Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D3 / Baltic
| Report type | Member State report to Commission |
| MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
| Report due | 2020-10-15 |
| GES Descriptor | D3 Commercial fish and shellfish |
| Region/subregion | Baltic |
Member state |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DE |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
DK |
EE |
EE |
EE |
FI |
FI |
LT |
LV |
LV |
LV |
PL |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report Access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Descriptor |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
D3 |
Monitoring strategy description |
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Das Monitoring kommerziell genutzten Fischbestände erfasst die Abundanz und biologische Parameter einzelner Bestände sowie die Fangzusammensetzungen in der kommerziellen Fischerei in der Ostsee. Das Monitoring erfasst somit Zustände von Fischbeständen, Fischgemeinschaften und die Auswirkung von Fischerei (D3).
Die Erfassung der kommerziellen Fänge und die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung von Fischpopulationen/-Beständen erlaubt die Abschätzung von Fangempfehlungen entsprechend des MSY-Ansatzes. Der MSY-Ansatz ist die Basis für die GES-Festlegung innerhalb von D3.
Die Monitoringstrategie zu D3 kann in Bezug zur Risikoabschätzung als gestuft bezeichnet werden: Für die wichtigsten, datenreichen Fisch- und Schalentierbestände sind die Messprogramme umfangreich und somit ist die Datengrundlage in vielen Fällen gut. Trotzdem sind die aus diesen Daten abgeleiteten Bewertungen mit Unsicherheiten behaftet, da abgeleitete Parameter natürlichen Schwankungen sowie Beobachtungsungenauigkeiten unterliegen. Für datenarme Bestände ist die Monitoringstrategie als risikoreich zu bezeichnen, da die erhobenen Daten in vielen Fällen keine aussagekräftige Bewertung erlauben. Allerdings ist zu erwähnen, dass eine bessere Monitoringabdeckung in vielen Fällen aus technischer oder personeller Sicht nicht möglich ist oder unverhältnismäßig wäre.
Durch das vorhandene Monitoring kann die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen bewertet werden.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet for de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande skal skabe grundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om populationerne af alle fiske- og skaldyrar-ter, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt, ligger inden for sikre biologiske grænser og udvise en alders- og størrelsesfordeling, der er betegnende for en sund bestand.
Deskriptoren omhandler de fiskebestande, der fiskes i både konsum- og industrifiskeriet, hvorved de betegnes som erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede. Disse arter udgør en stor andel af havets samlede bio-masse og udfylder vigtige roller i havmiljøet som fødeemner og toprovdyr. En god miljøtilstand i havet, som er forenelig med et bæredygtigt fiskeri er således afhængig af, at disse bestande er sunde i deres forekomst og udbredelse.
I de danske havområder forvaltes de erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede fiskebestande i henhold til den fæl-les fiskeripolitik i EU-regi. Forvaltningen bygger på videnskabelig rådgivning fra ICES (Det Internati-onale Havundersøgelsesråd) og DTU Aqua (Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer), der benyttes til fast-sættelse af kvoter på EU-niveau og som efterfølgende fordeles mellem medlemslandene efter aftalte fordelingsnøgler. Kvoterne fastsættes efter principper om et maksimalt bæredygtigt udbytte (Maximum Sustainable Yield, MSY) med referencepunkter fastsat ud fra forsigtighedsprincippet.
Overvågningsprogrammet har til formål at sikre, at miljøtilstanden, som den er defineret i basisanalysen for Danmarks Havstrategi II, løbende kan følges i de danske havområder. Overvågningsprogrammet og basisanalyserne skal sammen danne grundlag for udarbejdelsen af de indsatsprogrammer, der skal sikre opfyldelse af miljømålene. Overvågningen vil endvidere føre til en vurdering af indsatsprogrammets foranstaltninger i forhold til opnåelse eller opretholdelse af god miljøtilstand. Overvågningsprogrammet er således tilrettelagt for at vurdere fremskridt i forhold til GES, miljømål og indsatser.
|
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD3 – Commercially exploited fish" is to assess the status of main commercial fish species in the sea areas of Estonia. The strategy aims to contribute to the assessment of the fishing mortality, status of spawning stock biomass and size and age structure of monitored stocks. The monitored fish stocks include pelagic Baltic herring (two stocks) and sprat stocks, economically significant coastal fish species (perch, flounder, pikeperch) and Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes.
The monitoring is undertaken under the "Coastal fish" and "Off-shore fish" monitoring programmes. The data on human activities that potentially affect fish stocks are collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. An additional data indirectly contributing to the strategy is gathered from several monitoring programmes as "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions", "Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources", "Contaminant levels – in sediment", "Contaminant levels – in water", "Oil spills", "Macrolitter", "Litter micro-particles", "Impulsive underwater noise" and "Continuous underwater noise". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD3 – Commercially exploited fish" is to assess the status of main commercial fish species in the sea areas of Estonia. The strategy aims to contribute to the assessment of the fishing mortality, status of spawning stock biomass and size and age structure of monitored stocks. The monitored fish stocks include pelagic Baltic herring (two stocks) and sprat stocks, economically significant coastal fish species (perch, flounder, pikeperch) and Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes.
The monitoring is undertaken under the "Coastal fish" and "Off-shore fish" monitoring programmes. The data on human activities that potentially affect fish stocks are collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. An additional data indirectly contributing to the strategy is gathered from several monitoring programmes as "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions", "Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources", "Contaminant levels – in sediment", "Contaminant levels – in water", "Oil spills", "Macrolitter", "Litter micro-particles", "Impulsive underwater noise" and "Continuous underwater noise". |
The aim of the monitoring strategy "SD3 – Commercially exploited fish" is to assess the status of main commercial fish species in the sea areas of Estonia. The strategy aims to contribute to the assessment of the fishing mortality, status of spawning stock biomass and size and age structure of monitored stocks. The monitored fish stocks include pelagic Baltic herring (two stocks) and sprat stocks, economically significant coastal fish species (perch, flounder, pikeperch) and Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes.
The monitoring is undertaken under the "Coastal fish" and "Off-shore fish" monitoring programmes. The data on human activities that potentially affect fish stocks are collected in the programme “Marine and coastal activities”. An additional data indirectly contributing to the strategy is gathered from several monitoring programmes as "Non-indigenous species – harbours and adjacent regions", "Inputs of nutrients and contaminants – land-based sources", "Contaminant levels – in sediment", "Contaminant levels – in water", "Oil spills", "Macrolitter", "Litter micro-particles", "Impulsive underwater noise" and "Continuous underwater noise". |
The vast majority of monitoring data on the main commercial species is collected in the EU Fisheries Data Collection Programme. Data will be collected for analysis and advice in support of the EUâs Common Fisheries Policy. The Data Collection Programme collects data on the status of herring, sprat, cod and salmon stocks, among others. Data on these species will be analysed and reported as international cooperation in the working groups of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). ICES has also made preliminary assessments and recommendations on the implementation of farm estimates for Descriptor 3 (ICES 2014). In addition to the EU Data Collection Programme, data are also produced for catch statistics for commercial fisheries. In addition to the stocks assessed through international cooperation, some of the so-called coastal species are also important species for commercial fishing. In particular, there would be a need for more systematic monitoring data on the status of spikes and pigs in coastal waters. Fishing is the most important factor in the state of commercial species. In addition to commercial fishing, recreational fishing also plays an important role in coastal populations.
The programme provides information to MSFD descriptor 1 (D1C1, D1C2 and D1C3), descriptor 3 (D3C1, D3C2 and D3C3) and descriptor 4 (D4C1, D4C2). The programme also collects data on fisheries under pressure.
|
The vast majority of monitoring data on the main commercial species is collected in the EU Fisheries Data Collection Programme. Data will be collected for analysis and advice in support of the EUâs Common Fisheries Policy. The Data Collection Programme collects data on the status of herring, sprat, cod and salmon stocks, among others. Data on these species will be analysed and reported as international cooperation in the working groups of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). ICES has also made preliminary assessments and recommendations on the implementation of farm estimates for Descriptor 3 (ICES 2014). In addition to the EU Data Collection Programme, data are also produced for catch statistics for commercial fisheries. In addition to the stocks assessed through international cooperation, some of the so-called coastal species are also important species for commercial fishing. In particular, there would be a need for more systematic monitoring data on the status of spikes and pigs in coastal waters. Fishing is the most important factor in the state of commercial species. In addition to commercial fishing, recreational fishing also plays an important role in coastal populations.
The programme provides information to MSFD descriptor 1 (D1C1, D1C2 and D1C3), descriptor 3 (D3C1, D3C2 and D3C3) and descriptor 4 (D4C1, D4C2). The programme also collects data on fisheries under pressure.
|
Verslinių žuvų rūšių (menkė, strimelė, brėtlingis ir plekšnė) duomenys renkami pagal Lietuvos nacionalinės žuvininkystės duomenų rinkimo programą. Pagal gautus duomenis, ICES skaičiuoja vertes D3C1 ir D3C2 kriterijų rodikliams (mirtingumo dėl žvejybos koeficientas (F) ir neršiančių išteklių biomasė (SSB) atskiriems Baltijos jūros pakvadračiams. Nacionaliniu lygiu skaičiuojamos vertės D3C3 kriterijaus rodikliams: 1) populiacijos pasiskirstymas pagal amžių ir dydį ir 2) didesnių už vidutinę pirmos lytinės brandos normą žuvų proporcija.
