Member State report / Art8 / 2012 / D5 / Black Sea
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2012-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
Region/subregion | Black Sea |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | BG |
RO |
|
---|---|---|---|
Marine reporting units | Number used | 12 |
3 |
Features | No theme | ImpactPressureSeabedHabitats (3) ImpactPressureWaterColumn (3) LevelPressureNConcentration (3) LevelPressureNLoad (3) LevelPressureOConcentration (3) LevelPressureOLoad (3) LevelPressureOverall (3) LevelPressurePConcentration (3) LevelPressurePLoad (3) |
|
Elements | Predominant habitats | MarineShelf (1) ShallMxdSed (1) |
|
Elements | No theme | NotRelevant (4) |
|
Criteria used | D5 Eutrophication | ||
Criteria used | D5C1 Nutrient concentrations (5.1, 5.1.1) | 5.1, 5.1.1 |
|
Criteria used | D5C2 Chlorophyll-a concentration (5.2.1) | ||
Criteria used | D5C3 Harmful algal blooms (5.2.4) | ||
Criteria used | D5C4 Photic limit (5.2.2) | ||
Criteria used | D5C5 Dissolved oxygen concentration (5.3.2) | ||
Criteria used | D5C6 Opportunistic macroalgae of benthic habitats (5.2.3) | ||
Criteria used | D5C7 Macrophyte communities of benthic habitats (5.3.1) | ||
Criteria used | D5C8 Macrofaunal communities of benthic habitats | ||
Criteria used | 5.1.2 Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus) | 5.1.2 |
|
Criteria used | 5.2 Direct effects of nutrient enrichment | ||
Criteria used | 5.3 Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment | ||
Threshold values | % of indicators with values (no. of indicators reported) | 0.0% (0) |
85.7% (21) |
Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of indicators reported) | 0 - 67 (18) |
|
Baseline | No. of indicators reported per response | Reference values for nutrients were assessed based on analysis of historical data from the period 1960-1965 taking into account the median of these values after outliers were canceled. (14) Reference values for oxygenation conditions were assessed based on historical data analysis in the period 1960-1965 taking into account the limits between which stood 80% of values. (4) |
|
Proportion values achieved | No. of criteria reported per category | 1251,613 (1 or 3.7%) 13,65 (1 or 3.7%) 362,873 (1 or 3.7%) 367972 (1 or 3.7%) 404597,8 (1 or 3.7%) 8222,8 (1 or 3.7%) Unknown_NotAssessed (21 or 77.8%) |
|
Assessment trend (status) | No. of criteria assessments per category | Declining (1 or 8.3%) Improving (1 or 8.3%) Unknown_NotAssessed (10 or 83.3%) |
|
Criteria status | No. of criteria assessments per category | Descriptive (4 or 33.3%) Good (6 or 50.0%) NotGood (2 or 16.7%) |
|
Assessment period | 2006 - 2011 2007 - 2011 |
||
Related activities | Industry, NotReported, Urban |