Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D8 / Baltic
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D8 Contaminants |
| Region/subregion | Baltic |
Member state |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
FI |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LV |
LV |
LV |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report Access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Descriptor |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
D8 |
Monitoring strategy description |
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Schadstoffmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Schadstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch), die Schadstoffkonzentrationen (Wasser, Sediment und Biota) als auch die Schadstoffeffekte.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Schadstoffkonzentrationen und -effekte führen.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Formålet med overvågningsprogrammet af forurenende stoffer er, at følge om koncentrationen af de forurenende stoffer, overstiger niveauer, der medfører forureningsvirkninger i miljøet. Miljøfarlige stoffer stammer fra mange forskellige aktiviteter, som kan være helt eller delvis regulerede, men også akutte forureningshændelser, som stammer fra uheld og spild af fx kemikalier og olie. Overvågningen består af to dele 1) overvågning af en lang række miljøfarlige stoffer samt test for biologiske effekter, og 2) overvågning i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Formålet med overvågningsprogrammet af forurenende stoffer er, at følge om koncentrationen af de forurenende stoffer, overstiger niveauer, der medfører forureningsvirkninger i miljøet. Miljøfarlige stoffer stammer fra mange forskellige aktiviteter, som kan være helt eller delvis regulerede, men også akutte forureningshændelser, som stammer fra uheld og spild af fx kemikalier og olie. Overvågningen består af to dele 1) overvågning af en lang række miljøfarlige stoffer samt test for biologiske effekter, og 2) overvågning i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Formålet med overvågningsprogrammet af forurenende stoffer er, at følge om koncentrationen af de forurenende stoffer, overstiger niveauer, der medfører forureningsvirkninger i miljøet. Miljøfarlige stoffer stammer fra mange forskellige aktiviteter, som kan være helt eller delvis regulerede, men også akutte forureningshændelser, som stammer fra uheld og spild af fx kemikalier og olie. Overvågningen består af to dele 1) overvågning af en lang række miljøfarlige stoffer samt test for biologiske effekter, og 2) overvågning i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Formålet med overvågningsprogrammet af forurenende stoffer er, at følge om koncentrationen af de forurenende stoffer, overstiger niveauer, der medfører forureningsvirkninger i miljøet. Miljøfarlige stoffer stammer fra mange forskellige aktiviteter, som kan være helt eller delvis regulerede, men også akutte forureningshændelser, som stammer fra uheld og spild af fx kemikalier og olie. Overvågningen består af to dele 1) overvågning af en lang række miljøfarlige stoffer samt test for biologiske effekter, og 2) overvågning i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Formålet med overvågningsprogrammet af forurenende stoffer er, at følge om koncentrationen af de forurenende stoffer, overstiger niveauer, der medfører forureningsvirkninger i miljøet. Miljøfarlige stoffer stammer fra mange forskellige aktiviteter, som kan være helt eller delvis regulerede, men også akutte forureningshændelser, som stammer fra uheld og spild af fx kemikalier og olie. Overvågningen består af to dele 1) overvågning af en lang række miljøfarlige stoffer samt test for biologiske effekter, og 2) overvågning i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” is to collect data on levels of contaminants and their impact on the marine environment in the Estonian waters. Based on the gathered data, the human-induced pressures in the marine environment are assessed. The levels of contaminants are analysed in water, sediments or biota whereas the matrix depends on the substance. Priority substances, listed in EQS directive 2013/39 are monitored in coastal waters and metals, PCBs, TBT, PFOS, HBCDD, PBDE, PAH, DEHP, HCH and pesticides on offshore areas (from Baltic herring). The monitoring programmes involved are: “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Contaminant levels – in water”, “Contaminant levels – in sediments”, “Contaminant levels – in species”, “Radioactive substances”, “Oil spills”. The impact onto biota is assessed using data collected within the monitoring programmes “Birds – mortality due to oil pollution” and “Abundance of waterbirds in the breeding season”. Information on the uses and human activities, potentially causing contamination of the environment and on pollution loads, is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
The programme consists of eight sub-programmes to collect information on the main harmful substances in the coastal and offshore waters, on certain substances in the Priority Substances Directive and on harmful substances discharged through rivers and from the air to the sea. The programme also covers the monitoring of oil spills from ships, as well as the monitoring of discharges of radioactive substances and their presence at sea.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. monitoringo programa, prioritetinių pavojingų, pavojingų ir kitų teršiančių medžiagų tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone atliekami skirtingu dažnumu, skirtingose vietose ir tam tikrai medžiagai ar medžiagų grupei būdingoje akumuliacinėje terpėje (vandenyje, dugno nuosėdose ir/ar biotoje). Viso 2018-2023 m. monitoringo programoje numatyta ištirti visas teršiančias medžiagas, įtrauktas į Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 2013/39/ES ir Stokholmo konvencijos dėl patvariųjų organinių teršalų priedus, įvertinti jų kaitos tendencijas (jei yra pakankamai duomenų) ir galimus taršos šaltinius.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono būklei pagal D8 vertinti, cheminei būklei pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą vertinti, įgyvendinant Stokholmo konvenciją dėl Patvariųjų organinių teršalų (POT). Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D8 rodikliai: 1) Teršiančios medžiagos vandenyje; 2) Teršiančios medžiagos dugno nuosėdose; 3) Teršiančios medžiagos biotoje.
Taršos pavojingomis medžiagos šaltinių analizei naudojamos atskirų tyrimų studijų rezultatai, ūkio subjektų teršiančių medžiagų nuotekose ir poveikio aplinkai monitoringo ataskaitos, valstybinės ūkio subjektų nuotekų kontrolės duomenys. Teršiančių medžiagų (sunkieji metalai, naftos produktai) apkrovos su upėmis skaičiuojamos remiantis Valstybinio upių monitoringo upių žiotyse duomenimis, duomenys teikiami HELCOM.
Teršiančių medžiagų poveikio gyviesiems organizmams vertinimas vykdomas mokslinių studijų metu (pvz., Mikrobranduolių ir kitų branduolio pažaidų tyrimai). Tokias studijas atlieka Gamtos tyrimų centras (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/), duomenys buvo naudoti HELCOM vertinimams.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. monitoringo programa, prioritetinių pavojingų, pavojingų ir kitų teršiančių medžiagų tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone atliekami skirtingu dažnumu, skirtingose vietose ir tam tikrai medžiagai ar medžiagų grupei būdingoje akumuliacinėje terpėje (vandenyje, dugno nuosėdose ir/ar biotoje). Viso 2018-2023 m. monitoringo programoje numatyta ištirti visas teršiančias medžiagas, įtrauktas į Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 2013/39/ES ir Stokholmo konvencijos dėl patvariųjų organinių teršalų priedus, įvertinti jų kaitos tendencijas (jei yra pakankamai duomenų) ir galimus taršos šaltinius.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono būklei pagal D8 vertinti, cheminei būklei pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą vertinti, įgyvendinant Stokholmo konvenciją dėl Patvariųjų organinių teršalų (POT). Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D8 rodikliai: 1) Teršiančios medžiagos vandenyje; 2) Teršiančios medžiagos dugno nuosėdose; 3) Teršiančios medžiagos biotoje.
Taršos pavojingomis medžiagos šaltinių analizei naudojamos atskirų tyrimų studijų rezultatai, ūkio subjektų teršiančių medžiagų nuotekose ir poveikio aplinkai monitoringo ataskaitos, valstybinės ūkio subjektų nuotekų kontrolės duomenys. Teršiančių medžiagų (sunkieji metalai, naftos produktai) apkrovos su upėmis skaičiuojamos remiantis Valstybinio upių monitoringo upių žiotyse duomenimis, duomenys teikiami HELCOM.
Teršiančių medžiagų poveikio gyviesiems organizmams vertinimas vykdomas mokslinių studijų metu (pvz., Mikrobranduolių ir kitų branduolio pažaidų tyrimai). Tokias studijas atlieka Gamtos tyrimų centras (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/), duomenys buvo naudoti HELCOM vertinimams.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. monitoringo programa, prioritetinių pavojingų, pavojingų ir kitų teršiančių medžiagų tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone atliekami skirtingu dažnumu, skirtingose vietose ir tam tikrai medžiagai ar medžiagų grupei būdingoje akumuliacinėje terpėje (vandenyje, dugno nuosėdose ir/ar biotoje). Viso 2018-2023 m. monitoringo programoje numatyta ištirti visas teršiančias medžiagas, įtrauktas į Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 2013/39/ES ir Stokholmo konvencijos dėl patvariųjų organinių teršalų priedus, įvertinti jų kaitos tendencijas (jei yra pakankamai duomenų) ir galimus taršos šaltinius.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono būklei pagal D8 vertinti, cheminei būklei pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą vertinti, įgyvendinant Stokholmo konvenciją dėl Patvariųjų organinių teršalų (POT). Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D8 rodikliai: 1) Teršiančios medžiagos vandenyje; 2) Teršiančios medžiagos dugno nuosėdose; 3) Teršiančios medžiagos biotoje.
Taršos pavojingomis medžiagos šaltinių analizei naudojamos atskirų tyrimų studijų rezultatai, ūkio subjektų teršiančių medžiagų nuotekose ir poveikio aplinkai monitoringo ataskaitos, valstybinės ūkio subjektų nuotekų kontrolės duomenys. Teršiančių medžiagų (sunkieji metalai, naftos produktai) apkrovos su upėmis skaičiuojamos remiantis Valstybinio upių monitoringo upių žiotyse duomenimis, duomenys teikiami HELCOM.
Teršiančių medžiagų poveikio gyviesiems organizmams vertinimas vykdomas mokslinių studijų metu (pvz., Mikrobranduolių ir kitų branduolio pažaidų tyrimai). Tokias studijas atlieka Gamtos tyrimų centras (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/), duomenys buvo naudoti HELCOM vertinimams.
|
1. The primary matrix used is biota (fish and mussels) as concentrations in water are below detection limit and sediments are providing integrated signal.
2. Biological effects of contaminants (AChE, GST, CAT, MT) are measured in mollusks.
3. Remote observations form basis of information on acute pollution events. |
1. The primary matrix used is biota (fish and mussels) as concentrations in water are below detection limit and sediments are providing integrated signal.
2. Biological effects of contaminants (AChE, GST, CAT, MT) are measured in mollusks.
3. Remote observations form basis of information on acute pollution events. |
1. The primary matrix used is biota (fish and mussels) as concentrations in water are below detection limit and sediments are providing integrated signal.
2. Biological effects of contaminants (AChE, GST, CAT, MT) are measured in mollusks.
3. Remote observations form basis of information on acute pollution events. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
The goal of the Strategy is to achieve the status of the marine environment in which concentrations of contaminants are at levels not giving rise to pollution effects.The strategy concerns the monitoring of the level of hazardous substances in various matrices: biota, sediments, seawater and the effects of their impact on marine organisms. The strategy includes research in the range of concentrations of selected substances in samples collected systematically at selected stations and locations with the assumed frequency. The choice of substances to be monitored results from the current legislation, regional arrangements (HELCOM) and the analysis of current pressures. Both the network of stations / locations and the frequency are adjusted to the specificity of the substances of concern in selected matrixes - indicators. The strategy takes into account regional arrangements (cooperation within HELCOM), both in terms of the assessed indicators, as well as spatial and temporal resolution guaranteeing the obtaining of results that can be the basis for holistic assessment in the entire Baltic Sea area. The strategy concerns monitoring investigations, which are primarily to provide information on the current status of the marine environment. The assessment of the status of the environment in terms of the indicators is carried out by relating the current concentrations of the hazardous substance to the threshold values set at European, regional or national level.The information obtained is the basis for tracking changes taking place in the environment, mainly as a result of the measures taken, which are determined on the basis of the analysis of the current situation, properties typical of good environmental status (permissible concentrations of hazardous substances, below which there are no harmful effects) and environmental targets. |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances is sufficient to assess the primary criteria under D8 and for following up the progress towards achieving GES and effects of measures. However, there is potential for improvement and some development work is underway to optimize the monitoring and provide an even better basis for both status assessment and analysis of underlying causes of impacts.
For hazardous substances in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is in general based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes.
The D8 monitoring is based on a combination of measurements of hazardous substances in biota and sediment, monitoring of biological effects, screening and environmental specimen banking.
Selection and non-selection of substances to be monitored is done within the respective ongoing programmes. An important tool is the screening programme where samples are analyzed annually to identify new and potentially harmful substances in the environment. The screening programme also evaluates new methods for monitoring of biological effects of hazardous substances. Priority substances that have long been banned in Sweden and that have not been found in screening surveys in the vicinity of potential sources of spread are not included in the ongoing monitoring.
In cases where the screening survey identifies elevated levels in the environment, the Environmental specimen bank at the Swedish Museum of Natural History enables retrospective studies in biota. The Environmental specimen bank contains frozen samples from the late 1960s and onwards, which can provide information on increasing or decreasing levels over time and is therefore an important basis for assessing whether the substance should be included in the ongoing monitoring or not.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances includes monitoring of inputs and concentrations of heavy metals, organic pollutants, radioactive substances and oil. General and specific effects of hazardous substances on marine animals such as amphipods, snails, fish and marine birds and mammals are also monitored.
In a majority of the monitoring programmes, samples are stored to enable future analysis of various kind (hazardous substances, DNA, stable isotopes, fatty acids, etc.). The analyzes are outside the current national monitoring, but in recent years the Swedish |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Gaps and plans |
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Indikatoren für Pharmazeutika und Personal Products sowie Biozide fehlen für die AWZ. Da die Ausgestaltung von D8C4 noch nicht auf regionaler Ebene abgeschlossen ist, sind auch die Anforderungen an das Monitoring noch nicht absehbar.
|
Der foreligger endnu ikke en akutplan for overvågning ved forureningshændelser, men, der vil først i den kommende overvågningsperioden udarbejdes en akutplan, som adresserer konkrete arbejdsgange og overvågningsaktiviteter i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
|
Der foreligger endnu ikke en akutplan for overvågning ved forureningshændelser, men, der vil først i den kommende overvågningsperioden udarbejdes en akutplan, som adresserer konkrete arbejdsgange og overvågningsaktiviteter i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
|
Der foreligger endnu ikke en akutplan for overvågning ved forureningshændelser, men, der vil først i den kommende overvågningsperioden udarbejdes en akutplan, som adresserer konkrete arbejdsgange og overvågningsaktiviteter i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
|
Der foreligger endnu ikke en akutplan for overvågning ved forureningshændelser, men, der vil først i den kommende overvågningsperioden udarbejdes en akutplan, som adresserer konkrete arbejdsgange og overvågningsaktiviteter i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
|
Der foreligger endnu ikke en akutplan for overvågning ved forureningshændelser, men, der vil først i den kommende overvågningsperioden udarbejdes en akutplan, som adresserer konkrete arbejdsgange og overvågningsaktiviteter i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser.
|
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of contaminants load from land-based sources. There is no information about the input and load of synthetic substances.
The monitoring frequency of concentration of contaminants in the coastal area does not provide sufficient data that could be used for the HELCOM assessments based on core indicators (at least 3 times per 6-year period needed). Open-sea area monitoring of contaminants in biota is carried out using fish species, while zoobenthos is the preferred matrix for some substances. There is no monitoring of contaminants in water and sediments in open-sea areas. There is also a need to monitor secondary pollution, including getting data of developments, dredging and dumping works into a public database.
