Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D1-F / Baltic
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
| Region/subregion | Baltic |
Member state |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DK |
EE |
EE |
EE |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
LT |
LT |
LV |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report Access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Descriptor |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
D1.4 |
Monitoring strategy description |
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Das derzeitige Monitoring der Biodiversität von Fischen basiert überwiegend auf fischereiwissenschaftlichen Surveys, welche die Erfassung von kommerziell genutzten Arten als Schwerpunkt haben. Diese Surveys sind auf die großräumige Erfassung von Fischpopulationen und -beständen ausgelegt. Erfasst werden im Wesentlichen die Abundanz und Verteilung sowie biologische Parameter einzelner Arten und damit hauptsächlich Zustände und Trends in Fischpopulationen und Fischgemeinschaften. Belastungen, welche die Biodiversität von Fischen beeinflussen, werden in den Monitoringprogrammen zu den Deskriptoren D2, D3, D5, D6, D7, D8, D10 und D11 erfasst. Die Kriterien entsprechend (EU) 848/2017 basieren überwiegend auf Abundanzerfassungen der Fischgemeinschaften (D1C2, D1C3, D1C4).
Datenerfassungs- und Bewertungssysteme für bisher schlecht oder gar nicht erfasste Arten (v.a. nicht kommerziell genutzte Arten) sind noch zu entwickeln. Das Portfolio von kommerziell genutzten Arten, die durch den ICES bewertet werden, sollte entsprechend D3 fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewandt.
Das Monitoring kann zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt nicht verwendet werden, um die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zu bewerten.
|
Pelagiske habitater omfatter de frie vandmasser i det åbne hav og de marine organismer (fisk, havpattedyr, fugle og plankton) der befinder sig heri. I havstrategien er der fokus på plankton, da det er i de frie vandmasser at hovedparten af primærproduktionen (fytoplankton) finder sted, hvilket skaber fødegrundlaget for sekundærproduktionen (zooplankton) og de højere trofiske niveauer. Produktiviteten i de pelagiske habitater er påvirket af de fysiske og kemiske forhold – salinitet, temperatur, lysindstråling og vandomrøring - og især af næringstilgængeligheden. Eftersom de planktoniske organismer danner fødegrundlaget for det samlede marine fødenet, er det vigtigt, at miljøtilstanden af disse er god, da en dårlig tilstand vil påvirke hele fødenettet. God miljøtilstand for denne deskriptor er i havstrategien overordnet beskrevet sådan, at biodiversiteten er opretholdt ved, at kvaliteten og forekomsten af habitater samt udbredelsen og tætheden af arter svarer til de fremherskende fysiografiske, geografiske og klimatiske forhold.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.4 – Biological diversity – Fish" is to assess the status of fish species in the sea areas of Estonia. The status of the temporal and geographical structure of fish communities and population dynamics of different fish species are monitored. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as a model species for migratory (anadromous) species. Baltic herring and sprat are included as model pelagic fish species. The monitoring and assessment system for protected fish species under Habitats Directive needs further development. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.4 – Biological diversity – Fish" is to assess the status of fish species in the sea areas of Estonia. The status of the temporal and geographical structure of fish communities and population dynamics of different fish species are monitored. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as a model species for migratory (anadromous) species. Baltic herring and sprat are included as model pelagic fish species. The monitoring and assessment system for protected fish species under Habitats Directive needs further development. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD1.4 – Biological diversity – Fish" is to assess the status of fish species in the sea areas of Estonia. The status of the temporal and geographical structure of fish communities and population dynamics of different fish species are monitored. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as a model species for migratory (anadromous) species. Baltic herring and sprat are included as model pelagic fish species. The monitoring and assessment system for protected fish species under Habitats Directive needs further development. |
The programme consists of two sub-programmes that provide information on migratory pigs in the Bothnian Bay and on the sea trout of rivers entering the Baltic Sea. The third sub-programme, which provides information on archipelagic fisheries, is implemented only by the Provincial Government of Ã
land.
|
The programme consists of two sub-programmes that provide information on migratory pigs in the Bothnian Bay and on the sea trout of rivers entering the Baltic Sea. The third sub-programme, which provides information on archipelagic fisheries, is implemented only by the Provincial Government of Ã
land.
|
The programme consists of two sub-programmes that provide information on migratory pigs in the Bothnian Bay and on the sea trout of rivers entering the Baltic Sea. The third sub-programme, which provides information on archipelagic fisheries, is implemented only by the Provincial Government of Ã
land.
|
The programme consists of two sub-programmes that provide information on migratory pigs in the Bothnian Bay and on the sea trout of rivers entering the Baltic Sea. The third sub-programme, which provides information on archipelagic fisheries, is implemented only by the Provincial Government of Ã
land.
|
The programme consists of two sub-programmes that provide information on migratory pigs in the Bothnian Bay and on the sea trout of rivers entering the Baltic Sea. The third sub-programme, which provides information on archipelagic fisheries, is implemented only by the Provincial Government of Ã
land.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, ichtiofaunos monitoringas Baltijos jūros priekrantėje vykdomas 7 vietose, 1 kartą per metus kasmet (šiltuoju metų laiku). 4 tyrimų vietos išdėstytos žemyninėje ir Kuršių Nerijos priekrantės dalyse; 3 – Kuršių marių vandenų išplitimo Baltijos jūroje zonoje.
Tyrimų metu vertinama ichtiofaunos rūšinė sudėtis, žuvų rūšių gausumas ir biomasė, žuvų amžinė ir dydžių struktūra.
Baltijos jūros priekrantės žuvų bendrijų monitoringas taip pat vykdomas Duomenų rinkimo programos rėmuose, žuvų išteklių vertinimo tikslais. Gaunami duomenys taip pat naudojami D1/D4 žuvų rodikliams vertinti.
Baltijos jūros priekrantės būklė vertinama pagal HELCOM FISH PRO pasiūlytus rodiklius: žuvų bendrijos dydžio indeksas, žuvų bendrijos gausumo indeksas (abu indeksai naudojami ir būklei pagal D4 vertinti), žuvų bendrijos įvairovės indeksas, žuvų bendrijos trofinį indeksas, plekšnių gausumas.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, ichtiofaunos monitoringas Baltijos jūros priekrantėje vykdomas 7 vietose, 1 kartą per metus kasmet (šiltuoju metų laiku). 4 tyrimų vietos išdėstytos žemyninėje ir Kuršių Nerijos priekrantės dalyse; 3 – Kuršių marių vandenų išplitimo Baltijos jūroje zonoje.
Tyrimų metu vertinama ichtiofaunos rūšinė sudėtis, žuvų rūšių gausumas ir biomasė, žuvų amžinė ir dydžių struktūra.
Baltijos jūros priekrantės žuvų bendrijų monitoringas taip pat vykdomas Duomenų rinkimo programos rėmuose, žuvų išteklių vertinimo tikslais. Gaunami duomenys taip pat naudojami D1/D4 žuvų rodikliams vertinti.
Baltijos jūros priekrantės būklė vertinama pagal HELCOM FISH PRO pasiūlytus rodiklius: žuvų bendrijos dydžio indeksas, žuvų bendrijos gausumo indeksas (abu indeksai naudojami ir būklei pagal D4 vertinti), žuvų bendrijos įvairovės indeksas, žuvų bendrijos trofinį indeksas, plekšnių gausumas.
|
The monitoring addresses status of coastal fish population. Two distinct features - key fish species and abundance of functional groups are used to characterize status of fish population. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The goal of the Strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to the populations of coastal, pelagic, demersal and deep-sea fish species in compliance with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. The Strategy consists of 4 monitoring programmes: 2 for coastal and transitional WFD waterbodies, 1 for fish of offshore shallow water areas and 1 for fish of the deep-water zone. Strategy takes into consideration regional cooperation through established HELCOM monitoring guidelines as well as international cooperation through International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The strategy also reflects the human activities, pressures and impacts by monitoring by-catch and externally visible fish diseases. Information gathered within the strategy will not only provide information on the status of marine waters but also help to identify measures to be implemented and assess progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
The monitoring of fish provides a basis for assessing state based on the size of the stocks, size distribution, spawning biomass and health conditions for certain species. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Fish stocks are directly affected by fishing activities and variation in environmental variables such as salinity, temperature and oxygen conditions. Fish stocks can also be affected by changes in the food web, as a result of, for example, overfishing, climate change, alien species, hunting of seals and seabirds and eutrophication, as well as by the exploitation of spawning and nursery areas. In addition, hazardous substances can lead to damage and diseases in the fish community.
The monitoring of by-catch, recreational fishing and commercial fishing provides a basis for direct impact. At the same time, other human activities and pressures that may affect fish, such as physical disturbance and inputs of pollutants, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries. |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Gaps and plans |
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Bisher ist das Monitoring von nicht-kommerziell genutzten Fischen nur teilweise vorhanden. Lücken bestehen bei seltenen, großen und weitwanderden Arten sowie kleinen Küstenfischarten, die nicht mit auf Surveys eingesetzten Fanggeräten gefangen werden können. Eine Schließung der Lücken wird derzeit auf Projektbasis angegangen.
