Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D5 / Baltic
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D5 Eutrophication |
| Region/subregion | Baltic |
Member state |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DK |
DK |
DK |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
EE |
FI |
FI |
FI |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LT |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
LV |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
PL |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report Access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Descriptor |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
D5 |
Monitoring strategy description |
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Eutrophierungsmonitoring berücksichtigt sowohl die Nährstoffeinträge (flussbürtig und atmosphärisch) und die Nährstoffkonzentrationen als auch die direkten und indirekten Eutrophierungseffekte. Über die Eutrophierungsbewertung von HELCOM (HEAT) und die HELCOM PLC Berichterstattung sowie die ökologische Zustandsbewertung nach WRRL werden unterschiedliche Belastungssituationen identifiziert, so dass das Monitoring entsprechend differenziert erfolgen kann.
Deutschland nutzt zur Quantifizierung von Nährstoffemission aus punktuellen und diffusen Quellen in die Oberflächengewässer routinemäßig das Stoffeintragsmodell MoRe. Dieses Modell ermöglicht die Quantifizierung der unterschiedlichen Eintragspfade der Nährstoffemissionen (z.B. Grundwasser, Erosion, atmosphärische Deposition, Oberflächenabfluss, Dränagen, Punktquellen, urbane Gebiete) und somit die Steuerung von Maßnahmen zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge. Darüber hinaus bietet die routinemäßige HELCOM-PLC Berichterstattung einen Überblick über die Nährstoffeinträge und Quellen in der gesamten Ostsee.
Mit dem Monitoring soll auch überprüft werden, ob die entsprechenden Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der atmosphärischen Einträge, Flusseinträge und Ferneinträge führen und sich dies sowohl in den direkten als auch in den indirekten Eutrophierungseffekten zeigt. Diese können ebenso wie die Nährstoffkonzentrationen quantitativ bewertet werden, womit auch eine Aussage über die Entfernung vom Bewirtschaftungszielwert (2,6 mg/l TN am Übergabepunkt limnisch- marin) sowie über Trends möglich ist. Unter HELCOM läuft die Berichterstattung zur Reduktion der Nährstoffeinträge gemäß Ostseeaktionsplan.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, erfolgt ein flächendeckendes Monitoring und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
En øget koncentration af næringsstofferne kvælstof og fosfor i havmiljøet kan forårsage øget algevækst, hvilket kan give negative følgevirkninger for miljøet - iltsvind og dårlige lysforhold, der forringer
forholdene for bundplanter, fisk og andre marine dyr. Endvidere kan det medvirke til opblomstring af giftige alger. Samlet set er eutrofiering et udtryk for processer i havmiljøet, hvor en øget mængde næringsstoffer (kvælstof og fosfor) påvirker det samlede havmiljø. Næringsstoffer tilføres primært havmiljøet fra landbaserede kilder og fra atmosfæren. Havstrømmene bevirker, at der sker en udveksling af næringsstoffer mellem de forskellige havområder. For denne deskriptor er god miljøtilstand overordnet defineret ved, at den menneskeskabte eutrofiering er minimeret, navnlig de negative virkninger heraf,
såsom faldende biodiversitet, forringelse af økosystemer, skadelige algeopblomstringer og iltmangel på havbunden.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
En øget koncentration af næringsstofferne kvælstof og fosfor i havmiljøet kan forårsage øget algevækst, hvilket kan give negative følgevirkninger for miljøet - iltsvind og dårlige lysforhold, der forringer
forholdene for bundplanter, fisk og andre marine dyr. Endvidere kan det medvirke til opblomstring af giftige alger. Samlet set er eutrofiering et udtryk for processer i havmiljøet, hvor en øget mængde næringsstoffer (kvælstof og fosfor) påvirker det samlede havmiljø. Næringsstoffer tilføres primært havmiljøet fra landbaserede kilder og fra atmosfæren. Havstrømmene bevirker, at der sker en udveksling af næringsstoffer mellem de forskellige havområder. For denne deskriptor er god miljøtilstand overordnet defineret ved, at den menneskeskabte eutrofiering er minimeret, navnlig de negative virkninger heraf,
såsom faldende biodiversitet, forringelse af økosystemer, skadelige algeopblomstringer og iltmangel på havbunden.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
En øget koncentration af næringsstofferne kvælstof og fosfor i havmiljøet kan forårsage øget algevækst, hvilket kan give negative følgevirkninger for miljøet - iltsvind og dårlige lysforhold, der forringer
forholdene for bundplanter, fisk og andre marine dyr. Endvidere kan det medvirke til opblomstring af giftige alger. Samlet set er eutrofiering et udtryk for processer i havmiljøet, hvor en øget mængde næringsstoffer (kvælstof og fosfor) påvirker det samlede havmiljø. Næringsstoffer tilføres primært havmiljøet fra landbaserede kilder og fra atmosfæren. Havstrømmene bevirker, at der sker en udveksling af næringsstoffer mellem de forskellige havområder. For denne deskriptor er god miljøtilstand overordnet defineret ved, at den menneskeskabte eutrofiering er minimeret, navnlig de negative virkninger heraf,
såsom faldende biodiversitet, forringelse af økosystemer, skadelige algeopblomstringer og iltmangel på havbunden.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The aim of the monitoring strategy “SD5 - Eutrophication” is to collect data on nutrient inputs, concentrations as well as direct and indirect effect of eutrophication. The parameters monitored are concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP), total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP), phytoplankton chlorophyll-a content, biomass and blooms, water transparency, dissolved oxygen concentration, status of the benthic flora and fauna. The main human-induced pressures are related to the nutrient inputs by rivers, direct discharges (incl marine fish farms) and atmospheric deposition. Also, nutrient loads from the adjacent marine areas as well as from bottom sediments have to be estimated. The following monitoring programmes produce relevant data for the assessments of the eutrophication status and impact, as well as pressures in the environment: “Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass”, “Chlorophyll-a”, “Harmful blooms (remote sensing)”, “Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources”, “Phytobenthic communities”, “Macrozoobenthos”, “Water column – physical characteristics”, “Water column – chemical characteristics”, and “Nutrients in the water column”. Information on the uses and human activities causing eutrophication is collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. |
The programme consists of three sub-programmes that provide information on the drivers of marine eutrophication: Changes in the basic chemical characteristics of the coastal and offshore water column and the load of nutrients, organic matter and solids entering the sea and nitrogen deposition. The third sub-programme, coastal and offshore phytoplankton pigment monitoring, provides information on the effects of eutrophication.
|
The programme consists of three sub-programmes that provide information on the drivers of marine eutrophication: Changes in the basic chemical characteristics of the coastal and offshore water column and the load of nutrients, organic matter and solids entering the sea and nitrogen deposition. The third sub-programme, coastal and offshore phytoplankton pigment monitoring, provides information on the effects of eutrophication.
|
The programme consists of three sub-programmes that provide information on the drivers of marine eutrophication: Changes in the basic chemical characteristics of the coastal and offshore water column and the load of nutrients, organic matter and solids entering the sea and nitrogen deposition. The third sub-programme, coastal and offshore phytoplankton pigment monitoring, provides information on the effects of eutrophication.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
Vadovaujantis Valstybine 2018-2023 m. aplinkos monitoringo programa, Lietuvos jūriniuose vandenyse tiriami šie eutrofikacijos procesus charakterizuojantys parametrai: vandens skaidrumas, temperatūra, deguonies kiekis vandenyje, maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis), chlorofilo “a” koncentracijos, fitoplanktonas, makrozoobentosas, makrofitai (makrofitobentosas). Hidrologiniams procesams paaiškinti matuojami ir meteorologiniai parametrai.
Vandens stulpo hidrologiniai, fizikiniai-cheminiai rodikliai ir chlorofilas “a” tiriami 18-19 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Fitoplanktono tyrimai vykdomi 14 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Makrozoobentoso tyrimai Lietuvos jūros rajone vykdomi 15 tyrimų vietų, 1 kartą per metus. Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai, 1-2 kartus kartą per 6 metų ciklą.
Makrofitų (makrofitobentoso) tyrimai Baltijos jūroje vykdomi 4 vietose, 1 kartą per 2 metus.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 jūros rajono būklę charakterizuojantys rodikliai. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą.
|
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The monitoring includes primary (nutrient concentration in water) and secondary (phytoplankton, benthic organisms, near-bottom water oxygen) factors as well as plankton blooms and water transparency to cover full spectrum of eutrophication effects both in coastal and offshore water bodies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
The goal of the strategy is to provide information for the assessments of the status of marine waters with regard to eutrophication and its effects. The strategy is compliant with Commission Directive (EU) 2017/845 of 17 May 2017 and criteria laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017. Monitoring of eutrophication and its effects will enable to identify measures to be implemented and progress of those already implemented to achieve good environmental status of marine waters, in accordance with the initial assessment of the status of marine waters and the set of characteristics for the good environmental status of marine waters, provide information to assess the impact of the measures set out in the programme of measures, enable identification of the cause of changes in the environmental status of marine waters and undertake possible corrective measures to restore the good environmental status of marine waters. The Strategy incorporates information gathered within 4 monitoring programmes: water column chemical and physical characteristics and benthic communities and species characteristics.Regional coordination is assured by applying HELCOM monitoring guidelines and assessment strategies. |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
"The monitoring the inputs and concentrations of nutrients in combination with monitoring of various effects of eutrophication, provides a good basis for assessing status and for following up the progress towards acheiving GES and effects of measures.
There are no significant gaps. However, there is a need to streamline monitoring and to increase the frequency and geographical coverage of monitoring, as well as to improve indicators to provide more reliable assessments of eutrophication.
An example of this is oxygen indicators, which are based on monthly sampling despite the fact that short-term oxygen deficiency (one to two days) can lead to unwanted changes in the benthic species community.
For eutrophication in coastal waters, the basis for status assessment is largely based on the WFD monitoring. Through the ongoing national action plan ""Full control of our waters"", the geographical coverage of coastal waters will be improved for some of the monitoring programmes." |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Die Monitoringstrategie für den Deskriptor 5 „Eutrophierung“ weist gegenwärtig keine Lücken auf.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt. Det skal dog bemærkes hvad angår de 'nye teknologier' - satellitter, ferrybox og økologisk modellering - at integration af de tre teknologier ikke er udviklet endnu, men vil være en del af overvågningsprogrammet.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt. Det skal dog bemærkes hvad angår de 'nye teknologier' - satellitter, ferrybox og økologisk modellering - at integration af de tre teknologier ikke er udviklet endnu, men vil være en del af overvågningsprogrammet.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt. Det skal dog bemærkes hvad angår de 'nye teknologier' - satellitter, ferrybox og økologisk modellering - at integration af de tre teknologier ikke er udviklet endnu, men vil være en del af overvågningsprogrammet.
|
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
There is a need to analyse the structure of the national hydrochemical monitoring programme of rivers, including its spatial and temporal scope, in order to ensure sufficient data for reliable assessment of nutrient load from land-based sources (including nutrient balance on agricultural land).
There are only a few marine stations, where water sampling of nutrients are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Samples are collected from 1, 5, 10 m depth and the bottom layer at the most stations. This doesn't give a comprehensive overview of nutrients concentration in the water column, the depth of nutricline after spring bloom and stratification process.
There is no monitoring to assess the internal nutrient load from sediments and transboundary nutrient inputs yet.
There is no regular monitoring of pCO2. Regular measurements of pH are done, but only pH data do not allow reliably assess the acidification of the marine environment. Regular pCO2 measurements also would provide the data for production assessments.
The frequency of monitoring in off-shore areas (6 times per year) does not allow the full use of developed chlorophyll-a indicator as the status assessment based on this data is not with sufficient reliability. There are only a few stations, where water sampling and analyses of chlorophyll-a are done from discrete depths strictly following HELCOM guidance. Off-shore area low sampling frequency is partly compensated by ferrybox-monitoring.
Dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected by remote sensing and new technologies (buoys, glider) (fluorescence is measured and converted to Chl a concentration using corresponding laboratory analyses results) should be integrated to regular in situ monitoring for status assessments.
The number of benthic monitoring stations and benthic transects in coastal waters is not sufficient to provide high-level confidence assessments of the ecological status of a body of water in some areas. Currently, there is no zoobenthos transect in the Northern Baltic Proper basin and Limecola balthica depth distribution in this area could not be assessed, therefore.
There is a need to develop the remote sensing methods as perspective and effective approach to monitoring the effects of eutrophication (criteria D5C2, D5C3, and also D5C4, D5C6). It is necessary to carry out relevant pilot projects and develop regional cooperation. |
Monitoring is adequate, but requires new kind of administrative data collection to support following of some environmental targets or some measures. |
Monitoring is adequate, but requires new kind of administrative data collection to support following of some environmental targets or some measures. |
Monitoring is adequate, but requires new kind of administrative data collection to support following of some environmental targets or some measures. |
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
1) Monitoringo (in-situ) duomenų ne visuomet pakanka vertinant tarpinių vandenų ir priekrantės ekologinę būklę, identifikuojant ir įgyvendinant tinkamas pasklidosios taršos iš žemės ūkio rajonų priemones, susieti žemės ūkio veiklą ir jos pokyčius su vandens kokybe ir jos pokyčiais. Todėl Lietuva įvairių studijų rėmuose siekia vidaus, tarpinių ir priekrantės vandenų ekologinės būklės (eutrofikacijos) vertinimui kiek galima labiau įtraukti nuotolinių sistemų duomenis (palydovų vaizdus).
