MS/Art11/2020/D6/Sweden/NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D6 / Sweden / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea

Report type	Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article	Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due	2020-10-15
GES Descriptor	D6 Sea-floor integrity/D1 Benthic habitats
Member State	Sweden
Region/subregion	NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Reported by	Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Gullbergs Strandgata 15, 411 04 Göteborg Box 11930,
Report date	2020-10-16
Report access	ART11_SE_MONprog_v5.xml ART11_SE_MONstrat_v4.xml

Simplified table

Descriptor	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1	D6/D1
Monitoring strategy description	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "	"The range and condition of benthic habitats are governed by several basic conditions such as depth, light, temperature, salinity, currents, sediment transport and nutrients. Bentical habitats are also affected by a number of different human pressures, especially oxygen deficiency due to eutrophication and physical disturbance due to various activities at sea. By monitoring the benthic habitats and their constituents as well as the activities and pressures that affect the environments, the condition can be monitored over time and provide a basis for the need of measures. At present, a large part of the monitoring is still under development. A complete assessment of GES for D6 criteria has so far not been possible, as the monitoring of benthic habitats and human activities has been lacking or inadequate. Assessment of relevant criteria requires consistent mapping of relevant habitats and methods for a cost-effective monitoring of these. In addition, ongoing monitoring of relevant pressures and activities is needed, as well as information on sensitivity to each pressure per habitat type in order to be able to define what the threshold for negative impact is. Monitoring for the indicator linked to target D.1 is sufficient. D.1 can however be assessed better depending on the development of monitoring of physical loss and disturbance which is ongoing (see programme Physical disturbance and loss). Monitoring for D.2 is under development (see programme Benthic habitats). The development of monitoring of benthic habitats and physical disturbance and loss will, when ready help to assess whether measures have had effect. "
Coverage of GES criteria	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Gaps and plans	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "	"Assessment of D6C1 and D6C2 has so far not been possible due to lack of data, but monitoring of different types of physical impact is under development in the programme Physical disturbance and loss. Only a qualitative estimate of potential impact from physical disturbance on the relevant habitat type (D6C3) has so far been possible in the North Sea, based on impact from trawling activities. However, data have been lacking to assess the extent of habitats affected by physical loss (D1C4). Assessment of D6C5 has only been possible qualitatively with the help of assessments from the WFD and the Habitats Directive. Assessments based on station-based monitoring of benthic fauna, vegetation and oxygen balance were supplemented with data from the latest species and habitat directive reporting for the relevant habitat type. There is an ongoing development of methods and programs to assess variables that complement the depth distribution of vegetation as assessment of D6C5. The reason is that the depth distribution often is imited by change in substrate rather than human influence. There are also no methods for monitoring sediment bottoms shallower than five meters, which constitute large areas in the Gulf of Bothnia. Specific plans of improvements: Since 2016, a large-scale mapping of Sweden's sea basins has been carried out to improve knowledge of benthic marine habitats. In parallel, the development of monitoring (using satellites to cover all shallow habitats, combined with drop video, drones or divers for validation), is also underway in order to be able to continuously monitor the condition of the benthic habitats, as well as the extent of human activities and their negative effects on the habitats. However, reliable comprehensive monitoring of benthic habitats in deeper areas still requires extensive mapping efforts, above all to create sufficiently accurate data on depths and substrates. Swedish experts are engaged in TG Seabed together with ICES, OSPAR, HELCOM and other countries to develop common methods to assess pressure from fishing gear. Monitoring of physical disturbance and loss using aerial image interpretation and impact models is has been developed and started in 2020. Several research projects on cumulative impacts is also underway to clarify how certain combinations of pressures affect marine ecosystems. "
Related targets	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal	ANSSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion ANSSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal BALSE-D.1_Havsbottenareal_struktur_funktion BALSE-D.2_Biogena_substrat_areal
Coverage of targets	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Related measures	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'	ANSSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' ANSSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' ANSSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' ANSSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' ANSSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' ANSSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' ANSSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' ANSSE-M034 - 'National environmental targets' ANSSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 660' BALSE-M024 - 'ÅPH 24 - developing a comprehensive framework for national action programmes for threatened species and habitats in the marine environment, and coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M025 - 'ÅPH 25 - developing knowledge-building programmes for endangered species and habitats in the marine environment, as well as coordinating such efforts nationally' BALSE-M026 - 'ÅPH 26 - developing guidance for the content of MPA management documents' BALSE-M027 - 'ÅPH 27 - guidelines and criteria developed in SwAM’s national action plan for marine protection establishes new MPAs of sufficient geographical coverage and with appropriate management measures to help to achieve GES under the Marine Environmental Regulation' BALSE-M028 - 'ÅPH 28 - introduce management measures in MPAs (existing/new where these do not currently exist)' BALSE-M029 - 'ÅPH 29 - with the assistance of the county administrative boards, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Heritage Board, Sweden aims to develop a coordinated response strategy against physical impact and biological recovery of the coastal environment' BALSE-M030 - 'ÅPH 30 - develop methods for ecological compensation and the restoration of marine environments, in collaboration with county administrative boards' BALSE-M031 - 'ÅPH 31 - implement restoration measures for seagrass (Zostera marina) in the North Sea, in collaboration with SwAM and the municipalities concerned' BALSE-M036 - 'Water Management Regulation 2004: 661'
Coverage of measures	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024	Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024