Monitoring of the biological effects of hazardous substances has been carried out as pilot projects, i.e information for the development of D8C2 assessment indicators has been collected. An indicator "Proportion of oiled birds" has been developed for the assessment of the impact and specific pressure of oil pollutants to the status of species and habitats (or the impact of significant acute pollution events on species health and habitat status, GES criterion D8C4), but has not been applied in the D8 assessment yet. Baltic Sea-specific threshold values for contaminants in sediments need to be developed. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
The programme adequately covers the Priority Substances and the regionally agreed substances in the Baltic Sea. |
Teršiančių medžiagų poveikio gyviesiems organizmams vertinimas vykdomas mokslinių studijų metu (pvz., Mikrobranduolių ir kitų branduolio pažaidų tyrimai). Tokias studijas atlieka Gamtos tyrimų centras (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/), duomenys buvo naudoti HELCOM vertinimams.
|
Teršiančių medžiagų poveikio gyviesiems organizmams vertinimas vykdomas mokslinių studijų metu (pvz., Mikrobranduolių ir kitų branduolio pažaidų tyrimai). Tokias studijas atlieka Gamtos tyrimų centras (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/), duomenys buvo naudoti HELCOM vertinimams.
|
Teršiančių medžiagų poveikio gyviesiems organizmams vertinimas vykdomas mokslinių studijų metu (pvz., Mikrobranduolių ir kitų branduolio pažaidų tyrimai). Tokias studijas atlieka Gamtos tyrimų centras (http://www.gamtostyrimai.lt/en/), duomenys buvo naudoti HELCOM vertinimams.
|
1. The frequency of monitoring is inadequate. It is planned to solve deficiencies by 2024.
2. The frequency and spatial coverage is not adequate. The deficiencies will be solved by 2024.
3. The data/information logistic issues should be solved. It is planned to solve them by 2024. |
1. The frequency of monitoring is inadequate. It is planned to solve deficiencies by 2024.
2. The frequency and spatial coverage is not adequate. The deficiencies will be solved by 2024.
3. The data/information logistic issues should be solved. It is planned to solve them by 2024. |
1. The frequency of monitoring is inadequate. It is planned to solve deficiencies by 2024.
2. The frequency and spatial coverage is not adequate. The deficiencies will be solved by 2024.
3. The data/information logistic issues should be solved. It is planned to solve them by 2024. |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
Extending the scope of research on biological effects with new indicators |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
"The monitoring of hazardous substances in sediment and biota is continuously being developed based on requirements within EU Directives, HELCOM and OSPAR. Screening surveys may also lead to new substances being added in the ongoing monitoring.
Today's monitoring of hazardous substances in biota and sediment mainly covers reference areas. Therefor there is a need for increased monitoring in more polluted areas and also a need for improved quality in all steps from planning, sampling and delivery to data host so that more data can be used in the assessment. The review of all regional monitoring in 2020 provides the opportunity to further improve the quality of the data generated.
For monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances, the SEPA has in recent years increased both the number of sampling sites and variables monitored. In addition, targeted efforts have been made to improve reporting of data both nationally and internationally (ICES). During 2020/2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances is being evaluated in order to optimize the monitoring both in terms of coverage and cost and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
The monitoring can also be developed to produce data for SVHC substances/substances on the REACH candidate list as well as active substances in biocidal products. Such data may form the basis for limitation proposals under REACH. Non-target/suspect screening, which can identify new substances that tend to increase in the environment, is also an important step in working towards a non-toxic environment. Within both OSPAR and HELCOM, there are screening projects that aim to identify new harmful substances in the marine environment.
SEPA and SwAM are also financing projects in 2020 to develop new monitoring of the health status of marine mammals. SwAM has commissioned the Swedish Veterinary Institute and the Swedish Museum of Natural History to develop health monitoring of marine mammals, which also includes harbour porpoises. SEPA are financing a project, which aims to determine appropriate pathological variables that can be included in an individual-based disease index for grey seals based on autopsy data.
There is currently no full-scale monitoring in place for monitoring the effects of possible oil spills, but mussels are collected in a reference network approximately every five years, to enable analysis of oil related substances before and after a spill.
" |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALDE_MPr_064_MP_092 |
BALDE_MPr_064_MP_124 |
BALDE_MPr_067_MP_310 |
BALDE_MPr_067_MP_314 |
BALDE_MPr_067_MP_330 |
BALDE_MPr_067_MP_344 |
BALDE_MPr_068_MP_355 |
BALDE_MPr_068_MP_356 |
BALDE_MPr_069_MP_126 |
BALDE_MPr_115_MP_304 |
BALDE_MPr_131_MP_350 |
BALDE_MPr_131_MP_351 |
BALDE_MPr_131_MP_352 |
DK-D08-01 |
DK-D08-02 |
DK-D08-03 |
DK-D08-04 |
DK-D08-05 |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D0104-2_BirdsBreeding |
BALEE-D0508-22_NutContLandSource |
BALEE-D08-30_ContaminantSediment |
BALEE-D08-31_ContaminantWater |
BALEE-D08-34_OilPollution |
BALEE-D08-35_BirdsWashedAshore |
BALEE-D0809-29_ContaminantBiota |
BALEE-D0809-33_Radionuclides |
BALFI-D08-1 |
BALFI-D08-2 |
BALFI-D08-3 |
BALFI-D08-4 |
BALFI-D08-5 |
BALFI-D08-6 |
BALFI-D08-7 |
BALFI-D08-8 |
BALLT-D08_ContaminantBiota |
BALLT-D08_ContaminantSediment |
BALLT-D08_ContaminantWater |
LV-4.8.1. (D8C1) |
LV-4.8.2. (D8C2) |
LV-4.8.3. (D8C3) |
PL-D08-01 |
PL-D08-01 |
PL-D08-02 |
PL-D08-02 |
PL-D08-03 |
PL-D08-03 |
PL-D08-04 |
PL-D08-04 |
PL-D08-05 |
PL-D08-05 |
PL-D1.1-03 |
SE-D1D4D8-mammalhealth |
SE-D1D8-fishhealth |
SE-D4D8-eagle |
SE-D5D8-atmosphericinput |
SE-D5D8-landinput |
SE-D8-bathingwaters |
SE-D8-imposex |
SE-D8-monoporeia |
SE-D8-oilspills |
SE-D8-radionuclides |
SE-D8-sediment |
SE-D8D9-biota |
Programme name |
Schadstoff-Einträge - über die Atmosphäre: Atmosphärische Deposition Schadstoffe (Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Einträge - über die Atmosphäre: Atmosphärische Schadstoffemissionen (Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Biota, einschließlich Meeresfrüchten: Schadstoffe in Biota (Fische [Kliesche, Hering, Dorsch]) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Biota, einschließlich Meeresfrüchten: Radioaktive Stoffe in Biota (Fische, Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Biota, einschließlich Meeresfrüchten: Schadstoffe in Biota (Muscheln, Küstengewässer Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Biota, einschließlich Meeresfrüchten: Schadstoffe in Biota (Fische, Küstengewässer Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Wasser: Schadstoffe in Wasser (Küsten- und Hoheitsgewässer, Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Wasser: Schadstoffe in Wasser (AWZ, Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Einträge - landseitige Quellen: Schadstoffeinträge aus landseitigen Quellen (Ostsee) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Gesundheitszustand: Biologische Effekte von Schadstoffen in Biota (Plattfische, AWZ Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Sediment: Organische Schadstoffe in Sediment/Schwebstoff (< 2mm-Fraktion, Küsten-, Übergangsgewässer und AWZ, Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Sediment: Schadstoffe (Metalle) in Sediment/Schwebstoff (< 63µm-Fraktion, Küsten-, Übergangsgewässer, Ostsee) |
Schadstoff-Konzentrationen - in Sediment: Schadstoffe (Metalle) in Sediment/Schwebstoff (< 20µm-Fraktion, Übergangs- und Küstengewässer, AWZ, Ostsee) |
Contaminant levels - in sediment |
Contaminant levels - in biota |
Contaminant effects - in biota |
Contaminant levels - acute pollution incidents |
Non-target screeninger |
Marine and coastal activities |
Abundance of water birds in the breeding season |
Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources |
Contaminant levels – in sediment |
Contaminant levels – in water |
Oil spills |
Birds – mortality due to oil pollution (birds washed ashore) |
Contaminant levels – in species |
Radioactive substances |
Contaminants in offshore waters |
Contaminants in coastal waters |
Permitted use of hazardous substances |
Riverine contaminant inputs |
Contaminant inputs from atmosphere |
Acute pollution |
Radioactivity in the Baltic Sea |
Radioactivity inputs from land based sources |
BALLT-D08_ContaminantBiota |
BALLT-D08_ContaminantSediment |
BALLT-D08_ContaminantWater |
Contaminant levels in water/sediments and species |
Mobile species and benthic species health status |
Contaminant inputs acute pollution events, incl. oil spills |
Contaminant levels - in species, including seafood |
Contaminant levels - in species, including seafood |
Contaminant levels - in sediment |
Contaminant levels - in sediment |
Contaminant levels - in water |
Contaminant levels - in water |
Contaminant inputs – acute pollution events, incl. oil spills |
Contaminant inputs – acute pollution events, incl. oil spills |
Mobile species – fish – health status |
Mobile species – fish – health status |
Mobile species - birds - health status |
Marine mammals health status |
Fish health status |
White-tailed eagle productivity |
Nutrient and contaminant inputs from atmosphere |
Nutrient and contaminant inputs from land-based sources |
Microbial pathogen levels - in water column (bathing waters) |
Biological effects of organic pollutants (imposex) |
Malformed embryos of Monoporeia affinis |
Oilspills |
Radionuclides in water, sediment and biota |
Contaminant levels - in sediment |
Contaminant levels - in biota |
Update type |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_92 || Atmosphärische Deposition Schadstoffe (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffen, die aus der Atmosphäre auf der Ostsee deponieren. Die nasse Deposition von ausgewählten Schadstoffen (Metalle und Polycyclische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe) wird an der Küstenmessstelle des Umweltbundesamt-Luftmessnetzes in Deutschland in Zingst gemessen. Die Messdaten dienen zur Validierung der Modellierung des „European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme“ (EMEP). EMEP modelliert die Gesamtdeposition (trocken und nass) von Blei (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Quecksilber (Hg), Benzo[a]pyren (B(a)P), Polychlorierten Dibenzo-p-dioxinen und Dibenzofuranen (PCDD/PCDF), Hexachlorbenzol (HCB) und dem Polychlorierten Biphenyl-153 (PCB-153). Die Mess- und Modelldaten zur atmosphärischen Schadstoffdeposition werden benötigt, um die Menge an Schadstoffen zu bestimmen, die über die Atmosphäre in die Ostsee gelangen. Ziel ist es, auf der Grundlage der gesammelten Daten die Effektivität von Schadstoffreduktionsmaßnahmen abzuschätzen. Weiterhin dient das Monitoring-Programm der Erfassung von Schadstoffemissionen, die von Emissionsquellen an Land wie auch mobilen Quellen (Binnenschifffahrt und Flugverkehr) in Deutschland emittiert werden. Die berichtete nationale Emissionssumme enthält nicht alle anthropogenen Emissionen Deutschlands. So sind die Emissionen aus der internationalen Seeschifffahrt, aus dem Flugverkehr oberhalb von 3000 m, aus militärischen Operationen (z. B. NATO-Übungen) und aus Waldbränden nicht in der nationalen Berichterstattung enthalten. Für die internationale Seeschifffahrt nutzt das EMEP-Modell i. d. R. einen europäischen Emissionsdatensatz. Die berechneten Daten der ausgewählten Schadstoffe dienen zum Teil als Eingangsdaten für die Modellierung der Schadstoffdepositionen des „European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme“ (EMEP). Die berechneten Daten zu atmosphärischen Schadstoffemissionen werden benötigt, um die Menge an emittierten Schadstoffen von Deutschland zu bestimmen. Ziel ist es, auf der Grundlage der gesammelten Daten die Effektivität von Schadstoffreduktionsmaßnahmen abzuschätzen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_124 || Atmosphärische Schadstoffemissionen (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffen, die aus der Atmosphäre auf der Ostsee deponieren. Die nasse Deposition von ausgewählten Schadstoffen (Metalle und Polycyclische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe) wird an der Küstenmessstelle des Umweltbundesamt-Luftmessnetzes in Deutschland in Zingst gemessen. Die Messdaten dienen zur Validierung der Modellierung des „European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme“ (EMEP). EMEP modelliert die Gesamtdeposition (trocken und nass) von Blei (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Quecksilber (Hg), Benzo[a]pyren (B(a)P), Polychlorierten Dibenzo-p-dioxinen und Dibenzofuranen (PCDD/PCDF), Hexachlorbenzol (HCB) und dem Polychlorierten Biphenyl-153 (PCB-153). Die Mess- und Modelldaten zur atmosphärischen Schadstoffdeposition werden benötigt, um die Menge an Schadstoffen zu bestimmen, die über die Atmosphäre in die Ostsee gelangen. Ziel ist es, auf der Grundlage der gesammelten Daten die Effektivität von Schadstoffreduktionsmaßnahmen abzuschätzen. Weiterhin dient das Monitoring-Programm der Erfassung von Schadstoffemissionen, die von Emissionsquellen an Land wie auch mobilen Quellen (Binnenschifffahrt und Flugverkehr) in Deutschland emittiert werden. Die berichtete nationale Emissionssumme enthält nicht alle anthropogenen Emissionen Deutschlands. So sind die Emissionen aus der internationalen Seeschifffahrt, aus dem Flugverkehr oberhalb von 3000 m, aus militärischen Operationen (z. B. NATO-Übungen) und aus Waldbränden nicht in der nationalen Berichterstattung enthalten. Für die internationale Seeschifffahrt nutzt das EMEP-Modell i. d. R. einen europäischen Emissionsdatensatz. Die berechneten Daten der ausgewählten Schadstoffe dienen zum Teil als Eingangsdaten für die Modellierung der Schadstoffdepositionen des „European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme“ (EMEP). Die berechneten Daten zu atmosphärischen Schadstoffemissionen werden benötigt, um die Menge an emittierten Schadstoffen von Deutschland zu bestimmen. Ziel ist es, auf der Grundlage der gesammelten Daten die Effektivität von Schadstoffreduktionsmaßnahmen abzuschätzen.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_310 || Schadstoffe in Biota (Fische [Kliesche, Hering, Dorsch]) || Das Messprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen in Biota. An den Probenahme-Stationen werden Biota entnommen und die Konzentrationen der unterschiedlichen Parameter chemisch analytisch erfasst. Die chemischen Messungen werden immer von adäquater Qualitätssicherung begleitet. Berichtet werden die Daten als Konzentration in Gesamtorganismus oder in Geweben wie Leber, Muskel oder Galle. Aus den folgenden Parametergruppen werden Konzentration erhoben: Polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe (PAK); Polychlorierte Biphenyle (PCB); Chlorkohlenwasserstoffe; Perfluorierte organische Verbindungen (PFC); Organozinn-Verbindungen; Bromierte Flammschutzmittel (PBDE); Metalle und Radionuklide. Zusätzlich werden biologische Begleitparameter erhoben wie z.B. Länge und Gewicht des Organismus.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und WRRL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben und über die MUDAB an ICES DOME abgegeben (Ausnahme Radionuklide).
Das genutzte Bewertungsinstrument berechnet den aktuellen Mittelwert, als aktuellen Status (mean last year), basierend auf den im Bewertungszeitraum eingeflossenen Messwerten. Dieser Wert wird mit dem Grenzwert abgeglichen. Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch Teile der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffe befinden, wird kontinuierlich gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_314 || Radioaktive Stoffe in Biota (Fische, Ostsee) || Das Messprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen in Biota. An den Probenahme-Stationen werden Biota entnommen und die Konzentrationen der unterschiedlichen Parameter chemisch analytisch erfasst. Die chemischen Messungen werden immer von adäquater Qualitätssicherung begleitet. Berichtet werden die Daten als Konzentration in Gesamtorganismus oder in Geweben wie Leber, Muskel oder Galle. Aus den folgenden Parametergruppen werden Konzentration erhoben: Polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe (PAK); Polychlorierte Biphenyle (PCB); Chlorkohlenwasserstoffe; Perfluorierte organische Verbindungen (PFC); Organozinn-Verbindungen; Bromierte Flammschutzmittel (PBDE); Metalle und Radionuklide. Zusätzlich werden biologische Begleitparameter erhoben wie z.B. Länge und Gewicht des Organismus.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und WRRL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben und über die MUDAB an ICES DOME abgegeben (Ausnahme Radionuklide).
Das genutzte Bewertungsinstrument berechnet den aktuellen Mittelwert, als aktuellen Status (mean last year), basierend auf den im Bewertungszeitraum eingeflossenen Messwerten. Dieser Wert wird mit dem Grenzwert abgeglichen. Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch Teile der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffe befinden, wird kontinuierlich gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_330 || Schadstoffe in Biota (Muscheln, Küstengewässer Ostsee) || Das Messprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen in Biota. An den Probenahme-Stationen werden Biota entnommen und die Konzentrationen der unterschiedlichen Parameter chemisch analytisch erfasst. Die chemischen Messungen werden immer von adäquater Qualitätssicherung begleitet. Berichtet werden die Daten als Konzentration in Gesamtorganismus oder in Geweben wie Leber, Muskel oder Galle. Aus den folgenden Parametergruppen werden Konzentration erhoben: Polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe (PAK); Polychlorierte Biphenyle (PCB); Chlorkohlenwasserstoffe; Perfluorierte organische Verbindungen (PFC); Organozinn-Verbindungen; Bromierte Flammschutzmittel (PBDE); Metalle und Radionuklide. Zusätzlich werden biologische Begleitparameter erhoben wie z.B. Länge und Gewicht des Organismus.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und WRRL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben und über die MUDAB an ICES DOME abgegeben (Ausnahme Radionuklide).
