Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D9 / Baltic

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2012-10-15
GES Descriptor D9 Contaminants in seafood
Region/subregion Baltic
Reported by Member state
Member state
FI
EE
LV
LT
PL
DE
DK
SE
Marine reporting units Number used
8
1
10
4
0
2
2
66
Features No theme
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureSea (1)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (2)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (2)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (2)
LevelPressureAir (2)
LevelPressureEnvironment (2)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (2)
LevelPressureLand (2)
LevelPressureSea (2)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureSea (3)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureSea (3)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureSea (3)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (2)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureSea (3)
ImpactPressureFunctionalGroup (3)
ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3)
ImpactlPressureFishSeafood (3)
LevelPressureAir (3)
LevelPressureEnvironment (3)
LevelPressureFunctionalGroups (3)
LevelPressureLand (3)
LevelPressureSea (3)
Elements No theme
NotRelevant (4)
NotRelevant (1)
NotRelevant (3)
Not assessed (4)
Not reported (2)
Elements Functional group
FunctionalGroupOther (1)
FunctionalGroupOther (1)
Elements Predominant habitats
HabitatsOther (3)
HabitatsOther (3)
HabitatsOther (1)
Elements Species group
FishAll (2)
BirdsAll (1)
FishAll (1)
FishAll (5)
Criteria used D9 Contaminants in seafood
Criteria used D9C1 Contaminants in seafood (9.1, 9.1.1)
9.1, 9.1.1
9.1, 9.1.1
9.1
Threshold values % of indicators with values (no. of indicators reported)
0.0% (0)
100.0% (10)
100.0% (8)
100.0% (15)
0.0% (0)
100.0% (93)
100.0% (5)
38.5% (13)
Proportion threshold values Range of % values (no. of indicators reported)
100 - 100 (15)
Baseline No. of indicators reported per response
not developed (10)
1990 (1)
2004-2011 (1)
2004–2009 (2)
2007-2011 (1)
2007–2011 (2)
2008-2011 (2)
2009-2011 (2)
Die PCB sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 0.01ng/g TM (9)
Die PCB sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 1pg/L. (9)
Die Pestizide sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 0.01ng/g TM (9)
Die Pestizide sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter 1pg/L. (9)
Die Pestizide sind alle künstlichen Ursprungs, die Hintergrundkonzentrationen liegen daher bei oder unter der Bestimmungsgrenze. (9)
ICES BAC recommendation for 1-hydroxypyrene in dab and flounder: 16 ng/ml (9)
OPSAR BCs/BACs normalisiert auf 5% Al: Hg 50/70; Cd: 200/310; Pb: 25000/38000 (3)
OSPAR LL, BAC: Mussels: OSPAR-BAC (µg/kg dry weight): Hg 140, Cd 1940, Pb 1520; Fish OSPAR-BAC (µg/kg wet weight): Hg: 35, Cd 26 , Pb 26(Source:Background Document on CEMP Assessment Criteria for QSR 2010) (3)
mussels OSPAR LC: CB118, CB153, CB180 =0.25 µg/kg dwFish, seabirds: OSPAR LC: CB118, CB153, CB180 =0.05 µg/kg ww; OSPAR BAC CB 118 = 1.3 µg/kg ww; CB153 = 0.2 µg/kg ww; Cb180 = 0.5 µg/kg ww(Source: Background Document onCEMP Assessment Criteria for QSR 2010. Monitoring and Assessment Series. Publ.-No. 461. OSPAR Commission, 2009) (9)
not defined (6)
According to EU regulation (4)