Related monitoring programmes	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab SE-D1D5-oxygenph SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance
Programme code	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna	SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes	SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes	SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes	SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes	SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D4D6D7-benthab	SE-D1D5-oxygenph	SE-D1D5-oxygenph	SE-D1D5-oxygenph	SE-D1D5-oxygenph	SE-D1D5-oxygenph	SE-D1D5-oxygenph	SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos	SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos	SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos	SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos	SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos	SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance	SE-D6D7-physicaldisturbance
Programme name	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor	Macrophytes	Macrophytes	Macrophytes	Macrophytes	Macrophytes	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Benthic habitats	Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH)	Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH)	Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH)	Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH)	Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH)	Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH)	Macrozoobenthos - infauna	Macrozoobenthos - infauna	Macrozoobenthos - infauna	Macrozoobenthos - infauna	Macrozoobenthos - infauna	Macrozoobenthos - infauna	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss	Physical disturbance and loss
Update type	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	New programme	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014	Modified from 2014
Old programme codes	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-COMFISH-D3-Havskrafta	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation BALSE-BENT-D165-Vegetation											ANSSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning ANSSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre BALSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre	ANSSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning ANSSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre BALSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre	ANSSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning ANSSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre BALSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre	ANSSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning ANSSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre BALSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre	ANSSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning ANSSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre BALSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre	ANSSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning ANSSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre BALSE-EUTRO-D5-Forsurning BALSE-EUTRO-D514-Syre	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna	ANSSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna BALSE-BENT-D165-Bottenfauna	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump	ANSSE-BENT-D16-Tralning ANSSE-BENT-D168-MudDump BALSE-BENT-D16-Tralning BALSE-BENT-D168-MudDump
Programme description	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed. The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area.	The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs. During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring. Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year	The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs. During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring. Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year	The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs. During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring. Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year	The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs. During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring. Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year	The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs. During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring. Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Mapping and monitoring of benthic habitats is of crucial importance for all environmental management at sea, from a functioning ecosystem-based marine environment management to meeting the various requirements of environmental legislation. The need for continuous and comprehensive monitoring covering the biological components of the MSFD, the Habitats Directive and the WFD has been clarified in recent reporting cycles. Corresponding needs also exist within the national environmental goals, from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the current challenges of tackling climate change. The new objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy (2021-2030) require functioning monitoring systems that provide comprehensive information for protection, assessment of permits, action planning and evaluation (of protection, permit modification and implemented measures). Monitoring is needed for sustainable fisheries regulation and coastal planning linked to exploitation, as well as for the management of transport routes and energy production, and last but not least to ensure a functioning network of protected areas and a functioning beach protection. The monitoring of benthic habitats is largely dependent on technical solutions. Methods for monitoring are under development and will, together with monitoring of pressures (see program Physical disturbance and loss), provide a basis for assessing the condition of the benthic habitats and how they are affected by various human activities. The Habitats Directive's assessment in 2019 shows that physical impact on conservation status in the form of construction, ports, dredging and bottom trawling predominates in the North Sea, while water quality, hazardous substances and nutrient load instead have a greater derogatory impact on habitats in the Baltic Sea. In order to be able to respond to the requirements in an integrated manner, a development of coordinated methods is underway that can deliver the necessary data on benthic habitats. The pilot phase of a survey and monitoring of shallow marine areas using satellite, aerial and drone images and biological sampling will be completed in 2020 and the established monitoring method will be tested and fine-tuned in 2021. The studies include testing of methods from satellite to biological sampling both in the Baltic Sea and on the West Coast. The overall monitoring of shallow benthic environments strives to be able to annually measure shallow marine areas completely (all of Sweden) w	Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions. The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs. Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993. Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly. Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders.	Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions. The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs. Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993. Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly. Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders.	Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions. The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs. Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993. Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly. Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders.	Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions. The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs. Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993. Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly. Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders.	Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions. The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs. Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993. Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly. Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders.	Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions. The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs. Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993. Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly. Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders.	Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities. Sampling primarily every year or every other year Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea.	Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities. Sampling primarily every year or every other year Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea.	Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities. Sampling primarily every year or every other year Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea.	Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities. Sampling primarily every year or every other year Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea.	Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities. Sampling primarily every year or every other year Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea.	Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities. Sampling primarily every year or every other year Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea.	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during	This programme include monitoring of physical disturbance or loss of the sea's bottom and coastal environment through human activities such as bottom trawling, dredging, dumping, land claim, constructions and other activities that cause physical change of the bottom (water depth, sediment distribution and habitat loss) and possible the sediment dynamic conditions and hydrographic conditions (eg currents and water exchange). Physical impact can be identified based on registered information about where and when different activities are carried out. Such information is found, for example, in permits and exemptions or notifications made in accordance with the Environmental Code and can also be produced through, for example, analysis of aerial photographs, VMS and logbooks for fishing activities as well as hydroacoustic measurements with, for example, multibeam sonar. After coordinating geographical and temporal information about human impact with information about ecosystem components in an area, the impact can be assessed. To estimate the physical impact on benthic habitats, the plan is to use data on human activities and their pressures, together with data from e.g. the programmes Benthic habitats and Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor. The latter also includes documenting traces of trawling when monitoring the seabed. Different types of data are thus collected that could be used to estimate physical impact. However, methods for monitoring and assessment are still under development. Benthic trawling began to be monitored in 1998. Dumping activities began to be reported to the Regional Sea Conventions in 1996. Since 2011, dredging activity linked to dumping has also been reported. Data on other activities have been collected from permits prior to certain reports, but ongoing collection is not yet in place. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are data on the volume of extraction in m3 per licensed area and year in Sweden from 1967. In 2018, historical and new aerial images of Sweden's coastal areas were analyzed to identify physical disturbance within the project ”Physical impact in Swedish coastal waters - mapping, assessment and guidelines”. The results apply to the 1960s, and the present (2016). In order to get an idea of the rate of change, interpretations of five major sub-areas have been made for the years 1994 and 2008. The analyzes have been made through interpretations of orthophotos and are planned to be followed up once or twice during
Monitoring purpose	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Environmental state and impacts	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source	Effectiveness of measures Human activities causing the pressures Pressures at source
Other policies and conventions	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	Data Collection Framework Multi-Annual Plan (Common Fisheries Policy) HELCOM Monitoring programmes Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive	HELCOM Monitoring programmes Habitats Directive Maritime Spatial Planning Directive Monitoring programme targeting at national legislation OSPAR Coordinated Environmental Monitoring Programme Water Framework Directive
Regional cooperation - coordinating body								OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR	OSPAR											HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR	HELCOM OSPAR
Regional cooperation - countries involved	DK	DK	DK	DK	DK	DK	DK
Regional cooperation - implementation level	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Agreed data collection methods	Agreed data collection methods	Agreed data collection methods	Agreed data collection methods	Agreed data collection methods											Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection	Coordinated data collection
Monitoring details
Features	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Commercially exploited fish and shellfish	Coastal ecosystems	Shelf ecosystems	Coastal ecosystems	Shelf ecosystems	Benthic broad habitats	Coastal ecosystems	Coastal ecosystems	Eutrophication	Eutrophication	Benthic broad habitats	Coastal ecosystems	Coastal ecosystems	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats	Pelagic broad habitats	Eutrophication	Benthic broad habitats	Chemical characteristics	Chemical characteristics	Chemical characteristics	Coastal ecosystems	Shelf ecosystems	Coastal ecosystems	Shelf ecosystems	Eutrophication	Benthic broad habitats	Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational)	Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell)	Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure	Canalisation and other watercourse modifications	Coastal defence and flood protection	Land claim	Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials	Transport infrastructure	Physical loss of the seabed	Physical disturbance to seabed	Benthic broad habitats	Other benthic habitats