Das genutzte Bewertungsinstrument berechnet den aktuellen Mittelwert, als aktuellen Status (mean last year), basierend auf den im Bewertungszeitraum eingeflossenen Messwerten. Dieser Wert wird mit dem Grenzwert abgeglichen. Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch Teile der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffe befinden, wird kontinuierlich gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_344 || Schadstoffe in Biota (Fische, Küstengewässer Ostsee) || Das Messprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen in Biota. An den Probenahme-Stationen werden Biota entnommen und die Konzentrationen der unterschiedlichen Parameter chemisch analytisch erfasst. Die chemischen Messungen werden immer von adäquater Qualitätssicherung begleitet. Berichtet werden die Daten als Konzentration in Gesamtorganismus oder in Geweben wie Leber, Muskel oder Galle. Aus den folgenden Parametergruppen werden Konzentration erhoben: Polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe (PAK); Polychlorierte Biphenyle (PCB); Chlorkohlenwasserstoffe; Perfluorierte organische Verbindungen (PFC); Organozinn-Verbindungen; Bromierte Flammschutzmittel (PBDE); Metalle und Radionuklide. Zusätzlich werden biologische Begleitparameter erhoben wie z.B. Länge und Gewicht des Organismus.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und WRRL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben und über die MUDAB an ICES DOME abgegeben (Ausnahme Radionuklide).
Das genutzte Bewertungsinstrument berechnet den aktuellen Mittelwert, als aktuellen Status (mean last year), basierend auf den im Bewertungszeitraum eingeflossenen Messwerten. Dieser Wert wird mit dem Grenzwert abgeglichen. Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch Teile der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffe befinden, wird kontinuierlich gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_355 || Schadstoffe in Wasser (Küsten- und Hoheitsgewässer, Ostsee) || Das Monitoringprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen im Meerwasser an Messstellen in den Küstengewässern, der offenen Ostsee innerhalb der Deutschen AWZ und den Übergangsgewässern der Ostsee zur Überwachung der Schadstoffbelastung und der Bestimmung des Umweltzustands. Die Meerwasserproben werden auf Schadstoffkonzentrationen der nachfolgend genannten Parameter untersucht und die erhaltenen Analysenergebnisse werden anschließend berichtet.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer als auch der größte Teil der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten chemischen Zustand befinden, werden Schadstoffkonzentrationen an den vorhandenen Messstellen kontinuierlich, aber je nach Institution in unterschiedlichen Frequenzen, bestimmt. Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht verfolgt.
Die Anforderungen der Monitoringprogramme der regionalen Meeresschutz-Übereinkommen (HELCOM Combine) und der WRRL werden in die Untersuchungen einbezogen. Im Rahmen der MSRL erheben die Messprogramme Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 2 (UZ 2) „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die Überwachung der Meeresumwelt erfolgt koordiniert auf Landes- und Bundesebene. Eine Gruppe von Fachexperten innerhalb der nationalen Überwachungsstrukturen fungiert als Bindeglied zwischen den am Monitoring beteiligten Institutionen, während eine Gruppe von Datenmanagementexperten und die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) die Übertragung von Daten an die internationale ICES-Datenbank (DOME) gewährleisten (Ausnahme Radionuklide). Somit erfolgt die Datenerhebung nach den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_356 || Schadstoffe in Wasser (AWZ, Ostsee) || Das Monitoringprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen im Meerwasser an Messstellen in den Küstengewässern, der offenen Ostsee innerhalb der Deutschen AWZ und den Übergangsgewässern der Ostsee zur Überwachung der Schadstoffbelastung und der Bestimmung des Umweltzustands. Die Meerwasserproben werden auf Schadstoffkonzentrationen der nachfolgend genannten Parameter untersucht und die erhaltenen Analysenergebnisse werden anschließend berichtet.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer als auch der größte Teil der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten chemischen Zustand befinden, werden Schadstoffkonzentrationen an den vorhandenen Messstellen kontinuierlich, aber je nach Institution in unterschiedlichen Frequenzen, bestimmt. Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht verfolgt.
Die Anforderungen der Monitoringprogramme der regionalen Meeresschutz-Übereinkommen (HELCOM Combine) und der WRRL werden in die Untersuchungen einbezogen. Im Rahmen der MSRL erheben die Messprogramme Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 2 (UZ 2) „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die Überwachung der Meeresumwelt erfolgt koordiniert auf Landes- und Bundesebene. Eine Gruppe von Fachexperten innerhalb der nationalen Überwachungsstrukturen fungiert als Bindeglied zwischen den am Monitoring beteiligten Institutionen, während eine Gruppe von Datenmanagementexperten und die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) die Übertragung von Daten an die internationale ICES-Datenbank (DOME) gewährleisten (Ausnahme Radionuklide). Somit erfolgt die Datenerhebung nach den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_126 || Schadstoffeinträge aus landseitigen Quellen (Ostsee) || Das Messprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffeinträgen über Flüsse und Direkteinleiter wie kommunalen Kläranlagen und industriellen Einleitern, die direkt in die Ostsee entwässern. An den Fluss- und Direkteinleiter-Messstellen werden die Konzentrationen der unterschiedlichen Parameter und der Abfluss erfasst. Berichtet werden die Daten als Fracht, welche aus der Multiplikation der Konzentration und dem Abfluss berechnet wird. Von den folgenden Parametern wird die Konzentration gemessen: Cadmium (Cd), Chrom (Cr), Kupfer (Cu), Quecksilber (Hg), Nickel (Ni), Zink (Zn) und Blei (Pb). Die Messdaten zu den Fluss- und Direkteinträgen (Fracht, Konzentration und Abfluss) werden benötigt, um die Menge an eingetragenen Schadstoffen zu bestimmen. Ziel ist es, auf der Grundlage der gesammelten Daten die Effektivität von Schadstoffreduktionsmaßnahmen abzuschätzen.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und WRRL sowie des OSPAR -Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 2 (UZ2) „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere den PLC-Guidelines „HELCOM Guidelines for the annual and periodical compilation and reporting of waterborne pollution inputs to the Baltic Sea“. Die Berichterstattung wird bei HELCOM koordiniert und es werden jährlich Berichte zu den PLC-Daten veröffentlicht.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffbelastung (Deskriptor 8) befinden, werden die Schadstoffeinträge an allen vorhanden Messstellen ganzjährig gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_304 || Biologische Effekte von Schadstoffen in Biota (Plattfische, AWZ Ostsee) || Wenn Fische durch Schadstoffe belastet werden und/oder umweltbedingtem Stress ausgesetzt sind, kann es zu Häufungen von Krankheitsbildern kommen. Deshalb werden mit dem Monitoring Programm Erkrankungen bei Fischen untersucht und dokumentiert. Die Krankheitssymptome werden durch äußerliche Inspektion festgestellt und in Schweregrade eingeteilt. Zusammen mit einem Faktor, der die Gesundheitsbeeinträchtigung des Fisches durch die Erkrankung gewichtet, werden die Krankheitsdaten in einen Fischkrankheiten Index (fish diesease index, FDI) überführt. Der Index wird als ein Wert pro Fisch aus insgesamt 9 Krankheitsbildern unter Einbeziehung des Schweregrades und der Gewichtung errechnet.
Die FDI Werte werden pro Individuum oder als Mittelwert einer Kohorte (Population) in Beziehung zu Bewertungskriterien gesetzt. Das sind Hintergrund Kriterien (background assessment criteria = BAC) und Umwelt Kriterien (environmental assessment criteria =EAC). Der BAC ist definiert als das niedrigste 10% Perzentil der Individuen oder der Mittelwerte, wenn Kohorten/Populationen bewertet werden. Der EAC ist der FDI Wert, der mit 10% Verlust im Körperkonditionsfaktor nach Fulton verbunden ist.
In unbelasteten oder wenig belasteten Fischbeständen, liegen die FDI Werte zwischen BAC und EAC. Kommt es zu Umweltbelastungen steigen die FDI Werte an und können den EAC übersteigen, was anzeigt, dass die Körperkondition der Fische erheblich (>10%) beeinträchtigt wird. Fische in solchen Beständen wachsen schlecht und sind in ihrer Reproduktionskapazität eingeschränkt.
In der Ostsee werden für das Monitoringprogramm Klieschen (Limanda limanda) verwendet.
Die im Monitoringprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und WRRL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Biologische Effekte von Schadstoffen“ und das MSRL Umweltziel „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben und voraussichtlich ab 2021 über MUDAB an ICES übermittelt.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch Teile der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich der Schadstoffe befinden, wird kontinuierlich gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht a
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_350 || Organische Schadstoffe in Sediment/Schwebstoff (< 2mm-Fraktion, Küsten-, Übergangsgewässer und AWZ, Ostsee) || Das Monitoringprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen im Sediment und Schwebstoffen an Messstellen in den Küstengewässern, der offenen Ostsee innerhalb der Deutschen AWZ und den Übergangsgewässern der Ostsee zur Bestimmung des Umweltzustandes, deren Auswirkungen und von Schadstofftrends. An den Sedimenten/Schwebstoffen der an den Messstellen entnommenen Proben werden die Konzentrationen der nachfolgend genannten Parameter erfasst und berichtet.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten chemischen Zustand befinden, werden Schadstoffkonzentrationen an den vorhandenen Messstellen kontinuierlich, aber je nach Institution in unterschiedlichen Frequenzen, gemessen. Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
Die Untersuchungen werden unter Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen der Monitoringprogramme der regionalen Meeresschutz-Übereinkommen (z.B. HELCOM Combine) sowie denen der WRRL durchgeführt. Im Rahmen der MSRL erheben die Messprogramme Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 2 (UZ 2) „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die Überwachung der Meeresumwelt erfolgt koordiniert auf Landes- und Bundesebene. Eine Gruppe von Fachexperten innerhalb der nationalen Überwachungsstrukturen fungiert als Bindeglied zwischen den am Monitoring beteiligten Institutionen, während eine Gruppe von Datenmanagementexperten und die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) die Übertragung von Daten an die internationale ICES-Datenbank (DOME) gewährleisten (Ausnahme Radionuklide). Somit erfolgt die Datenerhebung nach den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_351 || Schadstoffe (Metalle) in Sediment/Schwebstoff (< 63µm-Fraktion, Küsten-, Übergangsgewässer, Ostsee) || Das Monitoringprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen im Sediment und Schwebstoffen an Messstellen in den Küstengewässern, der offenen Ostsee innerhalb der Deutschen AWZ und den Übergangsgewässern der Ostsee zur Bestimmung des Umweltzustandes, deren Auswirkungen und von Schadstofftrends. An den Sedimenten/Schwebstoffen der an den Messstellen entnommenen Proben werden die Konzentrationen der nachfolgend genannten Parameter erfasst und berichtet.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten chemischen Zustand befinden, werden Schadstoffkonzentrationen an den vorhandenen Messstellen kontinuierlich, aber je nach Institution in unterschiedlichen Frequenzen, gemessen. Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
Die Untersuchungen werden unter Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen der Monitoringprogramme der regionalen Meeresschutz-Übereinkommen (z.B. HELCOM Combine) sowie denen der WRRL durchgeführt. Im Rahmen der MSRL erheben die Messprogramme Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 2 (UZ 2) „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die Überwachung der Meeresumwelt erfolgt koordiniert auf Landes- und Bundesebene. Eine Gruppe von Fachexperten innerhalb der nationalen Überwachungsstrukturen fungiert als Bindeglied zwischen den am Monitoring beteiligten Institutionen, während eine Gruppe von Datenmanagementexperten und die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) die Übertragung von Daten an die internationale ICES-Datenbank (DOME) gewährleisten (Ausnahme Radionuklide). Somit erfolgt die Datenerhebung nach den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_352 || Schadstoffe (Metalle) in Sediment/Schwebstoff (< 20µm-Fraktion, Übergangs- und Küstengewässer, AWZ, Ostsee) || Das Monitoringprogramm dient der Erfassung von Schadstoffkonzentrationen im Sediment und Schwebstoffen an Messstellen in den Küstengewässern, der offenen Ostsee innerhalb der Deutschen AWZ und den Übergangsgewässern der Ostsee zur Bestimmung des Umweltzustandes, deren Auswirkungen und von Schadstofftrends. An den Sedimenten/Schwebstoffen der an den Messstellen entnommenen Proben werden die Konzentrationen der nachfolgend genannten Parameter erfasst und berichtet.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten chemischen Zustand befinden, werden Schadstoffkonzentrationen an den vorhandenen Messstellen kontinuierlich, aber je nach Institution in unterschiedlichen Frequenzen, gemessen. Ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
Die Untersuchungen werden unter Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen der Monitoringprogramme der regionalen Meeresschutz-Übereinkommen (z.B. HELCOM Combine) sowie denen der WRRL durchgeführt. Im Rahmen der MSRL erheben die Messprogramme Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D8 „Schadstoffe“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 2 (UZ 2) „Meere ohne Verschmutzung durch Schadstoffe“.
Die Überwachung der Meeresumwelt erfolgt koordiniert auf Landes- und Bundesebene. Eine Gruppe von Fachexperten innerhalb der nationalen Überwachungsstrukturen fungiert als Bindeglied zwischen den am Monitoring beteiligten Institutionen, während eine Gruppe von Datenmanagementexperten und die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) die Übertragung von Daten an die internationale ICES-Datenbank (DOME) gewährleisten (Ausnahme Radionuklide). Somit erfolgt die Datenerhebung nach den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
|
Sedimentprøver
Fra sedimentet udtages prøver fra den øverste centimeter, som typisk repræsenterer de sidste 3-7 års påvirkninger. Prøverne udtages minimum engang i perioden på forskellige stationer. Der overvåges i alt 4 kontrolstationer, 178 operationelle stationer og 15 havstrategistationer . Frekvens og udvalgte parametre findes i NOVANA 2017-21 programbeskrivelsen. For sedimentstationerne uden for 12 sømil, ligger der ti i Nordsøen til og fem stationer fordelt på Skagerrak (1), Kattegat (2), Ar-konabassinet (1) og øst for Bornholm (1). Desuden udvides stofgruppepakken på et udvalg af de eksisterende fjord- og kyststationer. De supplerende stationer og stofgrupper vil foruden øget geografisk dækning sikre, at de af havstrategien fokuserede miljøfarlige stoffer dels overvåges i både HELCOM og OSPAR-områderne og dels på kystnære såvel som på åbenvandsstationer.
|
Biota
Muslinger
MFS opkoncentreres i muslinger, og målingerne repræsenterer et integreret niveau af stofferne over de sidste dage/måneder. Muslingeprøverne tages hvert andet år i tidsrummet oktober-november på 20 kontrolstationer. 178 stationer er omfattet af den operationelle overvågning og analyseres én gang over en femårig periode. Syv stationer er havstrategstationer, som analyseres hvert eller hvert andet år. Desuden er der tre supplerende stationer, hvorfra der analyseres for indholdet af dioxiner, dioxinlignende PCB’er og furaner en til to gange i perioden. Frekvens og udvalgte parametre findes i NOVANA 2017-21 programbeskrivelsen.