Proportion values achieved No. of criteria reported per category
1-5% (1 or 14.3%)
75-100% (4 or 57.1%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (2 or 28.6%)
1-5% (4 or 25.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (12 or 75.0%)
75-100% (1 or 4.2%)
Maksimālais dioksīnu un furānu emisijas apjoms, 31,2 g TEQ, tika reģistrēts 2009. gadā, savukārt, zemākās emisijas, 26, 8 g TEQ un 26,2 g TEQ , tika reģistrētas attiecīgi 1990. un 2000. gadā. (1 or 4.2%)
Max Hg 2007: 0,045. Cd 2001: 0,14. Cu 2008: 11,28. Min Cd 1996., 1999., 2005. : 1 (1 or 4.2%)
Max kopējais antropogēni emitētā svina apjoms 49 tonnas (1991.), min- 5,2 tonnas (2004.). Max Hg emisijas apjoms 0,24 tonnas (1990. ) min- 0,6 tonnas (2000.2002., 2003.2004. ). Max kop. antrop. emitētā Cd 0,32 tonnas (1990.), min-0,19 tonnas (1995,2000) (1 or 4.2%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (19 or 79.2%)
Visbiežāk naftas noplūžu apjomi bijuši nelieli – mazāk par 0,1 m3, taču tika reģistrētas arī lielākas noplūdes 0,1-1 m3. (1 or 4.2%)
2 (1 or 4.2%)
3 (1 or 4.2%)
75-100% (1 or 4.2%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (16 or 66.7%)
lessthan1% (5 or 20.8%)
5-25% (3 or 12.5%)
75-100% (1 or 4.2%)
Ableitung mit der Fortluft: Schwebstoffe (2009): 1,0 E+07 Bq; Tritium 1,2 E+08 Bq (1 or 4.2%)
Alle Eintragspfade: Periode: 2003-2005; Cadmium 0,5 t/a, Blei 10 t/a, Cu 20t/a (1 or 4.2%)
Datenlage unzureichend für Einträge durch die Schifffahrt und Offshoreaktivität (2 or 8.3%)
Einträge für alle Pfade: Periode: 2003-2005; Cadmium 0,5 t/a, Blei 10 t/a, Cu 20t/a (1 or 4.2%)
Fish (3 or 12.5%)
Tritium (2009): 1,9 E+08 Bq, Spalt- und Aktivierungsprod.:,= E+07 Bq; , Alphastrahler 1,2 E+05 Bq (1 or 4.2%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (11 or 45.8%)
75-100% (2 or 12.5%)
NotReported (2 or 12.5%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (12 or 75.0%)
75-100% (1 or 4.2%)
Cd: 3.184
Cu: 128.026
Ni: 75.058
Pb: 63.672
Zn: 702.495
Hg: 0.61 (1 or 4.2%)
Not assessed (9 or 37.5%)
Not reported (4 or 16.7%)
NotReported (5 or 20.8%)
Unknown (1 or 4.2%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (3 or 12.5%)
Assessment trend (status) No. of criteria assessments per category
Unknown_NotAssessed (2 or 100.0%)
Stable (4 or 40.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (6 or 60.0%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (15 or 100.0%)
Declining (2 or 13.3%)
Improving (5 or 33.3%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (8 or 53.3%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (13 or 100.0%)
Declining (1 or 100.0%)
Improving (2 or 15.4%)
Unknown_NotAssessed (11 or 84.6%)
Criteria status No. of criteria assessments per category
NotGood (2 or 100.0%)
Good (4 or 40.0%)
NotAssessed (6 or 60.0%)
Good (1 or 6.7%)
NotAssessed (14 or 93.3%)
Good (5 or 33.3%)
NotGood (10 or 66.7%)
Good (2 or 15.4%)
NotAssessed (5 or 38.5%)
NotGood (2 or 15.4%)
OtherStatus (4 or 30.8%)
Descriptive (1 or 33.3%)
NotGood (2 or 66.7%)
Description (12 or 92.3%)
NotGood (1 or 7.7%)
Assessment period
Related activities
Industry, Shipping, Urban
Industry, NotReported, Urban
Dredging, NotReported, Ports, Shipping, SolidWasteDisposal, Urban, UsesActivitiesOther
ActivitiesUsesAll, AgricultForestry, Shipping
AgricultForestry, Industry, NotReported, Shipping, Urban
AgricultForestry, Industry, NotReported, Urban