Das Portfolio von nicht kommerziell genutzten Fischarten, die gezielt erfasst werden z.B. mit spezifischen Monitoringprogrammen, sollte fortlaufend erweitert und neue Bewertungen in die nationale MSRL-Bewertung übernommen werden.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
The monitoring and assessment system for protected fish species under Habitats Directive needs further development: there are populations of Cobitis taenia, Cobitis taneria, Cottus gobio, Lampetra fluviatilis, Coregonus lavaretus represented in the Estonian sea area in the context of criterion D1C4, critically endangered Anguilla anguilla population status also needs to be monitored. But there is no regular monitoring held in marine waters on these species (monitored in rivers) and appropriate indicators need to be developed.
The protected areas monitoring programme needs to be developed and include birds, mammals, fish, benthos, and habitats, as well as pelagic communities' components. |
The monitoring and assessment system for protected fish species under Habitats Directive needs further development: there are populations of Cobitis taenia, Cobitis taneria, Cottus gobio, Lampetra fluviatilis, Coregonus lavaretus represented in the Estonian sea area in the context of criterion D1C4, critically endangered Anguilla anguilla population status also needs to be monitored. But there is no regular monitoring held in marine waters on these species (monitored in rivers) and appropriate indicators need to be developed.
The protected areas monitoring programme needs to be developed and include birds, mammals, fish, benthos, and habitats, as well as pelagic communities' components. |
The monitoring and assessment system for protected fish species under Habitats Directive needs further development: there are populations of Cobitis taenia, Cobitis taneria, Cottus gobio, Lampetra fluviatilis, Coregonus lavaretus represented in the Estonian sea area in the context of criterion D1C4, critically endangered Anguilla anguilla population status also needs to be monitored. But there is no regular monitoring held in marine waters on these species (monitored in rivers) and appropriate indicators need to be developed.
The protected areas monitoring programme needs to be developed and include birds, mammals, fish, benthos, and habitats, as well as pelagic communities' components. |
No gaps.
|
No gaps.
|
No gaps.
|
No gaps.
|
No gaps.
|
Kai kurios jūrinės žuvų rūšys, kaip pvz., menkė, Baltijos priekrantėje pasirodo tik šaltuoju metų laiku. Todėl siekiant įvertinti tipiškas jūrines žuvų rūšis, žuvų monitoringas 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo 2020 metais atnaujintoje programoje numatytas du kartus per metus – šiltuoju ir šaltuoju metų laiku.
|
Kai kurios jūrinės žuvų rūšys, kaip pvz., menkė, Baltijos priekrantėje pasirodo tik šaltuoju metų laiku. Todėl siekiant įvertinti tipiškas jūrines žuvų rūšis, žuvų monitoringas 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo 2020 metais atnaujintoje programoje numatytas du kartus per metus – šiltuoju ir šaltuoju metų laiku.
|
None
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Monitoring enable assessment of all primary criterias, however the spatial resolution should be improved in some basins. By using data on activities and pressures the aim is to combine these data together with data on fish to be able to assess D1C5.
Coastal fish – Gaps for D1C2 were identified in the IA 2018 in some basins, but have since been improved. A revision of the programme has been carried out to improve data used for status assessment. More data on certain species like pike, vendace and grayling are needed to improve the confidence.
Offshore fish - BITS and IBTS are being developed within ICES, especially to provide data on fish on an ecosystem level. In the monitoring of commercial fisheries there´s a common aim to intensify and deepen the cooperation between countries using regional plans. Methods are developed in ICES WGCATCH, and coordination of data management in RCG Baltic, RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic.
Migratory fish – The number of salmon monitoring locations is evaluated continously due to habitat restorations and removing migration barriers. Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate.
Health status - After reports of sick fish with leisures in Hanöbukten the Swedish gouvernment appointed SwAM to investigate this further and to find the causes. Monitoring of flounder started in 2016 and was later included in the programme. To add more wild fish species, crayfish and molluscs new monitoring started in 2020.
Recreational fishing – A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects. These are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where human observers are used, but where numbers are too low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are therefore being tested as a complement to the observers. |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
|
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALDE_MPr_113_MP_077 |
BALDE_MPr_113_MP_078 |
BALDE_MPr_113_MP_079 |
BALDE_MPr_113_MP_082 |
BALDE_MPr_113_MP_084 |
BALDE_MPr_113_MP_089 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_077 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_079 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_082 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_083 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_085 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_089 |
DK-D01.4-01 |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALFI-D01,04,06fis-1 |
BALFI-D01,04,06fis-2 |
BALFI-D01,04,06fis-3 |
BALFI-D03-1 |
BALFI-D03-2 |
BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal |
BALLT-D01234_FishMigratory |
LV-4.1.1.2.3. (D1C2) |
PL-D01-01 |
PL-D1.3-01 |
PL-D1.3-02 |
PL-D1.3-02 |
PL-D1.3-03 |
PL-D1.3-03 |
PL-D1.3-04 |
SE-D1D2D7-outfalls |
SE-D1D3-bycatch |
SE-D1D3-comfishing |
SE-D1D3-eel |
SE-D1D3-recreationalfishing |
SE-D1D3-salmon |
SE-D1D3D4-coastalfish |
SE-D1D3D4-offshorefish |
SE-D1D8-fishhealth |
Programme name |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS), Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Boxenmonitoring westliche Ostsee (BaltBox) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Hydroakustische Bestandsaufnahme pelagischer Fischarten in der westlichen Ostsee (German Autumn Acoustic Survey, GERAS) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Hydroakustik-Survey GerBASS, Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Monitoring Pommersche Bucht, Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Effizienzkontrolle Meerforellenbesatz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS), Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Hydroakustische Bestandsaufnahme pelagischer Fischarten in der westlichen Ostsee (German Autumn Acoustic Survey, GERAS) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Hydroakustik-Survey GerBASS, Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Rügen Heringslarvensurvey |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Reproduktion von Dorsch in der Ostsee (CoBalt) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Effizienzkontrolle Meerforellenbesatz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern |
Pelagic habitats – community characteristics |
Marine and coastal activities |
Coastal fish |
Off-shore fish |
River-spawning White Fish populations |
Sea trout |
Coastal fish gillnet survey |
Fisheries data collection |
Commercial fisheries catch statistics |
BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal |
BALLT-D01234_FishMigratory |
Mobile species distribution, abundance and/or biomass (coastal fish species) |
Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from incidental by-catch from fisheries |
Mobile species - fish of the deep-water zone |
Mobile species – fish of transitional waters |
Mobile species – fish of transitional waters |
Mobile species – coastal fish |
Mobile species – coastal fish |
Mobile species – shallow water fish |
Effects of outfalls from power stations |
Bycatch |
Commercial fisheries |
Migratory fish (eel) |
Recreational fisheries |
Migratory fish (salmon) |
Coastal fish |
Offshore fish |
Fish health status |
Update type |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Programme no longer in place |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_77 || Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS), Ostsee || Die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen wird seit Jahrzehnten im Rahmen von Fischereiforschungsreisen (Surveys) erfasst. In den deutschen Fischereiforschungs-Surveys kommen neben hydroakustischen Methoden Schleppnetze zum Einsatz, die in kurzen Hols auf einem standardisierten geographischen Beprobungsplan die Fischgemeinschaft eines Meeresgebietes erfassen. Viele Fischereiforschungs-Surveys werden international koordiniert und unter der Beteiligung mehrerer Mitgliedsländer durchgeführt. Um die Zeitserien über die Jahrzehnte und zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern vergleichbar zu machen, werden die Surveys mit den gleichen Methoden durchgeführt. Dementsprechend sind Modernisierungen und Anpassungen sehr behutsam vorzunehmen und eine grundsätzliche Änderung der Beprobungsmethodik ist nicht vorgesehen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_78 || Boxenmonitoring westliche Ostsee (BaltBox) || Die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen wird seit Jahrzehnten im Rahmen von Fischereiforschungsreisen (Surveys) erfasst. In den deutschen Fischereiforschungs-Surveys kommen neben hydroakustischen Methoden Schleppnetze zum Einsatz, die in kurzen Hols auf einem standardisierten geographischen Beprobungsplan die Fischgemeinschaft eines Meeresgebietes erfassen. Viele Fischereiforschungs-Surveys werden international koordiniert und unter der Beteiligung mehrerer Mitgliedsländer durchgeführt. Um die Zeitserien über die Jahrzehnte und zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern vergleichbar zu machen, werden die Surveys mit den gleichen Methoden durchgeführt. Dementsprechend sind Modernisierungen und Anpassungen sehr behutsam vorzunehmen und eine grundsätzliche Änderung der Beprobungsmethodik ist nicht vorgesehen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_79 || Hydroakustische Bestandsaufnahme pelagischer Fischarten in der westlichen Ostsee (German Autumn Acoustic