2) Vienas iš aplinkosauginių tikslų – sumažinti maistmedžiagių patekimą į jūros aplinką. Jūros rajono būklė labai priklauso nuo bendros Baltijos jūros būklės, tačiau šiaurinę dalį veikia ir Kuršių marių vandens prietaka, kurioje maistmedžiagių koncentracija yra 3–5 kartus didesnė nei jūros vandenyje. Iki šiol trūksta informacijos apie maistingųjų medžiagų transformaciją ir balansą Kuršių mariose, prietakos iš marių į jūrą dydžio. Todėl Lietuva nuo 2021 m. vykdys studiją, kurios metu bus atliktas mikrobiologinių ir biogeocheminių procesų (azoto fiksacijos ir nitratų redukcijos) įtakos maistmedžiagių balansui Kuršių mariose ir jų prietakai į Baltijos jūrą įvertinimas.
|
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
The temporal and spatial coverage is not adequate presently. It is planned to raise additional funding and resolve this issue. |
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
"All primary criteria can be assessed using today's monitoring. However, there is no indicator to assess D5C6. Amount of opportunistic algae is monitored but with the completed revision of the programme, the data will be improved and provide a basis for assessment of D5C6 in future assessments. Methods and programmes are also being developed to assess variables that complement the vegetation's depth distribution to assess D5C7, as the depth distribution often is controlled by change in substrate rather than eutrophication. To assess the status of the shallow bays in the Gulf of Bothnia, due to eutrophication and physical impact, the monitoring of vegetation needs to be developed and increased. The existing macrophyte index for the Baltic Proper should be adapted to take into account the species found in the Gulf of Bothnia and other pressures (e.g salinity). Methods for monitoring with remote sensing and with automatic measurements, for example from ferry boxes and bottom- or buoy-mounted measuring systems are being developed. There are already methodologies and routines for automated measurements of oxygen using probes on ships or permanently mounted measuring systems. The methodology available for automated measurements of inorganic nutrients requires validation for Swedish sea areas.
The monitoring of input of nitrogen and phosphorus from land is sufficient to assess progress towards GES through the targets and associated indicator. However, more measurements would reduce the uncertainty, as well as better data for input modelling used in unmonitored areas, especially in southern Sweden. Another thing that could be improved is to also montior the input of phosphorus via atmospheric deposition. N deposition is monitored, but as P emissions and deposition are not covered by the CLRTAP or E-PRTR, similar observations and model products forP are missing. Some measurements take place in SE, but these are far from the coast and are therefore not representative of the atmospheric P load to the sea. Some measurements have been carried out within HELCOM, but it has proved difficult to measure the P deposition at sea, why it is still missing in the ongoing monitoring. EMEP's modeling of heavy metal inputs to the Baltic Sea shows that dust particles can be a significant vector, so it´s possible that they are also an important for P loads. As the atmospheric P input is a knowledge gap on a broader scale, this lack of knowledge should be resolved on a European scale |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
|||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place by 2018 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALDE_MPr_083_MP_108 |
BALDE_MPr_083_MP_109 |
BALDE_MPr_084_MP_044 |
BALDE_MPr_087_MP_037 |
BALDE_MPr_087_MP_041 |
BALDE_MPr_092_MP_039 |
BALDE_MPr_097_MP_021 |
BALDE_MPr_097_MP_033 |
BALDE_MPr_099_MP_035 |
BALDE_MPr_099_MP_107 |
BALDE_MPr_099_MP_110 |
BALDE_MPr_099_MP_111 |
BALDE_MPr_099_MP_127 |
DK-D05-01 |
DK-D05-02 |
DK-D05-03 |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D010405-10_Phytop |
BALEE-D01040605-13_SeabedVegetationZone |
BALEE-D01040605-14_Macrozoobenthos |
BALEE-D05-20_PhytopChla |
BALEE-D05-21_AlgalBlooms |
BALEE-D05-23_NutrientWaterColumn |
BALEE-D05-24_WaterColumnChem |
BALEE-D0507-25_WaterColumnPhys |
BALEE-D0508-22_NutContLandSource |
BALFI-D05-1 |
BALFI-D05-2 |
BALFI-D05-3 |
BALLT-D01256_Macrozoobenthos |
BALLT-D0156_SeabedVegetation |
BALLT-D025_Phyto |
BALLT-D057_WaterPhys |
BALLT-D058_NutContLandSource |
BALLT-D05_ChlA |
BALLT-D05_Nutrients |
BALLT-D05_WaterChem |
LV-4.5.1.1. (D5C1) |
LV-4.5.1.2. (D5C1) |
LV-4.5.1.3. (D5C1) |
LV-4.5.1.4. (D5C1) |
LV-4.5.1.5. (D5C1) |
LV-4.5.2.1. (D5C2) |
LV-4.5.2.2. (D5C2) |
LV-4.5.2.3. (D5C2) |
LV-4.5.3. (D5C3) |
LV-4.5.4. (D5C4) |
LV-4.5.5. (D5C5) |
LV-4.5.6. (D5C7) |
LV-4.5.7. (D5C8) |
PL-D05-01 |
PL-D05-01 |
PL-D06-01 |
PL-D06-01 |
PL-D06-02 |
PL-D06-02 |
PL-D07-01 |
PL-D07-01 |
SE-D1D4D5-macrophytes |
SE-D1D4D5-phytoplankton |
SE-D1D5-optical |
SE-D1D5-oxygenph |
SE-D1D5D7-remote |
SE-D4D5D6-macrozoobenthos |
SE-D5-nutirentssediment |
SE-D5-nutirentswater |
SE-D5D8-atmosphericinput |
SE-D5D8-landinput |
Programme name |
Nährstoff-Einträge - aus der Atmosphäre: Atmosphärische Stickstoffemissionen (Ostsee) |
Nährstoff-Einträge - aus der Atmosphäre: Atmosphärische Deposition Nährstoffe (Ostsee) |
Nährstoff-Einträge - aus landseitigen Quellen: Nährstoffeinträge über Flüsse und Direkteinträge (Ostsee) |
Pelagische Habitate - Merkmale der Artengemeinschaften: Zooplankton (Ostsee) |
Pelagische Habitate - Merkmale der Artengemeinschaften: Phytoplankton – Artenzusammensetzung, Abundanz, Biomasse (Ostsee) |
Planktonblüten (Biomasse, Frequenz): Phytoplankton – Chlorophyll a und Blüten (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - chemische Merkmale (Nährstoffe, Sauerstoff, pH/CO2): Nährstoffe (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - chemische Merkmale (Nährstoffe, Sauerstoff, pH/CO2): Sauerstoff im Meerwasser (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - physikalische Merkmale (Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Trübung, Lichtdurchlässigkeit): Sichttiefe (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - physikalische Merkmale (Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Trübung, Lichtdurchlässigkeit): Marines Umweltmessnetz MARNET (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - physikalische Merkmale (Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Trübung, Lichtdurchlässigkeit): Meeresoberflächentemperatur (SST) Karten (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - physikalische Merkmale (Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Trübung, Lichtdurchlässigkeit): Eisdienst (Ostsee) |
Wassersäule - physikalische Merkmale (Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Trübung, Lichtdurchlässigkeit): Hydrographische Basisparameter (Hoheitsgewässer Ostsee) |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Water column - physical characteristics |
Water column characteristics (new technologies) |
Marine and coastal activities |
Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass |
Phytobenthic communities |
Macrozoobenthos |
Chlorophyll-a |
Harmful blooms (remote sensing) |
Nutrient levels in water column |
Water column – chemical characteristics |
Water column – physical characteristics |
Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Nutrient inputs - land-based sources |
Phytoplankton pigments |
BALLT-D01256_Macrozoobenthos |
BALLT-D0156_SeabedVegetation |
BALLT-D025_Phyto |
BALLT-D057_WaterPhys |
BALLT-D058_NutContLandSource |
BALLT-D05_ChlA |
BALLT-D05_Nutrients |
BALLT-D05_WaterChem |
Water column chemical characteristics (DIN) |
Water column chemical characteristics (DIP) |
Water column chemical characteristics (TN) |
Water column chemical characteristics (TP) |
Water column chemical characteristics (DSi) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) (Chlorophyll a annual average concentration) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) (Chlorophyll a summer average concentration) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) (Chlorophyll a spring cumulative concentration) |
Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency) (Cyanobacterial Bloom Index) |
Water column physical characteristics (transparency, TOC, turbidity) |
Water column chemical characteristics (CTD, dissolved oxygen, pH) |
Seabed habitats community characteristics; Benthic species abundance and/or biomass (macrophytes) |
Seabed habitats community characteristics; Benthic species abundance and/or biomass (macrofauna) |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Water column - chemical characteristics |
Seabed habitats - community characteristics |
Seabed habitats - community characteristics |
Benthic species – abundance or biomass |
Benthic species – abundance or biomass |
Water column - physical characteristics |
Water column - physical characteristics |
Macrophytes |
Phytoplankton (including pelagic bacteria and harmful algal blooms) |
Water column – optical properties |
Water column – chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH) |
Remote sensing of the water column |
Macrozoobenthos - infauna |
Nutrient and organic matter levels - in sediment |
Water column - nutrient and organic matter levels |
Nutrient and contaminant inputs from atmosphere |
Nutrient and contaminant inputs from land-based sources |
Update type |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_108 || Atmosphärische Stickstoffemissionen (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung von Nährstoffeinträgen aus der Atmosphäre. Erfasst werden Stickstoffemissionen, die von Emissionsquellen an Land wie auch mobilen Quellen (Binnenschifffahrt und Flugverkehr) in Deutschland emittiert werden sowie Stickstoff, der aus der Atmosphäre auf die Ostsee deponiert. Die berechneten (Emissionen) bzw. gemessenen (Deposition) dienen als Eingangsdaten bzw. zur Validierung der Modellierung des „European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme“ (EMEP).
Die Mess- und Modelldaten zur atmosphärischen Stickstoffdeposition sowie die berechneten Daten zu atmosphärischen Stickstoffemission werden benötigt, um die Menge an emittierten Stickstoff von Deutschland sowie die Menge an Stickstoff zu bestimmen, der über die Atmosphäre in die Ostsee gelangt.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL, der Genfer Luftreinhaltekonvention, der Richtlinie über nationale Emissionshöchstmengen für Luftschadstoffe sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
Ein innovatives Monitoring findet statt, indem das EMEP-Modell ständig verbessert und dessen räumliche Auflösung erhöht wird. Somit wird sichergestellt, dass die Modellierung immer auf den neuesten Daten und Berechnungen beruht.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_109 || Atmosphärische Deposition Nährstoffe (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung von Nährstoffeinträgen aus der Atmosphäre. Erfasst werden Stickstoffemissionen, die von Emissionsquellen an Land wie auch mobilen Quellen (Binnenschifffahrt und Flugverkehr) in Deutschland emittiert werden sowie Stickstoff, der aus der Atmosphäre auf die Ostsee deponiert. Die berechneten (Emissionen) bzw. gemessenen (Deposition) dienen als Eingangsdaten bzw. zur Validierung der Modellierung des „European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme“ (EMEP).
Die Mess- und Modelldaten zur atmosphärischen Stickstoffdeposition sowie die berechneten Daten zu atmosphärischen Stickstoffemission werden benötigt, um die Menge an emittierten Stickstoff von Deutschland sowie die Menge an Stickstoff zu bestimmen, der über die Atmosphäre in die Ostsee gelangt.
Die im Messprogramm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL, der Genfer Luftreinhaltekonvention, der Richtlinie über nationale Emissionshöchstmengen für Luftschadstoffe sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM.
Ein innovatives Monitoring findet statt, indem das EMEP-Modell ständig verbessert und dessen räumliche Auflösung erhöht wird. Somit wird sichergestellt, dass die Modellierung immer auf den neuesten Daten und Berechnungen beruht.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_44 || Nährstoffeinträge über Flüsse und Direkteinträge (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung von Nährstoffeinträgen über Flüsse und Direkteinleiter wie kommunalen Kläranlagen und industriellen Einleitern, die direkt in die Ostsee entwässern. An den Fluss- und Direkteinleiter-Messstellen werden die Konzentrationen der unterschiedlichen Parameter und der Abfluss erfasst. Berichtet werden die Daten als Fracht, welche aus der Multiplikation der Konzentration und dem Abfluss berechnet wird. Die Messdaten zu den Fluss- und Direkteinträgen (Fracht, Konzentration und Abfluss) werden benötigt, um die Menge an eingetragenen Nährstoffen zu bestimmen. Auf Grundlage der gesammelten Daten wird die Effektivität von Nährstoffreduktionsmaßnahmen abgebildet.
Die im Monitoring-Programm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL, WRRL und Nitrat-RL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Monitoring-Programm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D5 „Eutrophierung“ und das MSRL Umweltziel 1 (UZ1) „Meere ohne Beeinträchtigung durch Eutrophierung“ sowie für den Umweltzielindikator "Nährstoffkonzentrationen am Übergabepunkt limnisch-marin der in die Ostsee einmündenden Flüsse".
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere den PLC-Guidelines „HELCOM Guidelines for the annual and periodical compilation and reporting of waterborne pollution inputs to the Baltic Sea“. Die Berichterstattung wird bei HELCOM koordiniert und die Daten werden für das "follow-up" der Nährstoffreduktionsziele des Ostseeaktionsplans verwendet.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, werden die Nährstoffeinträge an allen vorhanden Messstellen ganzjährig gemessen und ein risikobasierter Ansatz wird nicht angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_37 || Zooplankton (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung der saisonalen Artenzusammensetzung, Abundanz und Biomasse des Phyto- und Zooplanktons an ausgewählten Messstationen in den Küstengewässern und in der offenen Ostsee. Die Daten dienen der Bewertung verschiedener HELCOM-Indikatoren sowie der Bewertung der biologischen Qualitätskomponente Phytoplankton gemäß WRRL
Die im Monitoring-Programm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und des HELCOM-Übereinkommens.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere des COMBINE Manuals (HELCOM Cooperative Monitoring in the Baltic Marine Environment). Im Rahmen von HELCOM werden die Daten in regelmäßig aktualisierten Indikatorkennblättern veröffentlicht und fließen in den HELCOM „State of the Baltic Sea“ Bericht ein.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden und deshalb davon ausgegangen wird, dass sich auch die pelagischen Habitate nicht in einem guten Zustand befinden, wird in keinem der Messprogramme dieses Monitoring-Programms ein risikobasierter Ansatz angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_41 || Phytoplankton – Artenzusammensetzung, Abundanz, Biomasse (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung der saisonalen Artenzusammensetzung, Abundanz und Biomasse des Phyto- und Zooplanktons an ausgewählten Messstationen in den Küstengewässern und in der offenen Ostsee. Die Daten dienen der Bewertung verschiedener HELCOM-Indikatoren sowie der Bewertung der biologischen Qualitätskomponente Phytoplankton gemäß WRRL
Die im Monitoring-Programm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL und des HELCOM-Übereinkommens.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere des COMBINE Manuals (HELCOM Cooperative Monitoring in the Baltic Marine Environment). Im Rahmen von HELCOM werden die Daten in regelmäßig aktualisierten Indikatorkennblättern veröffentlicht und fließen in den HELCOM „State of the Baltic Sea“ Bericht ein.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden und deshalb davon ausgegangen wird, dass sich auch die pelagischen Habitate nicht in einem guten Zustand befinden, wird in keinem der Messprogramme dieses Monitoring-Programms ein risikobasierter Ansatz angewendet.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_39 || Phytoplankton – Chlorophyll a und Blüten (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung der Plankton-Biomasse und des Auftretens sowie der Frequenz schädlicher Plankton-Blüten in den Küstengewässern und in der offenen Ostsee. Die Daten dienen der Bewertung verschiedener HELCOM-Indikatoren sowie der Bewertung der biologischen Qualitätskomponente Phytoplankton gemäß WRRL.
