Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-M / Baltic
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Region/subregion | Baltic |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | Finland |
Estonia |
Latvia |
Lithuania |
Poland |
Germany |
Denmark |
Sweden |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member state report | |||||||||
Marine reporting units | MRUs used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Features | Species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element | Halichoerus grypus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element | Phoca hispida botnica |
|
|
|
|||||
Element | Phoca vitulina |
|
|
|
|||||
Element | Phocoena phocoena |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Element | Pusa hispida |
|
|||||||
Element2 | |||||||||
Element sources | No. of elements per level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1 Mammals | ||||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
|
|
|||||
Threshold values | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 21% (14) |
66% (4) |
100% (8) |
0% (0) |
20% (3) |
33% (4) |
67% (61) |
|
Threshold value sources | D1 Mammals | ||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|
|
|||||
Threshold value sources | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold value sources | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Threshold value sources | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Threshold value sources | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
|
||||||
Value achieved upper | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 34% (22) |
66% (4) |
100% (8) |
20% (1) |
26% (4) |
58% (7) |
64% (59) |
|
Value achieved lower | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
58% (7) |
0% (0) |
|
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1 Mammals | ||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|
||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 100-100% (3 of 5 parameters) |
|||||||
Proportion values achieved | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 100-100% (3 of 5 parameters) |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value units | % of population achieving threshold value |
||||||||
Trends | No. of trends per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameters achieved | No. of parameters per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Criteria status | No. of criteria per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element status | No. of elements per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration rule type for parameters | OOAO (49 or 100.0%) |
NHIE_NWEI (10 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (1 or 11.1%) OOAO (8 or 88.9%) |
Not relevant (1 or 20.0%) OOAO (4 or 80.0%) |
OTH (15 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (12 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (4 or 3.1%) OOAO (124 or 96.9%) |
||
Integration rule description for parameters | In a single year assessment of each indicator the rule OOAO was applied straightforward, i.e. if a single indicator was assessed subGES, the entire annual assessment was subGES. In the case of multiyear (2011-2016) assessment, GES was assessed if all the annual results of indicators were GES or only less than 20% of results were subGES. If more than 20% of annual results of indicators were in subGES status, the overall assessment was subGES. |
It has not been possible to do cross-species integration.
Only one species has been studied within this GES component. It has not been possible to make integration across other species. |
|||||||
Integration rule type for criteria | OOAO (64 or 100.0%) |
OOAO (10 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (1 or 11.1%) OOAO (8 or 88.9%) |
Not relevant (1 or 20.0%) OOAO (4 or 80.0%) |
OTH (15 or 100.0%) |
OOAO (12 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (4 or 3.1%) OOAO (124 or 96.9%) |
||
Integration rule description for criteria |
The assessment of the criteria was derived from the partial evaluations of the species evaluation under the Habitats Directive.
|
It has only been possible to integrate across D2, D4 and D5 for one species. It has not been possible to make an integration for D1 and D3.
|
GES defined as: When the threshold values for all indicators of each species under all relevant criteria are achieved in the assessment area. GES defined as: When the threshold values for all indicators of each species under relevant criteria are achieved in the assessment area. |
||||||
GES extent threshold |
|
|
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|
||||||||
GES extent unit |
|
|
|||||||
GES achieved | Small toothed cetaceans |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GES achieved | Seals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment period | 2011-2016 (64 or 100.0%) |
2000-2017 (10 or 100.0%) |
2011-2016 (9 or 100.0%) |
2011-2016 (5 or 100.0%) |
2012-2018 (15 or 100.0%) |
2006-2016 (4 or 33.3%) 2006-2017 (8 or 66.7%) |
2011-2016 (128 or 100.0%) |
||
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Related targets | 7 |
1 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
11 |