Survey, GERAS) || Die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen wird seit Jahrzehnten im Rahmen von Fischereiforschungsreisen (Surveys) erfasst. In den deutschen Fischereiforschungs-Surveys kommen neben hydroakustischen Methoden Schleppnetze zum Einsatz, die in kurzen Hols auf einem standardisierten geographischen Beprobungsplan die Fischgemeinschaft eines Meeresgebietes erfassen. Viele Fischereiforschungs-Surveys werden international koordiniert und unter der Beteiligung mehrerer Mitgliedsländer durchgeführt. Um die Zeitserien über die Jahrzehnte und zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern vergleichbar zu machen, werden die Surveys mit den gleichen Methoden durchgeführt. Dementsprechend sind Modernisierungen und Anpassungen sehr behutsam vorzunehmen und eine grundsätzliche Änderung der Beprobungsmethodik ist nicht vorgesehen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_82 || Hydroakustik-Survey GerBASS, Ostsee || Die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen wird seit Jahrzehnten im Rahmen von Fischereiforschungsreisen (Surveys) erfasst. In den deutschen Fischereiforschungs-Surveys kommen neben hydroakustischen Methoden Schleppnetze zum Einsatz, die in kurzen Hols auf einem standardisierten geographischen Beprobungsplan die Fischgemeinschaft eines Meeresgebietes erfassen. Viele Fischereiforschungs-Surveys werden international koordiniert und unter der Beteiligung mehrerer Mitgliedsländer durchgeführt. Um die Zeitserien über die Jahrzehnte und zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern vergleichbar zu machen, werden die Surveys mit den gleichen Methoden durchgeführt. Dementsprechend sind Modernisierungen und Anpassungen sehr behutsam vorzunehmen und eine grundsätzliche Änderung der Beprobungsmethodik ist nicht vorgesehen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_84 || Monitoring Pommersche Bucht, Ostsee || Die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen wird seit Jahrzehnten im Rahmen von Fischereiforschungsreisen (Surveys) erfasst. In den deutschen Fischereiforschungs-Surveys kommen neben hydroakustischen Methoden Schleppnetze zum Einsatz, die in kurzen Hols auf einem standardisierten geographischen Beprobungsplan die Fischgemeinschaft eines Meeresgebietes erfassen. Viele Fischereiforschungs-Surveys werden international koordiniert und unter der Beteiligung mehrerer Mitgliedsländer durchgeführt. Um die Zeitserien über die Jahrzehnte und zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern vergleichbar zu machen, werden die Surveys mit den gleichen Methoden durchgeführt. Dementsprechend sind Modernisierungen und Anpassungen sehr behutsam vorzunehmen und eine grundsätzliche Änderung der Beprobungsmethodik ist nicht vorgesehen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_89 || Effizienzkontrolle Meerforellenbesatz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern || Die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen wird seit Jahrzehnten im Rahmen von Fischereiforschungsreisen (Surveys) erfasst. In den deutschen Fischereiforschungs-Surveys kommen neben hydroakustischen Methoden Schleppnetze zum Einsatz, die in kurzen Hols auf einem standardisierten geographischen Beprobungsplan die Fischgemeinschaft eines Meeresgebietes erfassen. Viele Fischereiforschungs-Surveys werden international koordiniert und unter der Beteiligung mehrerer Mitgliedsländer durchgeführt. Um die Zeitserien über die Jahrzehnte und zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern vergleichbar zu machen, werden die Surveys mit den gleichen Methoden durchgeführt. Dementsprechend sind Modernisierungen und Anpassungen sehr behutsam vorzunehmen und eine grundsätzliche Änderung der Beprobungsmethodik ist nicht vorgesehen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_77 || Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS), Ostsee || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_79 || Hydroakustische Bestandsaufnahme pelagischer Fischarten in der westlichen Ostsee (German Autumn Acoustic Survey, GERAS) || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_82 || Hydroakustik-Survey GerBASS, Ostsee || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_83 || Rügen Heringslarvensurvey || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_85 || Reproduktion von Dorsch in der Ostsee (CoBalt) || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_89 || Effizienzkontrolle Meerforellenbesatz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Overvågning af fyto- og zooplankton omfatter bestemmelser af artssammensætning og kulstofbio-masse. Fytoplanktonets produktion og vækst overvåges ved målinger af primærproduktionen.
Overvågning af plankton og primærproduktion er beskrevet her under D1 – Biodiversitet, pelagiske habitater. Overvågningsaktiviteterne har også relation til D4 – Havets fødenet og D5 – Eutrofiering.
|
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The sub-programme monitors in the sea the structure of the river-spawning White Fish populations, which migrate to spawn in the rivers of the Bothnian Bay. The only significant river spawning White Fish populations occur in the Bothnian Bay. |
Sea trout parr surveys (electrofishing) at index rivers. Stock assessments exist for overall trends for sea trout, determined using various methods of interpolating monitoring trends. Stock
assessments integrate time series trends and biological information. |
The sub-programme monitors the fisheries in archipelagos, mainly freshwater species, through net fisheries. The primary objective is to monitor changes in the abundance of perch and cherries.
The effectiveness and usefulness of the method shall be assessed. Explore the possibility of producing further monitoring data on insular fisheries using other alternative or parallel methods.
|
The sub-programme provides information on fisheries in EU countries. Data on the fish stock is collected by means of fishing samples and sonars. The aim is to provide information, inter alia, on scientific analysis and advice in support of the Common Fisheries Policy.
|
The sub-programme monitors catches by commercial fishermen and by-catches of birds and mammals. Monitoring shall be based on periodic catch reports from commercial fishermen to the authorities.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D01234_FishCoastal apima ichtiofaunos rūšinės sudėties, žuvų rūšių gausumo ir biomasės, žuvų amžinės ir dydžių struktūros tyrimus Baltijos jūros tyrimų rajonuose BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02. Ichtiofaunos monitoringas Baltijos jūros priekrantėje vykdomas 7 vietose, 1 kartą per metus kasmet (šiltuoju metų laiku). 4 tyrimų vietos išdėstytos žemyninėje ir Kuršių Nerijos priekrantės dalyse; 3 – Kuršių marių vandenų išplitimo Baltijos jūroje zonoje. 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programos 2020 metų pakeitime tyrimai numatyti dažnesni –
du kartus per metus (šiltuoju ir šaltuoju metų laiku). Baltijos jūros priekrantės žuvų bendrijų monitoringas taip pat vykdomas Duomenų rinkimo programos rėmuose, žuvų išteklių vertinimo tikslais.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-AA-01 rajono bioįvairovei pagal D1, mitybos tinklams pagal D4 vertinti.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D1/D4 rodikliai: žuvų bendrijos dydžio ir žuvų bendrijos gausumo indeksas; D1 rodikliai: žuvų bendrijos įvairovės, žuvų bendrijos trofinis indeksai, plekšnių gausumas; D4 rodiklis - mezo-plėšrių žuvų gausumas.
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje ir Gamtos tyrimų centre http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/. Duomenų rinkimo programos rėmuose surinkti duomenys kaupiami Klaipėdos universiteto Jūros tyrimų institute (http://apc.ku.lt/en/). Teikiami HELCOM, ICES.
|
Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D01234_FishMigratory apima migruojančių žuvų rūšių Salmo salar ir Salmo trutta trutta reproduktorių ir rituolių gausumo ir biomasės tyrimus.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono bioįvairovei pagal D1 vertinti pagal rodiklius: 1) Lašišų (Salmo salar) reproduktorių ir rituolių gausumas; 2) Šlakių (Salmo trutta trutta) reproduktorių ir rituolių gausumas.
Duomenys teikiami ICES.
|
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components biodiversity by observing current state and changes in coastal fish community resulting from impact of eutrophication, habitat changes, climate change, exposure to toxic substances, presence of non-indigenous species and human activities e.g. fishing.
The monitoring of fish and shellfish cover the abundance, distribution, growth, population dynamics and exploitation of fish in the HELCOM area. Much of the programme is carried out under the auspices of ICES.
Monitoring is carried out by national monitoring programmes and data are collated through HELCOM. HELCOM monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
HELCOM monitoring programme topic "Fish, Fisheries and Shellfish; programme "Coastal fish" with key indicator Abundance of key fish species.
Core indicators are calculated according to the HELCOM core indicator report: which is available: https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Abundance-of-key-coastal-fish-species-HELCOM-core-indicator-2018.pdf.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Corresponding legislative acts of the Republic of Latvia concerning fisheries:
Fishery Law (adopted 12.04.1995.) and
Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 296, adopted 2 May 2007 Regulations Regarding Commercial Fishing in Territorial Waters and Economic Zone Waters. |
The monitoring of incidental catches of cetaceans results from the implementation of EU regulations - the Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1224/2009 and Regulations (EU) No 1380/2013, (EU) 2016/1139, (EU) 2018/973, (EU) 2019/472 and (EU) 2019/1022 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 894/97, (EC) No 850/98, (EC) No 2549/2000, (EC) No 254/2002, (EC) No 812/2004 and (EC) No 2187/2005, hereinafter reffered to as “Regulation 2019/1241”. Until 2019, the monitoring of by-catch was carried out from the fishing vessels in Polish Marine Areas in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 812/2004 of 26.4.2004 laying down measures concerning incidental catches of cetaceans in fisheries and amending Regulation (EC) No 88/98 (OJ L 150, 30.04.2004, p.12 as amended), hereinafter reffered to as “Regulation 812/2004”.