Fisk
For at vurdere mængden af miljøfarlige stoffer, som ophobes i de øverste led i fødekæden, analyseres også for miljøfarlige stoffer i fisk. Ålekvabbe eller sortmundet kutling, rødspætte og skrubbe er kystnære og stationære fisk, som på den baggrund er udvalgt som gode moniteringsorganismer i kystnære områder. For fisk måles MFS i tidsrummet oktober-januar, hvor 14 kontrolstationer analyseres hvert andet år og 178 operationelle stationer analyseres en til to gange over en femårig periode. Derudover er der 76 operationelle stationer hvor der specifikt undersøges for dioxiner, furaner og 12 dioxinlignende PCB’er i fisk. I regi af havstrategien overvåges foruden ovennævnte stoffer også for Polybromerede diphenylethere (PBDE) og Perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) i fiskelever på tre stationer hvert år. Frekvens og udvalgte parametre findes i NOVANA 2017-21 programbeskrivelsen.
|
Biologiske effekter
De biologiske effekter af miljøfarlige stoffer undersøges ved forskellige biologiske effektindikatorer i marine snegle, muslinger, fisk og krebsdyr. Graden af imposex og intersex måles hos havsnegle og overvåges hvert andet år på 14 stationer. Derudover overvåges også for biologiske effekter hos ålekvabber og muslinger hvert år på to stationer. For så vidt angår effektovervågning af krebsdyr overvåges der på to effektstationer hvert år.
|
Akutplan
I den kommende overvågningsperiode udarbejdes en akutplan, som adresserer konkrete arbejdsgange og overvågningsaktiviteter i forbindelse med akutte forureningshændelser. I den kommende overvågningsperiode vil der blive nedsat en tværministeriel arbejdsgruppe, som kan bidrage til at fastlægge rammerne for udarbejdelsen af overvågningsprogrammet for akutte forureningshændelser.
|
Non-target screeninger
Danmark deltager i et projekt om non-target screeninger. Projektet gennemføres under de regionale havkonventioner HELCOM og OSPAR. Igennem projektet skal det undersøges, om brugen af non-target screening kan identificere miljøfarlige stoffer i den marine fødekæde, - stoffer der ikke indgår i de rutinemæssige undersøgelser. Medlemslandende bidrager med allerede indsamlede prøver i form af muslinger, fisk og sediment. Efterfølgende sendes prøverne til analyselaboratoriet, som foretager non-target screening og analyse af, hvilke stoffer der er indeholdt i prøverne. Resultaterne kan efter-følgende anvendes til at vurdere, om yderligere stoffer fremadrettet bør medtages i den nationale overvågning. Samtidig kan resultaterne anvendes i regi af HELCOM og OSPAR til en vurdering af, om listerne over prioriterede miljøfarlige stoffer bør revurderes.
|
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the abundance of waterbirds in Estonian coastal areas during the breeding season. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds” and “SD8 – Contaminants”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C2 and potentially D1C3 and D1C4, as well as GES Descriptor D4, Criteria D4C2 and D4C4 and Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C2. Monitoring is conducted yearly on small islands (island groups) where the full number of nests and species are registered. White-tailed eagle breeding success is monitored to assess the impact of contaminants. The monitoring area of the white-tailed eagle relevant to marine status assessment covers the area up to 20 km landward from the seashore. The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM. Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (annually by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – health status; Mobile species – population characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor and estimate the load of nutrients and contaminants from the land-based sources via rivers and direct discharges. It provides data to monitoring strategies “SD5 – Eutrophication” and “SD8 - Contaminants”. The programme is related to anthropogenic pressure “Input of nutrients” and “Inputs of other substances” (MSFD Annex III). Monitoring is conducted yearly. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM PLC guidelines are followed.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Nutrient inputs - land-based sources; Contaminant inputs - land-based sources. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the concentrations of contaminants in sediments. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” and is related to GES Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C1. The pressure levels in the environment are assessed for the Estonian waters, both the coastal and the off-shore areas (territorial waters, HELCOM division). Sediment samples are analysed for the following harmful substances: PAHs, PBDEs and BDE209, DEHPs, HCHs, phenols, metals (Hg, Cd, Ni, Pb, Zn, Cu, Ba, Cr, As, Sn), TBT, pesticides, chlorobenzenes, PFOS, dioxins and dl-PCBs, HBCDDs, hydrocarbons (C10-C40). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM, but data are delivered separately by each country. HELCOM guidelines are followed as well as EU-WFD guidelines on sediment sampling for chemical status assessment. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and the HELCOM ICES database (by 1 September).
The programme has been modified since 2014: the list of monitoring substances and monitoring sites was updated.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Contaminant levels - in water/sediment. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the concentrations of contaminants in water. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” and is related to GES Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C1. The pressure levels in the environment are assessed for the Estonian waters, both the coastal and the off-shore areas (territorial waters, HELCOM sub-divisions). Water samples are analysed for the harmful substances: DEHPs, phenols, metals (Hg, Cd, Ni, Pb, Zn, Cu, Ba, Cr, As, Sn), TBT, pesticides, PFOS, PFAS, hydrocarbons (C10-C40). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM (data delivered separately by each country), and the HELCOM guidelines and requirements of WFD and its daughter directives are followed. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and the HELCOM ICES database (by 1 September).
The programme has been modified since 2014: the list of monitoring substances was updated.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Contaminant levels - in water/sediment |
The aim of the programme is to detect oil spills in the Estonian marine waters. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” and is related to GES Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C3 (and D8C1). Data are gathered by regular aerial surveillance flights and remote sensing. The extent, duration and volume of oil spills are estimated. The program is regionally coordinated and the HELCOM Response manual (Ch. 7: CO-OPERATION ON AERIAL SURVEILLANCE OVER THE BALTIC SEA AREA) is followed. Data are yearly reported to HELCOM.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Contaminant inputs – acute pollution events, incl. oil spills.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only the code was changed. |
The aim of the programme is to assess the impact of oil pollution on water birds. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” and is related to GES Descriptor D8, Criteria D8C2 and D8C4, and potentially provides data for monitoring strategy „SD1.1 – Biological diversity – Birds“. Data are gathered to assess the impact of human-induced pressures. Monitoring is conducted twice a year (spring and autumn) by counting dead birds washed ashore along the selected monitoring sites (on beaches). The species and their contamination by oil are recorded, and data are reported as the number of dead birds per 1 km of coastline. The monitoring program is regionally not coordinated yet. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from other human activities.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only the code was changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the concentrations of contaminants in biota. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” and is related to GES Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C1. The pressure levels in the environment and the contamination of the species are assessed for the Estonian waters, both the coastal and the off-shore areas (HELCOM sub-divisions). Fish samples (perch in coastal waters and herring in open sea areas, either muscle or liver, depending on the substance) are analysed for the following harmful substances: PAHs, PBDEs and BDE209, DEHPs, HCHs, phenols, metals (Hg, Cd, Ni, Pb, Zn, Cu, Ba, Cr, As, Sn), TBT, pesticides, chlorobenzenes, PFOS, dioxins and dl-PCBs, HBCDDs, hydrocarbons (C10-C40). PAHs in coastal waters are monitored from Mytilus trossulus Gould. The programme is regionally coordinated via HELCOM, but also by EU WFD chemical monitoring guidelines. The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 September) and European Environment Agency Eionet database.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Contaminant levels - in species, including seafood.
The programme has been modified since 2014: the list of monitoring substances was updated and sampling is performed from different matrixes. Food safety monitoring is no longer a part of the programme: the new separate programme was created (Contaminant level - in seafood). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the concentrations of radioactive substances in the marine environment. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD8 – Contaminants” and is related to GES Descriptor D8, Criterion D8C1. The pressure levels and status are assessed for the Estonian waters in the Gulf of Finland as agreed in HELCOM MORS. Monitoring is conducted yearly, and the samples collected from water, sediments and biota are analysed for Cs-137 and K-40 concentrations. The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM (data delivered separately by each country) and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Contaminant levels - in water/sediment; Contaminant levels - in species, including seafood.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only the code was changed. |
Program monitors contamination level in water, sediment, plankton and biota (Clupea harengus). General objective is to lower concentrations of synthetic contaminants |
Program monitors contamination level in water, sediment and biota (perca fluviatilis). General objective is to lower concentrations of synthetic contaminants |
Program monitors waterborne inputs of hazardous substances to the Baltic Sea from point sources that require environmental permit (Industry and waste water treatment plants) |
Program monitors waterborne inputs of hazardous substances to the Baltic Sea from point sources (Industry and waste water treatment plants) and riverine input of mercury, cadmium and nickel |
Program monitors airborne inputs of hazardous substances to the Baltic Sea. Assesment are made in co-operation with UNECE EMEP-program and HELCOM and is based on data by participating countries |
Introduction of oil spills by marine traffic. Monitored mainly with The Finnish Border Guards monitoring flights. Monitoring do not include oil incidents. Helcom reports oil and chemical incidents yearly - http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/maritime/accidents/ |
Program monitors radioactive substances occurance, transportation and amount in the Baltic Sea. Radioactivity is analyzed from water, sediment and biota (Esox lucius and Clupea harengus) samples |
Program monitors the discharge of radio-active compounds (Cs-137, Sr-90, Co-60) from nuclear power plants and rivers to the sea. |
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D08_ContaminantBiota apima prioritetinių pavojingų, pavojingų ir kitų Lietuvoje kontroliuojamų teršiančių medžiagų tyrimus žuvyse ir moliuskuose BAL-LT-MS-01 tyrimų rajone. Teršiančių medžiagų biotoje monitoringas Baltijos jūroje vykdomas 4 vietose, tiriamos medžiagos ar medžiagų grupės: brominti difenileteriai (BDE), dioksinai, lakūs organiniai junginiai (Nr. 17), HBCDD, PFOS, policikliniai aromatiniai angliavandeniliai (28, 15), pesticidai (34, 44), PCB 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180 – kartą per metus kas 3 metus; Hg, Cd, Cu, Zn, Pb, chlororganiniai pesticidai (9a,9b,14,16,18,26) – 1 kartą kasmet; chlordanas,mireksas,toksafenas,chlordekonas,heksabrodifenilas - 1 kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono būklei pagal D8 vertinti, cheminei būklei pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą vertinti, įgyvendinant Stokholmo konvenciją dėl Patvariųjų organinių teršalų (POT). Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinamas D8 rodiklis: Teršiančios medžiagos biotoje.
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje ir kasmet teikiami ICES, WISE.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D08_ContaminantSediment apima prioritetinių pavojingų, pavojingų ir kitų Lietuvoje kontroliuojamų teršiančių medžiagų tyrimus BAL-LT-MS-01 tyrimų rajone. Teršiančių medžiagų dugno nuosėdose monitoringas Baltijos jūroje vykdomas viso 12 vietų, tyrimų dažnumas ir stočių skaičius priklauso nuo konkrečios tiriamos medžiagos: naftos angliavandeniliai (6 vietos, 1-2 kartus kasmet, 5 vietos, 1 kartą kas 3 metus); Ftalatai, brominti difenileteriai (BDE), dioksinai, chloralkanai (C10-C13), fenoliai (24, 25), HBCDD, tributilalavo junginiai, PFOS, pesticidai (9a,9b,14,16,18, 26, 34, 36, 44), PCB (28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180) - 8 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą kas 3 metus; 1 vieta, 1 kartą per 6 metų ciklą; kiti pesticidai (1,3,8,9,13,19,27,29,33,38,39,40,41,42,45), chlordanas,mireksas,toksafenas,chlordekonas,heksabrodifenilas - 9 tyrimų vietos 1 kartą per 6 metų ciklą; lakūs organiniai junginiai (4, 6a, 10, 11, 17, 29a, 29b, 31, 32) 9 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą per 6 metų ciklą; policikliniai aromatiniai angliavandeniliai (28, 22, 15, 2) 7 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą per metus, 3 vietos – 1 kartą kas 3 metus); metalai Hg, Cd, Pb, Ni, Al - 6 vietos, 1-2 kartus kasmet, 6 vietos – 1 kartą kas 3 metus; Sn, Cu, Zn, Cr, As - 6 vietos, 1 kartą kasmet, 5 vietos, 1 kartą kas 3 metus.
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono būklei pagal D8 vertinti, cheminei būklei pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą vertinti, įgyvendinant Stokholmo konvenciją dėl Patvariųjų organinių teršalų (POT). Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinamas D8 rodiklis: Teršiančios medžiagos dugno nuosėdose.
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje ir kasmet teikiami ICES, WISE.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D08_ContaminantWater apima prioritetinių pavojingų, pavojingų ir kitų Lietuvoje kontroliuojamų teršiančių medžiagų tyrimus visame BAL-LT-MS-01 tyrimų rajone. Teršiančių medžiagų vandenyje monitoringas Baltijos jūroje vykdomas 12 vietų, tyrimų dažnumas ir stočių skaičius priklauso nuo konkrečios tiriamos medžiagos: naftos angliavandeniliai (12 vietų, 1-4 kartus kasmet); Ftalatai (7 tyrimų vietos, 1-4 kartus kas 2 metus); brominti difenileteriai (BDE) (6 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą kas 3 metus); chloralkanai (C10-C13) (6 tyrimų vietos, 2-4 kartus per metus, kartą per 6 metų ciklą); lakūs organiniai junginiai (4, 6a, 10, 11, 17, 29a, 29b, 31, 32) 7 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą per metus kas 3 metus); fenoliai (7 tyrimų vietos, 1-4 kartus per metus kas 3 metus); HBCDD (7 tyrimų vietos, 1kartą per metus kartą per 6 metų ciklą); tributilalavo junginiai (6 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą kas 3 metus); PFOS (7 tyrimų vietos, 1-4 kartus per metus kas 2 metus); policikliniai aromatiniai angliavandeniliai (28, 22, 15, 2) 7 tyrimų vietos, 1-4 kartus per metus kas 2 metus); metalai (Hg, Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cr, V) (10 vietų, 1-4 kartus kasmet), Sn, Al, As (6 tyrimų vietos, 1-4 kartus kas 3 metus); chlororganiniai pesticidai (9a,9b,14,16,18,26) (5 tyrimų vietos, 1-3 kartus kas 3 metus); kiti pesticidai (1,3,8,9,13,19,27,29,33,34,36,38,39,40,41,42,44,45) (7 tyrimų vietos, 1kartą per metus kartą per 6 metų ciklą); PCB 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180 (5 tyrimų vietos, 1 kartą kas 3 metus).
Duomenys naudojami BAL-LT-MS-01 rajono būklei pagal D8 vertinti, cheminei būklei pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą vertinti, įgyvendinant Stokholmo konvenciją dėl Patvariųjų organinių teršalų (POT). Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinamas D8 rodiklis:
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje ir kismet teikiami ICES, WISE.
|
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess concentration of pollutants in environmental elements water and sediments as well as in representative indicator organisms and to detect trends and pressure to the environment caused by these contaminants.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Concentrations of contaminants; Programmes Contaminants in biota, Contaminants in sediment and Contaminants in water. Coordination of monitoring is partially (water, sediments), fully (biota).
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Lists of priority substances as well as requirements for the monitoring (reference methods, assessment of the results etc.) are established in the Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 34 (adopted 22 January 2002) Regulations Regarding Discharge of Polluting Substances into Water. |
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess whether the observed concentrations of contaminants has adverse effect on health status of the marine organisms by the mean of measurements of disorders for benthic organisms. The reproductive disorders/malformed embryos as well as a level of stress indicator substances caused by the presence of contaminants in the environment is determined with an aim to get an overview of the biological effects of priority and other harmful (hazardous) compounds in organisms, including spatial distribution of these effects.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM programme topic is Biological effects of contaminants; sub-programme (indicators) Reproductive disorders: malformed embryos of amphipods; acetylcholinesterase inhibition.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components pollution by observing spatial extent and duration of significant acute pollution events.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program (sub-programme "Acute pollution"), in cooperation with the other Member States. The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Other corresponding legislative acts regulating control of prevention of accidental pollution events (oil spills from ships):
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (adopted in Latvia 20.08.1992.)
Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 455 Adopted 8 October 2002 Procedures for Reception of Ship-generated Waste and Polluted Water and for Development of a Ship-generated Waste Handling Plan as amended. |
The programme of contaminant levels in organisms, including commercially exploited species, covers research on fish collected once a year during the summer season from 7 locations: Władysławowo fishery, Kolobrzeg – Darłowo fishery, Gdańsk Basin, Pomeranian Bay, Szczecin Lagoon, Vistula lagoon and Central Coast, studies of mussels collected once a year during summer at one location in the Sopot area and studies of macrophytes collected from 4 locations: Orłowski Cliff, Jama Kuźnicka, Słupsk Bank, Rowy. In fish muscle tissue polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hexabromocyclododecane, perfluorooctane sulphonate, perfluorooctanoic acid, polychlorinated biphenyls, organotin compounds, organochlorine pesticides, mercury, arsenic and 137Cs are analysed. In fish liver lead, cadmium, zinc i copper are analysed. In fish bile polyaromatic hydrocarbon metabolites are analysed. In mussel soft tissue polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hexabromocyclododecane, perfluorooctane sulphonate, perfluorooctanoic acid, polychlorinated biphenyls, organotin compounds, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, organochlorine pesticides, lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, zinc and copper are analysed. In macrophyte tissue lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, zinc, copper 137Cs are analysed. The programme also covers analysis of arsenic in fish as a possible indicator of pollution with chemical warfare agents. Arsenic is analysed in fish muscle tissue collected from 4 locations of the deep sea area.
