MS in (sub)region
MS in (sub)region
MS in (sub)region
Criterion
Parameter
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Parameter achieved
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Description criteria
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
In the absence of harmonised methods and procedures to assess trends in the composition, quantity and spatial distribution of litter in the marine environment, in particular microplastics, technical and scientific groups have been set up at the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission, the Regional Sea Conventions and include representatives of the Member States. These groups produced several supporting documents to identify knowledge gaps and harmonise best practices for the implementation of the D10 evaluation in the MSFD. None of the indicators for missing studies/monitoring could not be made in the initial assessment report. Thus, in the initial assessment report it was not possible to carry out the assessment of D10?s GES for the subdivision of Madeira due to the lack of sufficient information to establish trends in the amount of litter on beaches, water column and seabed and to characterise the impacts of litter on marine ecosystems. Taking into account the need identified in the initial assessment report to foster research on indicators for Descriptor 10, a number of research projects have been initiated in the context of the marine waste (ex: PLSMAR18, CleanAtlantich19), which will lay the foundations for continued monitoring in the subdivision of Madeira. This work mainly concerns D10C1, more particularly on the coastline, and D10C2 (coastline and water column), and opportunistic information was also gathered for these criteria with regard to the seabed. The absence of thresholds for levels of marine litter implies that the assessment of the GES of the descriptor, in combination with the lack of information available for the subdivision of Madeira, is not possible. Therefore, while significant progress has been made on the initial report, the number of research projects for this descriptor, the fact that the data were not yet made makes it impossible to assess the GES of D10 in the subdivision of Madeira. There are a number of ongoing work on turtles, cetaceans and bird monitoring programmes, and on beaches, but which are not yet available in publications.
In the absence of harmonised methods and procedures to assess trends in the composition, quantity and spatial distribution of litter in the marine environment, in particular microplastics, technical and scientific groups have been set up at the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission, the Regional Sea Conventions and include representatives of the Member States. These groups produced several supporting documents to identify knowledge gaps and harmonise best practices for the implementation of the D10 evaluation in the MSFD. None of the indicators for missing studies/monitoring could not be made in the initial assessment report. Thus, in the initial assessment report it was not possible to carry out the assessment of D10?s GES for the subdivision of Madeira due to the lack of sufficient information to establish trends in the amount of litter on beaches, water column and seabed and to characterise the impacts of litter on marine ecosystems. Taking into account the need identified in the initial assessment report to foster research on indicators for Descriptor 10, a number of research projects have been initiated in the context of the marine waste (ex: PLSMAR18, CleanAtlantich19), which will lay the foundations for continued monitoring in the subdivision of Madeira. This work mainly concerns D10C1, more particularly on the coastline, and D10C2 (coastline and water column), and opportunistic information was also gathered for these criteria with regard to the seabed. The absence of thresholds for levels of marine litter implies that the assessment of the GES of the descriptor, in combination with the lack of information available for the subdivision of Madeira, is not possible. Therefore, while significant progress has been made on the initial report, the number of research projects for this descriptor, the fact that the data were not yet made makes it impossible to assess the GES of D10 in the subdivision of Madeira. There are a number of ongoing work on turtles, cetaceans and bird monitoring programmes, and on beaches, but which are not yet available in publications.
In the absence of harmonised methods and procedures to assess trends in the composition, quantity and spatial distribution of litter in the marine environment, in particular microplastics, technical and scientific groups have been set up at the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission, the Regional Sea Conventions and include representatives of the Member States. These groups produced several supporting documents to identify knowledge gaps and harmonise best practices for the implementation of the D10 evaluation in the MSFD. None of the indicators for missing studies/monitoring could not be made in the initial assessment report. Thus, in the initial assessment report it was not possible to carry out the assessment of D10?s GES for the subdivision of Madeira due to the lack of sufficient information to establish trends in the amount of litter on beaches, water column and seabed and to characterise the impacts of litter on marine ecosystems. Taking into account the need identified in the initial assessment report to foster research on indicators for Descriptor 10, a number of research projects have been initiated in the context of the marine waste (ex: PLSMAR18, CleanAtlantich19), which will lay the foundations for continued monitoring in the subdivision of Madeira. This work mainly concerns D10C1, more particularly on the coastline, and D10C2 (coastline and water column), and opportunistic information was also gathered for these criteria with regard to the seabed. The absence of thresholds for levels of marine litter implies that the assessment of the GES of the descriptor, in combination with the lack of information available for the subdivision of Madeira, is not possible. Therefore, while significant progress has been made on the initial report, the number of research projects for this descriptor, the fact that the data were not yet made makes it impossible to assess the GES of D10 in the subdivision of Madeira. There are a number of ongoing work on turtles, cetaceans and bird monitoring programmes, and on beaches, but which are not yet available in publications.
Assessments period
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
Related pressures
Related targets
  • AMAPT-T004-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T008-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T009-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T010-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T008-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T009-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T010-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T008-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T009-D11MAD
  • AMAPT-T010-D11MAD