Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D6 / Portugal / NE Atlantic: Macaronesia

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State Portugal
Region/subregion NE Atlantic: Macaronesia
Reported by DGRM
Report date 2021-03-03
Report access ART8_GES_PT_setembro2020.xml

Part of Extended continental shelf (AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Antialtair)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Element
Abyssal
Abyssal
Abyssal
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
N\ a
N\ a
N\ a
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets

Part of Extended continental shelf (AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Josephine)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Element
Abyssal
Abyssal
Abyssal
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
N/a
N/a
N/a
N/a
N/a
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets

Part of Extended continental shelf (AMA-PT-AA-PCE_MARNA)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Element
Abyssal
Abyssal
Abyssal
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
N\ a
N\ a
N\ a
N\ a
N\ a
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets

Part of Extended continental shelf (AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Rainbow)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Element
Abyssal
Abyssal
Abyssal
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Lower bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenBathyalLowSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
N\ a
N\ a
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Stable
Stable
Parameter achieved
Yes, based on low risk
Yes, based on low risk
Description parameter
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
There are no activities that affect or affect the integrity of the seabed, such as bottom trawling which is prohibited in these areas.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Good, based on low risk
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Information available on habitat types is insufficient to assess this criterion.
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
Proportion of habitats in good status
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
GES achieved
Description overall status
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Despite the information gaps mentioned in the initial assessment report, it was considered that the Good Environmental Status was achieved, since activities that condition or alter the integrity of the seabed are unknown, such as bottom trawling that is prohibited in these areas.
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
Related targets

Azores Subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-AZO)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Other benthic habitats
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Reefs
Reefs
Reefs
Benthic habitats
Element code
1170
1170
1170
HabBenAll
Element code source
HabitatsDirective
HabitatsDirective
HabitatsDirective
Link to other vocabulary or code lists that may be relevant
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
Other
Other
Other
National
Criterion
D6C3
D6C4
D6C5
D6C1
Parameter
Extent
Extent
Habitat condition
Extent
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Parameter achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description parameter
The habitats identified in the region are distributed by a variety of ecological contexts and in the depth range ranging from 3 to 4 metres above the coast to the depths of more than 4.000 m (offshore at abissal, Schmoning et al., 2015).
According to the Red List of Habitats in Europe, there are six threatened habitats in the Azores subdivision, four classified as Vulnerable and two as In Danger. Natura 2000 Habitats Directive aims to conserve threatened habitats and species, particularin three marine habitats for the region of conservation concern: Sheltered, submerged or semi-submerged and reefs (including deep sea rock formations, seamounts and deep water hydrothermal camps. The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR) refers to a number of habitats that are considered to be at risk and/or in decline, such as gardens and coral reefs and sponge aggregations, in the deep field, coastal fields of maerl in coastal areas and shallow and deep water hydrothermal camps.
Related indicator
Criteria status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description criteria
Sampaio et al., 2012). These estimates do not take into account the bodies affected but not presented in the fishing gear, the fishing mortality rate should therefore be higher than in the literature (Pham et al., 2014). In contrast to array areas where large epbenthic organisms are absent (Hall-Spencer et al., 2002) in the case of bottom longlining these organisms (at least two species) are present suggesting that the majority of cold-water corals are in good condition and only a small proportion is affected (Pham et al., 2014). Local fishermen have recognised that the places where more coral has been taken off by fishing was the seamounts of the Princesa Alice, Azores, Baixa de S. Mateus, Alcatraz of the North, Ferura, Voador and Gigante
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
The European project has published a list of EUNIS habitats identified for the Azores region, which includes proposals for new classes (tempera et al., 2013). Identifies 90 benthic habitats previously listed in EUNIS and 81 not included in the list. The authors therefore propose to include them, and indicate 18 previously identified habitats requiring amendment, making a total of 196 EUNIS habitats in the AAR (tempera et al., 2013). The exposure of coastal margins to intense oceanographic conditions is significant, given the small size of island platforms and the sharp drop of the slopes, which are adjacent to the islands of the Azores. In this context, marine habitats in this part of the North-East Atlantic support characteristic habitats of highly exposed waves and ocean currents (Gubbay et al., 2016).
The European project has published a list of EUNIS habitats identified for the Azores region, which includes proposals for new classes (tempera et al., 2013). Identifies 90 benthic habitats previously listed in EUNIS and 81 not included in the list. The authors therefore propose to include them, and indicate 18 previously identified habitats requiring amendment, making a total of 196 EUNIS habitats in the AAR (tempera et al., 2013). The exposure of coastal margins to intense oceanographic conditions is significant, given the small size of island platforms and the sharp drop of the slopes, which are adjacent to the islands of the Azores. In this context, marine habitats in this part of the North-East Atlantic support characteristic habitats of highly exposed waves and ocean currents (Gubbay et al., 2016).
The European project has published a list of EUNIS habitats identified for the Azores region, which includes proposals for new classes (tempera et al., 2013). Identifies 90 benthic habitats previously listed in EUNIS and 81 not included in the list. The authors therefore propose to include them, and indicate 18 previously identified habitats requiring amendment, making a total of 196 EUNIS habitats in the AAR (tempera et al., 2013). The exposure of coastal margins to intense oceanographic conditions is significant, given the small size of island platforms and the sharp drop of the slopes, which are adjacent to the islands of the Azores. In this context, marine habitats in this part of the North-East Atlantic support characteristic habitats of highly exposed waves and ocean currents (Gubbay et al., 2016).
To estimate loss of seabed habitats, impacts were considered to be the main impacts caused by artificial coastal works, submarine cables and pipelines, and submarine scientific observatories. The pressure on port infrastructure, defence and bathing infrastructures analysed by level and degree of coastal artificalisation is considered to be relatively low (10 % of the artificial coastal strip). There are currently 14 submarine communication cables installed in the Azores and the most recent in 2013 (Faial-Flores-CorvoGraciosa) have been completed, with a total length in the EEZ of ca. 3 350 km. For the submarine pipelines, there are 3 in the Azores region located on the island of São Miguel (Ponta Delgada, Lagoa and Vila Franca do Campo), the total length of these structures is 2.6 km. In the Azores Islands, 8 scientific observatories are identified, however, there is no information on their impacts on the seabed.
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description overall status
Assessments period
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
2012-2017
Related pressures
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities)
  • Litter in the environment
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets
  • D6-AZO-M1
  • D6-AZO-M2
  • D6-AZO-M3
  • D6-AZO-M4
  • D6-AZO-M5
  • D6-AZO-M1
  • D6-AZO-M2
  • D6-AZO-M3
  • D6-AZO-M4
  • D6-AZO-M5
  • D6-AZO-M1
  • D6-AZO-M2
  • D6-AZO-M3
  • D6-AZO-M4
  • D6-AZO-M5
  • D6-AZO-M1
  • D6-AZO-M2
  • D6-AZO-M5