Die im Monitoring-Programm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL, WRRL, Nitrat-RL und des HELCOM-Übereinkommens.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere des COMBINE Manuals (HELCOM Cooperative Monitoring in the Baltic Marine Environment). Im Rahmen von HELCOM werden die Daten in regelmäßig aktualisierten Indikatorkennblättern veröffentlicht und fließen in den HELCOM „State of the Baltic Sea“ Bericht ein.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch die offene Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden und deshalb davon ausgegangen wird, dass sich auch die pelagischen Habitate nicht in einem guten Zustand befinden, wird kein risikobasierter Ansatz angewendet.
Die in-situ Messungen werden durch räumlich und zeitlich hoch aufgelöste Satellitendaten der Chlorophyll-a Konzentrationen und von Cyanobakterienblüten ergänzt.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_21 || Nährstoffe (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung der relevanten chemischen Merkmale der Wassersäule wie Nährstoff- und Sauerstoffkonzentrationen in den Küstengewässern und der deutschen AWZ der Ostsee. Die im Monitoring-Programm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL, WRRL und Nitrat-RL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D5 „Eutrophierung“ und liefert Informationen zur Versauerung.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere des COMBINE manuals (HELCOM Cooperative Monitoring in the Baltic Marine Environment). Im Rahmen von HELCOM werden die Daten in regelmäßig aktualisierten Indikatorkennblättern veröffentlicht und fließen in den HELCOM „State of the Baltic Sea“ Bericht ein.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch der größte Teil der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, wird in keinem Messprogramm dieses Monitoring-Programms ein risikobasierter Ansatz angewendet.
Innovative Überwachungsansätze wie die Verwendung autonomer Messgeräte, Verschneidung mit hochaufgelösten Sondendaten etc. finden zum Teil bereits Anwendung, müssen in den nächsten Jahren jedoch noch weiter operationalisiert werden.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_33 || Sauerstoff im Meerwasser (Ostsee) || Das Monitoring-Programm dient der Erfassung der relevanten chemischen Merkmale der Wassersäule wie Nährstoff- und Sauerstoffkonzentrationen in den Küstengewässern und der deutschen AWZ der Ostsee. Die im Monitoring-Programm erhobenen Daten dienen der Umsetzung der MSRL, WRRL und Nitrat-RL sowie des HELCOM-Übereinkommens. Im Rahmen der MSRL erhebt das Messprogramm Daten für den MSRL-Deskriptor D5 „Eutrophierung“ und liefert Informationen zur Versauerung.
Die regionale Koordination findet im Rahmen von HELCOM statt. Die Messdaten werden national erhoben, die Datenerhebung folgt aber den Vorgaben von HELCOM, insbesondere des COMBINE manuals (HELCOM Cooperative Monitoring in the Baltic Marine Environment). Im Rahmen von HELCOM werden die Daten in regelmäßig aktualisierten Indikatorkennblättern veröffentlicht und fließen in den HELCOM „State of the Baltic Sea“ Bericht ein.
Da sich gegenwärtig sowohl die Küstengewässer als auch der größte Teil der offenen Ostsee nicht in einem guten Zustand hinsichtlich Eutrophierung befinden, wird in keinem Messprogramm dieses Monitoring-Programms ein risikobasierter Ansatz angewendet.
Innovative Überwachungsansätze wie die Verwendung autonomer Messgeräte, Verschneidung mit hochaufgelösten Sondendaten etc. finden zum Teil bereits Anwendung, müssen in den nächsten Jahren jedoch noch weiter operationalisiert werden.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_35 || Sichttiefe (Ostsee) || Um den physikalischen Zustand der deutschen Küsten-, Hoheits- und AWZ-Gewässer der Ostsee und die Ursachen potentieller Veränderungen gemäß den Verpflichtungen aus WRRL, MSRL, HELCOM und dem BLMP/BLANO ("Bund/Länder-Messprogramm" / "Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee") bewerten zu können, werden regelmäßige Messfahrten zur Datenerhebung durchgeführt. Das Gebiet für die In-Situ-Messungen wird durch die Erreichbarkeit für kleinere Messschiffe limitiert. Die räumliche Abdeckung der Satelliten bestimmt die Gebiete, in denen relevante hydrographische Parameter (z.B. SST, Sichttiefe, Trübung) regelmäßig durch Fernerkundung erfasst werden können.
Je nach Verfügbarkeit von Schiffen werden mehrmals im Jahr die Ostseegewässer durch In-Situ-Messungen beprobt. Ferner werden permanente Messungen auf den ortsfesten Stationen des MARNET durchgeführt. Bei Eisbildung erstellt der Eisdienst des BSH tägliche Eisberichte.
Aufgrund der großen thematischen Redundanz wurden die Monitoringprogramme (frühere Sub-Programme) BALDE_Sub_099 und 098 zusammengefasst, da es sich inhaltlich und hinsichtlich der Durchführung um einen nicht zu trennenden thematischen Komplex handelt.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_107 || Marines Umweltmessnetz MARNET (Ostsee) || Um den physikalischen Zustand der deutschen Küsten-, Hoheits- und AWZ-Gewässer der Ostsee und die Ursachen potentieller Veränderungen gemäß den Verpflichtungen aus WRRL, MSRL, HELCOM und dem BLMP/BLANO ("Bund/Länder-Messprogramm" / "Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee") bewerten zu können, werden regelmäßige Messfahrten zur Datenerhebung durchgeführt. Das Gebiet für die In-Situ-Messungen wird durch die Erreichbarkeit für kleinere Messschiffe limitiert. Die räumliche Abdeckung der Satelliten bestimmt die Gebiete, in denen relevante hydrographische Parameter (z.B. SST, Sichttiefe, Trübung) regelmäßig durch Fernerkundung erfasst werden können.
Je nach Verfügbarkeit von Schiffen werden mehrmals im Jahr die Ostseegewässer durch In-Situ-Messungen beprobt. Ferner werden permanente Messungen auf den ortsfesten Stationen des MARNET durchgeführt. Bei Eisbildung erstellt der Eisdienst des BSH tägliche Eisberichte.
Aufgrund der großen thematischen Redundanz wurden die Monitoringprogramme (frühere Sub-Programme) BALDE_Sub_099 und 098 zusammengefasst, da es sich inhaltlich und hinsichtlich der Durchführung um einen nicht zu trennenden thematischen Komplex handelt.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_110 || Meeresoberflächentemperatur (SST) Karten (Ostsee) || Um den physikalischen Zustand der deutschen Küsten-, Hoheits- und AWZ-Gewässer der Ostsee und die Ursachen potentieller Veränderungen gemäß den Verpflichtungen aus WRRL, MSRL, HELCOM und dem BLMP/BLANO ("Bund/Länder-Messprogramm" / "Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee") bewerten zu können, werden regelmäßige Messfahrten zur Datenerhebung durchgeführt. Das Gebiet für die In-Situ-Messungen wird durch die Erreichbarkeit für kleinere Messschiffe limitiert. Die räumliche Abdeckung der Satelliten bestimmt die Gebiete, in denen relevante hydrographische Parameter (z.B. SST, Sichttiefe, Trübung) regelmäßig durch Fernerkundung erfasst werden können.
Je nach Verfügbarkeit von Schiffen werden mehrmals im Jahr die Ostseegewässer durch In-Situ-Messungen beprobt. Ferner werden permanente Messungen auf den ortsfesten Stationen des MARNET durchgeführt. Bei Eisbildung erstellt der Eisdienst des BSH tägliche Eisberichte.
Aufgrund der großen thematischen Redundanz wurden die Monitoringprogramme (frühere Sub-Programme) BALDE_Sub_099 und 098 zusammengefasst, da es sich inhaltlich und hinsichtlich der Durchführung um einen nicht zu trennenden thematischen Komplex handelt.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_111 || Eisdienst (Ostsee) || Um den physikalischen Zustand der deutschen Küsten-, Hoheits- und AWZ-Gewässer der Ostsee und die Ursachen potentieller Veränderungen gemäß den Verpflichtungen aus WRRL, MSRL, HELCOM und dem BLMP/BLANO ("Bund/Länder-Messprogramm" / "Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee") bewerten zu können, werden regelmäßige Messfahrten zur Datenerhebung durchgeführt. Das Gebiet für die In-Situ-Messungen wird durch die Erreichbarkeit für kleinere Messschiffe limitiert. Die räumliche Abdeckung der Satelliten bestimmt die Gebiete, in denen relevante hydrographische Parameter (z.B. SST, Sichttiefe, Trübung) regelmäßig durch Fernerkundung erfasst werden können.
Je nach Verfügbarkeit von Schiffen werden mehrmals im Jahr die Ostseegewässer durch In-Situ-Messungen beprobt. Ferner werden permanente Messungen auf den ortsfesten Stationen des MARNET durchgeführt. Bei Eisbildung erstellt der Eisdienst des BSH tägliche Eisberichte.
Aufgrund der großen thematischen Redundanz wurden die Monitoringprogramme (frühere Sub-Programme) BALDE_Sub_099 und 098 zusammengefasst, da es sich inhaltlich und hinsichtlich der Durchführung um einen nicht zu trennenden thematischen Komplex handelt.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_127 || Hydrographische Basisparameter (Hoheitsgewässer Ostsee) || Um den physikalischen Zustand der deutschen Küsten-, Hoheits- und AWZ-Gewässer der Ostsee und die Ursachen potentieller Veränderungen gemäß den Verpflichtungen aus WRRL, MSRL, HELCOM und dem BLMP/BLANO ("Bund/Länder-Messprogramm" / "Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee") bewerten zu können, werden regelmäßige Messfahrten zur Datenerhebung durchgeführt. Das Gebiet für die In-Situ-Messungen wird durch die Erreichbarkeit für kleinere Messschiffe limitiert. Die räumliche Abdeckung der Satelliten bestimmt die Gebiete, in denen relevante hydrographische Parameter (z.B. SST, Sichttiefe, Trübung) regelmäßig durch Fernerkundung erfasst werden können.
Je nach Verfügbarkeit von Schiffen werden mehrmals im Jahr die Ostseegewässer durch In-Situ-Messungen beprobt. Ferner werden permanente Messungen auf den ortsfesten Stationen des MARNET durchgeführt. Bei Eisbildung erstellt der Eisdienst des BSH tägliche Eisberichte.
Aufgrund der großen thematischen Redundanz wurden die Monitoringprogramme (frühere Sub-Programme) BALDE_Sub_099 und 098 zusammengefasst, da es sich inhaltlich und hinsichtlich der Durchführung um einen nicht zu trennenden thematischen Komplex handelt.
|
En øget koncentration af næringsstofferne kvælstof og fosfor i havmiljøet kan forårsage øget algevækst, hvilket kan give negative følgevirkninger for miljøet - iltsvind og dårlige lysforhold, der forringer forholdene for bundplanter, fisk og andre marine dyr. Samlet set er eutrofiering et udtryk for processer i havmiljøet, hvor en øget mængde næringsstoffer (kvælstof og fosfor) påvirker det samlede havmiljø. Næringsstoffer tilføres primært havmiljøet fra landbaserede kilder og fra atmosfæren. For deskriptor 5 er god miljøtilstand overordnet
defineret ved, at den menneskeskabte eutrofiering er minimeret, navnlig de negative virkninger heraf, såsom faldende biodiversitet, forringelse af økosystemer, skadelige algeopblomstringer og iltmangel på havbunden.
|
En øget koncentration af næringsstofferne kvælstof og fosfor i havmiljøet kan forårsage øget algevækst, hvilket kan give negative følgevirkninger for miljøet - iltsvind og dårlige lysforhold, der forringer forholdene for bundplanter, fisk og andre marine dyr. Samlet set er eutrofiering et udtryk for processer i havmiljøet, hvor en øget mængde næringsstoffer (kvælstof og fosfor) påvirker det samlede havmiljø. Næringsstoffer tilføres primært havmiljøet fra landbaserede kilder og fra atmosfæren. For deskriptor 5 er god miljøtilstand overordnet
defineret ved, at den menneskeskabte eutrofiering er minimeret, navnlig de negative virkninger heraf, såsom faldende biodiversitet, forringelse af økosystemer, skadelige algeopblomstringer og iltmangel på havbunden.
|
I forbindelse med overvågning af D5 tages ny teknologi i brug - satelitter, ferryboxe samt mekanistiske økosystemmodeller. Denne overvågning har bl.a. til hensigt tidsmæssigt og geografisk at udvide det eksisterende datagrundlag (som fx i Nordsøen er relativt sparsomt) hvad angår eutrofierings- samt fysiske parametre (næringssalte, klorofyl, salt, temperatur etc). Hertil kommer, at nye parametre, fx relateret forsuring, introduceres i programmet (ferrybox).
|
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytoplankton communities (species composition, abundance, biomass and seasonal cycle of dominant groups) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”, “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, Descriptor D1, Criterion D1C6 and Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C1. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 5 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). The threshold values for the indicator of seasonal succession of dominating phytoplankton groups are still missing for some assessment units of the Baltic Sea (incl. Estonian marine area), mainly due to the lack of data corresponding to the set criteria.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Pelagic habitats – community characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor phytobenthic communities (species composition, coverage, abundance, biomass, depth distribution) along the depth gradient. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats” and “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C6 and Criterion D5C7, Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted in coastal waters yearly or at least once per six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body). The program is regionally partly coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed (soft-bottom habitats). Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March).
