Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D8 / Sweden / NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D8 Contaminants |
Member State | Sweden |
Region/subregion | NE Atlantic: Greater North Sea |
Reported by | Havs- och vattenmyndigheten |
Report date | 2020-07-06 |
Report access | msfd2018-ART8GES_SE_200706.xml |
ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt
GES component |
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Marine species
|
Acute pollution events
|
Element |
Anthracene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cesium-137 |
Cesium-137 |
Cesium-137 |
Copper and its compounds |
Fluoranthene |
Hexachlorobenzene |
Lead and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDD) |
Mercury and its compounds |
Pentabromodiphenylether |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Tributyltin compounds |
Nassarius nitidus |
|
Element code |
CAS_120-12-7 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CS002370 |
CS002370 |
CS002370 |
CAS_7440-50-8 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_118-74-1 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
SCB6 |
CAS_50-32-8 |
EEA_33-58-9 |
EEA_33-57-8 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_32534-81-9 |
CAS_1763-23-1 |
TBTIN |
140509 |
|
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
HELCOM |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
|
Criterion |
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C2
|
D8C3
|
Parameter |
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Other
|
Other
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Concentration in biota (flatfish)
|
Concentration in biota (herring)
|
Imposex
|
Volume of oil
|
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
24.0 |
2.3 |
15.0 |
2.9 |
2.5 |
52.0 |
2000.0 |
10.0 |
120.0 |
75.0 |
5.0 |
6.5 |
167.0 |
20.0 |
0.0085 |
9.1 |
1.6 |
0.3 |
0.42 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
7.1 |
0.1 |
18.413810811 |
0.37626 |
0.65794444444 |
4.1 |
115.0 |
0.6 |
33.0 |
41.3 |
0.58 |
0.31 |
50.4 |
0.95 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
0.81 |
||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
Other
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Bq/m3
|
Bq kg-1
|
Bq kg-1 wet weight
|
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Vas Deferens Sequence Index
|
m3
|
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not assessed |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
No |
Description parameter |
Concentrations in seawater
|
Concentration in flatfish, Pleuronectes platessa
|
Concentration in herring, Clupea harengus
|
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
Values are TEQ (WHO PCDD/F-PCB).
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
Trend: improving since 2003
|
||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Not good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not assessed |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
|
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
||
GES extent achieved |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
87.50 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
60.00 |
||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
Not assessed |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
Description overall status |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Indicators under D8C2 are not integrated to criteria level |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for D8C3. The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund
GES component |
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Marine species
|
Acute pollution events
|
Element |
Anthracene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Cesium-137 |
Copper and its compounds |
Fluoranthene |
Hexachlorobenzene |
Lead and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDD) |
Mercury and its compounds |
Pentabromodiphenylether |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Tributyltin compounds |
Peringia ulvae |
|
Element code |
CAS_120-12-7 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CS002370 |
CAS_7440-50-8 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_118-74-1 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
SCB6 |
CAS_50-32-8 |
EEA_33-58-9 |
EEA_33-57-8 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_32534-81-9 |
CAS_1763-23-1 |
TBTIN |
151628 |
|
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://seadatanet.maris2.nl/v_bodc_vocab_v2/vocab_relations.asp?lib=P02
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
HELCOM |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
HELCOM |
|
Criterion |
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C2
|
D8C3
|
Parameter |
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in water
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Imposex
|
Volume of oil
|
|||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
24.0 |
2.3 |
15.0 |
52.0 |
2000.0 |
10.0 |
120.0 |
75.0 |
5.0 |
6.5 |
167.0 |
20.0 |
0.0085 |
9.1 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
0.11 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Helsinki Convention
|
Threshold value source other |
|||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
24.317777778 |
0.7 |
0.03 |
||||||||||||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
Other
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Other
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Bq/m3
|
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Vas Deferens Sequence Index
|
m3
|
|||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
No |
Yes |
Description parameter |
Concentrations in seawater
|
Trend: stable since 2009.