Tyrimai pagal Duomenų rinkimo programą vykdomi 4 kartus per metus. Du kartai dugniniu tralu menkės ir plekšnės rodikliams skaičiuoti ir 2 kartai akustikos tyrimai strimelių ir brėtlingių rodikliams skaičiuoti. D3C1 rodiklio skaičiavimui taip pat renkama biologiniai mėginiai iš verslinių laimikių. Verslinių mėginių rinkimas priklauso nuo žvejybos laiko ir intensyvumo. Verslinių mėginių ėmimas vyksta du kartus per mėnesį kiekvienai verslinei rūšiai, jei vyksta žvejyba.
|
Data are acquired in accordance with EPP regulation (EU) 2017/1004, EK decision (EU) 2019/909 and delegated decision (EU) 2019/910. |
Data are acquired in accordance with EPP regulation (EU) 2017/1004, EK decision (EU) 2019/909 and delegated decision (EU) 2019/910. |
Data are acquired in accordance with EPP regulation (EU) 2017/1004, EK decision (EU) 2019/909 and delegated decision (EU) 2019/910. |
Within the strategy information on the population dynamics of commercially exploited fish stocks is gathered. This strategy aims at providing data for assessments of the status of marine waters according to the criteria laid down in the Commission Decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 and to assess human impact on exploited fish stocks as well as effectiveness of measures applied. Regional coordination is assured by applying ICES common monitoring guidelines SISP manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS) and SISP Manual of international Baltic acoustic surveys (IBAS) and monitor commonly agreed fish stocks. |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Monitoring follow the requirements in the CFP and DCF to provide data for assessing status and for ICES and STECF advices. Monitoring of fish and fisheries helps to assess the progress with the relevant targets and measures, since the targets has indicators backed up with data and the measures are specifically targeting fisheries.
Comment: ANSSE-0024 and BALSE-0024 was not available in the list, but is also relevant here (salmon) |
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Gaps and plans |
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Eine adäquate Überwachung besteht seit 2014
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
There are no evident gaps or shortcomings in the commercially exploited fish monitoring strategy. |
There are no evident gaps or shortcomings in the commercially exploited fish monitoring strategy. |
There are no evident gaps or shortcomings in the commercially exploited fish monitoring strategy. |
Monitoring of some coastal species requires development but the monitoring is still seen adequate to assess state of coastal fish. |
Monitoring of some coastal species requires development but the monitoring is still seen adequate to assess state of coastal fish. |
Manome, kad monitoringas yra pakankamas.
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
Not applicable
|
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Monitoring within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) provides a good basis for assessing both fishing mortality (D3C1) and spawning biomass (D3C2). Data for assessment of size distribution at stock level (D3C3) are also available. However, there are data gaps for non-target species, such as elasmobranches on the West Coast, see gaps and plans in the fish monitoring strategy (Descriptor 1). |
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programme code |
BALDE_MPr_119_MP_086 |
BALDE_MPr_119_MP_137 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_077 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_079 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_082 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_083 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_085 |
BALDE_MPr_121_MP_089 |
DK-D03-01 |
DK-D03-02 |
DK-D03-03 |
DK-D03-04 |
DK-D03-05 |
DK-D03-06 |
DK-D03-07 |
DK-D03-08 |
DK-D03-09 |
DK-D03-10 |
DK-D03-11 |
DK-D03-12 |
BALEE-D00-40_MarineAndCoastalActivities |
BALEE-D010403-7_FishCoastal |
BALEE-D010403-8_FishOffshore |
BALFI-D03-1 |
BALFI-D03-2 |
BALLT-D01234_FishOffshore |
LV-4.3.1. (D3C1) |
LV-4.3.2. (D3C2) |
LV-4.3.3. (D3C3) |
PL-D1.3-01 |
SE-D1D3-bycatch |
SE-D1D3-comfishing |
SE-D1D3-eel |
SE-D1D3-recreationalfishing |
SE-D1D3-salmon |
SE-D1D3D4-coastalfish |
SE-D1D3D4-offshorefish |
SE-D1D3D4D6-seafloormegafauna |
Programme name |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Sterblichkeits/Schädigungsraten durch Fischerei (gezielt und/oder beiläufig): Beprobung der kommerziellen Fischerei (DCF) - Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Sterblichkeits/Schädigungsraten durch Fischerei (gezielt und/oder beiläufig): Data Collection Framework (DCF), Recreational Fisheries (Freizeitfischerei), Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS), Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Hydroakustische Bestandsaufnahme pelagischer Fischarten in der westlichen Ostsee (German Autumn Acoustic Survey, GERAS) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Hydroakustik-Survey GerBASS, Ostsee |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Rügen Heringslarvensurvey |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Reproduktion von Dorsch in der Ostsee (CoBalt) |
Mobile Arten (Fische) - Bestandsmerkmale: Effizienzkontrolle Meerforellenbesatz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and/or biomass - demersal fish - Survey IBTS |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and or biomass - demersal fish - Survey BITS |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and or biomass - cod - Survey CODS_Q4 |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and or biomass - flatfish - Survey FFS |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) - Observatørture |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) - Fiskerikontrollen |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) - Fiskerikontrol med kameraovervågning |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and/or biomass - pelagic fish - Survey NHAS |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and/or biomass - pelagic fish - Survey IESNS |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and/or biomass - sandeel - Survey NSSS |
Benthic species - abundance and/or biomass - nephrops - Survey NTV3&4 |
Mobile species - distribution, abundance and/or biomass - pelagic fish - Survey IESSNS |
Marine and coastal activities |
Coastal fish |
Off-shore fish |
Fisheries data collection |
Commercial fisheries catch statistics |
BALLT-D01234_FishOffshore |
Mobile species mortality rates from fisheries (commercially-exploited fish species) |
Mobile species the spawning stock biomass of populations of commercially-exploited fish species |
Mobile species population characteristics (age and size distribution of individuals of populations of commercially-exploited fish species) |
Mobile species - fish of the deep-water zone |
Bycatch |
Commercial fisheries |
Migratory fish (eel) |
Recreational fisheries |
Migratory fish (salmon) |
Coastal fish |
Offshore fish |
Macrozoobenthos - on the seafloor |
Update type |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Programme description |
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_86 || Beprobung der kommerziellen Fischerei (DCF) - Ostsee || Die Beprobung der Fangzusammensetzung in der kommerziellen Fischerei erfolgt im Rahmen des EU-Datensammelprogramms (DCF/DC-MAP). Die Fangbeprobung ermöglicht die Abschätzung der fischereilich induzierten Sterblichkeit für die Bestandsbewertungen des ICES, welche als Beratungsgrundlagen für die Festlegung von Fangquoten Eingang in die Gemeinsame Fischereipolitik der Europäischen Union (GFP) finden.
Die Fangbeprobung wird fortlaufend weiter entwickelt und durch die Gremien des ICES und der EU (STECF) kontrolliert und koordiniert. Neue Beprobungstechniken wie die Videoüberwachung der Fänge werden gerade getestet, allerdings ist unklar, ob und wie diese Techniken in der Lage sind, eine Beprobung durch Personen auf See zu ersetzen. Bisher bieten Beprobungen durch Personen auf See nach wie vor den höchsten Datenstandard, digitale Beprobungstechniken könnten in Zukunft aber den Beprobungsumfang steigern.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_137 || Data Collection Framework (DCF), Recreational Fisheries (Freizeitfischerei), Ostsee || Die Beprobung der Fangzusammensetzung in der kommerziellen Fischerei erfolgt im Rahmen des EU-Datensammelprogramms (DCF/DC-MAP). Die Fangbeprobung ermöglicht die Abschätzung der fischereilich induzierten Sterblichkeit für die Bestandsbewertungen des ICES, welche als Beratungsgrundlagen für die Festlegung von Fangquoten Eingang in die Gemeinsame Fischereipolitik der Europäischen Union (GFP) finden.
Die Fangbeprobung wird fortlaufend weiter entwickelt und durch die Gremien des ICES und der EU (STECF) kontrolliert und koordiniert. Neue Beprobungstechniken wie die Videoüberwachung der Fänge werden gerade getestet, allerdings ist unklar, ob und wie diese Techniken in der Lage sind, eine Beprobung durch Personen auf See zu ersetzen. Bisher bieten Beprobungen durch Personen auf See nach wie vor den höchsten Datenstandard, digitale Beprobungstechniken könnten in Zukunft aber den Beprobungsumfang steigern.
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_77 || Baltic International Trawl Survey (BITS), Ostsee || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_79 || Hydroakustische Bestandsaufnahme pelagischer Fischarten in der westlichen Ostsee (German Autumn Acoustic Survey, GERAS) || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_82 || Hydroakustik-Survey GerBASS, Ostsee || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_83 || Rügen Heringslarvensurvey || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_85 || Reproduktion von Dorsch in der Ostsee (CoBalt) || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || BALDE_MP_89 || Effizienzkontrolle Meerforellenbesatz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern || Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).Die Bestandsmerkmale (individuelles Alter, Länge, Gewicht, Geschlecht und Reifegrad) werden mit den gleichen Methoden wie die Abundanz und Biomasse von Fischen erfasst. Deswegen gelten die gleichen Eckpunkte der Monitoring-Strategie (internationale Koordination, Standardisierbarkeit, Erhalt der Zeitserie).
|
IBTS - International Bottom Trawl Survey
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af kommercielt udnyttede fiskebestande I Nordsøen. IBTS finder sted to gange årligt i 1. kvartal i februar (IBTS 1) og i 3. kvartal i august (IBTS). Under dette survey bundtrawles der ved faste lokaliteter og alle fangsterne registreres til art og længde, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for udvalgte arter (alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). Således indsamles der også data for mindre udbredte fiskearter, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt. Desuden indsamles også hydrografiske data med CTD og sildelarver overvåges ved brug af et MIK net (Midwater Ringnet). IBTS er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen IBTSWG og data anvendes af arbejdsgrupperne WGNSSK og HAWG til assessment og rådgivning.
|
BITS - Baltic International Trawl Survey
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af kommercielt udnyttede fiskebestande i Kattegat, Bælthavet og Østersøen, med særlig fokus på målarterne torsk, skrubbe, rødspætte, brisling og sild. BITS udføres to gange om året i 1. kvartal i marts (BITS 1) og i 4. kvartal i november (BITS 4). Under dette survey bundtrawles der ved faste lokaliteter og alle fangsterne registreres til art og længde, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for udvalgte arter (alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). Således indsamles der også data for mindre udbredte fiskearter, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt. Desuden indsamles der hydrografiske data med CTD, plankton/zooplankton med WP2 net og fiskeæg/fiskelarver med Bongo net. BITS er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen WGBIFS, og data anvendes af arbejdsgruppen WGBFAS til assessment og rådgivning.