Elements	Nephrops norvegicus	Nephrops norvegicus	Sub-apex demersal predators	Sub-apex demersal predators	Sub-apex demersal predators	Sub-apex demersal predators	Circalittoral mud Offshore circalittoral mud	Filter-feeders Primary producers	Filter-feeders Primary producers	Benthic habitats - opportunistic macroalgae	Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities	Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand	Filter-feeders Primary producers	Filter-feeders Primary producers	Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand	Reefs Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time	Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand	Reefs Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time	Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand	Reefs Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time	Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand	Reefs Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time	Coastal pelagic habitat Shelf pelagic habitat Variable salinity pelagic habitat	Dissolved oxygen (O2)	Circalittoral coarse sediment Circalittoral mud Circalittoral sand Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral sand Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment Offshore circalittoral mud Offshore circalittoral sand	Dissolved carbon dioxide (pCO2)	H2S	pH	Deposit-feeders Filter-feeders Planktivores Secondary producers Sub-apex demersal predators	Deposit-feeders Filter-feeders Planktivores Secondary producers Sub-apex demersal predators	Deposit-feeders Filter-feeders Planktivores Secondary producers Sub-apex demersal predators	Deposit-feeders Filter-feeders Planktivores Secondary producers Sub-apex demersal predators	Benthic habitats - macrobenthic communities	Circalittoral coarse sediment Circalittoral mud Circalittoral sand Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral sand Offshore circalittoral coarse sediment Offshore circalittoral mud Offshore circalittoral sand									Not Applicable	Not Applicable	Infralittoral coarse sediment Infralittoral mud Infralittoral rock and biogenic reef Infralittoral sand	Reefs Sandbanks which are slightly covered by seawater all the time
GES criteria	D3C2	D3C3	D4C2	D4C2	D4C3	D4C3	D6C5	D4C1	D4C2	D5C6	D5C7	D6C5	D4C1	D4C2	D6C3	D6C3	D6C4	D6C4	D6C5	D6C5	D7C2	D7C2	D1C6	D5C5	D6C5	NotRelevan	NotRelevan	NotRelevan	D4C1	D4C1	D4C2	D4C2	D5C8	D6C5									D6C1	D6C2	D7C2	D7C2
Parameters	Abundance (number of individuals)	Other Size distribution	Abundance (number of individuals)	Abundance (number of individuals)	Other Size distribution	Other Size distribution	Extent Other	Other	Abundance (number of individuals) Biomass	Abundance (number of individuals) Coverage (e.g. of a species within a habitat or area) Extent	Abundance (number of individuals) Coverage (e.g. of a species within a habitat or area) Extent	Extent Other	Other	Other	Extent Other	Extent Other	Extent Other	Extent Other	Extent Other	Extent Other	Other	Other	Extent Other	Concentration in water Other	Extent Other	pco2 - alkalinity	Concentration in water	Ph	Other	Other	Abundance (number of individuals) Biomass	Abundance (number of individuals) Biomass	Abundance (number of individuals) Other	Extent Other									Extent	Extent	Other	Other
Parameter Other		Age distribution Sex distribution			Age distribution Sex distribution	Age distribution Sex distribution	Abundance (number of individuals) Size distributio	Species composition	Species composition	Oxygen debt	Oxygen debt	Species composition Abundance (number of individua	Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an	Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an	Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an	Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an	Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range) Distri	Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range) Distri	Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an	Relative abundance within community (of pelagic an	Extent Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range)	Extent Distribution (pattern) Distribution (range)	Oxygen debt Ph pco2 - alkalinity Concentration in	Oxygen debt	Oxygen debt H2S Ph pco2 - alkalinity Concentratio				Species composition	Species composition			Biomass Species composition	Abundance (number of individuals) Biomass Species											Extent	Extent
Spatial scope	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Coastal waters (WFD)	Beyond MS Marine Waters Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Beyond MS Marine Waters Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters	Coastal waters (WFD) EEZ (or similar) Territorial waters
Marine reporting units	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-BG_Vasterhavet BAL-SE-AA-BG_Bottniska_Viken BAL-SE-AA-BG_Egentliga_Ostersjon	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet	ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak BAL-SE-AA-B_Alands_hav BAL-SE-AA-B_Arkonahavet_och_S_Oresund BAL-SE-AA-B_Bornholmshavet_och_Hanobukten BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenhavet BAL-SE-AA-B_Bottenviken BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_N_Kvarken BAL-SE-AA-B_O_Gotlandshavet BAL-SE-AA-B_V_Gotlandshavet
Temporal scope (start date - end date)	2011-9999	2011-9999	2011-9999	2011-9999	2011-9999	2011-9999	2011-9999	1993-9999	1993-9999	1993-9999	1993-9999	1993-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	2022-9999	1893-9999	1893-9999	1893-9999	1893-9999	1893-9999	1893-9999	1971-9999	1971-9999	1971-9999	1971-9999	1971-9999	1971-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999	1967-9999
Monitoring frequency	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Yearly	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other	Other
Monitoring type	Visual observation	Visual observation	Visual observation	Visual observation	Visual observation	Visual observation	Visual observation	In-situ sampling coastal Visual observation	In-situ sampling coastal Visual observation	In-situ sampling coastal Visual observation	In-situ sampling coastal Visual observation	In-situ sampling coastal Visual observation	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Ecological modelling In-situ sampling coastal Numerical modelling Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	In-situ sampling coastal In-situ sampling offshore	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery	Administrative data collection Ecological modelling Numerical modelling Other Remote flight imagery Remote satellite imagery
Monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	Other monitoring method	HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of dissolved oxygen HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of hydrogen sulphide HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of pH HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of total alkalinity OSPAR Revised JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guideline: Oxygen (Agreement 2013-05) (Replaces Agreement 1997-03) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of dissolved oxygen HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of hydrogen sulphide HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of pH HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of total alkalinity OSPAR Revised JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guideline: Oxygen (Agreement 2013-05) (Replaces Agreement 1997-03) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of dissolved oxygen HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of hydrogen sulphide HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of pH HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of total alkalinity OSPAR Revised JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guideline: Oxygen (Agreement 2013-05) (Replaces Agreement 1997-03) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of dissolved oxygen HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of hydrogen sulphide HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of pH HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of total alkalinity OSPAR Revised JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guideline: Oxygen (Agreement 2013-05) (Replaces Agreement 1997-03) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of dissolved oxygen HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of hydrogen sulphide HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of pH HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of total alkalinity OSPAR Revised JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guideline: Oxygen (Agreement 2013-05) (Replaces Agreement 1997-03) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of dissolved oxygen HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of hydrogen sulphide HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of pH HELCOM Guidelines for sampling and determination of total alkalinity OSPAR Revised JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guideline: Oxygen (Agreement 2013-05) (Replaces Agreement 1997-03) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Manual for monitoring in COMBINE programme OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Manual for monitoring in COMBINE programme OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Manual for monitoring in COMBINE programme OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Manual for monitoring in COMBINE programme OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Manual for monitoring in COMBINE programme OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	HELCOM Manual for monitoring in COMBINE programme OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method	NEAFC: Vessel Monitoring System Other monitoring method
Monitoring method other	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf	The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020.	The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020.	The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020.	The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020.	The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	A review of existing methods has shown that there is no single method that can meet all data needs. Therefore, the current focus is on developing a concept based on combined methods, where one or more sub-methods can deliver large-scale coverage while other sub-methods can deliver more accurate spatial and/or biological data. The results from the various sub-methods must be able to be seamlessly linked so that together they form a functioning monitoring system. One possibility that is being investigated is the use of Sentinel 2 satellite data to create a comprehensive and uniform image throughout Sweden (scale 10 x 10 meters) in combination with drones that can locally create image mosaics of benthic vegetation (with an accuracy of a few centimeters) and biological sampling of the vegetation, which in turn enables more accurate species identification and other biological factors. Pilot surveys in 2019 have shown that the method has the potential to cover benthic habitats down to medium visibility depths. Deeper benthic environments (below the visibility depth limit) require monitoring based on comprehensive substrate and depth models based on data from different types of remote mapping (especially different sonar-based methods). The technical possibilities for producing and modeling bottom information in the same accuracy as shallower areas were initially investigated in 2019 within the National Marine Mapping (NMK) project and showed great potential. Development of reliable and usable models is, however, limited by the lack of measurement data of sufficiently high quality for parts of Sweden's sea area and by the fact that large parts of the existing data are unavailable.	"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure"	"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure"	"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure"	"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure"	"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure"	"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure"	https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html	https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html	https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html	https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html	https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html	https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf	Trawling – trawling is modelled using a combination of AIS-, VMS- and SAR-data and data from the ship´s logbook. Data on human activities based on permits – See HELCOM and OSPAR guidelines for dredging. Data on other activities are collected in the same manner. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – A combination of remote sensing using aerial or satellite images, AIS and VMS is used to detect physical loss and disturbance in coastal waters. A method standard is being developed and will be published in the end of 2021. https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/eiha/dredging-dumping https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-for-Management-of-Dredged-Material-at-Sea.pdf
Quality control	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations.	The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	Will be developed during test-phase	The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty.	The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty.	The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty.	The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty.	The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty.	The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty.	The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.	Trawling – Today, there is no automatic QC of VMS and AIS reports. VMS is sealed and there is a set of rules for functionality and handling in the event of errors. AIS is a maritime safety system, but in terms of monitoring, there are no legal requirements for functionality and error handling. Quality assurance of logbook information takes place via error reports. The errors are then corrected manually. Data on human activities based on permits – When compiling data from permits and exemptions, the reasonableness of the values stated is assessed. There is also a follow-up of how the activity has been carried out compared to what is stated in the reports. The follow-up is done by contacting the supervisory authority or the contracter. Regarding sand gravel and rock extraction, there are conditions in the permit in accordance with the Continental Shelf Act for how control programmes and reporting are to take place. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Map projection must be Sweref99TM. Screening is done with a pixel size of 25 meters. Raster files are created so that the pixels are distributed according to 0, 25, 50, 100 meters, etc. In addition, it is checked that measured maximum and minimum values are reasonable on retrieved data.