Data on dioxins, furans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls are collected within dioxin monitoring conducted under National Control Programme of dioxins (PCDD), furans (PCDF), dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCB) and non-dioxin-like PCBs (ndl-PCB) in animal food products supervised by General Veterinary Inspectorate. Monitoring assumes the assimilation of data from WFD monitoring. |
The programme of contaminant levels in organisms, including commercially exploited species, covers research on fish collected once a year during the summer season from 7 locations: Władysławowo fishery, Kolobrzeg – Darłowo fishery, Gdańsk Basin, Pomeranian Bay, Szczecin Lagoon, Vistula lagoon and Central Coast, studies of mussels collected once a year during summer at one location in the Sopot area and studies of macrophytes collected from 4 locations: Orłowski Cliff, Jama Kuźnicka, Słupsk Bank, Rowy. In fish muscle tissue polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hexabromocyclododecane, perfluorooctane sulphonate, perfluorooctanoic acid, polychlorinated biphenyls, organotin compounds, organochlorine pesticides, mercury, arsenic and 137Cs are analysed. In fish liver lead, cadmium, zinc i copper are analysed. In fish bile polyaromatic hydrocarbon metabolites are analysed. In mussel soft tissue polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hexabromocyclododecane, perfluorooctane sulphonate, perfluorooctanoic acid, polychlorinated biphenyls, organotin compounds, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, organochlorine pesticides, lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, zinc and copper are analysed. In macrophyte tissue lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, zinc, copper 137Cs are analysed. The programme also covers analysis of arsenic in fish as a possible indicator of pollution with chemical warfare agents. Arsenic is analysed in fish muscle tissue collected from 4 locations of the deep sea area.
Data on dioxins, furans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls are collected within dioxin monitoring conducted under National Control Programme of dioxins (PCDD), furans (PCDF), dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCB) and non-dioxin-like PCBs (ndl-PCB) in animal food products supervised by General Veterinary Inspectorate. Monitoring assumes the assimilation of data from WFD monitoring. |
The programme of contaminant levels in sediment includes analyses of organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls. polyaromatic hydrocarbons, cadmium, lead, mercury, aluminium, arsenic, copper, zinc, organotin compounds and sulfur mustard in stratified sediments collected once every 6 years in four locations: Gdańsk Deep, Bornholm Deep, south-eastern Gotland Basin, Bornholm Basin, sampled once every 3 years in 2 locations: Vistula lagoon and Szczecin lagoon.
The programme also includes measurements and analysis of arsenic and sulfur mustard as indicators of potential contamination with chemical warfare agents and PAHs as indicators of contamination with petroleum products, the source of which is fuel from shipwrecks. Arsenic and sulfur mustard are analysed in sediment samples from six locations from the open sea and the Gulf of Gdańsk. PAH monitoring includes analysis of sediment samples from five locations from the Puck Bay and the Gulf of Gdańsk. Samples are collected once a year. |
The programme of contaminant levels in sediment includes analyses of organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls. polyaromatic hydrocarbons, cadmium, lead, mercury, aluminium, arsenic, copper, zinc, organotin compounds and sulfur mustard in stratified sediments collected once every 6 years in four locations: Gdańsk Deep, Bornholm Deep, south-eastern Gotland Basin, Bornholm Basin, sampled once every 3 years in 2 locations: Vistula lagoon and Szczecin lagoon.
The programme also includes measurements and analysis of arsenic and sulfur mustard as indicators of potential contamination with chemical warfare agents and PAHs as indicators of contamination with petroleum products, the source of which is fuel from shipwrecks. Arsenic and sulfur mustard are analysed in sediment samples from six locations from the open sea and the Gulf of Gdańsk. PAH monitoring includes analysis of sediment samples from five locations from the Puck Bay and the Gulf of Gdańsk. Samples are collected once a year. |
The programme contaminant levels in water includes analysis of 137Cs and 90Sr in seawater samples collected once a year at 17 monitoring stations from surface and near-bottom layers and every 20 m depths at 5 monitoring stations as well as analysis of pharmaceuticals: diclofenac and 17-alpha ethinylestradiol in surface water collected once a year at 9 monitoring stations. Monitoring assumes the assimilation of data from WFD monitoring. |
The programme contaminant levels in water includes analysis of 137Cs and 90Sr in seawater samples collected once a year at 17 monitoring stations from surface and near-bottom layers and every 20 m depths at 5 monitoring stations as well as analysis of pharmaceuticals: diclofenac and 17-alpha ethinylestradiol in surface water collected once a year at 9 monitoring stations. Monitoring assumes the assimilation of data from WFD monitoring. |
The parameter characterizing oil spills is the average annual spill volume expressed in m3 in a specific assessment area. Data for this parameter are obtained from aerial observations supervised by the Maritime Office in Gdynia. The data are obtained from HELCOM assessments of the HELCOM Core Indicator: Operational oil spills from ship (https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/). |
The parameter characterizing oil spills is the average annual spill volume expressed in m3 in a specific assessment area. Data for this parameter are obtained from aerial observations supervised by the Maritime Office in Gdynia. The data are obtained from HELCOM assessments of the HELCOM Core Indicator: Operational oil spills from ship (https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/indicators/). |
Two parameters are monitored within the monitoring programme of mobile species – fish – health status: micronucleus test - genotoxicity index (monitored since 2014) end externally visible fish diseases (monitored since 1994).
In order to perform the micronucleus test, fish blood samples are collected once a year in 4 to 6 assessment areas. The analysis of aberrations with micronucleus test method is performed by means of microscopy analysis.
The monitoring of externally visible fish diseases is performed on all fish species collected within monitoring of deep-sea, shallow areas of the open sea and transitional and coastal waters.
MIR-PIB began observations of external pathological changes in Baltic fish in 1980 and from 1994 this institute performs systematic monitoring in this field. The methodology applied in monitoring programme performed by MIR-PIB has been developed based on recommendations of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), that coordinates research on the international scale. National reports on the occurrence of externally visible fish diseases are drawn annually and presented at meetings of ICES Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO). Research conducted by MIR-PIB cover recording of only 3 diseases (skin ulcers, lymphocytosis and skeletal deformities).
In 2021 additional pilot monitoring of pathological changes has been conducted for 2 fish species – cod Gadus morhua and flounder Platichthys flesus – neceserry to calculate fish disease index – FDI (6-9 pathological changes depending on the species). Selected individuals will be submitted to standard ichthyological analysis. The mass of gonads and liver of monitored fish will also be determined. The analysis of pathological changes will focus on subsequent diseases:
flatfish – lymphocystis, ulceration, fin diseases, skeletal deformities, existance of parasites (Lepeophtheirus pectoralis i Cryptocotyle sp.), macroscopic liver neoplasms, non-specific histopathological liver lesions, histopathological contaminant specific liver lesions;
cod – ulcers, epidermal hyperplasia/papilloma, fin disease, skeletal deformities, gill disease, existance of parasites (Lepeophtheirus pectoralis and Cryptocotyle sp.), macroscopic liver neoplasms, non-specific histopathological liver lesions, histopathological contaminant specific liver lesions.
The research will be performed in 2 waterbodies (Outher Puck Bay and Inner Gulf of Gdańsk) in order to extens |
Two parameters are monitored within the monitoring programme of mobile species – fish – health status: micronucleus test - genotoxicity index (monitored since 2014) end externally visible fish diseases (monitored since 1994).
In order to perform the micronucleus test, fish blood samples are collected once a year in 4 to 6 assessment areas. The analysis of aberrations with micronucleus test method is performed by means of microscopy analysis.
The monitoring of externally visible fish diseases is performed on all fish species collected within monitoring of deep-sea, shallow areas of the open sea and transitional and coastal waters.
MIR-PIB began observations of external pathological changes in Baltic fish in 1980 and from 1994 this institute performs systematic monitoring in this field. The methodology applied in monitoring programme performed by MIR-PIB has been developed based on recommendations of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), that coordinates research on the international scale. National reports on the occurrence of externally visible fish diseases are drawn annually and presented at meetings of ICES Working Group on Pathology and Diseases of Marine Organisms (WGPDMO). Research conducted by MIR-PIB cover recording of only 3 diseases (skin ulcers, lymphocytosis and skeletal deformities).
In 2021 additional pilot monitoring of pathological changes will be conducted for 2 fish species – cod Gadus morhua and flounder Platichthys flesus – neceserry to calculate fish disease index – FDI (6-9 pathological changes depending on the species). Selected individuals will be submitted to standard ichthyological analysis. The mass of gonads and liver of monitored fish will also be determined. The analysis of pathological changes will focus on subsequent diseases:
flatfish – lymphocystis, ulceration, fin diseases, skeletal deformities, existance of parasites (Lepeophtheirus pectoralis i Cryptocotyle sp.), macroscopic liver neoplasms, non-specific histopathological liver lesions, histopathological contaminant specific liver lesions;
cod – ulcers, epidermal hyperplasia/papilloma, fin disease, skeletal deformities, gill disease, existance of parasites (Lepeophtheirus pectoralis and Cryptocotyle sp.), macroscopic liver neoplasms, non-specific histopathological liver lesions, histopathological contaminant specific liver lesions.
The research will be performed in 2 waterbodies (Outher Puck Bay and Inner Gulf of Gdańsk) in order to extensi |
White-tailed Eagle Productivity Monitoring is carried out to meet the requirements of the Birds Directive as well as the Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 for Descriptors D1 and D8. The results of the monitoring are also used for the work of the HELCOM group |
Marine mammals are top predators in the food chain, which increases the probability of detecting changes in ecosystems and high levels of hazardous substances. Substances found in low levels in fish can be enriched and detected in high levels in seals and porpoises, which makes them suitable as indicator organisms for early detection of changes in the environment.
The primary aim of the monitoring is to study the long-term effects of hazardous substances and other human activities affecting the marine environment by documenting population development for grey seals, harbor seals, ringed seals and harbor porpoises in combination with studies of cause of death, health, diseases and chemical analyzes.
Marine mammals (bycatch, hunted or found dead for unknown reasons) are collected and investigated each year. Monitoring of Baltic seal healths started in 1975 and was expanded with ongoing health and disease monitoring of marine mammals in 2020.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
Comment: D8C2 was not in the list for the feature Adverse effects on species and habitats, but this criteria is relevant for this programme. |
Monitoring, where biological effects are studied at both subcellular and cellular levels, can be used to describe the general state of health of different organisms and provides an opportunity to demonstrate the toxicity of unknown and known substances in a study area. The national monitoring of the health status of coastal fish aims to use proven and sensitive methods to demonstrate the presence and effects in fish of a possible large-scale impact of hazardous substances in coastal reference areas in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea.
The aim of the monitoring is to be able to describe the current state of the environment in coastal reference areas regarding effects of mainly hazardous substances on the state of fish health by following time trends of biochemical, physiological, histological and pathological effect variables in fish. The surveys shall also provide reference data for surveys on fish in regionally and locally affected areas and provide a basis for monitoring environmental quality objectives, regional environmental objectives and the effects of measures taken to reduce chemical emissions.
The national monitoring of fish health began with surveys of perch in 1988 in the Baltic Sea and in 1989 the programme was expanded with eelpout from the North Sea.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects. |
White-tailed eagles are at the top of the food chain in the Baltic Sea, which makes the species particularly exposed to hazardous substances. White-tailed eagles can show high levels of persistent organic compounds that are also enriched in their adipose tissue. The white-tailed eagle was one of the earliest animal species to signal the problems of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea, which was expressed as a greatly reduced reproductive success. The primary purpose of the monitoring is to study effects and demonstrate long-term load changes of hazardous substances in the marine environment by documenting the reproductive capacity and population development of the white-tailed eagle population along the Swedish Baltic coast. Observed reproduction figures are compared with background levels from the time before the impact of environmental toxins.
Other than the main areas that are included in national monitoring there are also monitoring in other areas based on voulontary actions, but this is mostly conducted by elderly persons, so the future of these ations are rather uncertain, therefore we only included MRU:s covered by national monitoring.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects. |
Air pollutants can travel long distances in the atmosphere before reaching land, inland water or sea via dry deposition or precipitation. Emissions of pollutants to air come primarily from combustion (for example, vehicle traffic and burning with fossil fuels), metal production, wind transport of sand and by the spread of ammonia from manure into the air.
The SEPA, municipalities and air conservation associations monitor air quality in Sweden, through measurements and model calculations of air pollution. Frequency of monitoring varies from daily to monthly. Emission data from Swedish industries are available to the public on the website ”Utsläpp i siffror”, where the information is retrieved from the environmental reports for the facilities that are required to submit an emission declaration (according to Appendix 1 in the Environmental Report Regulation (NFS 2016: 8)). Information in the environmental reports is also annually reported to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR).
Sweden's modeling of air pollutants is part of the internationally coordinated European monitoring and evaluation program (EMEP) under the UN Convention on Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). Substances deposited over land and lakes can be spread to the sea and this input is thus captured in the calculations of inputs of pollutants from land. Substances deposited directly on the sea surface are calculated using models under C-LRTAP by EMEP. This information is used in the Swedish marine management based on reports that EMEP delivers to HELCOM and OSPAR. EMEP receives data from countries within the UN Economic Commission for Europe as well as data on international shipping, and produces various model products, e.g. deposition on the sea surface and source distributions showing which countries and sectors the air pollutants come from.
Input data are not used to assess the state of the environment, but as the load can cause a number of negative effects on the ecosystem, it is used to identify the causes of impacts, design necessary measures, and to follow up effects of implemented measures.
The monitoring of the inputs of nutrients and metals to the sea via the atmosphere began in 1979, when the collection of Swedish data for Helcom and Emep began at a station in northern Sweden. The measurements of organic hazardous substances started in 1994. |
Nutrients and hazardous substances in the sea often come from sources on land, such as agriculture, forestry, fish farms, industries, stormwater and sewage treatment plants. The pollutants are added to the sea via direct discharges and runoff from land. The total inputs from land are calculated annually based on measured levels of nutrients and hazardous substances in larger estuaries, measured water flows and reported discharges to coastal waters from industrial and municipal point sources.
Approximately every six years, calculations are also made of the source distribution, that is, a survey of the sources of the nutrients that end up in the sea. This includes both point sources and diffuse sources of inland waters, including atmospheric deposition.
Input data are not used to assess the state of the environment, but as the input can cause a number of negative effects on the ecosystem, it is used to identify the causes of impacts, design necessary measures, and to follow up effects of implemented measures. |
Bathing water in lakes and seas in Sweden is monitored in the summers and serves several purposes. Each sampling is a current assessment of the water quality at the bathing site and the municipality informs the public if there are risks with bathing. For the bathing sites covered by the Bathing Water Directive (2006/7 / EC), a historical assessment of the bathing water is also carried out, where the bathing sites are classified based on results from four years back in time. In the event of long-term or short-term pollution in EU baths, the public is informed and measures are taken. The aim of the Bathing Water Directive is for Member States to achieve good bathing water quality and a high level of protection.
Bathing water can contain various infectious substances, toxins from phytoplankton or cyanobacteria or other pollutants that can cause diseases and other health-related problems. Faecal contaminated water can contain pathogenic bacteria, viruses and parasites. Accidental ingestion of contaminated water can mainly cause gastrointestinal symptoms. When monitoring EU baths, levels of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and intestinal enterococci are analyzed. These bacteria are normally found in the feces of humans and other warm-blooded animals and therefore act as indicators of fecal contamination. At each sampling occasion, an ocular inspection is also performed to detect algal blooms or marine litter.
Bathing sites that are not covered by the Bathing Water Directive are often monitored in the same way as EU bathing sites by the municipalities, although this is not mandatory.
Monitoring frequence varies from weekly to 2-weekly during the bathing water season (21 June-29 August in the south, 15 July-15 August in the North). |
Tributyl tin (TBT) and other organic tin compounds have previously been used as an additive in boat bottom paint because the substance is very effective against biofouling. Unfortunately, TBT has been shown to be extremely toxic and can cause damage to marine life in very low concentrations and is therefore a priority in marine monitoring. Restrictions and bans on the use of TBT-based paints on boats were introduced in many countries starting in the mid-1980s, and the use of these substances is now completely banned. Organic tin compounds are unfortunately percistent and often accumulate in sediments and will continue to have a negative impact on the environment for a long time to come.