|
CODS_Q4 - Cod survey in 3aS
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af torsk i Kattegat, i supplering til BITS. CODS_Q4 finder sted i 4. kvartal. Under dette survey benyttes et finmasket trawl net (70 mm), og alle fangsterne registreres til art og længde, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for udvalgte arter (alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). Således indsamles der også data for mindre udbredte fiskearter, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt. Desuden indsamles også hydrografiske data med CTD. CODS_Q4 koordineres imellem Danmark og Sverige og ICES arbejdsgruppen WGBFAS anvender data til assessment og rådgivning.
|
FFS - Flatfish survey in the Kattegat and Skagerrak
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af tunge og rødspætte i Kattegat og Skagerrak. FFS finder sted i 4. kvartal. Under dette survey benyttes et finmasket trawl net (70 mm), og alle fangsterne registreres til art og længde, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for udvalgte arter (alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). Således indsamles der også data for mindre udbredte fiskearter, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt. Desuden indsamles også hydrografiske data med CTD. CODS_Q4 koordineres imellem Danmark og Sverige og ICES arbejdsgruppen WGBFAS anvender data til assessment og rådgivning.
|
Observatørture
DTU Aqua foretager årligt omkring 200 observatørture, hvor observatører registrerer fangstsammen-sætningen på kommercielle fiskefartøjer. Allefangsterne registreres til art og længde, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for udvalgte arter (længde, alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). Således indsamles der også data for mindre udbredte fiskearter, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt. Data fra de videnskabelige observatørture giver information om omfanget af udsmid af erhvervsmæssigt udnyttede arter, hvilket bidrager til en mere eksakt vurdering af fiskeridødeligheden for nogle arter af fisk, der udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt. Derudover registreres bifangst af havpattedyr, fugle, fisk, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt og marint affald indsamles og registreres.
|
Fiskerikontrollen
Fiskerikontrollen fører kontrol med det erhvervsmæssige fiskeri ved fysisk kontrol til havs, i havn, ved landing, under transport af fisk og hos opkøbere af fisk. Endvidere foretages der administrativ kontrol af faretøjer og opkøberes indberettede oplysninger. For kvoterede fiskearter er erhvervsfiskere pålagt en landingsforpligtigelse og skal derfor bringe deres fangster i land. Fiskerikontrollen laver på det grundlag en opgørelse af de samlede landinger på artsniveau. Udviklingen i landingstal giver for nogle arter indblik i bestandsudviklingen og anvendes i alle tilfælde, hvor en bestandsmodel er opsat for en fiskebestand.
|
Fiskerikontrol med kameraovervågning
I forbindelse med forhandlingerne om 2020 fiskekvoterne i Nordsøen, Skagerrak og Kattegat blev det aftalt, at Danmark gennemfører et projekt med elektronisk monitorering i hovedparten af bundtrawlfiskeriet i Kattegat. Det er endnu ikke afklaret, i hvilket omfang videomateriale fra projektet vil blive brugt i relation til biologiske undersøgelser, men vil potentielt kunne bidrage til en bedre vurdering af fiskeri-dødeligheden for nogle fiskearter. Projektet gennemføres for perioden 2020-2022 og en eventuel forlængelse eller udvidelse af projektet er på nuværende tidspunkt uafklaret.
|
NHAS - North Sea Herring Acoustic Survey
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af sild og brisling i den østlige Nordsø, Skagerrak og Kattegat. NHAS finder sted en gang om året i 2-3. kvartal i juni-juli. Under dette survey anvendes akustik til at aflede akustiske indicer for fiskenes bestandsstørrelser. Desuden anvendes pelagiske trawl til at validere artsammensætningen for de akustiske data og alle fangsterne registreres til art, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for sild og brisling (længde, alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). NHAS er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen HERSUR og data anvendes af arbejdsgrupperne WGIPS og HAWG til assessment og rådgivning.
|
IESNS - International Ecosystem Survey in the Nordic Seas
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering pelagiske fiskebestande i Norskehavet mellem 62⁰ -74⁰ N, med særlig fokus på målarterne sild og blåhvilling. IESNS finder sted en gang om året i 2. kvartal i maj. Under dette survey anvendes akustik til at aflede akustiske indicier for fiskenes bestandsstørrelser. Desuden anvendes pelagiske trawl til at validere artsammensætningen for de akustiske data og alle fangsterne registreres til art, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for sild, brisling og makrel (længde, alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). IESNS er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen WGIPS og data anvendes af arbejdsgrupperne WGIPS og HAWG til assessment og rådgivning.
|
NSSS - North Sea Sandeels Survey
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af tobis i Nordsøen. NSSS finder sted en gang om året i 4. kvartal i november. Under dette survey benyttes et modificeret muslingeskrab, og for stikprøver af de fangede tobis registreres længde, alder, køn, vægt og seksuel modenhed. Desuden indsamles også hydrografiske data med CTD og bundprøver indsamles med Van Veen grab. NSSS er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen NSSKWG og den samme arbejdsgruppe anvender data til assessment og rådgivning.
|
NTV3&4 - Nephrops TV survey in FU 3 og 4
Dette survey har til formål, at monitere udbredelsen og bestandsstørrelsen af jomfruhummer i Skagerrak og Kattegat. NTV3&4 udføres en gang om året i 2. kvartal i april. Under dette survey benyttes en TV slæde til at videooptage organismerne på havbunden. NTV3&4 er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen WGNSSK og den samme arbejdsgruppe anvender data til assessment og rådgivning.
|
IESSNS – Coordinated Nordic Seas Ecosystem Survey
Dette survey har til formal, at monitere udbredelsen, bestandsstørrelserne og den årlige rekruttering af makrel I Nordsøen. IESSNS finder sted en gang om året i 3. kvartal i juli. Under dette survey benyttes et kommercielt trawl net, og alle fangsterne registreres til art og længde, og yderligere biologiske parametre måles for udvalgte arter sild, brisling og makrel (længde, alder, køn, seksuel modenhed). IESSNS er internationalt koordineret igennem ICES arbejdsgruppen WGIPS og data anvendes af arbejdsgruppen WGWIDE.
|
The aim of the monitoring programme is to collect data on human activities that directly or indirectly impact the marine environment. The monitored human activities are those listed in the MSFD Annex III Table 2b (2017/845/EC) and relevant for point (c) of Article 8(1), and Articles 10 and 13. The following activities are covered: Coastal defence and flood protection; Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables); Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials; Extraction of minerals; Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure; Extraction of water; Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure; Transmission of electricity and communications (cables); Fish harvesting (professional, recreational); Fish and shellfish processing; Marine plant harvesting; Hunting and collecting for other purposes; Aquaculture — marine, including infrastructure; Transport infrastructure; Transport — shipping; Waste treatment and disposal; Tourism and leisure infrastructure; Tourism and leisure activities; Military operations and Research, survey and educational activities. Data are gathered at least once during a six-year assessment period, but in some cases also annually. The system of such data collection activities is still under development.
The programme corresponds to the following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Activities extracting living resources (fisheries including recreational, marine plant harvesting, hunting and collecting); Activities extracting non-living resources (sand, gravel, dredging); Activities producing food (aquaculture); Activities with permanent infrastructures (e.g. renewable energy, oil & gas, ports) or structural changes (e.g. coastal defences); Sea-based mobile activities (shipping, boating); Coastal human activities (e.g. tourism, recreational sports, ecotourism).
The programme is the further development of the programme presented in 2014. The code of the programme also changed. |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the coastal fish species and communities (Species composition of the group; Size, age and sex structure; fecundity, survival and mortality/injury rates; Habitat for the species (extent, suitability); Species abundance (numbers of individuals and/or biomass)). It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish”, „SD3–Commercially exploited fish“ and “SD4/SD1 Food webs / Biodiversity – ecosystems”, but also to “SD2– Non-indigenous species”. The program is regionally coordinated by HELCOM (partially also by ICES) and the HELCOM monitoring manual is followed. During the annual monitoring programme, all coastal fish species are included in the dataset, but special attention is directed towards economically significant or ecologically relevant key species (perch, flounder, pikeperch). Atlantic salmon is used as an indicator species for migratory (anadromous) fishes and is monitored in coastal waters and selected rivers (salmonid habitats). Monitoring of protected fish species under HD needs to be developed for the sea area as well.
The programme was modified from 2014 by adding migratory fishes that were as a separate sub-programme in 2014.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – population characteristics; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The aim of the programme is to monitor the status of the commercially exploited pelagic fish species – sprat and herring in the offshore areas of the Estonian marine waters. The biomass and fishing mortality of stocks are assessed. It provides data to monitoring strategy “SD1.4 Biodiversity – Fish” and „SD3-commercially exploited fish“. Monitoring is conducted annually. The program is regionally coordinated via ICES and the ICES monitoring manual is followed.
