Member State report / Art9 / 2018 / D11 / Baltic

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 9 Determination of GES (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D11 Energy, incl. underwater noise
Region/subregion Baltic
Reported by Member state
Member state
Finland
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Germany
Denmark
Sweden
Member state report
Marine reporting units MRUs used
  • BAL-FI-AS
  • BAL-FI-BB
  • BAL-FI-BS
  • BAL-FI-GF
  • BAL-FI-NB
  • BAL-FI-QK
  • L2-SEA-007-POL
  • L2-SEA-008-POL
  • BALDE_MS
  • DK-TOTAL-part-BAL
Structure, functions and processes of marine ecosystems: Ecosystems, including food webs Sound
  • D11 (1)
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: Substances, litter and energy Input of other forms of energy (including electromagnetic fields, light and heat)
  • D11 (6)
  • D11C1 (6)
Anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment: Substances, litter and energy Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous)
  • D11 (1)
  • D11C1 (1)
  • D11C2 (1)
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Physical and hydrological Continuous low frequency sound
  • D11C2 (18)
  • D11 (2)
  • D11 (1)
Pressure levels and impacts in marine environment: Physical and hydrological Impulsive sound in water
  • D11C1 (6)
  • D11 (2)
  • D11 (1)
GES description D11 Energy, incl. underwater noise
The amount of derived heat does not lead to a significant reduction in the natural habitats in the area.
Insufficient amount of recorded noise data (short period measurements) prevented to define threshold values.


The feature was not evaluated due to lack data contain information about spreading and coverage of influence of impulsive sound on the area of interest.
Good environmental status shall be achieved when "(1) the sound budget of the German Baltic Sea does not adversely affect the living conditions of the animals concerned. All human noise activities should therefore not have a significant impact on the marine environment of the Baltic Sea. (2) light input does not adversely affect marine species. (3) the emission of electromagnetic fields does not adversely affect the movement or sense of orientation of marine species. This is currently assumed to be achieved if at direct current the values measured at the sediment surface do not exceed the strength of the earth's magnetic field. (4) the temperature rise does not result in negative impacts on the marine environment.

For the assessment of GES for underwater noise, the following criteria are used in in accordance with Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848: D11C1, D11C2.

Explanation: Germany does not update the general description of good environmental status (GES) from 2012 at descriptor level in this reporting exercise. During the reporting period, Germany has worked with the countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the framework of the EU MSC CIS process and in HELCOM to develop methodological standards (indicators, evaluation procedures). Specific aspects of criteria and indicators that contribute to a quantitative assessment of good environmental status are reported in the reporting scheme Art. 8_GES. For the assessment of the criteria in accordance with Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 under Article 8_GES, assessments under other EU directives will be taken into account where relevant. Where possible, the regional assessments that have been agreed on to date will be taken into account and complemented by national assessments on a case by case basis.
Underwater noise is at a level that does not adversely affects species.
GES description D11C1 Anthropogenic impulsive sound (11.1, 11.1.1)
A HELCOM register shall be used to ensure that the presence and frequency of the noise does not endanger the presence of sensitive species and the functionality of habitats. The threshold will be developed through HELCOM cooperation.


The amount of derived heat does not lead to a significant reduction in the natural habitats in the area.
The spatial distribution, temporal extent, and levels of man-made impulse sounds do not exceed levels that negatively affect populations of marine animals.
GES description D11C2 Anthropogenic continuous low-frequency sound (11.2, 11.2.1)
The amount of continuous 125 Hz man-made noise will decrease from the baseline in 2014-2016, especially in nature reserves and habitats where the species are sensitive. For high frequency noise and low levels of natural noise.


The amount of continuous 2000 Hz noise produced by man is decreasing from the baseline of 2014–2016, especially in nature reserves and habitats where the species are sensitive. for high frequency noise and low levels of natural noise.


The amount of man-made continuous noise at 63 Hz will decrease from the baseline of 2014-2016, especially in nature reserves and habitats where the species are sensitive. for high frequency noise and low levels of natural noise.
The spatial distribution, temporal extent, and levels of man-made sustained low-frequency sound do not exceed levels that negatively affect marine animal populations.
Determination date
  • 2018-07 (D11, D11C1, D11C2)
  • 2022-05 (D11)
  • 2018-10 (D11)
  • 2019-04 (D11, D11C1, D11C2)
Update type
  • Modified from reported determination (D11, D11C1, D11C2)
  • Same as last reported determination (D11)
  • Same as last reported determination (D11)
  • Modified from reported determination (D11)
  • New determination (D11C1, D11C2)
Justification for non-use of criterion
D11C1: There are no nationally or regionally agreed GES indicator under criteria D11C1.