TBT can disrupt the production of the hormones that control the development, growth and reproduction in animals and can lead to the formation of male sex characteristics, such as the penis and spermatic cords in snails. This phenomenon which is irreversible is called imposex and can lead to reduced reproductive capacity. The disorder has so far been observed in about a hundred snail species in the world. Of these species, Tritia nitida and Peringia ulvae are used in the Swedish monitoring.
The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor long-term changes in the marine environment with regard to concentrations and effects of organic tin compounds.
The monitoring started in 2003 in the North sea region and 2008 in the Baltic sea.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects. |
Monoporeia affinis is a small benthic crustacean that occurs in the Baltic Sea and is a relic from the ice age. Monoporeia affinis is sensitive to hazardous substances found in sediments and other environmental impacts and therefore works well as an indicator species. Environmental monitoring, where biological effects are studied, can be used to describe the general state of health of various organisms and provides an opportunity to demonstrate the toxicity of unknown and known substances in a study area. Registering the incidence of malformed eggs and embryos of Monoporeia affinis is a sensitive method for detecting environmental changes, including exposure to hazardous substances.
The purpose of the monitoring is to detect long-term changes in pressures, mainly of metals and organic pollutants, by documenting biological effects with the help of the embryonic development of Monoporeia affinis. The monitoring thus primarily follow changes in environmental conditions with regard to anthropogenic pollutants, but also follow changes in the oxygen situation and other influencing factors such as food supply at the bottom as well as climate change.
The monitored areas are selected to provide information on as many sea basins as possible and to provide the opportunity for possible surveys in more affected areas. In order for the results to be used as a reference for surveys in more polluted areas, the sampling stations are located in areas that are unaffected by local emissions.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
In particular, biochemical markers and markers for genotoxicity are evaluated as a complement to field studies of embryo malformations and other reproductive variables. |
Emissions of oil and other harmful substances entail a significant risk to the surrounding marine environment by, for example, causing acute toxic effects or permanent damage such as suffocation. The purpose of the monitoring is therefore to monitor activities at sea in order to be able to detect and combat emissions at an early stage. The operation also performs mapping and follow-up of identified locations where the consequences of an emission, or the risk of emission, are greatest, as well as established critical time periods when the consequences of an emission and the probability of emission are greatest. When a discharge is detected, a visual assessment is made and, if necessary, sampling of the discharge is also performed to obtain more information. |
Radionuclides in the marine environment are monitored through both national monitoring and local monitoring at the nuclear facilities. The national monitoring aims to monitor how the levels in the environment change in the long term and on a large scale and is mainly focused on cesium-137, which mainly originates from the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and from the atmospheric atomic bomb tests carried out during the 1950s and 1960s.
The local monitoring consists partly of control of emissions and partly of sampling and measurement according to an environmental program for radioactive substances in the local environment. The purpose of the latter is to verify that the levels of radioactive substances continue to remain at a low level and that no major releases have taken place that have not been detected through the emission control. The measurements in the local environment also provide knowledge of long-term trends and can be used to validate the calculation methods used to calculate the radiation dose to the public. The results from the measurements in the local environment also provide important knowledge about what it looked like in the surroundings before a possible accident.
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency's 16 sediment stations are visited every five years, and The Swedish Radiation Safety Authoritys' (SSM) supplementary stations are visited annually. The national monitoring is generally performed once a year, with the exception of the stations where data are reported to OSPAR, where sampling of water and fish is performed twice a year.
The programmes for local environmental monitoring are based on the five nuclear facilities and cover the surrounding stretch of coast with a total of just over 140 sampling stations. Sampling is performed annually with sampling frequencies that vary between monthly (epiphytes), quarterly (sediment) and once a year (macrovegetation and benthic fauna). Every four years, an intensive programme is carried out with an increased number of sampling stations, and where a deeper sediment profile is also obtained at each facility for analysis regarding the content of radioactive substances.
Concentrations in the following species are monitored: Clupea harengus, Gadus morhua, Zoarces viviparus, Perca fluviatilis, Anguilla anguilla, Esox lucius, Myxocephalus scorpius, Platichtys flesus, Symphodus melops, Chelon labrosus, Homarus gammarus, Cancer pagurus, Cancer maenas, Fucus vesiculosus, Cladophora sp, Fucus serratus, E |
Many substances, both metals and organic pollutants, are adsorbed into particles in the sediments and the sediment can therefore constitute a potential swale for pollutants. Sediment is therefore a suitable material to monitor to follow conditions and trends of hazardous substances exposure as well as dispersal patterns of hazardous substances.
With the national monitoring, we aim to monitor large-scale changes and diffuse impacts, for example via long-distance transport, and consequently the sampling stations are located so that they are as far as possible unaffected by local emissions. This makes the results suitable for use as reference sites for the local monitoring. The local monitoring is carried out in more affected areas adjacent to cities, ports, industries, sewage treatment plants or estuaries.
Monitoring frequency varies from every 5 to 10 years
In addition to the elements listed below, Alpha-Chlordan, α-Endosulfan and β-Endosulfan is also monitored (were not part of the Reference List). |
Examples of animals that ingest hazardous substances are mussels, fish and seabirds. By measuring concentrations of hazardous substances in samples from these animals, the contaminant load in a sea basin can be reflected. The purpose of the national monitoring is to monitor how the levels of a number of hazardous substances vary over time at selected stations and between stations in reference areas (areas unaffected by local sources) in order to monitor the effects of bans and restrictions on emissions and to generate representative reference values for regional and local hazardous substances studies. Parts of the material collected are saved in the Swedish Museum of Natural History's environmental specimen bank for future retrospective analyzes of currently both known and unknown substances.
When analyzing mussels, perch and eelpout, which are stationary species, the hazardous substances load is reflected in a smaller, delimited area, while the analyzes of cod and herring, which move over larger areas, better reflect the general load in a larger area.
With the national monitoring, we aim to monitor large-scale changes and diffuse impacts, for example via long-distance transport, and consequently the sampling stations are located so that they are as far as possible unaffected by local emissions. This makes the results suitable for use as reference sites for the local monitoring. The local monitoring is carried out in more affected areas adjacent to cities, ports, industries, sewage treatment plants or estuaries.
The monitoring started in 1968 in the Baltic Sea and in 1979 in the North Sea.
An extra collection of mussels also takes place approximately every five years in a reference network along large parts of Sweden's coast that enables analysis of oil-related substances before and after a discharge. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
||||||||||
Monitoring details |
|| MP_92 || Gemessene nasse Deposition von ausgewählten Schadstoffen (Pb, Cd, Hg, As, Ni, Cr, Zn, Cu; B(a)P, B(a)A, Summe B(b+j+k)F, I(cd)P, DB(a)A ); Modellierte Gesamtdeposition (trocken & nass) von ausgewählten Schadstoffen (Pb, Cd, Hg, B(a)P, PCDD/Fs, HCB, PCB-153) mit dem EMEP-Modell
|
|| MP_124 || Berechnung der Schadstoffemissionen von Pb, Cd, Hg, As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Se, Zn, B(a)P, PCDD/F, HCB, PCB) mit dem EMEP-Modell
|
|| MP_310 || Nationales Monitoring zum Erfüllen der Anforderungen aus der MSRL hinsichtlich D8: Schadstoffe in marinen Fischen.
|
|| MP_314 ||
|
|| MP_330 ||
|
|| MP_344 ||
|
|| MP_355 ||
|
|| MP_356 ||
|
|| MP_126 || Deutschland entwässert aus einem Gebiet von 25645 km2 in die Ostsee. Von diesem Gebiet werden 18370 km2 durch Messungen erfasst. Die restlichen 7275 km2 werden nicht durch Messungen erfasst, sondern auf der Datenbasis von ähnlichen gemessenen Gebieten errechnet. Im HELCOM PLC-Projekt werden jährlich die Flusseinträge und die direkt Einträge aus dem deutschen Ostseeeinzugsgebiet erfasst. Anlassbezogen wird eine periodische Berichterstattung durchgeführt, welche zusätzlich zu den jährlich erfassten Flusseintrgen und direkten Einträgen noch die modellierten pfadspezischen Einträge aus dem deutschen Ostseeeinzugsgebiet enthält. Die Modellierung wird mit dem MoRE- Modell durchgeführt (https://isww.iwg.kit.edu/MoRE.php)
|
|| MP_304 || Äußerlich sichtbare Fischkrankheiten, Makroskopische Leberneoplasmen (Tumore), Leberhistopathologie, Mikronucleus Assay, Konditionsfaktor (Fitness-Indikator)
|
|| MP_350 ||
|
|| MP_351 ||
|
|| MP_352 ||
|
Data indsamles efter den akutte hændelse er forekommet.
|
Projektet gennemføres under de regionale havkonventioner HELCOM og OSPAR. Igennem projektet skal det undersøges, om brugen af non-target screening kan identificere miljøfarlige stoffer i den marine fødekæde, - stoffer der ikke indgår i de rutinemæssige undersøgelser.
|
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. All breeding species on the island are registered. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend by species are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity their nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are registered. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously. Other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years.
Breeding birds monitoring is mainly being conducted in frames of the national monitoring programme. Updated and detailed information on the monitoring plan according to the national monitoring programme is available at https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/eesmargid-tegevused/keskkonnaseire/seireankeedid. |
Based on the data from hydrometric stations, the discharges of the monitored rivers are determined. The flows of rivers and areas that not covered by the monitoring are estimated using the corresponding transfer coefficients and model (ESTMODEL). In frames of hydrochemical monitoring of watercourses, the contents of nutrients and hazardous substances in water are determined at designated monitoring stations. The pollution loads are assessed by the Estonian Environment Agency according to the methodology agreed within the HELCOM cooperation (PLC-Water Guidelines; https://helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-guidelines/plc-water-guidelines/).
The hydrochemical sampling is performed yearly, 4-12 times a year; river flows are measured continuously.
The data are used for assessment of achievement of environmental targets (targets 16 and 23) on the basis of associated indicators. |
According to the national environmental monitoring programme, coastal water sediment samples are taken from clayey sediments (more than 20% of sediments with siltstone or clay fraction particles d <0.63 μm) from the upper sediment layer of the accumulation areas (depth 0-3-5 cm, maximum 10 cm for older pollution). Minimum of three subsamples are collected for the pooled sample. Samples, with a total volume of at least 1 litre, are mixed, sieved to remove stones and other unnecessary particles. In the laboratory, the concentrations of hazardous substances (µg/kg dry weight) and supplementary parameters as total organic carbon (TOC) concentration are determined.
The HELCOM sediment sampling methodology may be used for sampling and contaminants' trend analysis in the territorial sea area.
The monitoring is carried at designated sites out in rotation. The monitoring data are also gathered from the environmental impact assessment projects and environmental permits when the corresponding requirement is listed. |
The samples for analyses of contaminant levels in water are collected from coastal and territorial waters in frames of the national monitoring programme. The monitoring considers WFD requirements. Total organic carbon and water hardness are also measured for supplementary background information.
The monitoring is conducted annually in rotation at designated sites - 3 times in the 6-year period at certain sites, 1-4 times during the ice-free period.
The monitoring data are also gathered from companies' environmental permits, according to monitoring and frequency requirements listed. |
Oil pollution is monitored by the Estonian Police and Border Guard Board. The remote observation is performed either by satellite or aerial surveys (ordered and patrol flights), which provides the detection of pollution. The satellite images also contain additional information about the possible level of pollution alert. Three alert levels – green, yellow and red – are distinguished depending on pollution seriousness. When pollution is detected, an aircraft or ship is sent to assess the situation. There are also regular flights conducted 2-3 times a week on certain routes. In case of flight monitoring during daylight hours, the extent and volume of pollution shall be determined visually by the operator in accordance with HELCOM methods. In the dark time, the radar device provides information on the extent of the pollution.
To detect oil pollution, satellite images are ordered and patrol flights are organized in the Estonian sea area. Patrols are coordinated with Finland by a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), under which the Gulf of Finland is covered by patrols even if one of the parties is unable to do so at some reason. The rest of the Estonian sea area is covered only by Estonian patrol flights. |
The monitoring is carried out twice a year in four designated areas: in spring, usually in April and May, when migratory waterbirds have not left yet, and in autumn, usually in late October or early November, when the autumn migration of birds is ending. In some monitoring areas additional winter and spring observations have also been conducted at the initiative of observers. The number of dead birds is characterized by the density (number of individuals/km).
At certain monitoring area, all dead birds or their remains washed ashore are counted. Residues that are difficult to determine are collected with reference material for later determination.
In addition, dead seals found during the observations are recorded. The main parameters obtained as a result of monitoring are the density of dead waterbirds (individuals/ km) and the proportion of oil-stained waterbirds of all found waterbirds (%).
The monitoring is carried out in frames of the national environmental monitoring programme (Wildlife diversity and landscape monitoring subprogramme, monitoring activity Birds washed ashore). |
Sampling material (fish) is collected from commercial trawling and scientific fish monitoring and the biological analyse is performed (length, weight, age, sex and gonadal maturity). For chemical analyses as uniform as possible in age, size, sex and sexual maturity specimens are chosen. Chemical analyses should be performed in 3-5 replicates for each chemical class, therefore pooled fish samples are used to make up a sample large enough to provide sufficient material for analysis.
The target species for monitoring of contaminants in biota are perch (Perca fluviatilis) in coastal waters and herring (Clupea harengus) in territorial waters and off-shore areas. Samples are taken from female 10-15 perch specimens caught in July-September and female 12-15 herring specimens caught in August-September. Depending on substances that will be analysed, both liver samples (metals, excl. Hg) and muscle tissue (dorso-lateral muscle) samples are made. Although fish is predominantly used for monitoring, PAHs (excl anthracene, naphthalene, fluoranthene) should be determined separately from molluscs - Mytilus trossulus Gould, soft body is used for sample. Pooled sample should be made to provide sufficient material for analysis, which makes ca 100 specimens per sample. Adult specimens (70-90% of the maximum size) are collected. If there are not enough mussels in the coastal water body to collect a representative sample, or if sampling proves to be too expensive, the molluscs samples are replaced by fish samples and analyses are performed from fish muscle tissue.
Monitoring is carried out in frames of national marine monitoring - hazardous substances, which contributes to WFD RBMP and programme of measures. In addition, the data on contaminants concentration and impact in biota are gathered from different project-based studies that are ordered by the Ministry of the Environment. |
Radioactive substances monitoring is carried out by the Environmental Board in the frame of national environmental monitoring programme (radiation monitoring sub-programme). Monitoring in seawater, biota (fish, bladderwrack) and sediments is carried out every year at designated sites and areas in the Gulf of Finland, and long-term data series are already available. Water samples and sediment samples are collected during off-shore monitoring cruises, benthic samples are collected separately and fish samples are obtained from professional fishermen (commercial fishing).
The collection and analysis of samples are guided by the HELCOM MORS guidelines and the radiation monitoring sub-programme of the national environmental monitoring programme. Water samples from the Baltic Sea are collected from five stationary stations agreed in the framework of the HELCOM marine monitoring programme. The concentration of Cs-137 and K-40 in the surface water samples of the Gulf of Finland is determined by gamma spectrometry. |
Metals and MCPA determined every year. WFD contaminant groups are monitored only once during six year monitoring period. PFAS (2019), alklyylifenolit (2020), phthalates (2021); |
Metals and MCPA determined every year. WFD contaminant groups are monitored only once during six year monitoring period. PFAS (2019), alklyylifenolit (2020), phthalates (2021); |
Oil and chemical incidents, which are not part of this program, are reported yearly by Helcom - http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/maritime/accidents/ |
Cesium-137 samples are taken annually on 14 stations, which covers both coastal- and open sea areas. Strontium-90 is measured from some of the samples. See more details in MORS-Guidelines - http://www.helcom. fi/helcom-at-work/groups/monas/mors/ |
Cesium-137 and strontium-90 samples are taken annually on 4 river mouths and two nuclear power plants. See more details in MORS-Guidelines - http://www.helcom. fi/helcom-at-work/groups/monas/mors/ |
Moliuskų mėginiai imami remiantis HELCOM metodika, Van Veen tipo gruntotraukiu (paėmimo plotas 0,1 m2). Žuvys pagaunamos kitų mokslinių tyrimų metu ir užšaldytos pristatomos į laboratoriją.
|
Dugno nuosėdų mėginiai imami remiantis HELCOM metodika, Van Veen tipo gruntotraukiu (paėmimo plotas 0,1 m2).
|
The monitoring of concentrations of contaminants is divided in two subsections: trend monitoring and periodic survey.