The programme corresponds to following monitoring programmes in the indicative list: Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass; Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental). |
The sub-programme provides information on fisheries in EU countries. Data on the fish stock is collected by means of fishing samples and sonars. The aim is to provide information, inter alia, on scientific analysis and advice in support of the Common Fisheries Policy.
|
The sub-programme monitors catches by commercial fishermen and by-catches of birds and mammals. Monitoring shall be based on periodic catch reports from commercial fishermen to the authorities.
|
Verslinių žuvų rūšių (menkė, strimelė, brėtlingis ir plekšnė) duomenys renkami pagal Lietuvos nacionalinės žuvininkystės duomenų rinkimo programą. Tyrimai pagal Duomenų rinkimo programą vykdomi 4 kartus per metus. Du kartai dugniniu tralu menkės ir plekšnės rodikliams skaičiuoti ir 2 kartai akustikos tyrimai strimelių ir brėtlingių rodikliams skaičiuoti. D3C1 rodiklio skaičiavimui taip pat renkama biologiniai mėginiai iš verslinių laimikių. Verslinių mėginių rinkimas priklauso nuo žvejybos laiko ir intensyvumą. Verslinių mėginių ėmimas vyksta du kartus per mėnesį kiekvienai verslinei rūšiai, jei vyksta žvejyba. Pagal gautus duomenis, ICES skaičiuoja vertes D3C1 ir D3C2 kriterijų rodikliams (mirtingumo dėl žvejybos koeficientas (F) ir neršiančių išteklių biomasė (SSB) atskiriems Baltijos jūros pakvadračiams. Nacionaliniu lygiu skaičiuojamos vertės D3C3 kriterijaus rodikliams: 1) populiacijos pasiskirstymas pagal amžių ir dydį ir 2) didesnių už vidutinę pirmos lytinės brandos normą žuvų proporcija.
|
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of Baltic sea including one of significant indicators status of populations of fish species fished for commercial purposes as well as changes in the species distribution, population size and condition, and other characteristics of fish stock state and level of pressure of the fishing activities by using information obtained in the frame of the fisheries data collection programme and monitoring surveys of fish stocks in international hydroacoustic surveillance and other fisheries and ecosystem surveys. The aim is to provide good information on the state of fish stocks. This information is used to support sustainable management of marine resources.
Corresponding HELCOM monitoring programme Fish, Fisheries and Shellfish and
sub-programme Coastal Fish.
In the HELCOM region monitoring of this sub-programme is partly coordinated. The sub-programme is coordinated within HELCOM FISH-PRO II to facilitate comparability of data across areas and harmonized assessments.
The evaluation of the stocks of the main industrial species in the Baltic Sea is coordinated by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The Baltic Sea herring, sprat and cod stocks and flatfish stocks are assessed in the ICES Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS) with the participation of all specialists in the Baltic Sea States and using data from these countries on fish catches and research records.
Corresponding working group in the frame of ICES is also ICES Fisheries Resources Steering Group.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Corresponding legislative acts of the Republic of Latvia concerning fisheries:
Fishery Law (adopted 12.04.1995.) and
Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 296, adopted 2 May 2007 Regulations Regarding Commercial Fishing in Territorial Waters and Economic Zone Waters. |
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of Baltic sea including one of core indicators status of populations of fish species (spawning stock biomass) fished for commercial purposes as well as changes in the species distribution, population size and condition, and other characteristics of fish stock state by using information obtained in the frame of the fisheries data collection programme and monitoring surveys of fish stocks in international hydroacoustic surveillance and other fisheries and ecosystem surveys. The aim is to provide good information on the state of fish stocks. This information is used to support sustainable management of marine resources.
Corresponding HELCOM monitoring programme Fish, Fisheries and Shellfish and
sub-programme Coastal Fish.
In the HELCOM region monitoring of this sub-programme is partly coordinated. The sub-programme is coordinated within HELCOM FISH-PRO II to facilitate comparability of data across areas and harmonized assessments.
The evaluation of the stocks of the main industrial species in the Baltic Sea is coordinated by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The Baltic Sea herring, sprat and cod stocks and flatfish stocks are assessed in the ICES Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS), with the participation of all specialists in the Baltic Sea States and using data from these countries on fish catches and research records.
Corresponding working group in the frame of ICES is also ICES Fisheries Resources Steering Group.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Corresponding legislative acts of the Republic of Latvia concerning fisheries:
Fishery Law (adopted 12.04.1995.) and
Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 296, adopted 2 May 2007 Regulations Regarding Commercial Fishing in Territorial Waters and Economic Zone Waters. |
The purpose of the monitoring is to assess the ecological status of Baltic sea including one of significant indicators status of populations of fish species (age and size distribution of individuals) fished for commercial purposes as well as changes in the species distribution, population size and condition, and other characteristics of fish stock state by using information obtained in the frame of the fisheries data collection programme and monitoring surveys of fish stocks in international hydroacoustic surveillance and other fisheries and ecosystem surveys. The aim is to provide good information on the state of fish stocks. This information is used to support sustainable management of marine resources.
Corresponding HELCOM monitoring programme Fish, Fisheries and Shellfish and
sub-programme Coastal Fish.
In the HELCOM region monitoring of this sub-programme is partly coordinated. The sub-programme is coordinated within HELCOM FISH-PRO II to facilitate comparability of data across areas and harmonized assessments.
The evaluation of the stocks of the main industrial species in the Baltic Sea is coordinated by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). The Baltic Sea herring, sprat and cod stocks and flatfish stocks are assessed in the ICES Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS), with the participation of all specialists in the Baltic Sea States and using data from these countries on fish catches and research records.
Corresponding working group in the frame of ICES is also ICES Fisheries Resources Steering Group.
The requirements for the marine waters of Latvia and the relationship of the specified environmental objectives with the qualitative characteristics characterizing the state of the marine environment are included in Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Republic of Latvia No. 1071 of 23 November 2010, Requirements for the Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment, the Determination of Good Environmental State of the Sea and Development of Marine Environmental Goals.
Corresponding legislative acts of the Republic of Latvia concerning fisheries:
Fishery Law (adopted 12.04.1995.) and
Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 296, adopted 2 May 2007 Regulations Regarding Commercial Fishing in Territorial Waters and Economic Zone Waters. |
The ichthyological monitoring of the Polish Exclusive Economic Zone in the deepwater zone of Polish marine area has been carried out as a part of national environmental monitoring since 2011, based on data from BITS (Baltic International Trawl Surveys). BITS consist of cruises of particular Baltic countries being temporally and spatially coordinated by ICES. BITS methodology establishes use of standarized bottom trawl of the same design for scientific catches and use of the same research method for hauling sites sampling, data collection and uploading of collected data to the ICES common database - DATRAS, supplemented with measurement and ichthyological analysis of all fish species (including non-commercial). |
In the regular sampling carried out on board commercial fishing vessels in accordance with EU data collection regulations ((EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2016/1251), as well as the regulation on the conservation of fishery resources and the protection of marine ecosystems (EU ) 2019/1241, information regarding by-catch is obtained. All fish species, commercial shellfish, mammals and birds are noted. Sampling takes place mainly on vessels fishing with various bottom trawls.
Data collection carried out according to the EU data collection regulations is coordinated internationally between Member States in regional data collection coordination groups. Sweden participates in two such groups RCG Baltic and RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic (to which the Skagerrak and Kattegat belong). Furthermore, a lot of international coordination and development work is done within ICES´s various expert groups (for by-catches mainly WGBYC). Sweden participates actively in these groups.
Pilot studies were carried out in 2017-2019 with the aim of conducting by-catch sampling in 2020 in fisheries that use passive gear (nets and hooks).
The purpose is to increase knowledge about by-catches in these fisheries, to test whether it is possible to estimate by-catches by having observers on board fishing boats, and if this is an effective method.
Sampling of nets in the Sound and in the Kattegat will be included in the regular sampling from 2020. However, no ongoing monitoring of passive gear is currently planned in the Baltic Proper as previous pilots observed fewer by-catches there. So based on risk, monitoring in the Sound and Kattegatt are therefore prioritized. The Skagerrak could possibly be added after the pilot study there is completed in 2021.
The pilot studies have shown that it also works to monitor the fish with passive gear with the help of observers (the challenge is that the vessels are small). However, the question remains whether this is the most effective way of estimating the total amount of by-catches in the fisheries. The problem is that observers can only cover a small part of the total fishing effort and that by-catches of many species (such as harbour porpoises and various birds) are relatively uncommon. This means that there will be few observations and thus uncertainty in the estimates of the total amount of by-catches. In 2020, therefore, a new pilot project was initiated where surveillance with the help of cameras is tested and compared with surveillance with the help |
Commercial fishing in this case refers to the commercial fishing that requires a fishing license and has an obligation to report its fishing activity. The obligation to report their catches and fishing activities is governed by both EU legislation and Swedish legislation. This information is used for the national quota allocation for fish stocks and as a basis for the biological stock estimate (see also programmes Offshore fish and coastal fish).
Economic statistics are collected to monitor economic drivers in the fisheries sector. The statistics are collected to meet the requirements from the EU via Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 and implementing decisions (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910. In addition to this reporting, statistics are used within the Swedish Fisheries Administration.
In addition to the pressure in the form of extracting fish, the monitoring of other parts of the fishing activities' impact is described in the programmes Physical disturbance and loss (bottom trawling) and in By-catch. |
Eels are monitored along the West Coast and the Baltic Sea. Eels along the Swedish coast are found in three life stages, which are glass eels, yellow eels and silver eels. The monitoring aims to provide a knowledge base for the management of eels. On the West Coast, eels are monitored through fisheries-independent sampling because eel fishing on the West Coast, north of Torekov, is not permitted. In the Baltic Sea, eels are monitored by sampling in commercial fishing. Most studies regarding migratory young eels are done in traps that catch very small yellow eels on migration in running water, in two studies migratory silver eels are caught. The programme describes the composition with respect to age and size at all stages of life. In addition, marking/tagging is done with the aim of estimating the proportion that is caught in commercial fishing, at the same time as an estimate is made of the size of the coastal stock.
This monitoring programme applies to eels in the sea. Eels are also caught in freshwater to monitor the impact of, among other things, fishing and hydropower. This monitoring is not described here.
Sweden's monitoring is coordinated with other countries that carry out monitoring of eels, by Sweden reporting every three years to ICES, who compiles an overview based on the countries' reporting to an overview analysis that covers the entire eel range (Europe, North Africa and West Asia). Monitoring data from Sweden and other countries are used here, to examine weighted trends in the occurrence of eels, the nature of eels, threats to eels and recommendations for a better knowledge base. Ices also issues annual scientific advice on the eel.
Eel is partly monitored using data from commercial fisheries, but since no new licencies are approved this data flow will eventually stop and need to be replaced with monitoring. We are collaborating with DK to tag eels in the Baltic sea and monitor them in the Sound and Danish straits to learn where eels migrate. |
Recreational fishing in Sweden is defined as all fishing that does not take place with the support of a commercial fishing license. Recreational fishing includes both fishing with hand gear (eg rod) and catching gear (eg nets).