D11C2: There are no nationally or regionally agreed GES indicator under criteria D11C2.
D11C1: Preliminary data have assessed existing and potential sources of underwater noise, noise sensitive areas and the potential impact of some noise sources (e.g. military explosions) on species. Criteria D11C1 and D11C2 do not have GES thresholds, no known effects on species, no GES thresholds and no EU level.


D11C2: Preliminary data have assessed existing and potential sources of underwater noise, noise sensitive areas and the potential impact of some noise sources (e.g. military explosions) on species. Due to the lack of data for criteria D11C1 and D11C2, no GES thresholds, no known effects on species, no GES thresholds at EU level.
Justification for delay in setting EU/regional requirements
D11C1: Thresholds for impulsive sound have not yet been developed under the TG NOISE in cooperation with other Member States.


D11C2: Thresholds for impulsive sound have not yet been developed under the TG NOISE in cooperation with other Member States.
D11: Lack of sufficient knowledge to set GES treshold values
D11C1: Preliminary data have assessed existing and potential sources of underwater noise, noise sensitive areas and the potential impact of some noise sources (e.g. military explosions) on species. Criteria D11C1 and D11C2 do not have GES thresholds, no known effects on species, no GES thresholds and no EU level. In 2019, the procedure for recording underwater impulsive noise and submitting that data to the register of underwater impulsive noise administered by ICES was approved. Due to the confidentiality of the information, the register does not provide data on the use of low frequency sonar, nor does the register contain data on sonar and seismic equipment used in research.


D11C2: Preliminary data have assessed existing and potential sources of underwater noise, noise sensitive areas and the potential impact of some noise sources (e.g. military explosions) on species. Due to the lack of data for criteria D11C1 and D11C2, no GES thresholds, no known effects on species, no GES thresholds at EU level.
D11: During the reporting period, regional cooperation has focused on the development of methodological standards to assess the various aspects of stress and resilience on the basis of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU. The indicators are variable and require further development or testing. Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 gives, for the first time, an explicit obligation for EU Member States to agree on evaluation elements, thresholds and integration rules in the framework of the EU MSFD (for underwater noise through TG Noise) and through regional or subregional cooperation. Germany is actively working with the countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the framework of the ongoing work programmes of the EU MSFD and the HELCOM bodies to establish a coordinated definition where it is still missing.
D11: There are no thresholds yet for which levels of underwater noise are compatible with good environmental conditions, either nationally or internationally.


D11C1: There are no thresholds yet for which levels of underwater noise are compatible with good environmental conditions, either nationally or internationally.


D11C2: There are no thresholds yet for which levels of underwater noise are compatible with good environmental conditions, either nationally or internationally.
D11C1: All Swedish determinations of GES are implemented in a regulation (HVMFS 2012:18) issued from the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. From the update made in 2018 only criteria supported with at least one indicator are included in the regulation. Furthermore, only indicators underpinned with a regular monitoring programme are included. We do not have indicators under this criterion yet, because it is not possible to establish a monitoring programme. Sweden will establish a monitoring programme for micro-litter as soon as method for monitoring of micro-litter is established internationally. Sweden will continue to take part in, and support development of, monitoring methods and studies on micro-litter with the aim to build knowledge. Another reason is that threshold values shall be established at union level. We will include these thresholds when they are established. We are active in groups discussing this in CIS-MSFD, as well as OSPAR & HELCOM.


D11C2: All Swedish determinations of GES are implemented in a regulation (HVMFS 2012:18) issued from the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. From the update made in 2018 only criteria supported with at least one indicator are included in the regulation. Furthermore, only indicators underpinned with a regular monitoring programme are included.
We do not have any indicator under this criterion yet, depending on lack of enough and/or reliable monitoring data.
Another reason is that threshold values shall be established at union level, and we will include thesholds when they are established at union level. We are active in groups discussing this in CIS-MSFD, Helcom and Ospar.
In the article 8 assessment some results from monitoring of continuous sound are included.