Monitoring of incidental catches has been carried out in Poland since 2006. The work will be carried out by the MIR-PIB under the National Programme for Collection of Fisheries Data (NPCFD). This programme will consist a continuation of the Monitoring Programme of Incidental Catches of Cetaceans performed since 2015 as part of the National Programme for Collection of Fisheries Data. By 2019, incidental catches of birds, fish and cetaceans based on data from NPCFD were reported to ICES by the Minister competent for fisheries.
Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 unlike Regulation (EU) 812/2004, does not specify the form and procedure of reporting on incidental catches to the European Commission. Reporting obligation will lie with scientific institutes and will take place under the so-called ICES Data calls in accordance with the Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 (OJ L 157, 20.6.2017, p. 1) that specifies the acces to multiannual progamms data. According to the abovementioned regulation since 2020 the entity authorized to report on accidental catches should be the entity conducting fisheries monitoring programmes within |
The ichthyological monitoring of the Polish Exclusive Economic Zone in the deepwater zone of Polish marine area has been carried out as a part of national environmental monitoring since 2011, based on data from BITS (Baltic International Trawl Surveys). BITS consist of cruises of particular Baltic countries being temporally and spatially coordinated by ICES. BITS methodology establishes use of standarized bottom trawl of the same design for scientific catches and use of the same research method for hauling sites sampling, data collection and uploading of collected data to the ICES common database - DATRAS, supplemented with measurement and ichthyological analysis of all fish species (including non-commercial). |
Monitoring in transitional waterbodies is carried out once every 3 years, except for Puck Lagoon, Vistula Lagoon and Puck Bay, where monitoring is conducted annually. Fish monitoring in transitional waterbodies includes an analysis of the following elements:
• determination of weight and abundance of all fish species present in the catch;
• ichthyological analysis of a representative sample of all fish species present in the catch, taking into account their length, individual weight, sex, gonad maturity stage, stomach degree fullness and age of individual fish.
The monitoring also includes the analysis of physico-chemical water parameters necessary for assessing the ecological status of transitional waters. |
Monitoring in transitional waterbodies is carried out once every 3 years, except for Puck Lagoon, Vistula Lagoon and Puck Bay, where monitoring is conducted annually. Fish monitoring in transitional waterbodies includes an analysis of the following elements:
• determination of weight and abundance of all fish species present in the catch;
• ichthyological analysis of a representative sample of all fish species present in the catch, taking into account their length, individual weight, sex, gonad maturity stage, stomach degree fullness and age of individual fish.
The monitoring also includes the analysis of physico-chemical water parameters necessary for assessing the ecological status of transitional waters. |
Fish monitoring in coastal waterbodies includes an analysis of the following elements:
• determination of weight and abundance of all fish species present in the catch;
• ichthyological analysis of a representative sample of all fish species present in the catch, taking into account their length, individual weight, sex, gonad maturity stage, stomach degree fullness and age of individual fish.
The monitoring also includes the analysis of physico-chemical water parameters necessary for assessing the ecological status of coastal waters. |
Fish monitoring in coastal waterbodies includes an analysis of the following elements:
• determination of weight and abundance of all fish species present in the catch;
• ichthyological analysis of a representative sample of all fish species present in the catch, taking into account their length, individual weight, sex, gonad maturity stage, stomach degree fullness and age of individual fish.
The monitoring also includes the analysis of physico-chemical water parameters necessary for assessing the ecological status of coastal waters. |
Fish monitoring in offshore shallow water areas includes an analysis of the following elements:
• determination of weight and abundance of all fish species present in the catch;
• ichthyological analysis of a representative sample of all fish species present in the catch, taking into account their length, individual weight, sex, gonad maturity stage, stomach degree fullness and age of individual fish.
The monitoring also includes the analysis of physico-chemical water parameters. |
A nuclear power plant affects the marine environment mainly through the use of large volumes of seawater for cooling. The cooling water is purified at the intake, which to some extent reduces the loss of organisms that would otherwise accompany the intake, but for those who follow, mortality occurs mechanically and thermally when the water passes through the power plant. The outgoing cooling water is 10° C warmer than the water taken in. The hot water is then spread over relatively large areas, where the organisms can be affected. The warm water can also make it easier for non-indigenous species to get established than in other areas.
To control the effects of cooling water use, extensive control programmes have been established at and around the Swedish nuclear power plants since the nuclear power plants were established. In Sweden, there are nuclear power plants at one site in the North Sea (Ringhals nuclear power plant) and two in the Baltic Sea (Forsmark nuclear power plant and Oskarshamnsverket). Electricity production at the power plant in Barsebäck by the Sound ceased in 2005.
Monitoring in the North sea started in 1968 and in the Baltic sea in 1969. Monitoring frequency varies from daily during spring/summer, to monthly or yearly depending on the parameter, location and purpose. Details are described in the monitoring fact sheet linked below.
The nuclear power plants are undergoing a slow decommissioning, for example at Ringhals, two out of four reactors are planned to be shut down in the near future. As the monitoring is connected to the industry, it will also in the long run be phased out after the activity has ended and the effects have ceased. |
In the regular sampling carried out on board commercial fishing vessels in accordance with EU data collection regulations ((EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2016/1251), as well as the regulation on the conservation of fishery resources and the protection of marine ecosystems (EU ) 2019/1241, information regarding by-catch is obtained. All fish species, commercial shellfish, mammals and birds are noted. Sampling takes place mainly on vessels fishing with various bottom trawls.
Data collection carried out according to the EU data collection regulations is coordinated internationally between Member States in regional data collection coordination groups. Sweden participates in two such groups RCG Baltic and RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic (to which the Skagerrak and Kattegat belong). Furthermore, a lot of international coordination and development work is done within ICES´s various expert groups (for by-catches mainly WGBYC). Sweden participates actively in these groups.
Pilot studies were carried out in 2017-2019 with the aim of conducting by-catch sampling in 2020 in fisheries that use passive gear (nets and hooks).
The purpose is to increase knowledge about by-catches in these fisheries, to test whether it is possible to estimate by-catches by having observers on board fishing boats, and if this is an effective method.
Sampling of nets in the Sound and in the Kattegat will be included in the regular sampling from 2020. However, no ongoing monitoring of passive gear is currently planned in the Baltic Proper as previous pilots observed fewer by-catches there. So based on risk, monitoring in the Sound and Kattegatt are therefore prioritized. The Skagerrak could possibly be added after the pilot study there is completed in 2021.
The pilot studies have shown that it also works to monitor the fish with passive gear with the help of observers (the challenge is that the vessels are small). However, the question remains whether this is the most effective way of estimating the total amount of by-catches in the fisheries. The problem is that observers can only cover a small part of the total fishing effort and that by-catches of many species (such as harbour porpoises and various birds) are relatively uncommon. This means that there will be few observations and thus uncertainty in the estimates of the total amount of by-catches. In 2020, therefore, a new pilot project was initiated where surveillance with the help of cameras is tested and compared with surveillance with the help |
Commercial fishing in this case refers to the commercial fishing that requires a fishing license and has an obligation to report its fishing activity. The obligation to report their catches and fishing activities is governed by both EU legislation and Swedish legislation. This information is used for the national quota allocation for fish stocks and as a basis for the biological stock estimate (see also programmes Offshore fish and coastal fish).
Economic statistics are collected to monitor economic drivers in the fisheries sector. The statistics are collected to meet the requirements from the EU via Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 and implementing decisions (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910. In addition to this reporting, statistics are used within the Swedish Fisheries Administration.
In addition to the pressure in the form of extracting fish, the monitoring of other parts of the fishing activities' impact is described in the programmes Physical disturbance and loss (bottom trawling) and in By-catch. |
Eels are monitored along the West Coast and the Baltic Sea. Eels along the Swedish coast are found in three life stages, which are glass eels, yellow eels and silver eels. The monitoring aims to provide a knowledge base for the management of eels. On the West Coast, eels are monitored through fisheries-independent sampling because eel fishing on the West Coast, north of Torekov, is not permitted. In the Baltic Sea, eels are monitored by sampling in commercial fishing. Most studies regarding migratory young eels are done in traps that catch very small yellow eels on migration in running water, in two studies migratory silver eels are caught. The programme describes the composition with respect to age and size at all stages of life. In addition, marking/tagging is done with the aim of estimating the proportion that is caught in commercial fishing, at the same time as an estimate is made of the size of the coastal stock.