Recreational fishing in Sweden is extensive and therefore good knowledge is needed about the practitioners, where to fish and what is caught. As part of the work to understand and describe the scope and impact, statistics on recreational fishing have been collected since the 1970s to form the basis for decisions within the administration. The first survey was part of the 1973 fishing water investigation, which was also followed up during the 1990s. In 2011, the SwAM became the coordinating agency for official statistics in the area of fishing and was thus given the responsibility to annually collect statistics regarding the extent of recreational fishing in Sweden. This collection takes place via a national survey that started in 2013 and is progressing in roughly the same direction and design today.
In addition to the national survey, several fishing sites are visited on a regular basis since 2012. Data collection is carried out annually in the Sound and the southern Baltic Sea in accordance with EU regulations ((EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910). The data collection aims to cover the fishing for cod and by-catches in this fishery (see programme Bycatch).
Monitoring frequency is three times per year (4-monthly).
A pilot study (2017-2019) found that the main part of cod catches in southern Baltic Sea and the Sound comes from recreational fishing in the Sound. The monitoring will therefore focus on this during 2020-2021. SwAM is also collaborating with SLU to develop a longterm plan for monitoring of recreational fishing.
An ongoing project initiated by Sportfiskarna is about developing an application – FångstDatabanken (Citizen science) for catch reporting. SwAM has since the start in 2012 been part of their reference and development group.
Data collection carried out under the EU Data Collection Regulation is coordinated internationally between Member States in regional data collection coordination groups. Sweden participates in two such groups, RCG Baltic and RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic (to which the Skagerrak and Kattegat belong). Furthermore, a lot of international coordination and development work is done within ICES 'various expert groups (for recreational fishing, especially WGRFS). Sweden participates actively in these g |
The monitoring includes the collection of biological data for wild salmon stocks (salmon rivers) as well as statistics for releases and fishing for both wild and farmed salmon. The purpose of the monitoring is to monitor the status and development of wild salmon stocks and to investigate the effects of fishing and hydropower. The purpose of the biological advice is to contribute to the overall goals for salmon management being met both nationally and internationally. These goals are to protect and rebuild weak wild salmon stocks so that they can gradually reach the management goal of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY).
Sweden's monitoring is coordinated with similar work in other countries, through guidelines and agreements developed within ICES, the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO), the Regional Coordination Groups (EU RCG) and HELCOM. Sweden actively participates in the regional coordination. |
Coastal fish refer to the fish species that live a significant part of their lives in the coastal ecosystem, such as flounder (Platichthys flesus), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and eelpout (Zoarces viviparus). Coastal fish monitoring (trawls, nets, hydroacoustics) aims to describe changes in the fishing community as a whole, in terms of species composition, relative occurrence of different species and size structure. In addition, changes at species level are followed up by analyzing changes in the number and size structure of the most common species in the catch. In some surveys, individual sampling of selected species is performed. The individual sampling aims to provide information about, for example, individual weight and condition, and provides material for further analysis of, for example, age and fish health.
The state of coastal fish reflects the coastal ecosystem and the impact of small-scale coastal fishing and recreational fishing (see programmes Commercial fisheries and Recreational fisheries). Long-term changes in the abundance of different functional groups of coastal fish can also be affected by eutrophication, deteriorating habitats and changes in predation. The latter may be due to imbalance in the food web due to human impact such as fishing and loss of important habitats.
Monitoring in the Baltic Sea started in 1960 while in the North Sea it started in 1969.
Abramis bjoerkna, Arnoglossus laterna, Callionymus lyra, Chelidonichthys gurnardus, Myoxocephalus scorpius and Trachinus draco are also monitored but they were not included in the element lists for Coastal fish nor Commercial fish |
Offshore fish refers to those fish species that live a significant part of their lives in the open sea off the coast, such as herring, sprat and cod. The monitoring of these species and also commercial crustaceans such as crabfish, North Sea shrimp and lobster is coordinated between several countries in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea area, and takes place via acoustic methods and trawl surveys. Data are also collected by sampling on board commercial fishing boats and catches in ports.
Several of the species monitored are used in commercial fishing (see programme Commercial fisheries) and all surveys described here are carried out within the framework of the data collection on fish and fisheries governed by EU legislation ((EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019 / 909 and (EU) 2019/910). The data collection forms the basis for the scientific basis for the EU Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the information is used in the work of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) to produce a basis for the fishing quotas decided by the EU. Data collection is also done for bycatches in the fishery, see programme Bycatch.
Trawling of demersal fish in the North Sea (IBTS) started 1972
Trawling of demersal fish in the Baltic Sea (BITS) started 1978
Acoustic survey of pelagic fish (BIAS) started 1978 (Baltic Sea only)
Sampling on board commercial fishing boats in the Baltic Sea and Kattegat stareted 1996
Sampling on board commercial fishing boats in the Skagerrak started 2002
Sampling of commercial catches in ports: different starting years for different species
Frequency: Trawl surveys are carried out 6-monthly and control of fisheries 3-monthly. |
What is currently included in the targeted monitoring is the ten-legged crustacean Nephrops norvegicus. The species is nocturnal and lives on and buried in solid clay bottoms. Along the coast of Sweden, the species occur in the Kattegat and Skagerrak. Nephrops norvegicus is an important commercial species that is fished through bottom trawling. In addition to Nephrops norvegicus, other species that live in the same habitat, such as sea pens and other coral animals, can be injured or die as a result of trawling. The purpose of monitoring Nephrops norvegicus is to map the abundance of the species in areas that are fished. This is done in a UWTV survey (Under Water TV), ie by filming the seabed with an underwater camera and counting the number of inhabited holes per unit area. During the monitoring, the effects of trawling can also be assessed.
The geographical coverage of the monitoring is based on the main catchment areas and is thus expected to cover the species main distribution areas. Data collection (in accordance with EU legislation (EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2019/909 and (EU) 2019/910) through UWTV is coordinated by ICES's working group WGNEPS between several countries in the North Sea area. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
||||||||
Monitoring details |
|| MP_86 ||
|
|| MP_137 ||
|
|| MP_77 || Deutschland nimmt seit 1991 mit FFS Solea zweimal jährlich teil und beprobt die westliche Ostsee mit ungefähr 120 Stationen jährlich (2 mal 20 Tage Reisedauer). Dänemark, Schweden, Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Russland, Polen und Deutschland erheben fast zeitgleich auf ihren Schiffen Daten zur Häufigkeit sowie zu Länge, Gewicht, und ggfs. Geschlecht, Reife und Gesundheitszustand der Nutzfische.
|
|| MP_79 ||
|
|| MP_82 || Details zum Monitoring können im Manual nachgelesen werden.
|
|| MP_83 || Während der gesamten Laichzeit, also von Anfang März bis Ende Juni, werden 36 Stationen im Strelasund/Greifswalder Bodden in wöchentlichen Abständen beprobt. Die Heringslarven werden dabei quantitativ mit Plankton-Bongonetzen gefangen.
|
|| MP_85 || Mit einem Schleppnetz (TV3/520 & PSN 388) werden Fischereihols in verschiednen Tiefenstufen durchgeführt. Im Sommer liegt das Hauptuntersuchungsgebiet in der Bornholm See und im Arkona Becken.
|
|| MP_89 ||
|
Data on all coastal fish species are being collected annually in discrete monitoring areas within the national fisheries data collection programme (https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/kalandus/kalanduse-riiklik-andmekoguminen-programm-akp). |
For monitoring offshore fish species the hydro-acoustic surveys and scientific trawlings are carried out. In addition, ICES coordinated cruises (BIAS, BITS) are carried out and the data are submitted to the ICES database. |
Fishermensâ reporting to authorities.
|
Data are collected according to the fisheries data collection programme.
For the estimation of the fishing mortality analytical assessment of fish stocks for major industrial fish indicator species (herring, sprat, cod and flatfish) is used using data both from the commercial and research fishing surveys.
Data about mortality caused by fishing, fishing act parameters and biological samples are obtained in several ways:
- from the fishermen,
- when experts of Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR participate as observers in industrial fishing trips,
- during the international surveys.
Data on catches of salmon, trout, cod and eel in recreational fisheries also are collected.
For the calculation of the fish mortality information about caught fish distribution in the age groups have to be collected using data from biological analysis (weight, age etc.).
For collecting of samples in ports and on vessels 2 methods are used:
- for coastal fishing according to agreements with BIOR fishermen collect and submit samples of specific species to BIOR;
- for fishing in open sea vessel, on which sampling have to be performed, is chosen randomly. Additional biological samples are collected by BIOR specialists participating in industrial fishing trips.
For fish species subject to an international stock assessment on the basis of the biological parameters obtained, fish catches are recalculated in quarters and in total per year.
3 kinds of international surveys are used:
1. Baltic Sea international trawling surveys.
Aim collect data about the state of cod and flounder stock (bottom trawling) and herring and sprat (pelagic trawling) as well as the size of it addition. Surveys for demersal fish are carried out twice a year - in March, December, for pelagic fish once per year in determined period in standard route crossing the ICES statistical rectangles. During trips fish hydroacoustic records are carried out, oceanographic and ihtioplankton samples are collected. Trawling is done in the light hours of the day. Trawling is done at random on a specified network of stations from the trawl track database.
2. Baltic Sea international hydroacoustic survey in standard route twice per year in May and October, in ICES 28th sub-region and in the N of 26th sub-region, using research pelagic trawl for control trawling. Catches are weighed and sorted by species.
3. Gulf of Riga acoustic herring survey 1 per year together with EMI. |
Data are collected according to the fisheries data collection programme.
For the estimation of spawning stock biomass analytical assessment of fish stocks for major industrial fish indicator species (herring, sprat, cod and flatfish) is used using data both from the commercial and research fishing surveys.