For trend monitoring observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Objective of the survey is to identify changes in concentrations of heavy metals, as well as priority and other harmful substances and compounds, including radionuclides in water, sediments and/or tissues of biological organisms for substances with observed concentrations above or significantly above the prescribed background level. Sampling is performed once in a year. Sampling time for radionuclides in August, for other contaminants in June August.
In the frame of periodic survey monitoring of sediment and biota contamination with harmful substances is carried out once in 6 years within the reference period of the monitoring programme, with an aim to obtain an overview of the levels of priority and other harmful (hazardous) compounds and substances and their spatial distribution. Sampling time in June to August.
Sampling method and/or kind of samples:
sediments Kajak Sediment Core sampler, layers 1.5 cm;
mussels Macoma balthica (Van Veen grab) and Mytilus edulis (divers)
fish tissues from Perca fluviatilis (coastal waters), Clupea harengus (open water) |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Observations are made in the same points as for the monitoring of soft-bottom zoobenthos. For the sampling HELCOM standard Van Ween grab is used.
For neurotoxic and oxidative stress markers (accordingly acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition, activity of glutathione S transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT)) as well as for the heavy metals presence indicator (concentration of metallothionein (MT)) in bivalve molluscs Limecola balthica (called also Macoma balthica) 3 times in a year in May, August and November. For the analysis substrate is filtered through the net with mesh size 9 mm and c.a. 50 individuals with size > 14 mm are collected in each station.
GST, CAT, MT is determined in digestive gland, but AChE in foot tissue of Limecola balthica.
Testing methods: Neurotoxic stress biomarker acetylcholinesterase inhibition (AchE) is measured using the Elman method (Elman et al., 1961) modified and adapted to the microplate reader (Bocquene and Galgani, 1998). The glutational-S-transferase activity of the oxidative stress biomarker (GST) is measured according to the Habig method (1974) modified for the microplate reader, while the catalase activity (CAT) according to the methods developed by Claiborne (1985) and Aebi (1974). The concentration of metalothionein (MT) is determined by the Viarengo (1997) method.
For the reproductive function/malformations of benthic amphipods Monoporeia affinis sampling is performed once in a year in winter (January-February) using HELCOM standard Van Ween grab. At least 50 alive fertilized females from each station are used for the analysis of quality of embryo development, where the number of embryos, the stage of development and their state of development are identified: the development of embryos, deformation, magnified embryos or embryos without visible visual disturbance, undeveloped, unfertilised or dead eggs, or the whole bag of eggs. This method ensures that the effects of pollution are identified and it is recommended that embryos be used for such analysis at their later stages of development (e.g. development stages 3-7 where deformation of embryos can be seen better). |
Observations are carried out using available satellite images. |
All known nests sites in the coastal zone (up to 10km from the coast) are inspected in every breeding season from the ground (early spring) and by climbing the nest tree (active nests in late spring). The monitoring includes the control of 107 known breeding sites of White-tailed Eagle on the Polish Baltic coast in a 10 km wide strip from the shoreline. The main goal of the study is to determine the reproductive parameters of the coastal population of the species.
White-tailed eagle's productivity is described by three indicators:
1) mean number of chicks per pair entering reproduction;
2) mean number of chicks per pair with successful breeding;
3) breeding success - an indicator defining the percentage share of pairs that brood chicks in relation to the number of all pairs with known final hatching effect. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grazing birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wading birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface-feeding birds |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benthic-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small toothed cetaceans |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal fish |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demersal shelf fish |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shelf ecosystems |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of organic matter – diffuse sources and point sources |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminants - non UPBT substances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminants - UPBT substances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminants – in seafood |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acute pollution events |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal defence and flood protection |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of water |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-renewable energy generation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine plant harvesting |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunting and collecting for other purposes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agriculture |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forestry |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport – shipping |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urban uses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial uses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste treatment and disposal |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2)) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, survey and educational activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse effects on species or habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
1990-9999 |
1990-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1985-9999 |
1985-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1985-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1998-9999 |
1998-9999 |
1998-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2020-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1957-9999 |
1924-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2010-9999 |
2000-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1979-9999 |
2012-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1990-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1974-9999 |
1970-9999 |
1990-9999 |
1992-9999 |
1992-9999 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
1998 |
1998 |
1998 |
1998 |
1985 |
1985 |
2011 |
2011 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1988-9999 |
1965-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1965-9999 |
1989-9999 |
2003-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1988-9999 |
2003-9999 |
2003-9999 |
1968-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Monthly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
As needed |
As needed |
Other |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Weekly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Continually |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
As needed |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Daily |
Other |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
|| MP_092 || EMEP: https://projects.nilu.no//ccc/ |
|| MP_124 || CEIP: https://www.ceip.at/
http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/welcome.html.html |
|| MP_310 || |
|| MP_314 || |
|| MP_330 || |
|| MP_344 || |
|| MP_355 || |
|| MP_356 || |
|| MP_304 || |
|| MP_350 || |
|| MP_351 || |
|| MP_352 || |
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M24_Miljoefarlige_stoffer_i_sediment_ver2.pdf |
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M22_Miljoefarlige_stoffer_i_muslinger_ver2.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M25_Miljoefarlige_stoffer_i_fisk__version_2_.pdf |
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M26_Biologisk_effektmonitering_i_fisk__ver_1_.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M27_Imposex_og_intersex_i_havsnegle_ver1.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M28_Biologisk_effektmonitering_i_muslinger__VERSION_2_.pdf |
https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2020/07/978-87-7038-209-0.pdf |
https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2020/07/978-87-7038-209-0.pdf
Henvises til kommende HELCOM og OSPAR manualer. |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
The monitoring is based on the method and proposals described by A. Leito in "Väikeste meresaarte haudelindude (merelindude) seire senine kogemus ning ettepanekud ühtse riikliku seireprogrammi rakendamiseks Eestis" ("Experience of monitoring of breeding birds on small maritime islands and proposals for the implementation of the common national monitoring programme in Estonia") in 2008.
Monitoring is carried out on selected small islands (island groups) and nesting sites of white-tailed eagle (on land up to 20 km from seashore). Breeding pairs, as well as a monitoring-year nest and/or pair or single bird, are used as counting units. The number of breeding species on the island Is counted. The indexes for the assessment of the abundance trend are based on whole gathered data from small islands. For assessment of white-tailed eagle productivity, the nesting sites are monitored and the number of occupied nests and fledglings are fixed. The nests are usually being controlled in late May-early July. The productivity is counted as the mean number of fledglings per occupied nest.
The monitoring on small islands is carried out every year on sites with continuous monitoring and where cormorant, Sandwich tern and Caspian tern colonies are monitored continuously, other sites are monitored in rotation – at least once per 6-year period. The monitoring of white-tailed eagle nesting sites is done in rotation, and all nests are controlled at least once every 3 years. |
WMO no 168, national regulations |
Commission Directive 2009/90/EC (technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status) |
Commission Directive 2009/90/EC (technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status); national regulation nr 35 of the minister of the environment. |
National (https://www.keskkonnaagentuur.ee/sites/default/files/seiretoo_ankeet_randa_uhutud_linnud_2020.docx; https://kese.envir.ee/kese/downloadReportFile.action?fileUid=12394806&monitoringWorkUid=1207453) and HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group agreed methods (the monitoring time is not agreed). |
2000/473/Euratom: Commission recommendation of 8 June 2000 on the application of Article 36 of the Euratom Treaty concerning the monitoring of the levels of radioactivity in the environment for the purpose of assessing the exposure of the population as a whole. |
Monitoring follows HELCOM COMBINE- methods
Analytics described in Finnish Environment Institutes (SYKE) report - http://hdl.handle.net/10138/301460 |
Analytics described in Finnish Environment Institutes (SYKE) report - http://hdl.handle.net/10138/301460 |
Monitoring methods for industry and WWTPs are defined in environmental permits |
Heavy metals: https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/hazardous-substances/atmospheric-emissions-of-heavy-metals/
Dioxins: https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/hazardous-substances/atmospheric-emissions-of-pcdd-fs/ |
Moliuskų mėginiai imami remiantis HELCOM metodika, Van Veen tipo gruntotraukiu (paėmimo plotas 0,1 m2). Žuvys pagaunamos kitų mokslinių tyrimų metu ir užšaldytos pristatomos į laboratoriją |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) relevant ISO standards are referred |
Monitoringas vykdomas pagal HELCOM rekomendacijas, pagal ISO standartus. |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl Podręcznik do monitoringu elementów biologicznych i klasyfikacji stanu ekologicznego wód powierzchniowych. Aktualizacja metod. (GIOŚ 2020) https://www.gios.gov.pl/images/dokumenty/pms/monitoring_wod/Podrecznik_Monitoringu_Wod.pdf |
Przewodnik metodyczny do badań terenowych i analiz laboratoryjnych ichtiofauny w wodach przejściowych i przybrzeżnych; GIOŚ 2014) www.gios.gov.pl |
The HELCOM common monitoring relevant on white-tailed sea eagles is described on a general level in the HELCOM Monitoring Manual in the sub-programme: Marine bird health.
http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual/birds/marine-bird-health |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/patologi-hos-grasal-vikaresal-och-knubbsal.html
Selected harbour porpoises are examined at the laboratories of the Swedish Veterinary Institute in collaboration with the staff of the Swedish Museum of Natural History.
During inspection before autopsy, the following biological data are noted:
Sex, external dimensions, weight, any damage to the body,
During autopsy the following biological data are noted:
Nutrient condition / blubber thickness, sexual maturity, pregnancy, external damage, including any damage from human activities (eg fishing nets), organ damage, including microscopic examination and X-ray if necessary, infectious substances, parasites and other diseases, stomach contents, age
" |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/halsotillstand-hos-kustfisk.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/havsorn-bestand.html |
"https://projects.nilu.no/ccc/manual/download/cccr1-95rev.pdf
https://www.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Rec-37-38-2.pdf" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/foreskrifter/register-badvatten/badvatten-hvmfs-201214.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.55c45bd31543fcf8536bd47c/1591097460488/vagledning-kring-eu-bad.pdf" |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/biologisk-effektovervakning-av-organiska-tennforeningar.html |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/missbildade-embryon-av-vitmarla.html |
Radar, ultraviolet and infrared radiation are used to detect emissions during flight monitoring, as well as a laser scanner. This is supported by optical assessment in order to be able to assess the volume of spills, among other things.
Optical assessment: The monitoring follows the method developed by the Bonn Agreement: Guidelines for oil pollution detection, investigation and post analysis/evaluation for volume estimation.
In situ sampling: In case of detection of illegal spills, sampling is carried out, either from ships or from aircraft. When sampling from aircraft, a buoy with a Teflon cloth is released which unfolds on the surface and binds a sample. The buoy is then picked up by ship. Samples are sent to the National Forensic Center and analyzed according to standard protocols for chemical analyzes.
Emission tracking: When an emission is detected, HELCOM's Seatrack Web system is used to identify the source of the emission and to forecast how the emission is moving and where there is a risk that the emission may reach land. |
The national sampling of radioactive substances in sediments, which is coordinated with the national monitoring of hazardous substances in sediments, is collected in addition to, but using the same methodology, samplers and at the same stations. Other sediment samples in the offshore areas are collected using the same methodology as in the local environmental programme (see below). Sampling of fish and benthic fauna (mussels at two stations) is also coordinated with national monitoring of hazardous substances in biota.
Seawater is only sampled in the national offshore program. Ten liters are collected one meter below the surface and then transferred to a plastic can pre-treated with CsNO3 (stable cesium) to prevent cesium-137 from sticking to the inside of the can. The samples are then analyzed for the content of radionuclides.
The methods used for sampling within the local environmental monitoring are specified in the Environmental Program for the nuclear facilities. Sediment profiles down to a depth of ten centimeters are taken and divided into layers of two centimeters and analyzed. Five liters of each algae are collected and analyzed. Algae are collected by hanging plexiglass in open water on which algae colonize the surface. The algae are scraped off the surface once a month, frozen and analyzed. For benthic fauna, 100 grams are collected per station and sample type and then analyzed. One kilogram of filleted fish is collected per sample, lyophilized or dried and analyzed for relevant radionuclides.
https://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/publikationer/rapporter/stralskydd/2004/200415/ |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/organiska-miljogifter-i-sediment.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/metaller-i-sediment.html" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/metaller-och-organiska-miljogifter-i-blamussla.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/metaller-och-organiska-miljogifter-i-fisk.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/metaller-och-organiska-miljogifter-i-agg-av-sillgrissla.html" |
|||||||||||||||||||
Quality control |
|| MP_092 || --
#Anderer Standard
--
#EMEP-Modellierung: Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East of EMEP (MSC-E): http://www.msceast.org/;
#EMEP-Messungen: Chemical Coordinating Centre of EMEP (CCC): http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/index.html; |
|| MP_124 || --
#Nationaler Standard: Zentrales System Emissionen (ZSE, Datenbank für die nationale Emissionsberechnung) mit implementierter QS/QA
#Anderer Standard: EMEP: Centre of Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP): http://www.ceip.at/
|
|| MP_310 || Qualtiätsmanagementsysteme nach DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025BEQUALM: nur PAH-MetabolitenQUASIMEME: alle anderen Parameter
|
|| MP_314 || Qualtiätsmanagementsysteme nach DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_330 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_344 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_355 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025, ISO TS 13530, ISO 11352, Technical guidance on monitoring for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive - http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/30508 |
|| MP_356 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025, ISO TS 13530, ISO 11352, Technical guidance on monitoring for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive - http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/30508 |
|| MP_126 || --
#Nationaler Standard: Qualitätssicherungsprogramm des Bund-Länder-Messprogramms (BLMP)
#Anderer Standard: DIN EN ISO/IEC 170025
|
|| MP_304 || Biological Effects Quality Assurance in Monitoring Programmes |
|| MP_350 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_351 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_352 || DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt af MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
National, ie observations are carried out by professional observers and quality control is performed when entering data into databases. |
The quality is assured by following the HELCOM PLC guidelines, standards EVS-EN ISO 11905-1, EVS-EN ISO 11732, EVS-EN ISO 13395, ISO 15681-2, EN ISO/IEC-17025 and accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025, following the guidance documents, national regulations' requirements and standards EVS-EN 25667 (EVS-EN 25667-1 and EVS-EN 25667-2), EVS-EN ISO 5667-12, EVS-EN ISO 5667-15, EVS-EN ISO 5667-19. When the data are being uploaded to the database, QA/QC controls are performed. |
The quality is assured by filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025, following the guidance documents, national regulations' requirements and standards EVS-EN 25667 (EVS-EN 25667-1 and EVS-EN 25667-2), EVS-EN ISO 5667 (parts 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 15). When the data are being uploaded to the database, QA/QC controls are performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM RESPONSE guidance materials. |
The observations are conducted by professional observers and data quality control is performed while submitting into the database. Also HELCOM/ICES JWGBirg Group agreed method is used. |
The quality is assured by filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025 and following the guidance documents and national regulations' requirements. Supplementary data analysed (biological data, lipid wight etc.) provides data normalisation. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM recommendation 26/3 and HELCOM monitoring guidance. EU member states have implemented a common methodology for environmental radiation monitoring, which is described in the European Commission's recommendation 2000/473/Euratom. In addition, the quality is assured by the accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and database, QA/QC requirements. |
Monitoring follows criteria set by SYKE, Finnish institute for health and welfare (THL) and WFD and HELCOM manuals. All analyzes are validated and use of accredited laboratories and analyzes are preferred. |
Monitoring follows criteria set by SYKE, Finnish institute for health and welfare (THL) and WFD and HELCOM manuals. All analyzes are validated and use of accredited laboratories and analyzes are preferred. |
The sampling and analyzes follows Finnish accredited standards of waste water and contaminant analytics. |
The sampling and analyzes follows Finnish accredited standards |
European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP)/Meteorological Synthesizing Centre (MSC-E) takes part on inter-calibration tests and -drills |
Monitoring flight crew takes part on regular rehearsals and training |
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authorities (STUK) laboratori (TKO) is FINAS-accredited EN ISO/ IEC 17025:2005 |
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authorities (STUK) laboratori (TKO) is FINAS-accredited EN ISO/ IEC 17025:2005 |
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti vykdomi palyginamieji tyrimai, braižomos kontrolinės diagramos. Kai kurie tyrimai perkami. Tokiu atveju, tyrimų kokybę siekiama užtikrinti keliant aukštus kvalifikacinius reikalavimus laboratorijoms (akreditacija, leidimai).