|
|||||||||||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not good |
|
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||||||||
GES extent achieved |
|||||||||||||||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
|||||||
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Indicators under D8C2 are not integrated to criteria level |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for D8C3. The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak
GES component |
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
D8
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feature |
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - non UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Contaminants - UPBT substances
|
Marine species
|
Marine species
|
Marine species
|
Marine species
|
Acute pollution events
|
Element |
Anthracene |
Cadmium and its compounds |
Copper and its compounds |
Fluoranthene |
Hexachlorobenzene |
Lead and its compounds |
Non-dioxin like PCB (sum of 6 PCB: 28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds (7 PCDDs + 10 PCDFs + 12 PCB-DLs) |
Hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDD) |
Mercury and its compounds |
Pentabromodiphenylether |
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and its derivatives |
Tributyltin compounds |
Nassarius nitidus |
Zoarces viviparus |
Zoarces viviparus |
Zoarces viviparus |
|
Element code |
CAS_120-12-7 |
CAS_7440-43-9 |
CAS_7440-50-8 |
CAS_206-44-0 |
CAS_118-74-1 |
CAS_7439-92-1 |
SCB6 |
CAS_50-32-8 |
EEA_33-58-9 |
EEA_33-57-8 |
CAS_7439-97-6 |
CAS_32534-81-9 |
CAS_1763-23-1 |
TBTIN |
140509 |
127123 |
127123 |
127123 |
|
Element code source |
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Eutrophication (D5) and contaminants (D8-D9) http://dd.eionet.europa.eu/vocabulary/wise/ObservedProperty/view
|
Contaminants (D8-D9) http://vocab.ices.dk/?ref=37
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
Species (D1) http://www.marinespecies.org/
|
|
Element 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element 2 code source |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element source |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
EU |
OSPAR |
National |
National |
National |
|
Criterion |
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C1
|
D8C2
|
D8C2
|
D8C2
|
D8C2
|
D8C3
|
Parameter |
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in biota
|
Concentration in sediment
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Other
|
Parameter other |
Imposex
|
Proportion of early dead fry
|
Proportion of late dead fry
|
Proportion of malformed fry
|
Volume of oil
|
||||||||||||||
Threshold value upper |
120.0 |
2.3 |
52.0 |
2000.0 |
10.0 |
120.0 |
75.0 |
5.0 |
6.5 |
167.0 |
20.0 |
0.0085 |
9.1 |
1.6 |
0.3 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
2.0 |
1.15 |
Threshold value lower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold qualitative |
|||||||||||||||||||
Threshold value source |
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
OSPAR Convention
|
National
|
National
|
National
|
Other (specify)
|
Threshold value source other |
Bonn Agreement
|
||||||||||||||||||
Value achieved upper |
16.0 |
0.11 |
2.3 |
205.0 |
1.1 |
34.0 |
0.95 |
0.01 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
20.2 |
0.12 |
0.1 |
0.28 |
0.28 |
||||
Value achieved lower |
|||||||||||||||||||
Value unit |
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Other
|
Other
|
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
Other
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of wet weight
|
microgram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Other
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
percentage
|
Other
|
Value unit other |
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
milligram per kilogram of dry weight
|
Vas Deferens Sequence Index
|
m3
|
||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion value achieved |
|||||||||||||||||||
Proportion threshold value unit |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trend |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Stable |
Unknown |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Stable |
Unknown |
Improving |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Improving |
Parameter achieved |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Description parameter |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
Values are TEQ (WHO PCDD/F-PCB).
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
”Stable” trend means that over the last 10 years period generally no significant trends can be seen regarding concentrations of these contaminants in biota. |
Trend: improving since 2003
|
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for fry malformations in eelpout, indicator 8.2D, under criterion D8C2. The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for fry malformations in eelpout, indicator 8.2D, under criterion D8C2. The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for fry malformations in eelpout, indicator 8.2D, under criterion D8C2. The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
|||||||
Related indicator |
|||||||||||||||||||
Criteria status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||
Element status |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Not good |
Not good |
Good |
Unknown |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|
Description element |
|||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type parameter |
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
OOAO
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description parameter |
|||||||||||||||||||
Integration rule type criteria |
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Not relevant
|
Integration rule description criteria |
|||||||||||||||||||
GES extent threshold |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|||||
GES extent achieved |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
66.70 |
66.70 |
66.70 |
66.70 |
66.70 |
66.70 |
66.70 |
|||||
GES extent unit |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Proportion of substances in good status |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
Not relevant |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES achieved |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, Article 14 exception reported |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
Not assessed |
GES achieved |
Description overall status |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Sweden has not used the prefilled data reported under the Water Framework Directive. The primary data sources for the assessment are the national monitoring programmes for metals and organic contaminants in sediment and biota, processed using protocols agreed in Helcom and Ospar. Because of differences in monitoring and data used for the respective assessment it has not been possible to systematically combine the results. However, threshold values for biota and sediment are the same as those used under the Water Framework Directive, whereby there is an agreement on substances that generally do not achieve threshold values. Additionally, in the national report it is noted that higher concentrations of contaminants may occur on local scales, and that this may be expressed on the level of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive.
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for substances under criterion D8C1 (except cesium-137) as well as for GES assessment.
The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Indicators under D8C2 are not integrated to criteria level |
Indicators under D8C2 are not integrated to criteria level |
Indicators under D8C2 are not integrated to criteria level |
Indicators under D8C2 are not integrated to criteria level |
The national legislation sets down a different assessment level for D8C3. The national legislation may be revised as regard the level of assessment in line with the present reporting. |
Assessments period |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
2011-2016 |
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|