Data about spawning stock biomass, fishing act parameters and biological samples are obtained in several ways:
- from the fishermen,
- when experts of Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR participate as observers in industrial fishing trips,
- during the international surveys.
For the calculation of the spawning stock biomass information about caught fish distribution in the age groups have to be collected using data from biological analysis (weight, age etc.).
For collecting of samples in ports and on vessels 2 methods are used:
- for coastal fishing according to agreements with BIOR fishermen collect and submit samples of specific species to BIOR;
- for fishing in open sea vessel, on which sampling have to be performed, is chosen randomly. Additional biological samples are collected by BIOR specialists participating in industrial fishing trips.
For fish species subject to an international stock assessment on the basis of the biological parameters obtained, fish catches are recalculated in quarters and in total per year.
3 kinds of international surveys are used:
1. Baltic Sea international trawling surveys.
Aim collect data about the state of cod and flounder stock (bottom trawling) and herring and sprat (pelagic trawling) as well as the size of it addition. Surveys for demersal fish are carried out twice a year - in March, December, for pelagic fish once per year in determined period in standard route crossing the ICES statistical rectangles. During trips fish hydroacoustic records are carried out, oceanographic and ihtioplankton samples are collected. Trawling is done in the light hours of the day. Trawling is done at random on a specified network of stations from the trawl track database.
2. Baltic Sea international hydroacoustic survey in standard route twice per year in May and October, in ICES 28th sub-region and in the N of 26th sub-region, using research pelagic trawl for control trawling. Catches are weighed and sorted by species.
3. Gulf of Riga acoustic herring survey 1 per year together with EMI. |
Data are collected according to the fisheries data collection programme.
For the estimation of the age and size distribution of individuals in the populations of commercially-exploited species analytical assessment of fish stocks for major indicator species (herring, sprat, cod and flatfish) is used using data both from the commercial and research fishing surveys.
Data about age and size distribution, fishing act parameters and biological samples are obtained:
- from the fishermen,
- when experts of Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR participate as observers in industrial fishing trips,
- during the international surveys.
Data on catches of salmon, trout, cod and eel in recreational fisheries also are collected.
For the calculation of the age and size distribution information about caught fish distribution in the age groups have to be collected (weight, age etc.).
Methods used for collecting of samples in ports and on vessels:
- for coastal fishing according to agreements with BIOR fishermen collect and submit samples of specific species to BIOR;
- for fishing in open sea vessel, on which sampling have to be performed, is chosen randomly. Additional biological samples are collected by BIOR specialists participating in industrial fishing trips.
For fish species subject to an international stock assessment on the basis of the biological parameters obtained, fish catches are recalculated in quarters and in total per year.
International surveys:
1. Baltic Sea international trawling surveys collecting data about the state of cod and flounder stock (bottom trawling) and herring and sprat (pelagic trawling) as well as the size of it addition. Surveys for demersal fish are carried out twice a year in March, December, for pelagic fish once per year in determined period in standard route crossing the ICES statistical rectangles. During trips fish hydroacoustic records are carried out, oceanographic and ihtioplankton samples are collected. Trawling is done in the light hours of the day. Trawling is done at random on a specified network of stations from the trawl track database.
2. Baltic Sea international hydroacoustic survey in standard route twice per year in May and October, in ICES 28th sub-region and in the N of 26th sub-region, using research pelagic trawl for control trawling. Catches are weighed and sorted by species.
3. Gulf of Riga acoustic herring survey 1 per year together with EMI. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benthic-feeding birds |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small toothed cetaceans |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic shelf fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demersal shelf fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Benthic broad habitats |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shelf ecosystems |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of nutrients – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) – diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input of anthropogenic sound (impulsive, continuous) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Established non-indigenous species |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal defence and flood protection |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of water |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine plant harvesting |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunting and collecting for other purposes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport – shipping |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste treatment and disposal |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure infrastructure |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Military operations (subject to Article 2(2)) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, survey and educational activities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Species affected by incidental by-catch |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
2002-9999 |
2002-9999 |
1981-9999 |
1978-9999 |
1999-9999 |
1977-9999 |
1992-9999 |
2002-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1988-9999 |
2008-9999 |
2004-9999 |
1995-9999 |
1983-9999 |
2020-2022 |
2007-9999 |
2004-9999 |
2003-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2018-9999 |
2015-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1992-9999 |
2002-9999 |
1980-9999 |
2005-9999 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2021-2026 |
2011-9999 |
1996-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1969-9999 |
1973-9999 |
2004-9999 |
1960-9999 |
1972-9999 |
2011-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Weekly |
Continually |
6-monthly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Weekly |
Yearly |
6-monthly |
6-monthly |
6-monthly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
6-monthly |
3-monthly |
Continually |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Yearly |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
|| MP_086 || Es werden sowohl die aktive Fischerei (Schlepper) als auch die passive Fischerei (Stellnetzkutter, Langleinen, Fischfallen) beprobt. An Bord der Fischereifahrzeuge werden die Rückwurfraten sowie Längenverteilungen in den Anlandungen und Rückwürfen erfasst. Einzelne Fische werden eingehender untersucht und Informationen zu wichtigen biologischen Parametern wie Gewicht, Geschlecht, Reifegrad oder Alter dokumentiert. |
|| MP_137 || Es werdenganzjährig Proben an Stränden und Häfen genommen sowie Angler befragt An Bord von Angelkuttern wird die Länge von Fischen gemessen. Tagebuchstudien ermöglichen eine kontinuierlich Datenerhebung zu bestimmten Verhaltensweisen (Fang, Ausgaben, etc.), zudem dienen telefonische Befragungen dazu bevölkerungsrepräsentative Studien durchzuführen. |
|| MP_077 || |
|| MP_079 || |
|| MP_082 || |
|| MP_083 || Erfassung von Herings-Larven |
|| MP_085 || Fischerei-Standard-Hols mit einem Grundschleppnetz (TV 3/520) und pelagischen Schleppnetz (PSN 388). |
|| MP_089 || Elektrobefischung, Parr-Habitat-Index, Trout-Habitat-Score |
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%2010%20-%20Manual%20for%20the%20International%20Bottom%20Trawl%20Surveys%20-%20Revision%20IX.pdf
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%202%20MIK2.pdf |
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20%28SISP%29/SISP%207%20-%20Manual%20for%20the%20Baltic%20International%20Trawl%20Surveys%20%28BITS%29.pdf |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua. https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/. |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua. https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/. |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua. https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/. |
Er beskrevet i Fiskerikontrollens årsrapporter og på Fiskeristyrelsens hjemmeside.
https://fiskeristyrelsen.dk/ |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua or the Danish Fisheries Agency.
https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/.
https://fiskeristyrelsen.dk/ |
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%20
9%20Manual%20for%20International%20Pelagic%20Surveys%20(IPS).pdf |
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%209%20Manual%20for%20International%20Pelagic%20Surveys%20(IPS).pdf |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua. https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/. |
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Expert%20Group%20Report/EOSG/2018/WGNEPS/WGNEPS%20report%202018.pdf |
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%209%20Manual%20for%20International%20Pelagic%20Surveys%20(IPS).pdf |
There is no separate monitoring for the programme, the administrative data collection is performed and based on information from databases, maps, plans, environmental permits and their reporting and controls, etc. Estonian maritime spatial plan.
The frequency of monitoring depends on activity: from annually to once per the 6-year period. |
ICES WGBFAS |
The monitoring and assessment of the state of herring and sprat stocks are following the ICES WGBFAS methodology. Herring and sprat stocks and stock trends are assessed on the basis of the catches. Based on the collected material, biological analyses are performed and the age of the individuals is determined. |
Data collection and handling is coordinated in RCB Baltic group and ICES working groups WGBIFS and WGBAST |
Monitoring - https://stat.luke.fi/en/commercial-marine-fishery |
ICES. 2017. Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS). Series of
ICES Survey Protocols SISP 7 - BITS. 95 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.2883;
ICES. 2017. Manual for the International Baltic Acoustic Surveys (IBAS). Series of ICES Survey Protocols SISP 8 - IBAS. 47 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.3368 |
Catches and by-catches are monitored with the help of observers who accompany the fishing vessels during commercial fishing. The regular sampling is divided into area, fisheries and quarters. This means that observations are made every quarter from different types of bottom trawls (shrimp trawl, crayfish trawl with grate, trawl without grate). Usually, in the order of 0.5-2% (different for different types of fisheries) of commercial fishing trips are observed. The fishing trips observed are selected at random. Observations of by-catch within the framework of the pilot studies are carried out in the same manner. The observers examine the entire process during which the fishing gear is hauled so that also by-catches that do not follow on board but fall out of the nets can be registered. Furthermore, the observers examine the entire sorting of the catch. The observers then measure and weigh the catch and take samples for biological analysis. Remote surveillance using cameras onboard is being tested during 2020, and may supplement the monitoring in the future. |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/fiske-och-handel/rapportering-och-e-tjanster/yrkesfiske/manualer-for-verksamma-inom-yrkesfisket.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/lagstiftning-direktiv-och-forordningar/lagstiftning-som-ror-yrkesfisket.html
" |
Several different methods are used in eel monitoring. In the North Sea, test fishing with eel traps place, similar to the method described in the method standard ”Provfiske med kustöversiktsnät, nätlänkar och ryssjor” on coastal shallow water. In the Baltic Sea, eels are collected through commercial fishing within the framework of DCF.
Sampling with stationary trawl takes place in the intake channel of cooling water to Ringhals nuclear power plant and catches glass eels. The method is described in the reports from the Biological recipient control at Ringhals nuclear power plant.
By tagging and then recapturing the tagged eel on the Baltic coast, a measure is obtained of how hard the fishing pressure is (ICES report WGEEL 2018). |
There is currently no method that captures all data in a cost-effective way. Therefore, it is important to choose the right method(s) to answer the questions asked. Data of interest may be of a biological or non-biological nature. Biological data include, for example, the number and sizes of fish caught. Non-biological data can be, for example, different measures of effort, characterization of practitioners and socio-economic aspects. The methods are described separately below, but a preferred data collection is in most cases a combination of the methods to provide a comprehensive knowledge base of the structure of the fishery, participants and their activity and catches, including re-released catches. Depending on which question or questions are to be answered, methods can be combined flexibly.