This monitoring programme applies to eels in the sea. Eels are also caught in freshwater to monitor the impact of, among other things, fishing and hydropower. This monitoring is not described here.
Sweden's monitoring is coordinated with other countries that carry out monitoring of eels, by Sweden reporting every three years to ICES, who compiles an overview based on the countries' reporting to an overview analysis that covers the entire eel range (Europe, North Africa and West Asia). Monitoring data from Sweden and other countries are used here, to examine weighted trends in the occurrence of eels, the nature of eels, threats to eels and recommendations for a better knowledge base. Ices also issues annual scientific advice on the eel.
Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate. |
Recreational fishing in Sweden is defined as all fishing that does not take place with the support of a commercial fishing license. Recreational fishing includes both fishing with hand gear (eg rod) and catching gear (eg nets).
Recreational fishing in Sweden is extensive and therefore good knowledge is needed about the practitioners, where to fish and what is caught. As part of the work to understand and describe the scope and impact, statistics on recreational fishing have been collected since the 1970s to form the basis for decisions within the administration. The first survey was part of the 1973 fishing water investigation, which was also followed up during the 1990s. In 2011, the SwAM became the coordinating agency for official statistics in the area of fishing and was thus given the responsibility to annually collect statistics regarding the extent of recreational fishing in Sweden. This collection takes place via a national survey that started in 2013 and is progressing in roughly the same direction and design today.
In addition to the national survey, several fishing sites are visited on a regular basis since 2012. Data collection is carried out annually in the Sound and the southern Baltic Sea in accordance with EU regulations ((EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910). The data collection aims to cover the fishing for cod and by-catches in this fishery (see programme Bycatch).
Monitoring frequency is three times per year (4-monthly).
A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
An ongoing project initiated by Sportfiskarna is about developing an application – FångstDatabanken (Citizen science) for catch reporting. SwAM has since the start in 2012 been part of their reference and development group.
Data collection carried out under the EU Data Collection Regulation is coordinated internationally between Member States in regional data collection coordination groups. Sweden participates in two such groups, RCG Baltic and RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic (to which the Skagerrak and Kattegat belong). Furthermore, a lot of international coordination and development work is done within ICES 'various expert groups (for recreational fishing, especially WGRFS). Sweden participates actively in these g |
The monitoring includes the collection of biological data for wild salmon stocks (salmon rivers) as well as statistics for releases and fishing for both wild and farmed salmon. The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor the status and development of wild salmon stocks and to investigate the effects of fishing and hydropower. The purpose of the biological advice is to contribute to the overall goals for salmon management being met both nationally and internationally. These goals are to protect and rebuild weak wild salmon stocks so that they can gradually reach the management goal of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY).
Sweden's monitoring is coordinated with similar work in other countries, through guidelines and agreements developed within ICES, the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO), the Regional Coordination Groups (EU RCG) and HELCOM. Sweden actively participates in the regional coordination. |
Coastal fish refer to the fish species that live a significant part of their lives in the coastal ecosystem, such as flounder (Platichthys flesus), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and eelpout (Zoarces viviparus). Coastal fish monitoring (trawls, nets, hydroacoustics) aims to describe changes in the fishing community as a whole, in terms of species composition, relative occurrence of different species and size structure. In addition, changes at species level are followed up by analyzing changes in the number and size structure of the most common species in the catch. In some surveys, individual sampling of selected species is performed. The individual sampling aims to provide information about, for example, individual weight and condition, and provides material for further analysis of, for example, age and fish health.
The state of coastal fish reflects the coastal ecosystem and the impact of small-scale coastal fishing and recreational fishing (see programmes Commercial fisheries and Recreational fisheries). Long-term changes in the abundance of different functional groups of coastal fish can also be affected by eutrophication, deteriorating habitats and changes in predation. The latter may be due to imbalance in the food web due to human impact such as fishing and loss of important habitats.
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started in 1960 while in the North Sea it started in 1969.
Abramis bjoerkna, Arnoglossus laterna, Callionymus lyra, Chelidonichthys gurnardus, Myoxocephalus scorpius and Trachinus draco are also monitored but they were not included in the element lists for Coastal fish nor Commercial fish |
Offshore fish refers to those fish species that live a significant part of their lives in the open sea off the coast, such as herring, sprat and cod. The monitoring of these species and also commercial crustaceans such as crabfish, North Sea shrimp and lobster is coordinated between several countries in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea area, and takes place via acoustic methods and trawl surveys. Data are also collected by sampling on board commercial fishing boats and catches in ports.
Several of the species monitored are used in commercial fishing (see programme Commercial fisheries) and all surveys described here are carried out within the framework of the data collection on fish and fisheries governed by EU legislation ((EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019 / 909 and (EU) 2019/910). The data collection forms the basis for the scientific basis for the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the information is used in the work of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to produce a basis for the fishing quotas decided by the EU. Data collection is also done for bycatches in the fishery, see programme Bycatch.
Trawling of demersal fish in the North Sea (IBTS) started 1972
Trawling of demersal fish in the Baltic Sea (BITS) started 1978
Acoustic survey of pelagic fish (BIAS) started 1978 (Baltic Sea only)
Sampling on board commercial fishing boats in the Baltic Sea and Kattegat stareted 1996
Sampling on board commercial fishing boats in the Skagerrak started 2002
Sampling of commercial catches in ports: different starting years for different species
Frequency: Trawl surveys are carried out 6-monthly and control of fisheries 3-monthly. |
Monitoring, where biological effects are studied at both subcellular and cellular levels, can be used to describe the general state of health of different organisms and provides an opportunity to demonstrate the toxicity of unknown and known substances in a study area. The national monitoring of the health status of coastal fish aims to use proven and sensitive methods to demonstrate the presence and effects in fish of a possible large-scale impact of hazardous substances in coastal reference areas in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea.
The aim of the monitoring is to be able to describe the current state of the environment in coastal reference areas regarding effects of mainly hazardous substances on the state of fish health by following time trends of biochemical, physiological, histological and pathological effect variables in fish. The surveys shall also provide reference data for surveys on fish in regionally and locally affected areas and provide a basis for monitoring environmental quality objectives, regional environmental objectives and the effects of measures taken to reduce chemical emissions.
The national monitoring of fish health began with surveys of perch in 1988 in the Baltic Sea and in 1989 the programme was expanded with eelpout from the North Sea.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Common monitoring strategy |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
|||||||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
|| MP_77 || Deutschland nimmt seit 1991 mit FFS Solea zweimal jährlich teil und beprobt die westliche Ostsee mit ungefähr 120 Stationen jährlich (2 mal 20 Tage Reisedauer). Dänemark, Schweden, Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Russland, Polen und Deutschland erheben fast zeitgleich auf ihren Schiffen Daten zur Häufigkeit sowie zu Länge, Gewicht, und ggfs. Geschlecht, Reife und Gesundheitszustand der Nutzfische.
|
|| MP_78 || Die Details können den Fahrtberichten entnommen werden.
|
|| MP_79 ||
|
|| MP_82 || Details zum Monitoring können im Manual nachgelesen werden.
|
|| MP_84 ||
|
|| MP_89 ||
|
|| MP_77 || Deutschland nimmt seit 1991 mit FFS Solea zweimal jährlich teil und beprobt die westliche Ostsee mit ungefähr 120 Stationen jährlich (2 mal 20 Tage Reisedauer). Dänemark, Schweden, Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Russland, Polen und Deutschland erheben fast zeitgleich auf ihren Schiffen Daten zur Häufigkeit sowie zu Länge, Gewicht, und ggfs. Geschlecht, Reife und Gesundheitszustand der Nutzfische.
|
|| MP_79 ||
|
|| MP_82 || Details zum Monitoring können im Manual nachgelesen werden.
|
|| MP_83 || Während der gesamten Laichzeit, also von Anfang März bis Ende Juni, werden 36 Stationen im Strelasund/Greifswalder Bodden in wöchentlichen Abständen beprobt. Die Heringslarven werden dabei quantitativ mit Plankton-Bongonetzen gefangen.
|
|| MP_85 || Mit einem Schleppnetz (TV3/520 & PSN 388) werden Fischereihols in verschiednen Tiefenstufen durchgeführt. Im Sommer liegt das Hauptuntersuchungsgebiet in der Bornholm See und im Arkona Becken.
|
|| MP_89 ||
|
Det forudsættes, at omfanget af det nuværende NOVANA 2017-21 program for plankton og primærproduktion i al væsentlighed bibeholdes. Det gælder aktiviteter målrettet havstrategidirektivet, men derudover aktiviteter, der oprindelig er baseret på behov relateret vandrammedirektivet, men som også er indgået som en del af overvågningsgrundlaget for havstrategidirektivet.