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor macrozoobenthos communities (species composition, abundance and biomass) on the seafloor. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD6/SD1 Sea-floor integrity/Biological diversity – benthic habitats”, “SD2– Non-indigenous species” and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C8, Descriptor D2, Criteria D2C1, D2C2 and D2C3, Descriptor D4, Criterion D4C2 and Descriptor D6, Criterion D6C5. Data are gathered to assess spatial variability, temporal trends and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM division) in response to pressure levels. Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency once a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 11 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine).
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Seabed habitats – community characteristics; Benthic species – abundance and/or biomass. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chlorophyll-a levels in the water column (including surface layer) to assess phytoplankton biomass and productivity. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C2, and strategy SD4/SD1, Criterion D4C2. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, data are delivered separately by each country. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 September). Algorithms for chlorophyll-a concentration estimates based on remote sensing data are under development.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the surface accumulation of phytoplankton using remote sensing data. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C3. The status of mostly off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions) is assessed. Monitoring is conducted continuously. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM, and commonly developed and agreed algorithms are used. Algorithms and assessment methods (thresholds) are under development.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes: the satellites in use have been changed.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Plankton blooms (biomass, frequency). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor nutrient levels (total nitrogen, total phosphorus, NO3+NO2-N, NH4-N, PO4-P, SiO4-Si) in the water column. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication”, as well as “SD1.6 Biodiversity – pelagic habitats”. The programme is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C1 and anthropogenic pressure “Input of nutrients” (MSFD Annex III). Data are gathered to assess the pressure levels in the marine environment and environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The programme data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed. The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). The threshold values for the indicators of concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in coastal waters have still to be developed. The programme is not designed to assess the internal and transboundary loads of nutrients.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor chemical characteristics in the water column (including near-bottom layer) to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe conditions of the pelagic and benthic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C5. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country. Data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May). Monitoring of pCO2 is not continuous yet.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – chemical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor physical characteristics (water temperature, salinity, transparency) in the water column to assess the indirect effects of eutrophication and describe the physical conditions of the pelagic habitats. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD5 – Eutrophication” and is related to GES Descriptor D5, Criterion D5C4. Data are gathered to assess the environmental status in the coastal water bodies and off-shore sub-basins of the Baltic Sea (HELCOM sub-divisions). Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least three stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). The program data collection is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM guidelines are followed, but data are delivered separately by each country (except CMEMS/BOOS monitoring with joint data collection). The data are yearly reported to the environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March), HELCOM ICES database (by 1 May) and online data delivery into CMEMS/BOOS databases.
The programme is essentially the same as in 2014, only minor changes in some monitoring stations and frequencies were undertaken.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Water column – physical characteristics. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor and estimate the load of nutrients and contaminants from the land-based sources via rivers and direct discharges. It provides data to monitoring strategies “SD5 – Eutrophication” and “SD8 - Contaminants”. The programme is related to anthropogenic pressure “Input of nutrients” and “Inputs of other substances” (MSFD Annex III). Monitoring is conducted yearly. The program is regionally coordinated via HELCOM and the HELCOM PLC guidelines are followed.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Nutrient inputs - land-based sources; Contaminant inputs - land-based sources. |
The sub-programme monitors the state of the basic chemical properties of the water column in the Baltic Sea and their changes. Surveillance is carried out in Finlandâs exclusive economic zone (EEZ), both offshore and coastal areas. Monitoring also includes stations in Swedish, Estonian and Russian waters.
|
The sub-programme monitors the discharge of nutrients, solids and organic matter from the catchment area into the sea, as well as nitrogen deposition. They end up in the sea by deposition, with rivers and â as direct point pollution â from urban waste water treatment plants, industrial plants, fish farms, peat production and fur farms. The objective of the monitoring is to estimate load levels and long-term changes.
|
Program monitors phytoplankton blooms by monitoring pigments. Program produces information on consequences of eutrophication |
BAL-LT-AA-02
|
One is the area of the spread of the Curonian Lagoon waters in the Baltic Sea.
The data are used to assess eutrophication of BAL-LT-AA-01 and BAL-LT-AA-02 areas under the Common Water Policy Directive under D5 and D6.
The D5/D6 indicator is measured on the basis of the data collected: Maximum depth of distribution of Furcellaria lumbricalis.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D025_Phyto apima fitoplanktono gausumo, biomasės, rūšinės sudėties tyrimus Baltijos jūros tyrimų rajonuose BAL-LT-AA-01; BAL-LT-AA-02; BAL-LT-AA-03. Monitoringas vykdomas mokslinių tyrimų laivu „Vėjūnas“. Duomenys renkami kasmet, vidutiniškai 3-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 3-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Duomenys naudojami pelaginėms buveinėms pagal D1, mitybos tinklams pagal D4, eutrofikacijai pagal D5 vertinti.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinamias D4 rodiklis: Sezoninė dominuojančių fitoplanktono grupių kaita (tik BAL-LT-AA-01 jūros rajonui)
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Kasmet teikiami ICES.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D057_WaterPhys apima vandens temperatūros, druskingumo, skaidrumo matavimus Baltijos jūros tyrimų rajonuose BAL-LT-AA-01; BAL-LT-AA-02; BAL-LT-AA-03. Monitoringas vykdomas mokslinių tyrimų laivu „Vėjūnas“. Duomenys renkami viso 23 monitoringo vietose (19 vietų intensyviai, 4 vietose ekstensyviai). Tyrimai vykdomi vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus).
Duomenys naudojami pelaginėms buveinėms pagal D1, hidrografinėms sąlygoms pagal D7 vertinti.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 rodikliai: 1) Vidutinis vandens skaidrumas vasarą (BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-03); 2) Vidutinis metinis vandens skaidrumas (BAL-LT-AA-03).
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Kasmet teikiami ICES, WISE.
|
BALLT-D058_NutContLandSource apima maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P) matavimus pagrindinių upių, įtekančių į Kuršių marias ir Baltijos jūrą, žiotyse. Siekiant įvertinti poveikį Lietuvos jūros rajonui, upių monitoringo duomenų pagrindų skaičiuojamos metinės azoto ir fosforo junginių apkrovos į Baltijos jūrą ir vertinami tikslo pasiekimo rodikliai: 1) Azoto prietaka į Baltijos jūrą; 2) Fosforo prietaka į Baltijos jūrą. Duomenys teikiami HELCOM PLC darbo grupei.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D05_ChlA apima fitoplanktono pigmento Chlorofilo-a tyrimus Baltijos jūros tyrimų rajonuose BAL-LT-AA-01; BAL-LT-AA-02; BAL-LT-AA-03. Monitoringas vykdomas mokslinių tyrimų laivu „Vėjūnas“. Duomenys renkami kasmet, 18 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Duomenys naudojami pelaginėms buveinėms pagal D1, eutrofikacijai pagal D5 vertinti.
Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 rodikliai: 1) Vidutinė vasaros chlorofilo "a" koncentracija (BAL-LT-AA-01, BAL-LT-AA-02 ir BAL-LT-AA-03); 2) Vidutinė metinė chlorofilo „a“ koncentracija (BAL-LT-AA-03).
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Kasmet teikiami ICES, WISE.
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D05_Nutrients apima maistingųjų medžiagų (NO2-N, NO3-N, NH4-N, Bendras N, PO4-P, Bendras P, silicis) matavimus Baltijos jūros tyrimų rajonuose BAL-LT-AA-01; BAL-LT-AA-02; BAL-LT-AA-03. Monitoringas vykdomas mokslinių tyrimų laivu „Vėjūnas“. Parametrai matuojami kasmet, 18 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Duomenys naudojami eutrofikacijai pagal D5 vertinti. Renkamų duomenų pagrindu vertinami D5 rodikliai: 1) Vidutinė bendro azoto koncentracija vasarą (BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02); 2) Vidutinė bendro fosforo koncentracija vasarą (BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02); 3) Vidutinė metinė bendro azoto koncentracija (BAL-LT-AA-03); 4) Vidutinė metinė bendro fosforo koncentracija (BAL-LT-AA-03); 5) Ištirpusio neorganinio azoto koncentracija žiemą (BAL-LT-AA-03); 6) Ištirpusio neorganinio fosforo koncentracija žiemą (BAL-LT-AA-03).
|
Valstybinis aplinkos monitoringas vykdomas pagal Valstybinę 2018-2023 m. programą. Monitoringo programos dalis BALLT-D05_WaterChem apima ištirpusio deguonies, pH, sieros vandenilio (giluminiame jūros rajone) matavimus Baltijos jūros tyrimų rajonuose BAL-LT-AA-01; BAL-LT-AA-02; BAL-LT-AA-03. Monitoringas vykdomas mokslinių tyrimų laivu „Vėjūnas“. Parametrai matuojami kasmet, 18 tyrimų vietų, vidutiniškai 4-7 kartus per metus (dažnumas skiriasi skirtinguose rajonuose: BAL-LT-AA-01 ir BAL-LT-AA-02 – 4-7 kartai per metus; BAL-LT-AA-03 rajone tyrimai atliekami 1-4 kartus per metus). Kitose 4 tyrimų vietose tyrimai vykdomi ekstensyviai.
Duomenys naudojami vertinant pelagines buveines pagal D1, eutrofikacijai pagal D5, hidrografinėms sąlygoms pagal D7 vertinti.
Duomenys kaupiami Lietuvos aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje.
|
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by observing concentrations of key nutrients and their temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrochemistry. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Nutrients" with core indicator 'Concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (winter)'.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
For achieving of GES until 2024 for nitrogen have been granted an exception, as changes in natural conditions in the Baltic Sea take place with a major time lag, as determined by the internal biogeochemical processes of the Baltic Sea. Therefore, according to the common understanding of the timeline of processes in the Baltic Sea, it is recognized that the implementation of measures to improve the state of the marine environment may take a very long time, at least 30 to 50 years, until the desired state is reached. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by observing concentrations of key nutrients and their temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States.The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrochemistry. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Nutrients" with core indicator 'Concentrations of dissolved inorganic phosporous (winter)'.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by observing concentrations of key nutrients and their temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrochemistry. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Nutrients" with none core indicator currently but it is considered in EUTRO-OPER. The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by observing concentrations of key nutrients and their temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrochemistry. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Nutrients" with none core indicator currently but it is considered in EUTRO-OPER. The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by observing concentrations of key nutrients and their temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrochemistry. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Nutrients". The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status indicators eutrophication by direct measurements chlorophyll a concentration and calculating of annual average value of it as indicator of phytoplankton biomass and it's changes in the environment.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Phytoplankton. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Pigments". The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status indicators eutrophication by indirect (using satellite observations) and direct measurements (sampling of surface layer of water) of chlorophyll a concentration as indicator of phytoplankton biomass and calculating the summer average value of it as well as determining temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification. Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Phytoplankton. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Pigments". The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status indicators eutrophication by the measurements of chlorophyll a concentration as indicator of phytoplankton biomass as well as determining temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing state classification. Measurements will be performed by the automatic monitoring station (ferry-box) set on the Riga-Stockholm ferry. This kind of monitoring will be implemented after the purchase of the automatic station.
Monitoring will be carried out in cooperation with the other Member States within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program (EUTRO-OPER 4-2015, 2015) which is currently at the development stage. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Phytoplankton. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Pigments".
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status indicators eutrophication by the measurements of biomass of harmful algae cyanobacteria as well as determining temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing environmental state classification and also the pressure on the environment caused by these algae.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Phytoplankton. Corresponding HELCOM programme " Phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass" with the indicator Cyanobacterial Bloom Index (CyaBI). The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components - eutrophication - by observing transparency of the water column (Secchi depth) as well as related indicators (TOC and turbidity) and also determining temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing environmental state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrography. Corresponding HELCOM programme "Water column .physicalcharacteristics". The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
TOC measurements will be carried out following the implementation of the relevant analytical methods in practice.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by observing the concentration of dissolved oxygen as well as additional parameters (salinity, pH and temperature) and also determining temporal trends, spatial distribution and performing environmental state classification.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Hydrochemistry. Corresponding HELCOM programme " Water column chemical characteristics ". The monitoring of this programme is fully coordinated.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication and it's impact on the seabed habitats, and changes in these habitats by observing the abundance and biomass of macrophytes.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States.
HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Species distribution and abundance / Benthic community; monitoring programmes Softbottom flora and Hardbottom species. The monitoring of these HELCOM programmes is not coordinated yet.
Monitoring is focused on biological aspects and selected species, however information on physical and chemical parameters is also included.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals. |
The aim of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of the Baltic Sea, including one of the environmental status components eutrophication by evaluating the abundance (ind/m2) and biomass (g/m2) of organisms in soft-bottom zoobenthic populations, their distribution in certain areas as well temporal trends of their changes.