National survey
The survey uses a panel design with a stratified random sample. More information regarding the design of the survey is summarized in a quality declaration - https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.619e9cdf163fb20d0dd815a1/1529477995525/kvalitetsdeklaration-2017.pdf .
Site visiting studies
Site-visiting studies include, for example, inventories and interviews of recreational fishermen in port or during fishing. Inventories can be made by boat, in port or by plane. The pilot study in the Sound and the Southern Baltic Sea includes several different fishing methods. Therefore, the methodology differs depending on which fishing method is studied. Sampling takes place at random at all landing sites in the area (tour boats, charter boats, private boats and fishing from land) to describe the extent of recreational fishing, the number of fishermen and the amount of fish. More about this project is described here: https://www.slu.se/institutioner/akvatiska-resurser/miljoanalys/datainsamling/fritidsfiske/. More information about recreational fishing surveys, its methods and the overall work in Sweden can be read in SLU Aqua's Aqua reports - https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/inst/aqua/externwebb/sidan-publikationer/aqua-reports-xxxx_xx/aquarapporter/2018/aqua-reports-2018_22.pdf. |
https://www.havochvatten.se/vagledning-foreskrifter-och-lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/fisk-i-rinnande-vatten---vadningselfiske.html |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/provfiske-i-ostersjons-kustomraden---djupstratifierat-provfiske-med-nordiska-kustoversiktsnat.html
https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/provfiske-med-kustoversiktsnat-natlankar-och-ryssjor-pa-kustnara-grunt-vatten.html
Monitoring of vendace, which resides in the free water column are done with special sonar (vendace survey). These register the amount of fish on a predetermined distance. Trawl hauls are carried out at regular intervals to estimate the size composition. In addition to this, vendace is also sampled through on-board and harbor sampling in commercial fishing. This sampling is described in more detail in programmes Offshore fish and By-catch (for non-target species)." |
https://www.havochvatten.se/en/eu-and-international/international-cooperation/data-collection-framework-dcf/efforts-in-sweden.html |
https://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Cooperative%20Research%20Report%20(CRR)/CRR340.pdf |
||||
Quality control |
|| MP_086 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_137 || Institutseigene Kontrollen und Guidelines der ICES WGRFS
|
|| MP_077 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_079 || Planung, Durchführung und Berechnung der Bestandindizes durch die ICES-Arbeitsgruppe ‚Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
|
|| MP_082 || Planung, Durchführung und Berechnung der Bestandindizes durch die ICES-Arbeitsgruppe ‚Baltic International Fish Survey Working Group (WGBIFS)
|
|| MP_083 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_085 || National finden institutseigene Kontrollen statt.
|
|| MP_089 || Verwendung des Parr-Habitat-Index und des Trout-Habitat-Score.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
Fiskeristyrelsen er hovedansvarlig for kvalitetssikring af de data, som indrapporteres af fiskerne i deres logbøger og landingstal i havne. Dette kvalitetsikres til dels ved, at Fiskerikontrollen fører fysisk kontrol til havs, i havne, og landing, og under transport af fisk og hos opkøbere af fisk.
|
Kvalitetssikring af data fra projektet er endnu ikke afklaret, men Fiskeristyrelsen vil have ansvaret for, at data gennemgår en fornøden kvalitetssikring.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
Data quality control systems of relevant data sources. |
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories are filled according to ISO/IEC 17025 and the recommendations of monitoring manuals are followed (HELCOM, ICES WGBFAS). |
ICES WGBFAS
|
Quality control incorporated to national monitoring |
Quality control - https://stat.luke.fi/en/commercial-marine-fishery |
Duomenų kokybė užtikrinama atliekant pirminę duomenų kokybės apžiūrą, braižomi ilgio, svorio, amžiaus priklausomybių grafikai, vertinama, ar mėginio ir submėginio duomenys sutampa. Ekspertai dalyvauja darbo grupėse WGBIFS, WGBFAS ir RCG (Regional Coordination Group).
|
QA:
Common HELCOM quality assurance programme: still missing.
Analysis of information in the relevant ICES working groups (WGBFAS, WGIAB) and within the Advisory Committee (ACOM). Once in a 3-4 years in-depth stock assessment meetings (benchmark assessment) in which the data and valuation methods used in the calculations are examined in depth.
QC:
Analysis of information in the relevant ICES working groups (WGBFAS, WGBIFS) and within the Advisory Committee (ACOM). |
QA:
Common HELCOM quality assurance programme: still missing.
Analysis of information in the relevant ICES working groups (WGBFAS, WGIAB) and within the Advisory Committee (ACOM). Once in a 3-4 years in-depth stock assessment meetings (benchmark assessment) in which the data and valuation methods used in the calculations are examined in depth.
QC:
Analysis of information in the relevant ICES working groups (WGBFAS, WGBIFS) and within the Advisory Committee (ACOM). |
QA:
Common HELCOM quality assurance programme: still missing.
Analysis of information in the relevant ICES working groups (WGBFAS, WGIAB) and within the Advisory Committee (ACOM). Once in a 3-4 years in-depth stock assessment meetings (benchmark assessment) in which the data and valuation methods used in the calculations are examined in depth.
QC:
Analysis of information in the relevant ICES working groups (WGBFAS, WGBIFS) and within the Advisory Committee (ACOM). |
Screening programme ICES DATRAS centre
|
Sampling takes place through a random selection of ships/voyages. The observers bring with them a manual for determining the species of birds and also photograph captured birds as much as possible. Data is registered in the national database Fiskdata2 according to the updated manual. Data is examined and checked in several respects. Quality assurance includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers). |
Commercial fishing reporting is standardized. The information is validated and checked during physical and administrative control by SwAM and the Coast Guard. Physical inspections are carried out on site on the ships in port by SwAM and at sea by the Swedish Coast Guard. Quality assurance of the economic statistics is carried out according to proven methods and practices. |
The quality assurance is conducted by strictly following standardized methodology. Quality assurance takes place within the data hosting at SLU. Data is quality assured electronically via a sequence of routine questions and approved manually after a controller specially appointed for the purpose has approved the quality of the material. |
QC of the national survey is summarized in a quality declaration - https://www.havochvatten.se/download/18.619e9cdf163fb20d0dd815a1/1529477995525/kvalitetsdeklaration-2017.pdf .
QC of the Site visiting studies is described in the final reports of each projects - https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/inst/aqua/externwebb/sidan-publikationer/aqua-reports-xxxx_xx/aquarapporter/2018/aqua-reports-2018_22.pdf.
The methods carried out on the basis of EU data collection regulations, including the pilot projects, are also evaluated by ICES working group WGRFS. |
Monitoring programmes are coordinated and developed in consultation with ICES Working Groups on Salmon in the Baltic Sea (WGBAST) and the Atlantic (WGNAS) and within the EU RCG. The programmes are evaluated by the European Commission's Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF).
In connection with the data being entered into the database, they undergo a quality check. The QC includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers).
Results from electric fishing are reported in digital field protocols that are quality assured in SLU's database Swedish Electricity Fishing Registers (SERS). Quality assurance of age determination (via scales) takes place through recurring international calibrations. |
The quality assurance is conducted by strictly following standardized methodology. Quality control takes place within the data hosting for coastal fish. Data is quality checked electronically via a sequence of routine questions and approved manually after a controller specially appointed for the purpose has approved the quality of the material.
See also Quality guide for SLU's environmental data management: https://internt.slu.se/globalassets/mw/foma/verksamhetsstod/miljodatastod/kvalitetsguidesdokument/kvalitetsguiden-version-2.4.pdf |
Monitoring programmes are reviewed within ICES groups (trawl surveys) and/or through evaluations by the European Commission's Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). Data is registered in the national database FISKDATA2 according to the updated manual. The quality assurance includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers). Data from trawl surveys are delivered to ICES database DATRAS. Before data is accepted into DATRAS, delivered data undergoes quality review. Quality assurance of age reading and determination of sexual maturity of fish takes place through annual calibrations. |
ICES data center data type guidelines and reference images are used for quality assurance. Linns CCC is used as quality control of data to check that the counting is consistent between stations. |
Data management |
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data to ICES (for OSPAR and HELCOM), other EU directives and the provision of services to INSPIRE. To this end, various data management tools, such as a National Marine Catalogue (NMDK) or the coordination of data retention of geospatial, meta and time series data, are foreseen. The data are provided on a decentralised basis or centrally by the Marine Environment Database (MUDAB) by the various federal structures in the coastal Länder, federal and research institutions. However, individual data sets are not yet freely available.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die erhobenen Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei als auch auf dem ICES Server gespeichert. Die Daten können direkt auf der ICES Internetseite heruntergeladen werden.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Instituts für Ostseefischerei als auch beim ICES gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind sowohl auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei als auch beim ICES gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten sind auf dem Server des Thünen Institits für Ostseefischerei gespeichert.
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), weitere EU-Richtlinien und die Bereitstellung von Diensten für INSPIRE berücksichtigt. Hierzu werden verschiedene Instrumente des Datenmanagements, wie ein Nationaler mariner Datenkatalog (NMDK) oder die Koordinierung der Datenhaltung von Geo-, Meta-, sowie Zeitreihendaten vorgesehen. Die Daten werden durch die verschiedenen föderalen Strukturen in den Küstenländern, Bundes- und Forschungseinrichtungen dezentral oder zentral durch die Meeresumweltdatenbank (MUDAB) bereitgestellt. Trotzdem sind einzelne Datenbestände noch nicht frei verfügbar. Die Daten liegen im Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Lebensmittelsicherheit und Fischerei M-V intern vor und können auf Nachfrage angefordert werden.
|
The data are compiled from different databases of different institutions. The compilation and collection of data are coordinated by the Marine Environment Department of the Ministry of the Environment. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
Data are reported annually to the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. The raw data are also stored in databases of Estonian Marine Institute at Tartu University. |
National databases and submissions to ICES DATRAS and ICES Acoustic trawl surveys database. |
National database:http://www.ely-keskus.fi/web/ely/saalisseuranta.