Pt overvåges fytoplankton 20 gange årligt på 14 stationer i indre danske farvande (stationen ved Bornholm overvåges dog alene seks gange årligt). Fem af stationerne er beliggende udenfor 1-sømilsområdet. Stationerne har typisk lange tidsserier (op til 20-30 år). I den åbne del af Nordsøen overvåges 10 stationer en gang årligt, mens der i den kystnære del overvåges to stationer 20 gange årligt og Ringkøbing Fjord overvåges ligeledes 20 gange årligt. Meso- og mikrozooplankton overvåges 20 gange årligt på syv stationer i indre danske farvande, heraf er fire stationer beliggende udenfor 1-sømilsområdet. Stationerne har typisk lange tidsserier (op til 20-30 år). I den åbne Nordsø overvåges ti stationer en gang årligt, mens der kystnært overvåges en sta-tion 20 gange årligt.
Den geografiske dækning af planktonovervågningen i Kattegat er ikke fuldt tilstrækkelig. Planktonovervågningen i de indre danske farvande suppleres derfor med en ny intensiv (20 gange årligt) fyto- og zooplanktonstation i Kattegat. Det øger antallet af fytoplanktonstationer til 15, heraf seks i åbne dele af de indre danske farvande og antallet af zooplanktonstationer til otte, heraf fem i åbne dele.
Det vurderes, at den tidslige dækningsgrad af planktonovervågningen i Nordsøen er utilstrækkelig. Men overvågning med fuld sæsonvariation svarende til frekvensen i de indre danske farvande (20 gange), er af bl.a. ressourcemæssige årsager ikke mulig i Nordsøen. Derfor vil planktonovervågningen af de nuværende 10 stationer i den åbne del af Nordsøen udvides fra 1 til 2 gange årligt, dvs. der på begge de nuværende Nordsø-togter foretages planktonovervågning (februar og august). Desuden vil den geografiske, og primært tidsmæssige, dækning i Nordsøen forbedres, ved at der overvåges for plankton 20 gange årligt på en kystnær Nordsøstation.
Hertil kommer, at der i overvågningsperioden afsøges alternative muligheder for at øge den tidmæssige dækning af planktonovervågning i den danske del af Nordsøen, fx ved internationalt samarbejde, Fiskeristyrelsens skibe, i forbindelse med servicering af vindmøller og støjloggere etc.
|
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
Samples are taken from rivers.
|
Sea trout parr are caught by electrofishing, after which sea trouts are tagged and released. |
The exploratory fisheries shall take place in the period of July/August. The water is warm and the catch is mainly composed of freshwater species favouring warm water, most typically perch, mica and cherries.
https://helcom.fi/media/documents/Fish-Coastal-fish.pdf
|
Fishermensâ reporting to authorities.
|
Lašišų reproduktorių ir rituolių gausumo indikatorius įvertina dalies Baltijos jūros būklę atsižvelgiant į lašišų rituolių gausumą upėse, įtekančiose į jūrą.
|
Collecting of data is carried out within the framework of the Latvian National Fisheries and Aquaculture Data Collection Work Plan which is prepared in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/909 and Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/910.
Data are obtained by sampling according to the Guidelines for Coastal Fish Monitoring Sampling Methods of HELCOM in the coastal waters of Latvia (depth of 3.5 m) using the Nordic coastal type nets 45 metres long net constructions consisting of several panels with different mesh sizes.
Data are collected according to the BIOR Guidelines for coastal monitoring.
Monitoring is carried out annually in seven coastal areas of Gulf of Riga and Baltic sea in the period from February to December.
Key species perch (Perca fluviatilis) and flounder (Platichthys flesus).
Together with fishing measurements of water temperature, salinity, Secchi depth are performed. |
The catching of species listed in Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (Habitats Directive) and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (Birds Directive) is prohibited. Whereas species to be monitored under incidental by-catch are listed in table 1D of the Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1251 of 12 July 2016 adopting a multiannual Union programme for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors for the period 2017-2019 and Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/910 of 13 March 2019 establishing the multiannual Union programme for the collection and management of biological, environmental, technical and socioeconomic data in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors (OJ L 145, 4.6.2019, p. 27) prolonging the Commision Decision of 2016 and beeing in force for the period 2020-2021. The minimum conservation reference sizes for the Baltic Sea fish species are set out in Annex VIII to the Regulation 2019/1241.
In accordance with Annex XIII to the Regulation 2019/1241, defined mitigation measures minimizing incidental catches of protected species will be continued as for the repealed Regulation 812/2004. Other mitigation measures not listed in Annex XIII to the current Regulation shall be agreed at the regional level as a part of the regionalization process established on the basis of Common Fisheries Policy. Part A of the Annex applies to cetaceans, while part B to birds. In accordance with Regulation 2019/1241 monitoring of cetacean by-catch shall be established for fishing vessels with an overall length of 15 m or more fishing with bottom-set gillnets (GNS) and pelagic trawls (OTM). Observations on board of fishing vessels will be carried out by appropriately trained MIR-PIB staff that is familiar with the methodology for monitoring of incidental catches of cetaceans.
Observations of catches from midwater pair trawls, bottom trawls and hooks are not obligatory according to Regulation 2019/1241 but are included in the Multiannual Programme for Collection of Fisheries Data (DCF Poland). |
||||||||||||||||||
Surface-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benthic-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small toothed cetaceans |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic shelf fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Demersal shelf fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shelf ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of other forms of energy (including electromagnetic fields, light and heat) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newly introduced non-indigenous species |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Established non-indigenous species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydrographical changes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal defence and flood protection |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of water |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-renewable energy generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine plant harvesting |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunting and collecting for other purposes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport – shipping |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste treatment and disposal |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2)) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, survey and educational activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other pelagic habitats |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Species affected by incidental by-catch |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse effects on species or habitats |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
1981-9999 |
2003-9999 |
1978-9999 |
1999-9999 |
1991-2015 |
2002-9999 |
1981-9999 |
1978-9999 |
1999-9999 |
1977-9999 |
1992-9999 |
2002-9999 |
1986-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1990-9999 |
2002-9999 |
2002-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1992-9999 |
2000-9999 |
2021-2026 |
2006-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
1968-9999 |
1996-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1969-9999 |
1973-9999 |
2004-9999 |
1960-9999 |
1972-9999 |
1988-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
6-monthly |
3-yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
6-monthly |
6-monthly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Weekly |
Yearly |
6-monthly |
2-monthly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
6-monthly |
3-yearly |
3-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Other |
3-monthly |
Continually |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
|| MP_077 || |
|| MP_078 || |
|| MP_079 || |
|| MP_082 || |
|| MP_084 || |
|| MP_089 || Elektrobefischung, Parr-Habitat-Index, Trout-Habitat-Score |
|| MP_077 || |
|| MP_079 || |
|| MP_082 || |
|| MP_083 || Erfassung von Herings-Larven |
|| MP_085 || Fischerei-Standard-Hols mit einem Grundschleppnetz (TV 3/520) und pelagischen Schleppnetz (PSN 388). |
|| MP_089 || Elektrobefischung, Parr-Habitat-Index, Trout-Habitat-Score |
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M01_Indsamling_af_vand-_og_planktonproever_i_felten_ver1.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M09_Fytoplankton_ver4.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M10_Mikrozooplankton_ver2.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M11_Mesozooplankton_ver1.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/DT03PlanteplanktonDyreplanktonV2.pdf |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
ICES WGBFAS |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
Spawning Whitefish, migrating to rivers in September-October, are sampled from catches caught by local fishermen. Various fishing gear are used (e.g. net and fyke) to catch a few hundred individuals per river. The samplings take place 2-3 times during each spawning season. |
ICES. 2020. Baltic Salmon and Trout Assessment Working Group (WGBAST).
ICES Scientific Reports. 2:22. 261 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5974 |
Data collection and handling is coordinated in RCB Baltic group and ICES working groups WGBIFS and WGBAST |
Monitoring - https://stat.luke.fi/en/commercial-marine-fishery |
Method described in Monitoring programme, text-based paper report. |
ICES WGBFAS (Assessment WG), ICES WGBIFS (Survey WG)- https://datras.ices.dk/Documents/Manuals/Addendum_1_WGBIFS_BITS_Manual_2011.pdf - Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys |
For fisheries data collection: Latvian National Fisheries and Aquaculture Data Collection Programme (DCF) |
Monitoring under National Programme for Collection of Fisheries Data (NPCFD). |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl Podręcznik do monitoringu elementów biologicznych i klasyfikacji stanu ekologicznego wód powierzchniowych. Aktualizacja metod. (GIOŚ 2020) https://www.gios.gov.pl/images/dokumenty/pms/monitoring_wod/Podrecznik_Monitoringu_Wod.pdf |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/provfiske-i-ostersjons-kustomraden---djupstratifierat-provfiske-med-nordiska-kustoversiktsnat.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/provfiske-med-kustoversiktsnat-natlankar-och-ryssjor-pa-kustnara-grunt-vatten.html
https://www.slu.se/institutioner/akvatiska-resurser/miljoanalys/datainsamling/biologisk-recipientkontroll-vid-kusten/
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/vegetationskladda-bottnar-ostkust.html" |
Catches and by-catches are monitored with the help of observers who accompany the fishing vessels during commercial fishing. The regular sampling is divided into area, fisheries and quarters. This means that observations are made every quarter from different types of bottom trawls (shrimp trawl, crayfish trawl with grate, trawl without grate). Usually, in the order of 0.5-2% (different for different types of fisheries) of commercial fishing trips are observed. The fishing trips observed are selected at random. Observations of by-catch within the framework of the pilot studies are carried out in the same manner. The observers examine the entire process during which the fishing gear is hauled so that also by-catches that do not follow on board but fall out of the nets can be registered. Furthermore, the observers examine the entire sorting of the catch. The observers then measure and weigh the catch and take samples for biological analysis. Remote surveillance using cameras onboard is being tested during 2020, and may supplement the monitoring in the future. |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/fiske-och-handel/rapportering-och-e-tjanster/yrkesfiske/manualer-for-verksamma-inom-yrkesfisket.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/lagstiftning-direktiv-och-forordningar/lagstiftning-som-ror-yrkesfisket.html
" |
Several different methods are used in eel monitoring. In the North Sea, test fishing with eel traps place, similar to the method described in the method standard ”Provfiske med kustöversiktsnät, nätlänkar och ryssjor” on coastal shallow water. In the Baltic Sea, eels are collected through commercial fishing within the framework of DCF.