Monitoring is carried out within the framework of the HELCOM monitoring program, in cooperation with the other Member States. HELCOM Monitoring Programme topic Species distribution and abundance / Benthic community; Programme Softbottom fauna. Programme is partly coordinated; missing component is common quality assurance programme.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Relevant legislative acts for the protection of sea habitats are following Republic of Latvia Laws:
Law On the Conservation of Species and Biotopes (16.03.2000) and
Law On Specially Protected Nature Territories (02.03.1993) as amended. |
Monitoring of chemical parameters is carried out in the assessment units in accordance with the current HELCOM guidelines. Monitoring includes in-situ measurements carried out annually at 24 monitoring stations located in the deep sea and shallow water zones, as well as in the Vistula Lagoon and the Gulf of Gdańsk. Annual frequency of research is 6 measurements per year, with an exception of a high frequency station monitored 12 times a year and 6 shallow water stations monitored from 1 to 6 times a year.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection. |
Monitoring of chemical parameters is carried out in the assessment units in accordance with the current HELCOM guidelines. Monitoring includes in-situ measurements carried out annually at 24 monitoring stations located in the deep sea and shallow water zones, as well as in the Vistula Lagoon and the Gulf of Gdańsk. Annual frequency of research is 6 measurements per year, with an exception of a high frequency station monitored 12 times a year and 6 shallow water stations monitored from 1 to 6 times a year.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection. |
The community characteristics is monitored each year in accordance with the HELCOM methodology, including parameters necessary for the assessment of benthic habitats. Monitoring includes sampling of macrozoobenthos at 16 stations and macrophyte and angiosperms at places of occurrence within PMA.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by the Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection |
The community characteristics is monitored each year in accordance with the HELCOM methodology, including parameters necessary for the assessment of benthic habitats. Monitoring includes sampling of macrozoobenthos at 16 stations and macrophyte and angiosperms at places of occurrence within PMA.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by the Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection |
The abundance and/or biomass of species is monitored each year in accordance with the HELCOM methodology, including parameters necessary for the assessment of benthic habitats. Monitoring includes sampling of macrozoobenthos at 16 stations and macrophyte and angiosperms at places of occurrence within PMA.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by the Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection |
The abundance and/or biomass of species is monitored each year in accordance with the HELCOM methodology, including parameters necessary for the assessment of benthic habitats. Monitoring includes sampling of macrozoobenthos at 16 stations and macrophyte and angiosperms at places of occurrence within PMA.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by the Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection |
Monitoring of physical parameters is carried out in the assessment units in accordance with the recent HELCOM guidelines. Monitoring includes in-situ measurements carried out annually at 30 monitoring stations located in the deep sea and shallow water zones, as well as in the Vistula Lagoon and the Gulf of Gdańsk. Annual frequency of research is 6 times a year, with an exception of a high frequency station monitored 12 times a year and 6 shallow water stations monitored from 1 to 6 times a year.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by the Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection.
In order to increase the frequency and resolution of data, in-situ measurements of temperature and salinity can be supplemented by continuous measurements from the Ferry Box (automatic measurement system installed on board of vessels, usualy ferries, the marine water parameters are measured on the route, the system also enables collection of in-situ samples for analysis in on-land laboratories) and satellite data (for the temperature of seawater only). |
Monitoring of physical parameters is carried out in the assessment units in accordance with the recent HELCOM guidelines. Monitoring includes in-situ measurements carried out annually at 30 monitoring stations located in the deep sea and shallow water zones, as well as in the Vistula Lagoon and the Gulf of Gdańsk. Annual frequency of research is 6 times a year, with an exception of a high frequency station monitored 12 times a year and 6 shallow water stations monitored from 1 to 6 times a year.
For the transitional and coastal waterbodies monitoring will be carried out for 19 monitoring points in 2020-2021 and 11 monitoring points in 2022-2025 in accordance with the WFD monitoring programme, carried out under the surface water monitoring programme for the years 2020-2025 ("Strategic State Environmental Monitoring Programme for the years 2020-2025"), approved by the Competent Minister of Climate in 2020 and the surface water executive programme for a specific year of research approved annually by the Chief Inspector of Environmental Protection.
In order to increase the frequency and resolution of data, in-situ measurements of temperature and salinity can be supplemented by continuous measurements from the Ferry Box (automatic measurement system installed on board of vessels, usualy ferries, the marine water parameters are measured on the route, the system also enables collection of in-situ samples for analysis in on-land laboratories) and satellite data (for the temperature of seawater only). |
The purpose of monitoring macrophytes on hard- and sedimentbottom communities are to follow longterm changes in the marine environment due to changes in water transparency, nutrient enrichment and physical disturbance, and indirect effects due to changes in foodwebs.
During 2016-2019 the monitoring programme was revised. New methods for monitoring of hardbottom vegetation has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme. New methods for monitoring of sediment communities with vegetation/eelgrass has started and additional areas and stations has been added the national programme.
Sweden is also developing integrated methods for monitoring shallow habitats using satellites or drones to supplement the current in situ monitoring.
Sampling primarily every year, every other year or every third year |
The purposes of monitoring phytoplankton, blooms, bacterioplankton and primary production are to follow short- and longterm effects of eutrophication, climate change and changes in foodwebs.
Monitoring is conducted in both offshore and coastal areas as well as in areas with more pressures in terms of run-offs and point sources.
Starting year: Regular monitoring of phytoplankton started in 1983 in the Baltic Sea and 1986 in the North Sea. Chorophyll a has been monitored since 1982. Earliest data on bacterioplankton is available from 1989 and primary production from 1979. Algae blooms has been monitored using remote sensing since 2002.
Specify frequency: 1-26 times a year
Algae blooms – Daily
There is an ongoing work on developing improved methods and, above all, collaboration in the area of remotely analyzed chlorophyll using satellites. |
The optical properties of water refer to the conditions for light to be able to travel through the body of water. The Secchi depth is a property that is measured to assess the transparency of the water, but to gain more knowledge about the color and turbidity of the water, it is also important to measure chlorophyll, turbidity, colored disolved organic material (CDOM) and suspended particulate matter (SPM).
Monitoring the water's optical properties is among other things a prerequisite for being able to develop remote sensing models. In the Gulf of Bothnia and the coastal waters of the Baltic Sea, it is difficult to monitor chlorophyll with remote sensing because these areas are highly affected by CDOM and SPM, which have a similar color to chlorophyll. The development of new methods and models (remote sensing algorithms) for better estimates of chlorophyll is therefore dependent on observational data of chlorophyll, CDOM and SPM for calibration / validation of the remote sensing results, see more in programme Remote sensing of the water column.
Eutrophication and climate change can be the underlying causes of changes in the water's optical properties. The color and turbidity of the water are affected by both living and dead material in the water mass. Living material, such as phytoplankton, is controlled by for example weather and nutrient supply while the amount of dead material is controlled by for example runoff from land and land use. The goal is that the monitoring of the water's optical properties in combination with remote sensing of the water column should be able to follow changes over time, and be able to link the changes to human activities.
Coordinated measurements of the "optical properties of the water" began in the Gulf of Bothnia and the Baltic Proper in 2018 and are under development.
Secchi depth have been measured in its current form since 1993, but observations are available from national data hosts from 1967. Chlorophyll a is measured for various purposes, and has since 2018 been measured according to a new method that is suitable for monitoring the water's optical properties in support of remote sensing. For other monitoring of chlorophyll a, see programme Phytoplankton (including pelagic bacteria and harmful algal blooms). There is data on CDOM from 2017 within the project SEAmBOTH. However, humic substances, which is a similar parameter, has been measured since 1975.
Measurements of SPM within the national environmental monitorin |
Oxygen supply in the water mass is a prerequisite for most marine organisms and a lack of oxygen can thus have major effects on marine habitats and biodiversity. Changed oxygen concentration can be an effect of eutrophication as an increased amount of nutrients leads to increased production of biomass which when it is decomposed consumes oxygen. Changes in oxygen concentrations may also be due to hydrographic or climate-related conditions.
The ocean is acidified as an effect of carbon dioxide emissions that have led to increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. When carbon dioxide is dissolved in seawater, carbonic acid is formed, which leads to falling pH and the oceans becoming more acidic. Sea acidification can also be caused by exhaust fumes, from for example ships and industry, containing sulfur- and nitric oxid. In the air these oxids are converted into sulfuric acid and nitric acid, which reacts with water droplets that acidify the seawater. Sea acidification can have far-reaching consequences for organisms and ecosystems. Among other things by affecting the species that have shells or skeletons of lime. Climate change and ocean acidification are expected to together lead to changes in the distribution of species and food webs.
Oxygen measurements from the Baltic Sea are available from the 1890s, but the measurements are sparse and have low reliability due to unreliable measurement technology. Since 1902, the oxygen measurements have been performed using basically the same method, so-called Winkler titration. In the North Sea, oxygen began to be measured in 1970. pH monitoring started in 1993.
Monitoring frequency varies between 2-weekly to monthly.
Work is underway to develop new methods for monitoring using automated sampling and measurements, for example from ferry box systems or bottom- or buoy-mounted measurement systems. Methods are already in place and routines are being developed for automated measurements of oxygen by the use of probes on ships, buoys and measuring systems, or on moving gliders. |
The Sentinel family is a number of satellites that are part of the European space program Copernicus and can be used for environmental monitoring. With their large geographical coverage, satellites are an excellent complement to field measurements of the water column (for example chlorophyll) provided that the satellite products are locally adapted with acceptable accuracy. With the data collected by the satellites and their instruments, various variables can be calculated that can provide better knowledge of the condition in pelagic habitats and the possible extent of the effects of eutrophication. The monitoring complements the field measurements described in the programmes Phytoplankton, Water column - physical characteristics and Water column - optical properties.
Sentinel 3A was launched in 2016, and Sentinel 3B in 2018. Data are collected from other satellites further back in time, for example from NASA's SeaWiFS (1997 - 2010). Sentinel 3D, the last of that generation, will be launched in 2021. In addition to monitoring harmful algal blooms during the summer (mainly cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea), there is no ongoing programme for calculating data obtained by remote sensing, but it is under development. Since 2019, SMHI has been tasked with creating an infrastructure for the production of aquatic products, such as chlorophyll maps (data files), adapted to cover all of Sweden's land and water surfaces, as well as making them publically available. The goal is to have the monitoring in operation by 2022. |
Sediment-living macrofauna have a size that is captured on a 1 mm sieve and include many different animal groups e.g. polychaetes, molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans.
The aim is to follow long-term trends in the marine environment as a result of organic loading and oxygen deficiency by documenting changes in the structure of the sediment-living macrofauna communities.
Sampling primarily every year or every other year
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 1971, and 1972 in the North Sea. |
Nutrient concentrations in sediments are monitored to learn how these can affect the eutrophication situation along the coast of Sweden. Measurements are made in larger deeper basins where organic matter and nutrients can accumulate. The results can be used to compare water areas with each other and determine whether the sediments within a water area act as a source for nutrients or if they store nutrients, ie whether they contribute to increasing or decreasing eutrophication in the area.
As the bottom water in the deeper basins is often stagnant due to stratification in the water mass, point measurements of oxygen levels are also of value for monitoring eutrophication and anoxic bottoms. Low oxygen levels can make phosphate available and leak out of the bottomwater and thus provide an eutrophication effect from the bottom. For oxygen monitoring see program Water column - chemical characteristics (oxygen and pH). |
Nutrients refer primarily to nitrogen and phosphorus, but also carbon and in some cases silicon. Concentrations of nutrients are measured to indicate the eutrophication situation and its geographical distribution. The nutrient concentration lays the foundation for the growth of phytoplankton and therefore greatly controls how the ecosystem works. Monitoring is crucial for the follow-up of measures on land to reduce the supply of nutrients to the sea. See also the programmes Nutrient and contaminant inputs from atmosphere and Nutrient and contaminant inputs from land-based sources.
Measurments of nutrient concentrations began during the 1960s, but method development did not stabilize until the 1980s. The current monitoring programme started in 1993 and the methods have been similar since then.
In coastal waters, most samples are taken within the framework of operators' recipient control or through local environmental monitoring. Sampling frequency for this data varies between 1-24 times per year. In the open sea, sampling is usually monthly, except at high-frequency stations where samples are taken about 24 times a year and at winter mapping stations that are sampled once a year.
Work is underway to develop or validate other types of monitoring methods, for example the use of ferry box systems. |
Air pollutants can travel long distances in the atmosphere before reaching land, inland water or sea via dry deposition or precipitation. Emissions of pollutants to air come primarily from combustion (for example, vehicle traffic and burning with fossil fuels), metal production, wind transport of sand and by the spread of ammonia from manure into the air.
The SEPA, municipalities and air conservation associations monitor air quality in Sweden, through measurements and model calculations of air pollution. Frequency of monitoring varies from daily to monthly. Emission data from Swedish industries are available to the public on the website ”Utsläpp i siffror”, where the information is retrieved from the environmental reports for the facilities that are required to submit an emission declaration (according to Appendix 1 in the Environmental Report Regulation (NFS 2016: 8)). Information in the environmental reports is also annually reported to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR).
Sweden's modeling of air pollutants is part of the internationally coordinated European monitoring and evaluation program (EMEP) under the UN Convention on Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). Substances deposited over land and lakes can be spread to the sea and this input is thus captured in the calculations of inputs of pollutants from land. Substances deposited directly on the sea surface are calculated using models under C-LRTAP by EMEP. This information is used in the Swedish marine management based on reports that EMEP delivers to HELCOM and OSPAR. EMEP receives data from countries within the UN Economic Commission for Europe as well as data on international shipping, and produces various model products, e.g. deposition on the sea surface and source distributions showing which countries and sectors the air pollutants come from.
Input data are not used to assess the state of the environment, but as the load can cause a number of negative effects on the ecosystem, it is used to identify the causes of impacts, design necessary measures, and to follow up effects of implemented measures.
The monitoring of the inputs of nutrients and metals to the sea via the atmosphere began in 1979, when the collection of Swedish data for Helcom and Emep began at a station in northern Sweden. The measurements of organic hazardous substances started in 1994. |
Nutrients and hazardous substances in the sea often come from sources on land, such as agriculture, forestry, fish farms, industries, stormwater and sewage treatment plants. The pollutants are added to the sea via direct discharges and runoff from land. The total inputs from land are calculated annually based on measured levels of nutrients and hazardous substances in larger estuaries, measured water flows and reported discharges to coastal waters from industrial and municipal point sources.
Approximately every six years, calculations are also made of the source distribution, that is, a survey of the sources of the nutrients that end up in the sea. This includes both point sources and diffuse sources of inland waters, including atmospheric deposition.