Summary statisitcs:https://statdb.luke.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/fi/LUKE/LUKE__06 Kala ja riista__02 Rakenne ja tuotanto__02 Kaupallinen kalastus merella/?tablelist
|
Duomenys kaupiami Klaipėdos universiteto Jūrų tyrimų institute http://apc.ku.lt/en/. Duomenys iš BITS reisų teikiami į ICES DATRAS, iš akustikos reisų – į ICES Acoustic trawl surveys duomenų bazę, versliniai duomenys eina į ICES InterCatch ir RDB duomenų bazes
|
Data holder is Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR and ICES.
Results of biological analysis of samples collected in ports and from fishermen are entered in the relevant databases (Regional DataBase FishFrame, InterCatch).
Data collected in international trawling surveys are stored in ICES international database DATRAS.
QA/QC on data
Data are available in ICES/Regional DataBase (RDB)
DATRAS/BASS_DB, BIAS_DB/
INTERCATCH/BIOR.
Common HELCOM database is under development. |
Data holder is Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR and ICES.
Results of biological analysis of samples collected in ports and from fishermen are entered in the relevant databases (Regional DataBase FishFrame, InterCatch).
Data collected in international trawling surveys are stored in ICES international database DATRAS.
QA/QC on data
Data are available in ICES/Regional DataBase (RDB)
DATRAS/BASS_DB, BIAS_DB/
INTERCATCH/BIOR
Common HELCOM database is under development. |
Data holder is Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR and ICES.
Results of biological analysis of samples collected in ports and from fishermen are entered in the relevant databases (Regional DataBase FishFrame, InterCatch).
Data collected in international trawling surveys are stored in ICES international database DATRAS.
QA/QC on data
Data are available in ICES/Regional DataBase (RDB)
DATRAS/BASS_DB, BIAS_DB/
INTERCATCH/BIOR
Common HELCOM database is under development. |
On SwAM's website, you can freely search for available data on catch statistics for commercial fishing and daily fishing. Financial data are presented annually in the Annual Economic Reports. |
Electricity fishing data is stored and made publicly accessible via the Electricity Fisheries Register. Raw data from smolt traps are stored in ”Sötebasen” (database under construction at SLU Aqua). There is no national database for fish counters yet. Other information collected is stored in smaller databases at SLU Aqua, from which data can be obtained on request. Swedish data used internationally is delivered to relevant working groups within ICES. Aggregated data from commercial fishing for salmon are stored in ICES database InterCatch. |
The raw data collected is stored in SLU Aqua's databases KUL (nets and vendace) and Fiskdata2 (coastal trawling in the North Sea). Data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request to datavard-fisk@slu.se. Common international data is stored at ICES. |
Raw data is stored at SLU Aqua. This data is updated annually and aggregated data is made available upon request. Common international data is stored at ICES |
|||||||||||||||||
Data access |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
Fiskeristyrelsen
mail@fiskeristyrelsen.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Fiskeristyrelsen
mail@fiskeristyrelsen.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
masjo@mst.dk
kregn@mst.dk |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Ministry of the Environment: Elo Rasmann (elo.rasmann@envir.ee);
University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute: Redik Eschbaum, redik.eschbaum@ut.ee, Lauri Saks, lauri.saks@ut.ee. |
Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR: |
Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR: |
Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR: |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
|||||
References |
|| MP_86 || --#
Krumme U, Gröhsler T (2013) Analysis of the questionaires concerning the issue of species misreporting in the mixed pelagic fisheries in the Baltic Sea (sprat-herring mix). In: Report of the Benchmark Workshop on Baltic Multispecies Assessments (WKBALT): 4-8 February 2013. Copenhagen: ICES, pp 266-276
Krumme U, Gröhsler T (2013) Sprat (BS)/Central Baltic Herring (CBH): Analysis of the questionnaires concerning the issue of species misreportning in the mixed pelagic fisheries in the Baltic Sea (sprat-herring mix). In: Report of the Benchmark Workshop on Baltic Multispecies Assessments (WKBALT): 4-8 February 2013. Copenhagen: ICES, pp 266-276
# #-- |
|| MP_137 || --#
Hyder K, Weltersbach MS, Armstrong M, Strehlow HV, et al (2018) Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global context : participation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment. Fish Fisheries 19(2):225-243, DOI:10.1111/faf.12251
Radford Z, Hyder K, Zarauz L, Mugerza E, Ferter K, Prellezo R, Strehlow HV, Townhill B, Lewin W-C, Weltersbach MS (2018) The impact of marine recreational fishing on key fish stocks in European waters. PLoS One 13(9):e0201666, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0201666
Strehlow HV (2017) Die Sache mit dem Angelhaken .... Meer Küste(6):21
Strehlow HV, Weltersbach MS (2017) Jobmotor Meeresangeln - Zwei aktuelle Studien belegen: Meeresangeln ist ein bedeutender Wirtschaftsfaktor in Europa [online]. Fischerei Fischmarkt MV(4):38-40 # #-- |
|| MP_77 || --# Die Daten wurden bereits für mehrere Publikationen genutzt. Das "Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS)" kann auf der Internetseite des ICES heruntergeladen werden. # https://www.ices.dk/marine-data/data-portals/Pages/DATRAS-Docs.aspx #-- |
|| MP_79 || --# Schaber M, Gröhsler T (2019) Survey report for FRV SOLEA / German Acoustic Autumn Survey (GERAS): 01 - 19 October 2018. ICES Sci Rep 1(11):190-224 # http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGBIFS.aspx #-- |
|| MP_82 || --# http://www.ices.dk/community/groups/Pages/WGIPS.aspx #-- |
|| MP_83 || --# #-- |
|| MP_85 || --# Stroganov AN, Bleil M, Oeberst R, Semenova AV, Winkler H (2018) First evidence of spawning of eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias) in the Belt Sea, the main spawning area of western Baltic cod (Gadus morhua L.). J Appl Ichthyol 34(3):527-534, DOI:10.1111/jai.13550
Velasco A, Bleil M (2016) Bericht über die 716.+ 717. Reise des FFS "Solea" vom 18.2. bis 10.3.2016 : Baltic International Trawl Spring Survey (BITS) in der Arkonasee, Mecklenburger- und Kieler Bucht (ICES SD FFS24+22). Rostock: Thünen-Institut für Ostseefischerei, 10 p
Bleil M, Velasco A (2016) Bericht über die 721. Reise des FFS Selea vom 13.06. bis 20.06.2016 : Untersuchungen zur Laicherbestandsstruktur, zum Anteil aktiver Laicher. zu Kondition und Laichaktivitäten und zur Reifeentwicklung von Dorschen in Beziehung zur hydrographischen Situation in der zentralen Ostsee (COBALT). Rostock: Thünen-Institut für Ostseefischerei, 6 p # #-- |
|| MP_89 || --# https://www.lallf.de/fischerei/fischereischutz/besatzmassnahmen/ #-- |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
The monitoring programme is approved by the minister of the environment and available at https://www.envir.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/merekeskkonna-kaitse/merestrateegia (https://www.envir.ee/sites/default/files/mereala_seireprogramm_2021_2026.pdf) (in Estonian). |
Latvian National Fisheries and Aquaculture Data Collection Work Plan:
https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wp/2020)
Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS). Version 2.0 (WGBIFS, 2017),
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP7%20BITS%202017.pdf
Manual for the International Baltic Acoustic Surveys (IBAS) Version 2.0 (WGBIFS, 2017),
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%208%20IBAS%202017.pdf
BIOR guidelines/methods:
- Methods of collecting biological samples from fishing vessels by random choice:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Random_sampling.pdf
- Manual for observers on the Baltic Sea on Latvian fishing vessels
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Guidelines_observer_Baltic.pdf
- Sampling biological cod during industrial:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Latvia_cod_sampling.pdf
- Sampling of flounder biological material during industrial surveys:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Latvia_flounder_sampling.pdf
- Method for data collection during the recreational fishing in the sea:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Atputas_zvejas_uzskaite_jura.pdf |
Latvian National Fisheries and Aquaculture Data Collection Work Plan:
https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wp/2020)
Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS). Version 2.0 (WGBIFS, 2017),
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP7%20BITS%202017.pdf
Manual for the International Baltic Acoustic Surveys (IBAS) Version 2.0 (WGBIFS, 2017),
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%208%20IBAS%202017.pdf.
BIOR guidelines/methods:
- Methods of collecting biological samples from fishing vessels by random choice:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Random_sampling.pdf.
- Manual for observers on the Baltic Sea on Latvian fishing vessels:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Guidelines_observer_Baltic.pdf
- Sampling biological cod during industrial:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Latvia_cod_sampling.pdf
- Sampling of flounder biological material during industrial surveys:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Latvia_flounder_sampling.pdf. |
Latvian National Fisheries and Aquaculture Data Collection Work Plan:
https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wp/2020)
Manual for the Baltic International Trawl Surveys (BITS). Version 2.0 (WGBIFS, 2017),
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP7%20BITS%202017.pdf
Manual for the International Baltic Acoustic Surveys (IBAS) Version 2.0 (WGBIFS, 2017),
http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/ICES%20Survey%20Protocols%20(SISP)/SISP%208%20IBAS%202017.pdf
BIOR guidelines/methods:
- Methods of collecting biological samples from fishing vessels by random choice:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Random_sampling.pdf
- Manual for observers on the Baltic Sea on Latvian fishing vessels
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Guidelines_observer_Baltic.pdf
- Sampling biological cod during industrial:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Latvia_cod_sampling.pdf
- Sampling of flounder biological material during industrial surveys:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Latvia_flounder_sampling.pdf
- Method for data collection during the recreational fishing in the sea:
https://www.bior.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/Atputas_zvejas_uzskaite_jura.pdf |