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti vykdomi palyginamieji tyrimai, braižomos kontrolinės diagramos. Kai kurie tyrimai perkami. Tokiu atveju, tyrimų kokybę siekiama užtikrinti keliant aukštus kvalifikacinius reikalavimus laboratorijoms (akreditacija, leidimai).
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti vykdomi palyginamieji tyrimai, braižomos kontrolinės diagramos. Kai kurie tyrimai perkami. Tokiu atveju, tyrimų kokybę siekiama užtikrinti keliant aukštus kvalifikacinius reikalavimus laboratorijoms (akreditacija, leidimai).
|
QA procedures according to and Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual (Part D Programme for monitoring of contaminants and their effects).
QC procedures: X - and R - control charts as well as Z - control charts (with fixed quality criteria) - for metals in sediment and biota, participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
Description of QA/QC procedures - no
|
Description of QA/QC procedures - no
|
According to HELCOM recommendations and internal procedures, including the application of the requirements of the standard: ISO / IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories |
According to HELCOM recommendations and internal procedures, including the application of the requirements of the standard: ISO / IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories |
According to HELCOM recommendations and internal procedures, including the application of the requirements of the standard: ISO / IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories |
According to HELCOM recommendations and internal procedures, including the application of the requirements of the standard: ISO / IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories |
According to HELCOM recommendations and internal procedures, including the application of the requirements of the standard: ISO / IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories |
According to HELCOM recommendations and internal procedures, including the application of the requirements of the standard: ISO / IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories |
According to HELCOM recommendations
|
According to HELCOM recommendations
|
According to HELCOM recommendations. Screening programme ICES DATRAS centre. |
According to HELCOM recommendations. Screening programme ICES DATRAS centre. |
One step. National coordinator keeps sure that fieldwork is going on according to the methodological standards and is responsible for data validation and results calculation. |
Autopsies or organ examinations are performed by a veterinarian or biologist with experience in the field of veterinary medical pathology and, if necessary, in collaboration with the Swedish National Veterinary Institute (SVA). Laboratory analyzes are performed by Swedac-accredited laboratories. |
For monitoring the health condition of coastal fish, there is a quality declaration that includes the organization, division of responsibilities and quality routines for the monitoring activities. Capture, sampling procedures, analyzes (biochemical, physiological, histological and pathological measurement variables) and data management take place in a standardized manner and follow prepared method instructions. Most of the sampling routines and analysis methods included in the method standard ”Hälsotillstånd hos kustfisk” are covered by accreditation by Swedac. |
The monitoring method is based on locating settlements and determining what activity the sea eagles have engaged in at the settlements. There are several steps that can cause uncertainty in data. One such is, e.g., that newly built so-called alternative nests in previously known territories are not detected and the territory is therefore incorrectly interpreted as "inactive". The inspections of the settlements also include in many cases interpreting "negative data" or "zero data", ie to determine what happened in nests that at the (first) inventory did not have the presence of adult (brooding) sea eagles or young. It is very difficult from the ground to determine whether a seemingly "empty" nest has still been active during the current breeding season. Difficulty in determining the status of "empty" nests can lead to misinterpretations that affect the variable "breeding success" because only the number of active nests is included in this variable. With a helicopter and/or climbing, the possibility of a correct assessment is very good for experienced observers.
The inspections of the settlements that take place via climbing to the nest provide reliable data with regard to the number of young at the time of the inspection. However, there is some uncertainty as to whether all chicks registered in May-June reach flight-ready age. Breeding can fail at a later stage, for example due to a nest collapse or predation. Controls of nests from the ground systematically underestimate the litter size, as the eagles' large nests can make young difficult or impossible to detect if the nest is viewed from below. Only nests that have been climbed have therefore been included in the statistics for the Baltic Sea before. Complementing studies during 2017-2018 showed that the correspondence between controls from helicopters and controls via climbing to the nest is high, in about 90% of cases the same result was obtained. Collected data is quality controlled by the responsible project manager at the Swedish Museum of Natural History. Today, there is a need for increased quality assurance and the establishment of common routines for both inventory and registration of the variables within the monitoring. This applies in particular to the components of the variables that include nests that have not produced young. Digitization and supplementation of older inventory data is currently underway. |
The contractor is accredited by Swedac for the sampling and analysis methods used and regularly participates in test comparisons. The reporting of the emissions from facilities subject to a permit via The Swedish portal for environmental reporting (SMP) is examined annually for possible misspellings or missing data. |
The laboratory that analyzes the samples is Swedac-accredited and participates in annual intercalibrations. The quality assurance with water chemical analysis results takes place in several steps. Each individual analysis result is compared with the results from previous measurements, usually at least the last five years. In the event of major deviations, the analysis is repeated. When all variables for a water sample are completed, a plausibility assessment is made by checking that the theoretical and empirical relationships between the various parameters are correct. Deviations from expected results give rise to a new analysis of the same sample. The data host also perform plausibility assessments of data and of the calculated inputs to the sea.
The reporting of the emissions from facilities subject to a permit via The Swedish portal for environmental reporting (SMP) is examined annually for possible misspellings or missing data. Errors are reported back to the operator who is given the opportunity to change the information. Prior to each reporting, a further review of the data material is performed, especially with regard to unit errors and missing values. This year's values are then compared with a time series for previous years. In the event of missing values or suspicion of incorrect values, comments from the operator's environmental reports are used for verification if possible. If information is still missing, the operator is contacted, or missing values are replaced with a reasonable value. This is done to maintain the usability of the long time series.
In connection with the delivery and reporting of annual load data, an evaluation of the data material, regarding the implementation of the work, review of delivered results and a quality declaration is delivered to SwAM. |
The microbial analyzes are performed by a laboratory on behalf of the municipalities. There are a limited number of approved analysis methods listed in the Bathing Water Directive (2006/7 / EC) and HaV's regulations and general advice on bathing water HVMFS 2012: 14, where the methodology for sampling is also described. The Swedish Public Health Agency examines data that the municipalities report to the data portal ”Badplatsen”. The review is part of an ongoing agreement between SwAM and the Swedish Public Health Agency. Short-term pollution is one of the things that is especially taken into account in the review. The European Environment Agency (EEA) also has a dialogue with each Member State on possible ambiguities in reported data. |
Quality assurance in the analysis of imposex is conducted by strictly following given guidelines. If several people perform analysis of imposex, they are calibrated with each other and the staff participates in workshops and calibration meetings. The laboratories that perform the chemical analyzes are accredited. |
The conductors of the survey have good knowledge of the bottom fauna in the Baltic Proper and the Gulf of Bothnia, as well as solid experience of sediment sampling. The biological analysis requires knowledge of embryo development in crustacians and training in analyzing Monoporeia affinis embryos. Quality assurance takes place continuously by different contractors determining about 50 egg litters to check the degree of error rate. |
The delivered satellite images and, if necessary, the aerial images are usually followed up with control from ships to ensure what kind of substance that has been released. |
The monitoring and methods are compatible with and performed in accordance with international guidelines and standards. The analysis laboratory that analyzes the content of radionuclides regularly participates in intercalibrations that are carried out under the auspices of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). SSM also supervises current analysis laboratories and conducts regular test comparisons regarding analyzes of radioactive substances in different types of environmental samples. |
Sampling must be carried out by personnel with high field expertise and experience. Contact is maintained orally as well as in writing with instructions that are reviewed before each field campaign. In order for the precision and comparability between the stations to be as good as possible, only the top layers of sediment with a grain size <63 μm are sampled. The sampling sites are carefully examined with an underwater camera and sediment sampling before the sediment core for analysis of environmentally harmful substances is collected.
The chemical analyzes are performed by Swedac-accredited laboratories and authorities with long experience of sediment analysis. The quality assurance routines look different at different laboratories. For details, we refer to the instructions of each laboratory. |
Quality checks are carried out continuously and extra checks are made when changing equipment or standard solutions, etc. The analysis quality at the analysis laboratory is monitored by analyzing control samples and entering the results in control charts. The control samples consist of a sample from a very large homogenate (which is therefore sufficient for a long time) of comparable tissue that is always included in the analysis of new material. When changing the analysis method or laboratory, extensive parallel analyzes take place. Suspected analysis errors have been the subject of special analysis efforts. The chemical analyzes are performed by Swedac-accredited laboratories and authorities with long experience of analysis of biological material. The quality assurance routines look different at different laboratories. Quality assurance is also provided through participation in the international test comparison Quasimeme. For details, we refer to the instructions of each laboratory. |
Data management |
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. EMEP-Modellierung
EMEP-Messungen
HELCOM
EMEP-Website
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Emissionsdaten
EIONET
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Abgabe nationaler Daten über MUDAB an ICES DOME
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die ermittelten Daten stehen über eine Datenbank von HELCOM zur Verfügung.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten stehen in der Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) zur Verfügung.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. ----
##Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB)
##HELCOM PLC-Water Datenbank
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
Data are annually reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). Data collection into the regional database for assessment purposes is coordinated by the HELCOM/ICES JWGBird Group. |
The hydrochemical data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE. The hydrological data are uploaded quarterly to the database WISKI. Water-borne pollution loads are reported to HELCOM PLC database annually. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), ICES (HELCOM). The data gathered from environmental permits are stored at database KOTKAS. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE and ICES (HELCOM). The data gathered from environmental permits are stored at database KOTKAS. |
The data are stored at Joint Rescue Coordination Centre - JRCC Tallinn. |
Data and reports are yearly submitted to the national environmental monitoring database KESE. |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), ICES (HELCOM Combine) and Eionet. |
The data collected during the monitoring are stored at the Environmental Board but also submitted to the national monitoring database KESE. Monitoring data are reported to the HELCOM Combine database as well (and to the Helcom MORS working group). |
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant priekrantės ir tarpinių vandenų būklę pagal BVPD, jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt). Teikiami ICES, WISE, HELCOM tematiniams vertinimams.
|
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant priekrantės ir tarpinių vandenų būklę pagal BVPD, jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt). Teikiami ICES, WISE, HELCOM tematiniams vertinimams.
|
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant priekrantės ir tarpinių vandenų būklę pagal BVPD, jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt). Teikiami ICES, WISE, HELCOM tematiniams vertinimams.
|
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access.
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea.
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access.
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter (Part D: Programme for monitoring of contaminants and their effects).
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian State Environmental Service (SES).
Data are available in SES. |
Raw and processed data are stored in a dedicated database of the Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection |
Raw and processed data are stored in a dedicated database of the Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection |
Raw databases are stored on the Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection hard disks. |
Data is stored by the project manager at the Swedish Museum of Natural History. Data for official statistics are obtained from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. |
Data on atmospheric deposition at sea are available from the international data host NILU and EMEP's model calculations are available from EMEP centers in Oslo and Moscow. Source distribution information can be found in Emep's annual reports to HELCOM and OSPAR, as well as in HELCOM's PLC reports. |
The results of the recurring calculations of the input of nutrients and hazardous substances to the sea based on monitoring data, as well as point sources are presented in reports at SMED (Swedish Environmental Emissions Data). Results from the recurring analyzes of the source distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus are presented in SMED's tool TBV (Technical calculation system water). Annual statistics on the input of nitrogen and phosphorus are also produced by SwAM and the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. |
SwAM is the national data host for bathing water data. Test results are reported by the municipalities as soon as possible and no later than ten working days after the sampling and are made available via the website ”Badplatsen” run by SwAM. All EU baths must have clear signs with symbols that show the quality of the bathing water. The reports for the Bathing Water Directive are also available on Eionet. Data is updated at Badplatsen continuously during the bathing season (June – August). Reporting to Eionet is done no later than 31 December for the year in which the sampling took place. |
Data are stored at the Swedish Geological Survey, SGU, which is the national data host for hazardous substances. Data will be available via a WMS service and can be downloaded free of charge. Data collected up to and including 2014 can be downloaded from IVL's database for hazardous substances. Data are also reported to ICES |
Data are stored at the Swedish Geological Survey, SGU, which is the national data host for hazardous substances. Data will be available via a WMS service and can be downloaded free of charge. Data are also reported to ICES. |
Information on the number of oil spills is reported in the Coast Guard's annual reports. Maps with oil spills throughout the Baltic Sea can be downloaded from Helcom. |
Data from the national environmental monitoring of radionuclides are stored in a local database at SSM and are available to the public via SSM's website. Data from the local environmental monitoring is stored in a local database at SSM and can be released upon request to registrator@ssm.se. Work is underway to make data available to the public via SSM's website. |
Data are stored at the Swedish Geological Survey, SGU, which is the national data host for hazardous substances. Data is available via a WMS service and can be downloaded free of charge in the map viewer. Data from the national environmental monitoring are also reported to ICES. |
Analysis data for metals and organic environmental toxins in marine biota from the national monitoring are stored at the Swedish Geological Survey, SGU, which is the national data host for hazardous substances. Data will be available via a WMS service and can be downloaded free of charge. Data collected up to 2014 can be downloaded from IVL's database for hazardous substances. Data from the national monitoring are also reported to ICES. |
||||||||||||||||||
Data access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
cekan@mst.dk |
cekan@mst.dk |
cekan@mst.dk |
cekan@mst.dk |
cekan@mst.dk |
Meelis Leivits, Estonian Environment Agency, meelis.leivits@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Maritime security centre (Joint Rescue Coordination Centre - JRCC Tallinn): jrcc@politsei.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency: Piret Kiristaja, piret.kiristaja@envir.ee; Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee. |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Environmental Board: Monika Lepasson: monika.lepasson@keskkonnaamet.ee;
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
State Environmental Service |
Person responsible in Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection: Dorota Łukasik d.lukasik@gios.gov.pl
National coordinator of monitoring programme: Zdzisław Cenian cenian@wp.pl |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
||||||||||||||||||||||
References |
|| MP_92 || --# Atmospheric Deposition of Hazardous Substances # https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/hazardous-substances/ #-- |
|| MP_124 || --# Atmospheric Emissions of Hazardous Substances # https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/hazardous-substances/ #-- |
|| MP_310 || --# ICES-Times Methoden
Publikationen der Ergebnisse # https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26874057/ # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences (TIMES)/TIMES39.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences (TIMES)/TIMES45.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences (TIMES)/TIMES46.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences (TIMES)/TIMES53.pdf #-- |
|| MP_314 || --# http://www.ospar.org/content/content.asp?menu=00040400000000_000000_000000 # https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Radioactive-substances-HELCOM-core-indicator-2018.pdf #-- |
|| MP_330 || --# https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES39.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES45.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES46.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES53.pdf #-- |
|| MP_344 || --# https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES44.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES45.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES46.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20(TIMES)/TIMES53.pdf #-- |
|| MP_355 || --# #-- |
|| MP_356 || --# #-- |
|| MP_126 || --# Publikationen der PLC-Gruppe (https://helcom.fi/helcom-at- work/projects/plc-6/) # https://helcom.fi/media/publications/PLC-6-Executive-Summary.pdf #-- |
|| MP_304 || --# https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20%28TIMES%29/TIMES19.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20%28TIMES%29/TIMES38.pdf # https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Techniques%20in%20Marine%20Environmental%20Sciences%20%28TIMES%29/TIMES39.pdf #-- |
|| MP_350 || --# #-- |
|| MP_351 || --# #-- |
|| MP_352 || --# #-- |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
Siimes, K. Vähä E, Junttila V, Lehtonen K, Mannio J (toim.) 2019. Haitalliset aineet Suomen vesissä: tilanne ja seurannan suuntaviivat. SYKE raportteja 8/2019. 216p. |
HELCOM, 2012. Development of a set of core indicators: Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project. PART B:
Descriptions of the indicators. Balt. Sea Environ. Proc. No. 129 B.- http://www.helcom.fi/Lists/Publications/BSEP129B.pdf
Moore, M.N. Lowe, D. and Köhler, A. 2004b. Measuring lysosomal membrane stability. ICES Techniques in Marine Environmental Sciences, No. 36. ICES, Copenhagen, 31 p.
Siimes, K, Vähä E, Junttila V, Lehtonen K, Mannio J (toim.) 2019. Haitalliset aineet Suomen vesissä: tilanne ja seurannan suuntaviivat. SYKE raportteja 8/2019. 216p. |