Input data are not used to assess the state of the environment, but as the input can cause a number of negative effects on the ecosystem, it is used to identify the causes of impacts, design necessary measures, and to follow up effects of implemented measures. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Common monitoring strategy |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring details |
|| MP_108 || Berechnete Stickstoffemission von NOx und NHx.
|
|| MP_109 || Gemessene nasse Deposition von: NO3-, NH4+ ; modellierte Gesamtdeposition (trocken & nass) von NOx, NHx, Ntot (EMEP-Modell);
Eine Pilotstudie zu P-Deposition in dem deutschen Ostseeeinzugsgebiet wurde durchgeführt und hat ergeben, dass die P-Deposition an Messstationen unmittelbar an der Küste höher ist als auf offener See. Die Eintragsrate war an den Messstationen unmittelbar an der Küste gleich oder größer als 15 kg P km-2 Jahr-1, während die Eintragsrate auf offener See eine Eintragsrate von 5 kg P km-2 Jahr-1 vermutlich nicht überschritten hat. Die Messungen zeigen auch, dass der Standort einen Einfluss auf die Deposition hat. In weniger landwirtschaftlich geprägten Gegenden ist die Depositionsrate niedriger. Zukünftig wird die P-Deposition nicht routinemäßig gemessen, da die Ergebnisse der Studie für die HELCOM-Arbeiten ausreichen.
|
|| MP_44 || Deutschland entwässert aus einem Gebiet von 25645 km2 in die Ostsee. Von diesem Gebiet werden 18370 km2 durch Messungen erfasst. Die restlichen 7275 km2 werden nicht durch Messungen erfasst, sondern auf der Datenbasis von ähnlichen gemessenen Gebieten errechnet. Im HELCOM PLC-Projekt werden jährlich die Flusseinträge und die direkt Einträge aus dem deutschen Ostseeeinzugsgebiet erfasst. Anlassbezogen wird eine periodische Berichterstattung durchgeführt, welche zusätzlich zu den jährlich erfassten Flusseinträgen und direkten Einträgen noch die modellierten pfadspezischen Einträge aus dem deutschen Ostseeeinzugsgebiet enthält. Die Modellierung wird mit dem MoRE-Modell durchgeführt (https://isww.iwg.kit.edu/MoRE.php)
|
|| MP_37 ||
|
|| MP_41 ||
|
|| MP_39 ||
|
|| MP_21 ||
|
|| MP_33 ||
|
|| MP_35 ||
|
|| MP_107 ||
|
|| MP_110 ||
|
|| MP_111 || Eisbeobachter an Land und auf Schiffen
|
|| MP_127 ||
|
'Other' dækker over en kombination af satelliter (remote satellite imagery), ferrybox (in situ sampling coastal) samt mekanistisk modellering (ecological modelling)
|
Phytoplankton samples are collected with a bathometer at water depths of 1, 5 and 10 m together with samples of seawater chlorophyll a. An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. When the integrated sample is thoroughly mixed, a portion is poured into a clear glass bottle and fixed with preservation chemical for further transport, storage and analysis of the phytoplankton sample. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner. Phytoplankton is analysed according to the relevant international standard methods (EN 16695: 2015, HELCOM Monitoring Manual).
In 3 coastal water bodies sampling is carried out annually 10-12 times per year (from April to October), Haapsalu coastal waterbody - 10-12 times every third year. Other coastal water bodies are monitored in rotation 6 times per year (from June to September) at least once during a 6-year period. In the off-shore areas the research vessel-based monitoring is conducted 5 times per year (from April to October) and 12 times every year in frames of Ferrybox monitoring. |
The presence of species, total coverage and maximum distribution depth are registered during visual observations or using underwater video remote observation method. In the monitoring site, the total coverage of phytobenthos, species presence and their coverage, as well as sediment type are observed. Quantitative samples are collected by a diver with the 20x20 metal frame (in triplicate) and deep-freezed for laboratory analysis. In the laboratory, the species composition and dry weight of each species per 1m2 are determined. In frames of coastal waters monitoring, the total nitrogen, total phosphorus (6x per year) and PAR and water temperature are also registered (continuous measurements during 3-month period) in each monitoring area as supplementary information. |
Macrozoobenthos samples are collected once a year in off-shore areas and designated coastal waters and in rotation at least once in a 6-year period from other coastal waters. Van Veen or Ekman type grab samplers are used for sampling. The sediment type, concentration of dissolved oxygen in the near-bottom layer, concentration of H2S, water temperature and salinity are registered as supplementary information at the sampling site. Every sample is collected in triplicate and frozen for laboratory analyse. In the laboratory, the species composition, abundance of species and dry weight of every species (per 1 m2) is determined.
For observation of maximum depth distribution of Limecola balthica, three designated transects are monitored in the open-sea area; samples (one sample per each depth point) are taken in accordance with the transect depth gradient. |
Chlorophyll-a concentration determination samples are collected from certain monitoring stations with a bathometer at depths of 1, 5 and 10 m (if maxima concentration is fixed in the water column, then from this depth also). An integrated sample is made pooling equal amounts of water collected from fixed depths. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples for later laboratory Chl-a analysis are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner and chlorophyll-a fluorescence is analysed. In addition, chlorophyll-a fluorescence measurements are done at buoy-stations and by sonar equipment with fluorometers. Surface layer pigment concentration monitoring is done with a remote method (satellite).
Monitoring is conducted yearly or at least once in six years with a frequency of 6 to 12 times a year at the designated monitoring stations (at least 3 stations in each coastal water body and 18 in the Estonian off-shore areas). |
The monitoring and related indicator(s) are under development. Local applicable algorithms for Sentinel satellites data need to be developed. |
Samples are collected from designated monitoring stations with a bathometer at depths of 1, 5 and 10 m and near-bottom layer. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, samples are collected with an automatic sampler from depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with installed equipment.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas the monitoring is conducted 6 times per year and during winter cruise. In addition, samples are collected in frames of Ferrybox monitoring, 12 times every year in the period from April to October. |
Dissolved oxygen concentration is measured at designated monitoring stations either in situ with CTD sonde oxygen sensors or in a laboratory from samples collected with a bathometer (surface layer and near-bottom layer). International guidelines are followed measuring H2S, pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations. H2S is measured at deepest monitoring stations in particular.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. |
The temperature is measured within water column from surface to bottom with CTD sondes. Transparency is assessed with 30 cm diameter white Secchi disk. As part of the Ferrybox monitoring, the temperature and salinity are registered at depths of 4-5 m from a predefined location on the route of the liner with automatic equipment. CTD water column measurements of temperature and salinity are also being performed at autonomous monitoring buoys.
Sampling is carried out annually up to 12 times per year (from June to September) at certain monitoring stations, and in rotation 6 times per year at least once in 6-year period at other monitoring stations. In the off-shore areas monitoring is conducted 6 times per year. Ferrybox, remote (satellite) measurements and measurements at autonomous buoys are being conducted continuously. |
Based on the data from hydrometric stations, the discharges of the monitored rivers are determined. The flows of rivers and areas that not covered by the monitoring are estimated using the corresponding transfer coefficients and model (ESTMODEL). In frames of hydrochemical monitoring of watercourses, the contents of nutrients and hazardous substances in water are determined at designated monitoring stations. The pollution loads are assessed by the Estonian Environment Agency according to the methodology agreed within the HELCOM cooperation (PLC-Water Guidelines; https://helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-guidelines/plc-water-guidelines/).
The hydrochemical sampling is performed yearly, 4-12 times a year; river flows are measured continuously.
The data are used for assessment of achievement of environmental targets (targets 16 and 23) on the basis of associated indicators. |
Data is collected by samples from river mouths and by automated recorders. Source identifications is made by numerical modelling and by using reported data by actors. |
Zoobenthos shall be sampled on the basis of the HELCOM procedure, the Van Veen type primer (sampling area 0,1 m²), the Grunt samples have been washed through a sieve (the diameter of the eyes 0,5 mm) and the samples shall be recorded with 4 % formaldehyde solution. Samples are analysed by microscopy, gravimetric.
|
The weight shall be expressed in units of wet weight/m². A digital video camera (integrated into a sealed beam) performs the analysis of video images in a slow viewing mode in a laboratory. Video images assess the sediment composition (species, pebbles, gravel, sand), their average percentage and average coverage with macrophytobenthos species.
|
Jūros vandens mėginiai imami pagal LST ISO 5667-9:2009, išskyrus 5.1.1 p.; HELCOM tyrimų metodiką. Vandens mėginiai fitoplanktono tyrimams imami plastikiniu batometru, integruotu batometru (0-10 m.), fiksuojami Lugolio tirpalu. Fitoplanktono taksonominės sudėties ir gausumo tyrimai paviršiniame, jūros vandenyje vykdomi pagal HELCOM COMBINE, LST EN 15204:2007, išskyrus 6.3.1 p.
LST EN 15972:2011, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8 p.
Mėginiai analizuojami atvirkštinės mikroskopijos metodu.
|
Vandens temperatūra ir druskingumas matuojami CTD zondu, vandens skaidrumas – seki disku.
|
Jūros vandens mėginiai imami pagal LST ISO 5667-9:2009, išskyrus 5.1.1 p.; HELCOM tyrimų metodiką. Vandens mėginiai chlorofilo a tyrimams imami plastikiniu batometru, integruotu batometru (0-10 m.). Mėginiai laive filtruojami per 0,7 µm filtrus. Analizuojami spektrometriniu metodu.
|
Mėginiai maistingųjų medžiagų analizei imami CTD zondu su batometrų sistema (12 batometrų: 5 litrų ir 2,5 litrų talpos).
|
Vandenyje ištirpęs deguonis, pH matuojami automatiškai, ant zondo pritvirtintais davikliais.
|
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. The values of the parameters are measured on certain depths. For the calculation of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), content of N-NO2, N-NO3 and N-NH4 is determined, resulting in the sum - DIN value. Frequency of sampling - up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for sampling and determination of nitrite, nitrate, ammonium. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameters are measured on certain depths. For the determination of dissolved inorganic phosphorous (DIP), content of P-PO4 is used. Frequency of sampling - up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for sampling and determination of phosphate. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameters are measured on certain depths. Frequency of sampling - up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for sampling and determination of total nitrogen. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameters are measured on certain depths. Frequency of sampling - up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for sampling and determination of total phosphorous. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameters are measured on certain depths. Frequency of sampling - up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for sampling and determination of silicate. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameter are measured in the layer 0.10 m. Frequency of sampling up to 9 times per year. Sampling with integral sampler 0.10 m. Samples are filtered through the GF/F filter. The concentration of chlorophyll a is determined spectroscopically in the ethanol solution extracted from the filter precipitate. Testing according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for measuring chlorophyll a. |
1. The summer phytoplankton biomass indicator (VFBI) evaluates the average summer chlorophyll-a concentration in the surface layer of surface water for the period from June to September. The monitoring programme is based on the use of satellite data within the framework of the Copernicus programme of the European Space Agency. The satellite is equipped with an ocean and terrestrial colour instrument (OLCI) that measures water spectral properties and mathematically estimates the concentration of chlorophyll-a. Data selection grid created using ornithologist grid.
2. In parallel observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Sampling is performed in surface layer of water (0-0.5 m) with a batometer. Frequency of sampling - up to 9 times per year.
Samples are filtered through the GF/F filter. The concentration of chlorophyll a is determined spectroscopically in the ethanol solution extracted from the filter precipitate. Testing according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual Guidelines for measuring chlorophyll a.
The results of sample analyses are used to calibrate the satellite data conversion algorithm. |
The environmental status is assessed using the amount of spring phytoplankton during the period from the beginning of February to mid-June, when a peak of chlorophyll is observed in the Gulf of Riga. This period is defined as the target period of the Fitoplankton Spring bloom intensity index indicator. The MPP intensity is characterised by an area which falls under the chlorophyll-a curve of the MPP period. This indicator is created based on HELCOM eutrophication concept of indicator spring bloom chlorophyll-a indicator (currently is under development). |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameter are measured in the integrated sample form the layer 0-10 m. Frequency of sampling up to 4 times per year.
Biomass of cyanobacteria is determined according to HELCOM COMBINE Manual for Marine Monitoring and Guidelines for monitoring phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomass. The method is suitable for qualitative (species composition) and quantitative (biomass) detection of phytoplankton organisms in marine and brackish water samples.
Cyanobacteria bloom index has been developed and calculated according to the HELCOM indicator description (2018) "Cyanobacteria bloom index" and reflects degree of eutrophication based on the amount and biomass of the accumulated cyanobacteria in the surface layer in the summer period from 20 June to 31 August, as in an environment with limited nitrogen increased phosphorus loads supports the development of potentially toxic cyanobacteria. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameters are measured on certain depths. Frequency of sampling up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual ("Guidelines for monitoring of water transparency (Secchi depth)", "Annex B17 Technical note on the determination of organic carbon in seawater", "Guidelines for monitoring of turbidity") |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance. Values of the parameters are measured in the whole column (CTD parameters) and on the certain depths (DO, pH). DO content on certain depths is determined in parallel with the CTD measurements using standard iodometric method. Frequency of sampling up to 9 times per year. Sampling with rosette sampler which is combined with a CTD system or a cast of reversing water samplers equipped with reversing thermometers.
Testing methods according to the HELCOM COMBINE manual (Part B, Annex B-8: Appendix 1 Technical note on the determination of salinity and temperature of seawater; Appendix 2 Technical note on the determination of dissolved oxygen in seawater). |
Observations are made at fixed stations (representative areas), the coordinates of which have been determined in advance.
For monitoring of benthic macroalgae on solid substrate observations are carried out in two steps: video surveillance and sampling for further analysis. Video surveillance is performed with a drop-down video camera, producing a video from each station. Observations of physical and chemical characteristics of habitats, such as CTD profile measurements, Secchi, chlorophyll a concentration, turbidity, are carried out in parallel.