Madeira subdivision (AMA-PT-SD-MAD)

GES component
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
D6
Feature
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Benthic broad habitats
Physical disturbance to seabed
Physical loss of the seabed
Element
Abyssal
Circalittoral coarse sediment
Circalittoral mixed sediment
Circalittoral mud
Circalittoral rock and biogenic reef
Circalittoral sand
Infralittoral coarse sediment
Infralittoral mixed sediment
Infralittoral mud
Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef
Infralittoral sand
Littoral rock and biogenic reef
Littoral sediment
Lower bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Lower bathyal sediment
Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment
Offshore circalittoral mixed sediment
Offshore circalittoral mud
Offshore circalittoral rock and biogenic
Offshore circalittoral sand
Upper bathyal rock and biogenic reef
Upper bathyal sediment
Element code
HabBenAbyssal
HabBenCircalitCoarSed
HabBenCircalitMxdSed
HabBenCircalitMud
HabBenCircalitRock
HabBenCircalitSand
HabBenInfralitCoarSed
HabBenInfralitMxdSed
HabBenInfralitMud
HabBenInfralitRock
HabBenInfralitSand
HabBenLitRock
HabBenLitSed
HabBenBathyalLowRock
HabBenBathyalLowSed
HabBenOffshCoarSed
HabBenOffshMxdSed
HabBenOffshMud
HabBenOffshRock
HabBenOffshSand
HabBenBathyalUpReef
HabBenBathyalUpSed
Element code source
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Habitats (D1-D6) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/msfd/broadHabitatTypes/view
Element 2
Element 2 code
Element 2 code source
Element source
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
Criterion
D6C2
D6C1
Parameter
Parameter other
Threshold value upper
Threshold value lower
Threshold qualitative
Threshold value source
Threshold value source other
Value achieved upper
Value achieved lower
Value unit
Value unit other
Proportion threshold value
Proportion value achieved
Proportion threshold value unit
Trend
Parameter achieved
Description parameter
Related indicator
Criteria status
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description criteria
Element status
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Description element
Integration rule type parameter
Integration rule description parameter
Integration rule type criteria
Integration rule description criteria
GES extent threshold
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
GES achieved
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Not assessed
Description overall status
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Commission Decision 2010/477/EU established the objective of good environmental status for Descriptor 6 (D6) that ?human pressures on the seabed should not prevent ecosystem components from conserving their natural diversity, productivity and dynamic ecological processes, taking into account ecosystem resilience?. The assessment scale for this descriptor could be particularly problematic due to the diversity of characteristics of certain benthic ecosystems and several human pressures. For that reason, it indicated that after an initial examination of the impacts and threats to the specificities of biodiversity and human pressures, an assessment and monitoring would be necessary and to integrate the results of the more stringent assessments into the larger scale assessments covering, where appropriate, a subdivision, sub-region or region. The results obtained in the subdivision of Madeira concluded that GES was achieved for all assessment areas, with varying degrees of confidence (low, medium and high) for the benthic stands of the mobile and fixed sub-tidal substrates. There are a number of ongoing work on seabed integrity and associated marine communities in the coastal waters of the island of Madeira and the island of Porto Santo, but which are not yet available in publications, in particular those resulting from the MarSP16 project. In this project, a state of the art was established on the subdivision of Madeira and a methodology was implemented following international standards, but still lacks coordination and coherence between Member States.
Assessments period
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
2014-2018
Related pressures
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter)
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources
  • Physical disturbance to seabed
  • Physical loss of the seabed
Related targets
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T001-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T003-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T004-D6MAD
  • AMAPT-T007-D6MAD