Sampling with stationary trawl takes place in the intake channel of cooling water to Ringhals nuclear power plant and catches glass eels. The method is described in the reports from the Biological recipient control at Ringhals nuclear power plant.
By tagging and then recapturing the tagged eel on the Baltic coast, a measure is obtained of how hard the fishing pressure is (ICES report WGEEL 2018). |
There is currently no method that captures all data in a cost-effective way. Therefore, it is important to choose the right method(s) to answer the questions asked. Data of interest may be of a biological or non-biological nature. Biological data include, for example, the number and sizes of fish caught. Non-biological data can be, for example, different measures of effort, characterization of practitioners and socio-economic aspects. The methods are described separately below, but a preferred data collection is in most cases a combination of the methods to provide a comprehensive knowledge base of the structure of the fishery, participants and their activity and catches, including re-released catches. Depending on which question or questions are to be answered, methods can be combined flexibly.
National survey
The survey uses a panel design with a stratified random sample. More information regarding the design of the survey is summarized in a quality declaration - https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.619e9cdf163fb20d0dd815a1/1529477995525/kvalitetsdeklaration-2017.pdf .
Site visiting studies
Site-visiting studies include, for example, inventories and interviews of recreational fishermen in port or during fishing. Inventories can be made by boat, in port or by plane. The pilot study in the Sound and the Southern Baltic Sea includes several different fishing methods. Therefore, the methodology differs depending on which fishing method is studied. Sampling takes place at random at all landing sites in the area (tour boats, charter boats, private boats and fishing from land) to describe the extent of recreational fishing, the number of fishermen and the amount of fish. More about this project is described here: https://www.slu.se/institutioner/akvatiska-resurser/miljoanalys/datainsamling/fritidsfiske/. More information about recreational fishing surveys, its methods and the overall work in Sweden can be read in SLU Aqua's Aqua reports - https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/inst/aqua/externwebb/sidan-publikationer/aqua-reports-xxxx_xx/aquarapporter/2018/aqua-reports-2018_22.pdf. |
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/fisk-i-rinnande-vatten---vadningselfiske.html |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/provfiske-i-ostersjons-kustomraden---djupstratifierat-provfiske-med-nordiska-kustoversiktsnat.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/provfiske-med-kustoversiktsnat-natlankar-och-ryssjor-pa-kustnara-grunt-vatten.html
Monitoring of vendace, which resides in the free water column are done with special sonar (vendace survey). These register the amount of fish on a predetermined distance. Trawl hauls are carried out at regular intervals to estimate the size composition. In addition to this, vendace is also sampled through on-board and harbor sampling in commercial fishing. This sampling is described in more detail in programmes Offshore fish and By-catch (for non-target species)." |
https://www.havochvatten.se/en/eu-and-international/international-cooperation/data-collection-framework-dcf/efforts-in-sweden.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/halsotillstand-hos-kustfisk.html |
||
Quality control |
|| MP_077 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_078 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_079 || Planung, Durchführung und Berechnung der Bestandindizes durch die ICES-Arbeitsgruppe ‚Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
|
|| MP_082 || Planung, Durchführung und Berechnung der Bestandindizes durch die ICES-Arbeitsgruppe ‚Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
|
|| MP_084 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_089 || Verwendung des Parr-Habitat-Index und des Trout-Habitat-Score.
|
|| MP_077 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_079 || Planung, Durchführung und Berechnung der Bestandindizes durch die ICES-Arbeitsgruppe ‚Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
|
|| MP_082 || Planung, Durchführung und Berechnung der Bestandindizes durch die ICES-Arbeitsgruppe ‚Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
|
|| MP_083 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_085 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_089 || Verwendung des Parr-Habitat-Index und des Trout-Habitat-Score.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
ICES WGBFAS
|
No specified quality control
|
Electric fishing complies with the EU Electrical Fishing Directive (SFS-EN 14011:2003. Water quality â Sampling with electricity/Quality of water/Electric fishing method)
|
No separate quality assurance methods.
|
Quality control incorporated to national monitoring |
Quality control - https://stat.luke.fi/en/commercial-marine-fishery |
Tyrimų paslaugos perkamos. Tyrimų kokybę siekiama užtikrinti keliant aukštus kvalifikacinius reikalavimus tyrėjams (darbo patirtis, leidimai tokiai veiklai, plačiai taikomų bendrų metodikų naudojimas). Ekspertai dalyvauja HELCOM FISH darbo grupės veikloje.
|
Tyrimų paslaugos perkamos. Tyrimų kokybę siekiama užtikrinti keliant aukštus kvalifikacinius reikalavimus tyrėjams (darbo patirtis, leidimai tokiai veiklai, plačiai taikomų bendrų metodikų naudojimas). Ekspertai dalyvauja HELCOM darbo grupių veikloje.
|
Description of QA/QC procedures - no
|
not relevant
|
Screening programme ICES DATRAS centre
|
NMFRI provides an internal multi-layer quality control of data collected during sampling e.g: cross-checking the catches protocols, database correctness, working scheme in accordance with agreed HELCOM methodology. |
NMFRI provides an internal multi-layer quality control of data collected during sampling e.g: cross-checking the catches protocols, database correctness, working scheme in accordance with agreed HELCOM methodology. |
NMFRI provides an internal multi-layer quality control of data collected during sampling e.g: cross-checking the catches protocols, database correctness, working scheme in accordance with agreed HELCOM methodology. |
NMFRI provides an internal multi-layer quality control of data collected during sampling e.g: cross-checking the catches protocols, database correctness, working scheme in accordance with agreed HELCOM methodology. |
NMFRI provides an internal multi-layer quality control of data collected during sampling e.g: cross-checking the catches protocols, database correctness, working scheme in accordance with agreed HELCOM methodology. |
https://internt.slu.se/stod-service/fortlopande-miljoanalys/verksamhetsstod/ingangssida/kvalitetsguide/
|
Sampling takes place through a random selection of ships/voyages. The observers bring with them a manual for determining the species of birds and also photograph captured birds as much as possible. Data is registered in the national database Fiskdata2 according to the updated manual. Data is examined and checked in several respects. Quality assurance includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers). |
Commercial fishing reporting is standardized. The information is validated and checked during physical and administrative control by SwAM and the Coast Guard. Physical inspections are carried out on site on the ships in port by SwAM and at sea by the Swedish Coast Guard. Quality assurance of the economic statistics is carried out according to proven methods and practices. |
The quality assurance is conducted by strictly following standardized methodology. Quality assurance takes place within the data hosting at SLU. Data is quality assured electronically via a sequence of routine questions and approved manually after a controller specially appointed for the purpose has approved the quality of the material. |
QC of the national survey is summarized in a quality declaration - https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.619e9cdf163fb20d0dd815a1/1529477995525/kvalitetsdeklaration-2017.pdf .
QC of the Site visiting studies is described in the final reports of each projects - https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/inst/aqua/externwebb/sidan-publikationer/aqua-reports-xxxx_xx/aquarapporter/2018/aqua-reports-2018_22.pdf.
The methods carried out on the basis of EU data collection regulations, including the pilot projects, are also evaluated by ICES working group WGRFS. |
Monitoring programmes are coordinated and developed in consultation with ICES Working Groups on Salmon in the Baltic Sea (WGBAST) and the Atlantic (WGNAS) and within the EU RCG. The programmes are evaluated by the European Commission's Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF).
In connection with the data being entered into the database, they undergo a quality check. The QC includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers).
Results from electric fishing are reported in digital field protocols that are quality assured in SLU's database Swedish Electricity Fishing Registers (SERS). Quality assurance of age determination (via scales) takes place through recurring international calibrations. |
The quality assurance is conducted by strictly following standardized methodology. Quality control takes place within the data hosting for coastal fish. Data is quality checked electronically via a sequence of routine questions and approved manually after a controller specially appointed for the purpose has approved the quality of the material.