Sampling is carried out by diver by scraping organisms from a determined surface area. The composition and biomass of the hard-bottom zoobenthos species are determined according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM" Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual (Annex C-9 Guidelines for monitoring of phytobenthic plant and animal communities in the Baltic Sea).
Sampling is performed in July-August, once in a 6 years. |
Observations are made at fixed stations, the coordinates of which have been determined in advance.
Sampling of the soft bottom zoobenthos is performed using standard Van Veen grab with 3 parallel samples in each station; corresponding values are calculated as average from all 3 parallel sampes. Sampling is performed once in every year, in May.
The composition and biomass of the soft-bottom zoobenthos species is determined according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM" and Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual (Annex C8 Soft bottom macrozoobenthos).
This method is suitable for the qualitative and quantitative determination of macrozoobenthos organisms of natural waterbodies. |
Macrozoobenthos data is collected once a year, macrophytes 2 times a year (June, September). |
Macrozoobenthos data is collected once a year, macrophytes 2 times a year (June, September). |
Macrozoobenthos data is collected once a year, macrophytes 2 times a year (June, September). |
Macrozoobenthos data is collected once a year, macrophytes 2 times a year (June, September). |
The use of Ferry-Box data dependent on its availability.
The use of satellite products, information dependent on data availability. |
The use of Ferry-Box data dependent on its availability.
The use of satellite products, information dependent on data availability. |
||||||||||||||||||
Benthic broad habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other benthic habitats |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic broad habitats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shelf ecosystems |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input or spread of non-indigenous species |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of microbial pathogens |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of organic matter – diffuse sources and point sources |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydrographical changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eutrophication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Litter in the environment |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal defence and flood protection |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of water |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine plant harvesting |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunting and collecting for other purposes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agriculture |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forestry |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport – shipping |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urban uses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial uses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste treatment and disposal |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2)) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, survey and educational activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Physical and hydrological characteristics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other pelagic habitats |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
1990-9999 |
1990-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1997-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1979-9999 |
2010-9999 |
1968-9999 |
1970-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1980-9999 |
2021-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1993-9999 |
2006-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1993-9999 |
1924-9999 |
1965-9999 |
1970-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1981-9999 |
2007-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1981-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1980-9999 |
1972-9999 |
1972-9999 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
9999-9999 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
2014-9999 |
1999-9999 |
1999-9999 |
2014 |
2014 |
1993-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1967-9999 |
1893-9999 |
2022-9999 |
1971-9999 |
2003-9999 |
1961-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1965-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Monthly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Hourly |
Weekly |
As needed |
Monthly |
2-weekly |
2-weekly |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Monthly |
Continually |
Yearly |
2-yearly |
3-monthly |
3-monthly |
Yearly |
3-monthly |
3-monthly |
3-monthly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Daily |
Other |
6-yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
|| MP_108 || Ceip: https://www.ceip.at/
http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/welcome.html.html |
|| MP_109 || EMEP: https://projects.nilu.no//ccc/ |
|| MP_037 || |
|| MP_041 || HELCOM COMBINE Manual Annex C-3 sediment traps |
|| MP_039 || HELCOM COMBINE Manual Annex C-3 sediment traps |
|| MP_021 || |
|| MP_033 || |
|| MP_035 || |
|| MP_107 || Nationales marines Meeresumweltmessnetz mit autonomen Messgeräten |
|| MP_110 || In-situ Daten werden auf Schiffen und festen Plattformen in der Regel mit einer CTD erfasst. Die genutzten Satelliten sind mit speziellen Sensoren ausgerüstet, aus deren Messwerten sich die Oberflächentemperatur ableiten lässt. Fernerkundungsdaten |
|| MP_111 || In-situ Daten von Eisbeobachtern an Land sowie auf Schiffen, dazu Fernerkundungsdaten |
|| MP_127 || In-situ Daten werden auf Schiffen und festen Plattformen in der Regel mit einer CTD erfasst. Die genutzten Satelliten sind mit speziellen Sensoren ausgerüstet, aus deren Messwerten sich die Oberflächentemperatur ableiten lässt. |
Nationale methoder (baseret på HELCOM- og OSPAR-guidelines) for målinger af næringssalte, ilt og klorofyl:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M01_Indsamling_af_vand-_og_planktonproever_i_felten_ver1.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M02_Vandkemi_ver1.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M04_Ilt_i_vandsoejlen_ver.3.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M07_Klorofyl_a__VERSION_2_.pdf |
Nationale methoder (baseret på HELCOM- og OSPAR-guidelines) for CTD-målinger (temperatur, saninitet, fluorescens, lys og ilt) samt sigtdybde:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M03_CTD_maaling__VERSION_2_.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M04_Ilt_i_vandsoejlen_ver.3.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M05_Fluorescens_ver1.pdf
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M06_Lyssvaekkelse_ver3.pdf |
Der er generelt ikke godkendte overvågningsmetoder eller -manualer nationalt i fx. OSPAR eller HELCOM, der anviser hvordan overvågning ved ferrybox, satellitter eller modeller udføres. Dog omfatter fx. HELCOMs moniteringsmanual for chlorophyll-a et afsnit om chlorophyll-a målinger ved fluorescens i forbindelse med 'ships of opportunity' (ferrybox) |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
National monitoring programme |
National, under development |
WMO no 168, national regulations |
https://helcom.fi/media/documents/Water-column-habitats-Pigments.pdf |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) Near real time data are collected as well |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Monitoring is carried out according to the HELCOM guidelines (see HELCOM Monitoring Manual: http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/monitoring-and-assessment/monitoring-manual) |
Remote surveillance using Sentinel satellites (details see in field Monitoring Details (above)) |
Measurements will be performed by the automatic monitoring station (ferry-box) set on the Riga-Stockholm ferry (details see in field Monitoring Details (above)) |
Total organic carbon - Infrared spectroscopy PN-EN 14842. Methodology in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 9 October 2019 on the forms and method of monitoring surface water bodies and groundwater bodies (Office Journal of 2019, item 2147) http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20190002147/O/D20192147.pdf |
Total organic carbon - Infrared spectroscopy PN-EN 14842. Methodology in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 9 October 2019 on the forms and method of monitoring surface water bodies and groundwater bodies (Office Journal of 2019, item 2147) http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20190002147/O/D20192147.pdf |
Total organic carbon - Infrared spectroscopy PN-EN 14842. Methodology in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 9 October 2019 on the forms and method of monitoring surface water bodies and groundwater bodies (Office Journal of 2019, item 2147) http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20190002147/O/D20192147.pdf |
Total organic carbon - Infrared spectroscopy PN-EN 14842. Methodology in accordance with the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation of 9 October 2019 on the forms and method of monitoring surface water bodies and groundwater bodies (Office Journal of 2019, item 2147) http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20190002147/O/D20192147.pdf |
The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020. |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/vaxtplankton.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/bakteriell-syrekonsumtion.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/hydrografi-och-narsalter-trendovervakning.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.smhi.se/data/oceanografi/algsituationen" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/siktdjup.html" |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/syrehalt-i-bottenvatten-kartering.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/primarproduktion.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
Sweden are monitoring coastal and marine waters using Copernicus Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 data with the general aim to better assess dynamics and state through integrated use of Earth Observation, models and in-situ data. |
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/mjukbottenlevande-makrofauna-trend--och-omradesovervakning.html |
The monitoring is performed in all major sea basins where undisturbed accumulation of fine-grained material takes place continuously. Sampling takes place during the summer, May-September. A sampling round takes about two to three weeks to complete. Chemical analysis of elements as well as organic carbon and nitrogen takes place during the autumn of the same year.
The sampling of sediments for the chemical analyzes is carried out on accumulation bottoms with recent sediments with a grain size <63 μm. Sediment cores are taken at seven locations at each station, and the number of cores depends on the water content of the sediments so that sufficient material is obtained for the chemical analyzes. The sampling sites are carefully examined with an underwater camera and sediment sampling before sediment cores are collected to be analyzed. Through elemental analysis in the seven locations, the natural inhomogeneity in the sediments at each station can be statistically calculated for each substance. The sediment samples are taken with sediment corer that provide the opportunity to layer the sediment in the field. Analysis of the nutrients is done in the top sediment layer (0–10 mm). Collected surface samples are transferred to plastic jars that are weighed together with the wet sediment before they are frozen while awaiting chemical analyzes. |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/hydrografi-och-narsalter-trendovervakning.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/hydrografi-och-narsalter-kartering.html
https://www.ospar.org/work-areas/hasec/eutrophication/common-procedure" |
"https://projects.nilu.no/ccc/manual/download/cccr1-95rev.pdf
https://www.helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Rec-37-38-2.pdf" |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quality control |
|| MP_108 || --
#Nationaler Standard: zentralisiertes System Emissionen (ZSE) mit implementierter QS/QA
#Anderer Standard: EMEP: Centre of Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP): http://www.ceip.at/
|
|| MP_109 || --
#Anderer Standard
--
#EMEP-Modellierung: Meteorological Synthesizing Centre West of EMEP (MSC-W): http://emep.int/mscw/index_mscw.html;
#EMEP-Messungen: Chemical Coordinating Centre of EMEP (CCC): http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/qa/index.html; |
|| MP_044 || --
#Nationaler Standard: Qualitätssicherungsprogramm des Bund-Länder-Messprogramms (BLMP)
#Anderer Standard: DIN EN ISO/IEC 170025
|
|| MP_037 || Nationale SOP
|
|| MP_041 || national: Qualitätssicherungsprogramm des Bund-Länder-Messprogramms (BLMP);
anderer: DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_039 || Nationaler Standard: Qualitätssicherungsprogramm (Ringversuche) des Bund-Länder-Messprogramms
Anderer Standard: EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_021 || --
#Nationaler Standard:Qualitätssicherungsprogramm des Bund-Länder-Messprogramms (BLMP)
#Anderer Standard:DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025
|
|| MP_033 || Für die Sauerstoffanalytik gibt es keine internen/externen Standards. Angabe der Gesamtverfahrenmessunsicherheit; Angabe der Verfahrenskenndaten.
|
|| MP_035 || DIN EN ISO 7027 - C2. Anmerkung: Die Vergleichbarkeit von Secchi-Tiefen hängt nicht nur von den Lichtverhältnissen und dem (Standort des) Betrachter(s) ab, sondern wird auch durch unterschiedlich große Scheiben erschwert. Hier ist weitere Standardisierung erforderlich. Qualitätssicherungsprogramm des Bund-Länder-Messprogramms (BLMP);
|
|| MP_107 || unbekannt
|
|| MP_110 || BSH Qualitätsmanagement (ISO 9001)
|
|| MP_111 || BSH Qualitätsmanagement (ISO 9001)
|
|| MP_127 || BSH Qualitätsmanagement (ISO 9001)
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved 3 kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved 3 kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved 3 kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering af data og data serier i VanDa.
3. Fagdatacenter kontrol – manuel vurdering af data og dataserier udført af fagdatacentret.
Hvis data ikke indrapporteres til den nationale database kvalitetssikres data af konsulenten, der udfører overvågningsopgaven, samt MFVM efter metoderne beskrevet i nationale tekniske anvisninger eller internationale guidelines.
|
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
The quality is ensured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is ensured by following the HELCOM guidances recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is ensured by following the OSPAR/HELCOM guidance (OSPAR JAMP Eutrophication Monitoring Guidelines: Benthos (Agreement 2012-12) (Replaces Agreement 1997-06) recommendations, accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by following the HELCOM guidance as well as accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and by filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by using regionally developed algorithms and by international collaboration. |
The quality is assured by following the standard methods and HELCOM guidelines, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed and filling of general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories according to ISO/IEC 17025. |
The quality is assured by following the standards (ISO 5814, EVS-EN ISO 10523) and HELCOM guidelines and CMEMS protocols, by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following international standards, including CMEMS protocols and HELCOM guidelines, and by an accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The quality is assured by following the HELCOM PLC guidelines, standards EVS-EN ISO 11905-1, EVS-EN ISO 11732, EVS-EN ISO 13395, ISO 15681-2, EN ISO/IEC-17025 and accreditation of experts and persons by whom the monitoring is performed. |
The offshore monitoring parameters (research vessels and Alg@line), with the exception of pCO2, comply with the standard for testing laboratories (SFS-EN ISO/IEC 17025) and are determined by the FINAS-accredited Environment Testing Laboratory (FIN-T003).
|
Both sampling and laboratory analyses are quality assurance activities carried out by staff trained according to the standards and guidelines in force (Kuunen et al. 2008). The air deposition model is produced by EMEP and the annual report reflects the modelâs validation and uncertainty.
|
Fluorometers are calibrated annually in laboratory against standards. Analysis procedure is audited annually by FINAS laboratory accreditation |
The quality of the analyses carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency in the laboratory work shall be ensured in accordance with the requirements of LST EN ISO/IEC 17025.
Comparative studies are carried out to ensure data quality, data are compared to multi-annual trends, and exclusions are sought.
|
Macrophytobenthos monitoring shall be carried out in accordance with LST EN ISO 19493:2007, HELCOM methodology. Diving Instructors shall be carried out in accordance with the Diving Instructors (professional Association of diving Instructors) rules. Experts participate in joint HELCOM working groups.
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti daromi palyginamieji tyrimai, duomenys lyginami su daugiametėmis tendencijomis, ieškomos išskirtys. Tyrėjas dalyvauja HELCOM PEG (Phytoplankton Expert Group) darbo grupėje.
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Be CTD matavimų, tyrimai dar atliekami ir rankiniais instrumentais (konduktometru), siekiant palyginti duomenis ir užtikrinti jų kokybę. Į duomenų bazę suvestus duomenis dar kartą patikrina kitas tyrėjas, ir tik tuomet duomenys tampa prieinami kitiems vartotojams, teikiami į ICES, WISE duomenų bazes.
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti daromi palyginamieji tyrimai, duomenys lyginami su daugiametėmis tendencijomis, ieškomos išskirtys. Ekspertai dalyvauja HELCOM PLC darbo grupės veikloje.
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti daromi palyginamieji tyrimai, kontrolinės diagramos, duomenys lyginami su daugiametėmis tendencijomis, ieškomos išskirtys.