Data management	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES	Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES						Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Reports from the initial pilot study will be published in the spring of 2021. For the time being, the data collected during the development work will be stored and managed by SwAM, but the management will be reviewed and may be transferred to another agency.	Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA. SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI.	Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA. SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI.	Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA. SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI.	Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA. SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI.	Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA. SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI.	Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA. SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI.							Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).	Trawling – The raw data that is collected is stored at the SwAM and processed data that is not confidential is made available upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data collected and stored by other actors (Coast Guard, EMSA, other Member States or third countries) are not disclosed. Data on human activities based on permits – There is no national dredging and dumping. This information is stored at each decision-making authority. The data compiled by SwAM annually is stored at the agency and disclosed upon request to havochvatten@havochvatten.se. Data delivered to HELCOM is presented in the Helcom Map and Data Service. SGU reports annual sand extractions in Swedish coastal waters through the Working Group on the Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Ecosystem within ICES. The reporting is also done to HELCOM and OSPAR. Annual data for extractions in Sweden and for all countries in the ICES region are reported in each ICES WGXT annual report. Interpretation of aerial imaging and detection from satellite data – Work is underway to build up a management structure for produced data and models. In parallel with this, work is being done to classify the information, in order to determine what may be made publicly accessible and under what conditions. The ambition is that the basic impact components collected by SwAM through mapping will be made available via the SwAMs data portal for geographical information (under development).
Data access	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten-data	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska-data	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/datavardskap-oceanografi-och-marinbiologi/ladda-ner-data-1.135101	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan-data
Related indicator/name								5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters 5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters	5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters 5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters	5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters 5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters	5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters 5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters	5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters 5.7A Djuputbredning av makrovegetation i kustvatten/ 5.7A Depth distribution of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses in coastal waters	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev BALSE-D.1.2_F�rlust_sandbankar_rev	5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters 5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters ANSSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5C_Syreskuld_utsj�	5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters 5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters ANSSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5C_Syreskuld_utsj�	5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters 5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters ANSSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5C_Syreskuld_utsj�	5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters 5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters ANSSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5C_Syreskuld_utsj�	5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters 5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters ANSSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5C_Syreskuld_utsj�	5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters 5.5A Syrebalans i kustvatten/ 5.5A Dissolved oxygen in coastal waters ANSSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5B_Syrebalans_utsj� BALSE-5.5C_Syreskuld_utsj�	5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters 5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters ANSSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj� BALSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj�	5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters 5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters ANSSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj� BALSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj�	5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters 5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters ANSSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj� BALSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj�	5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters 5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters ANSSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj� BALSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj�	5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters 5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters ANSSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj� BALSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj�	5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters 5.8A Bottenfauna i kustvatten/ 5.8A Benthic fauna Quality Index (BQI) for coastal waters ANSSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj� BALSE-5.8B_Bottenfauna_utsj�	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend	ANSSE-6.3A_Fysisk_st�rning_bent_livsmilj� ANSSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend BALSE-D.1.1_St�rning_bottentr�lning_trend
Contact	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se	miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se
References	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-djur-havsbotten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vegetation-botten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vegetation-botten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vegetation-botten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vegetation-botten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vegetation-botten	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-bentiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-vattnet-kemiska	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-sediment-makrofauna	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-sediment-makrofauna	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-sediment-makrofauna	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-sediment-makrofauna	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-sediment-makrofauna	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-sediment-makrofauna	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan	https://www.havochvatten.se/marin-miljoovervakning-fysisk-paverkan