See also Quality guide for SLU's environmental data management: https://internt.slu.se/globalassets/mw/foma/verksamhetsstod/miljodatastod/kvalitetsguidesdokument/kvalitetsguiden-version-2.4.pdf |
Monitoring programmes are reviewed within ICES groups (trawl surveys) and/or through evaluations by the European Commission's Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). Data is registered in the national database FISKDATA2 according to the updated manual. The quality assurance includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers). Data from trawl surveys are delivered to ICES database DATRAS. Before data is accepted into DATRAS, delivered data undergoes quality review. Quality assurance of age reading and determination of sexual maturity of fish takes place through annual calibrations. |
For monitoring the health condition of coastal fish, there is a quality declaration that includes the organization, division of responsibilities and quality routines for the monitoring activities. Capture, sampling procedures, analyzes (biochemical, physiological, histological and pathological measurement variables) and data management take place in a standardized manner and follow prepared method instructions. Most of the sampling routines and analysis methods included in the method standard ”Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk” are covered by accreditation by Swedac. |
Data management |
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die erhobenen Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei als auch auf dem ICES Server gespeichert. Die Daten können direkt auf der ICES Internetseite heruntergeladen werden.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei als auch beim ICES gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei als auch beim ICES gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten liegen im Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Lebensmittelsicherheit und Fischerei M-V intern vor und können auf Nachfrage angefordert werden.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die erhobenen Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei als auch auf dem ICES Server gespeichert. Die Daten können direkt auf der ICES Internetseite heruntergeladen werden.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei als auch beim ICES gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei als auch beim ICES gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten liegen im Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Lebensmittelsicherheit und Fischerei M-V intern vor und können auf Nachfrage angefordert werden.
|
I Miljøstyrelsen udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare alle de data som styrelsen er ansvarlige for at indsamle. Når databasen er færdigudviklet, vil data efter en kvalitetssikring blive udstillet, således at de er tilgængelige for offentligheden.
|
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data available by request from the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) |
E-fishing data are available in the Exploratory Fishing Register in the Environmental Administrationâs HERTTA system: Https://www.syke.fi/avointieto
The labelling materials can be found in the Luke Labelling Database (SAS database).
ICES WGBASTâ http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGBAST.aspx
|
Public web service on environmental information - https://www.syke.fi/avointieto |
National databases and submissions to ICES DATRAS and ICES Acoustic trawl surveys database. |
National database:http://www.ely-keskus.fi/web/ely/saalisseuranta.
Summary statisitcs:https://statdb.luke.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/fi/LUKE/LUKE__06%20Kala%20ja%20riista__02%20Rakenne%20ja%20tuotanto__02%20Kaupallinen%20kalastus%20merella/?tablelist=true&rxid=0266bbbe-b8bd-4491-bcf6-90622cf7ca35. |
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros (www.gamta.lt) duomenų bazėje ir Gamtos tyrimų centre http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/. Surinkti Duomenų rinkimo programos rėmuose kaupiami Klaipėdos universiteto Jūrų tyrimų institute http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą, Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Teikiami HELCOM.
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje, Gamtos tyrimų centre http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/, Klaipėdos universiteto Jūrų tyrimų institute http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Teikiami ICES.
|
Data holder is Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR" .
Data are available in BIOR and in HELCOM COOL. |
The raw data collected is stored in SLU Aqua's databases KUL (nets) and is updated annually. The results from the surveys are compiled annually in the Aqua reports by the Department of Aquatic Resources at SLU. Fish fry data and data on Non-indigenous species in Ringhals are stored in simpler databases (Excel and Access). All data is owned by the respective power company, which must give its approval for the data to be used in other contexts. For access to raw data, it is required for the time being to contact the Coastal Laboratory at SLU, which in turn must obtain approval from the data owner to disclose data. Inquiries about aggregated data can be made to datavard-fisk@slu.se |
On SwAM's website, you can freely search for available data on catch statistics for commercial fishing and daily fishing. Financial data are presented annually in the Annual Economic Reports. |
Electricity fishing data is stored and made publicly accessible via the Electricity Fisheries Register. Raw data from smolt traps are stored in ”Sötebasen” (database under construction at SLU Aqua). There is no national database for fish counters yet. Other information collected is stored in smaller databases at SLU Aqua, from which data can be obtained on request. Swedish data used internationally is delivered to relevant working groups within ICES. Aggregated data from commercial fishing for salmon are stored in ICES database InterCatch. |
The raw data collected is stored in SLU Aqua's databases KUL (nets and vendace) and Fiskdata2 (coastal trawling in the North Sea). Data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request to datavard-fisk@slu.se. Common international data is stored at ICES. |
||||||||||||
Data access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
kregn@mst.dk |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Data available by request from the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) - https://www.luke.fi/en/natural-resources/fish-and-the-fishing-industry/fish-resources/whitefish/ |
https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/HELCOM-CoreIndicator-Abundance_of_sea_trout_spawners_and_parr.pdf
https://www.luke.fi/tietoa-luonnonvaroista/kalat-ja-kalatalous/kalavarat/taimen/suomenlahden-meritaimen/ |
Public web service on environmental information - https://www.syke.fi/avointieto
Helcom abundance of key fish species - https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/
Helcom abundance of coastal fish key functional groups - https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Abundance-of-coastal-fish-key-functional-groups-HELCOM-core-indicator-2018.pdf
Abundance of fish key functional groups - https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/ |
Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR": |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
||||||||||||
References |
|| MP_77 || --# Die Daten wurden bereits für mehrere Publikationen genutzt. Das "Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS)" kann auf der Internetseite des ICES heruntergeladen werden. # https://www.ices.dk/marine-data/data-portals/Pages/DATRAS-Docs.aspx #-- |
|| MP_78 || --# Rau A, Lewin W-C, Zettler ML, Gogina M, Dorrien C von (2019) Abiotic and biotic drivers of flatfish abundance within distinct demersal fish assemblages in a brackish ecosystem (western Baltic Sea). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 220:38-47, DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.035
Zudem sind die Fahrtprogramme öffentlich zugänglich.
# #-- |
|| MP_79 || --# Schaber M, Gröhsler T (2019) Survey report for FRV SOLEA / German Acoustic Autumn Survey (GERAS): 01 - 19 October 2018. ICES Sci Rep 1(11):190-224 # http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGBIFS.aspx #-- |
|| MP_82 || --# http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGIPS.aspx #-- |
|| MP_84 || --# Weitere Informationen können den Fahrtprogrammen entnommen werden. # #-- |
|| MP_89 || --# https://www.lallf.de/fischerei/fischereischutz/besatzmassnahmen/ #-- |
|| MP_77 || --# Die Daten wurden bereits für mehrere Publikationen genutzt. Das "Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS)" kann auf der Internetseite des ICES heruntergeladen werden. # https://www.ices.dk/marine-data/data-portals/Pages/DATRAS-Docs.aspx #-- |
|| MP_79 || --# Schaber M, Gröhsler T (2019) Survey report for FRV SOLEA / German Acoustic Autumn Survey (GERAS): 01 - 19 October 2018. ICES Sci Rep 1(11):190-224 # http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGBIFS.aspx #-- |
|| MP_82 || --# http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGIPS.aspx #-- |
|| MP_83 || --# #-- |
|| MP_85 || --# Stroganov AN, Bleil M, Oeberst R, Semenova AV, Winkler H (2018) First evidence of spawning of eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias) in the Belt Sea, the main spawning area of western Baltic cod (Gadus morhua L.). J Appl Ichthyol 34(3):527-534, DOI:10.1111/jai.13550
Velasco A, Bleil M (2016) Bericht über die 716.+ 717. Reise des FFS "Solea" vom 18.2. bis 10.3.2016 : Baltic International Trawl Spring Survey (BITS) in der Arkonasee, Mecklenburger- und Kieler Bucht (ICES SD FFS24+22). Rostock: Thünen-Institut für Ostseefischerei, 10 p
Bleil M, Velasco A (2016) Bericht über die 721. Reise des FFS Selea vom 13.06. bis 20.06.2016 : Untersuchungen zur Laicherbestandsstruktur, zum Anteil aktiver Laicher. zu Kondition und Laichaktivitäten und zur Reifeentwicklung von Dorschen in Beziehung zur hydrographischen Situation in der zentralen Ostsee (COBALT). Rostock: Thünen-Institut für Ostseefischerei, 6 p # #-- |
|| MP_89 || --# https://www.lallf.de/fischerei/fischereischutz/besatzmassnahmen/ #-- |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
Guidelines for Coastal Fish Monitoring Sampling Methods of HELCOM:
http://helcom.fi/Lists/Publications/Guidelines for Coastal fish Monitoring of HELCOM.pdf
and BIOR documentation:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Piekrastes_uzskaites_bentiska_uskaite_RJL.pdf |