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Duomenų kokybei užtikrinti daromi palyginamieji tyrimai, kontrolinės diagramos, duomenys lyginami su daugiametėmis tendencijomis, ieškomos išskirtys.
|
Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros laboratorijų darbe atliekamų tyrimų kokybė užtikrinama laikantis standarto LST EN ISO/IEC 17025 reikalavimų.
Be automatinių matavimų davikliais, tyrimai dar atliekami ir rankiniais instrumentais (oksimetru), siekiant palyginti duomenis ir užtikrinti jų kokybę. Į duomenų bazę suvestus duomenis dar kartą patikrina kitas tyrėjas, ir tik tuomet duomenys tampa prieinami kitiems vartotojams, teikiami į ICES, WISE duomenų bazes.
|
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual.
QC procedures: X - and R - control charts as well as Z - control charts (with fixed quality criteria), participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients".
QC procedures: X - and R - control charts as well as Z - control charts (with fixed quality criteria), participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA procedures according to and Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients".
QC procedures: X - and R - control charts as well as Z - control charts (with fixed quality criteria), participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients".
QC procedures: X - and R - control charts as well as Z - control charts (with fixed quality criteria), participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients".
QC procedures: X - and R - control charts as well as Z - control charts (with fixed quality criteria), participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual.
QC procedures: R - control charts, participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
For direct measurements:
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter".
QC procedures: R - control charts, participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations.
For indirect measurements:
calibration of satellite data using direct measurement data. |
QA/QC will be carried out in accordance with the HELCOM guidelines currently being developed within the corresponding monitoring programme and in line with the specifications and software requirements of the equipment concerned (ferry-box). |
QA procedures: according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in "Guidelines for monitoring phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomas".
QC procedures: R - control charts based on agreed quality criterion, participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA/QC procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter (Secchi depth, TOC, turbidity).
QC procedures (TOC): participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA procedures according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter.
QC procedures: R - control charts (for DO iodometric method), X-charts and R-charts (for pH and DO), participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations (DO), usage of certified reference material (pH). |
QA according to Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter (Annex C9).
QC procedures: Rcontrol charts based on agreed quality criterion for organisms with representative number of individuals in line with HELCOM recommendations. |
QA according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and Annex C8 Soft bottom macrozoobenthos of this Manual.
QC procedures: R control charts based on agreed quality criterion for organisms with representative number of individuals, participation in ring-testing activities in line with HELCOM recommendations. Values for control charts are calculated using results of 3 parallel samples. |
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
according HELCOM recommendations
|
The quality assurance is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
All analyzes of the national samples are analyzed by Swedac-accredited laboratories. Sampling is also performed using quality-assured and accredited methodology. The results are intercalibrated by the laboratories participating in various test comparisons, as well as by self-arranged comparisons between the national monitoring contractors. There are also regular intercalibrations for phytoplankton and chlorophyll between the Baltic Sea countries, as well as annual knowledge transfer between experts from these laboratories. |
Routines for quality control will be specified in the method standard that is under development. |
The laboratories are Swedac-accredited according to ISO 17025. Oxygen profile data are reviewed according to ICES's advice and reported according to international standards such as IPTS-68, ITS-90 and PSS-78. Quality review takes place at national and international level (through ICES) and data is used within assimilation and research, which take into account differences in measurement uncertainty. |
Data from the satellites' sensors undergoes a regular recalibration, (called re-processing) where data is flagged as suspicious due to various factors such as clouds, solar reflections, impact from land pixels and more. For products such as chlorophyll, an automated quality control takes place depending on where they are sourced from. Usually there are one or more scientific publications that describe the methods (equations) and how well these correspond to reality (assessment of model quality, validation). |
The quality assurance work is following standardized methodology and partly by using Swedac-accredited laboratories. For the work of determining the species of the animals, it is of great importance to have access to people with good knowledge of taxonomy.
In surveys of sediment-living macrofauna, the count of the sorted animals is a very small source of error. On the other hand, variations in the species and wet weight determination can vary between performers and it is therefore important that the method description is followed and that they regularly participate in national and international ring tests. The data should be checked before delivery to the national data host SMHI that make standardized tests and link data to taxonomic databases. |
The chemical analyzes are performed by accredited laboratories. Methods for environmental sampling in sediments are carried out in accordance with SGU's quality system. The quality system is integrated into SGU's operating system, which is reviewed and meets the requirements of the following standards and statutes: ISO 9001: 2008, ISO 14001: 2004 and OHSAS 18001. |
All contractors have Swedac accreditation for both sampling and laboratory analyzes. Some quality control also takes place in connection with delivery to data host. The data host check data against expected results and variation. Part of the laboratory's quality system is participation in intercalibrations and international test comparisons (mainly Quasimeme). |
The contractor is accredited by Swedac for the sampling and analysis methods used and regularly participates in test comparisons. The reporting of the emissions from facilities subject to a permit via The Swedish portal for environmental reporting (SMP) is examined annually for possible misspellings or missing data. |
The laboratory that analyzes the samples is Swedac-accredited and participates in annual intercalibrations. The quality assurance with water chemical analysis results takes place in several steps. Each individual analysis result is compared with the results from previous measurements, usually at least the last five years. In the event of major deviations, the analysis is repeated. When all variables for a water sample are completed, a plausibility assessment is made by checking that the theoretical and empirical relationships between the various parameters are correct. Deviations from expected results give rise to a new analysis of the same sample. The data host also perform plausibility assessments of data and of the calculated inputs to the sea.
The reporting of the emissions from facilities subject to a permit via The Swedish portal for environmental reporting (SMP) is examined annually for possible misspellings or missing data. Errors are reported back to the operator who is given the opportunity to change the information. Prior to each reporting, a further review of the data material is performed, especially with regard to unit errors and missing values. This year's values are then compared with a time series for previous years. In the event of missing values or suspicion of incorrect values, comments from the operator's environmental reports are used for verification if possible. If information is still missing, the operator is contacted, or missing values are replaced with a reasonable value. This is done to maintain the usability of the long time series.
In connection with the delivery and reporting of annual load data, an evaluation of the data material, regarding the implementation of the work, review of delivered results and a quality declaration is delivered to SwAM. |
Data management |
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Emissionsdaten
EIONET
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. EMEP-Modellierung
EMEP-Messungen
HELCOM
EMEP-Website
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. ----
##Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB)
##HELCOM PLC-Water Datenbank
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden von den Datenoriginatoren an die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank MUDAB geliefert. Von dort werden sie an den ICES weitergegeben.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden von den Datenoriginatoren an die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank MUDAB geliefert. Von dort werden sie an den ICES weitergegeben.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden von den Datenoriginatoren an die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank MUDAB geliefert. Von dort werden sie an den ICES weitergegeben.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden von den Datenoriginatoren an die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank MUDAB geliefert. Von dort werden sie an den ICES weitergegeben.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden von den Datenoriginatoren an die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank MUDAB geliefert. Von dort werden sie an den ICES weitergegeben.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden von den Datenoriginatoren an die nationale Meeresumweltdatenbank MUDAB geliefert. Von dort werden sie an den ICES weitergegeben.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten werden im BSH weitgehend automatisch aufbereitet und archiviert und stehen binnen einer Stunde Nutzern beispielsweise als Eis- und Oberflächentemperaturkarten zur Verfügung. In den Karten werden überwiegend mehrere Überflüge der Satelliten zusammengefasst, wodurch Datenlücken auf Grund von Bewölkung weitgehend geschlossen werden können.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Gathered data are reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE. |
Data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
Raw data (excl satellite images) are stored at the national environmental monitoring database KESE. |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March) and ICES (HELCOM Combine). |
The data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE (by 1 March). The data on autonomous buoys measurements are stored at CMEMS/EMODnet Physics. |
The hydrochemical data are yearly reported to the national environmental monitoring database KESE. The hydrological data are uploaded quarterly to the database WISKI. Water-borne pollution loads are reported to HELCOM PLC database annually. |
SYKE database , submitted to ICES and summarized by HELCOM. |
HELCOM PLC database
|
The data are stored in the Environmental Protection Agencyâs database. Used to assess the state of the marine environment under the Common Water Policy Directive, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. To be provided annually to ICES. Requests shall be made available to the public, legal persons (requests sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (www.gamta.lt) by e-mail to).
|
The data are compiled in the database of the Lithuanian Environmental Protection Agency and the Institute for Maritime Research of the University of KlaipÄda http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Used to assess the status of coastal and transitional waters in terms of WFD, the state of the marine environment under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, monitoring multi-annual trends. Submitted to HELCOM.
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą, Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Kasmet teikiami ICES. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt).
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą, Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Kasmet teikiami ICES, WISE. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt).
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą, Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, Nitratų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt). Teikiami į ICES, WISE duomenų bazes.
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą, Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, Nitratų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Kasmet teikiami ICES, WISE. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt).
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę pagal Bendrąją vandens politikos direktyvą, Jūrų strategijos pagrindų direktyvą, Nitratų direktyvą, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt). Teikiami į ICES, WISE duomenų bazes.
|
Duomenys kaupiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūros duomenų bazėje. Naudojami vertinant jūros aplinkos būklę, stebint daugiametes tendencijas. Pagal prašymus teikiami visuomenei, juridiniams asmenims (prašymai siunčiami Aplinkos apsaugos agentūrai (www.gamta.lt) elektroniniu paštu aaa@aaa.am.lt). Teikiami į ICES, WISE duomenų bazes.
|
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access.
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients".
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access. QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients". Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access. QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients". Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access. QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients". Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access. QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea and in Annex B9 "Technical note on the determination of nutrients". Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access.
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea.
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
For indirect measurements:
Data are available at CODA an online data archive, with access to Sentinel-3 first and second level marine data collected over the past 12 months. Available data, modelled and processing algorithms are adapted to the region where the data is collected. Data are analysed with both empirical and analytical algorithms and can be visualized using the SNAP (Sentinel Application Platform) application.
For direct measurements:
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE). Data are regularly reported to ICES database to which EEA has access.
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea.
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder will be Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
Data will be available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in "Guidelines for monitoring phytoplankton species composition, abundance and biomas".
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual (Secchi depth, TOC, turbidity).
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual (DO, pH, salinity and temperature).
Data are available in LIAE, ICES, EMODNET. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
QC on data according to the Manual for Marine Monitoring in the COMBINE Programme of HELCOM. Part B. General Guidelines on Quality Assurance for Monitoring in the Baltic Sea" and in Guidelines relating to the specific parameter in this Manual (Annex C-9 Guidelines for monitoring of phytobenthic plant and animal communities in the Baltic Sea).
Data are available in LIAE. |
Data holder is Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology (LIAE).
QA/QC procedures for data according to the HELCOM COMBINE Manual Annex C8 "Soft bottom macrozoobenthos".
Data are available in LIAE. |
Data are available for download at the national data host SMHI. Data are also reported to ICES, Helcom, Ospar and EEA.
SMHI also shares data through SeaDataNet, which has defined Inspire standards for marine data, as well as through EMODnet. Data are freely available through these sources. Computer products, such as SMHI's annual estimate of the total area of anoxic bottoms in the Baltic Sea, can also be collected from SMHI. |
Reprocessed ocean color data is available with daily average images from 2016 to today, at the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service. Eventually, data will also be available from SMHI, who are developing a publically available infrastructure for the production of aquatic products adapted to cover all of Sweden's land and water surfaces. |
Data on nutrient concentrations are available from the Swedish Geological Survey, SGU, which is the national data host for sediment, and supporting data such as oxygen are delivered to SMHI, which is the national data host for biological and oceanographic data. Detailed information about the above variables is given in the field report for the 2020 sampling campaign that will come during the year 2021. The field report is published in SGU's report series ”Rapporter och meddelanden”. Data is available via a WMS service and can be downloaded free of charge in the map viewer. Data from the national environmental monitoring are also reported to ICES. |
Data on atmospheric deposition at sea are available from the international data host NILU and EMEP's model calculations are available from EMEP centers in Oslo and Moscow. Source distribution information can be found in Emep's annual reports to HELCOM and OSPAR, as well as in HELCOM's PLC reports. |
The results of the recurring calculations of the input of nutrients and hazardous substances to the sea based on monitoring data, as well as point sources are presented in reports at SMED (Swedish Environmental Emissions Data). Results from the recurring analyzes of the source distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus are presented in SMED's tool TBV (Technical calculation system water). Annual statistics on the input of nitrogen and phosphorus are also produced by SwAM and the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. |
||||||||||||||
Data access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Estonian Environment Agency: Anastasiia Kovtun-Kante, anastasiia.kovtun-kante@envir.ee; Arthur Kivi, arthur.kivi@envir.ee |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology
e-mail: juris.aigars@lhei.lv |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
References |
|| MP_108 || --# Nitrogen Emissions to the Air in the Baltic Sea # https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/eutrophication/nitrogen-emissions-to-the-air-in-the-baltic-sea-area/ #-- |
|| MP_109 || --# PLC-6 Report
Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the Baltic Sea # https://helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/environment-fact-sheets/eutrophication/atmospheric-nitrogen-depositions-to-the-sea/ # https://helcom.fi/media/publications/PLC-6-Executive-Summary.pdf #-- |
|| MP_44 || --# Publikationen der PLC-Gruppe (https://helcom.fi/helcom-at-work/projects/plc-6/) # https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PLC-6-Executive-Summary.pdf #-- |
|| MP_37 || --# #-- |
|| MP_41 || --# #-- |
|| MP_39 || --# #-- |
|| MP_21 || --# #-- |
|| MP_33 || --# #-- |
|| MP_35 || --# #-- |
|| MP_107 || --# #-- |
|| MP_110 || --# #-- |
|| MP_111 || --# #-- |
|| MP_127 || --# #-- |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
Kettunen, I, Mäkelä, A. & Heinonen, P. 2008. Vesistötietoa näytteenottajille. Suomen ympäristökeskus ympäristöopas. |