Member State report / Art11 / 2020 / D1-M / North East Atlantic
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 11 Monitoring programmes (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2020-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Mammals |
Region/subregion | North East Atlantic |
Member state |
BE |
DE |
DK |
ES |
FR |
IE |
NL |
PT |
SE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report Access |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Descriptor |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
D1.2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring strategy description |
The abundance and distribution of harbour porpoises is monitored using an internationally standardised methodology. Distribution feeds into information on possible effects of offshore construction and where needed and feasible, appropriate preventive or mitigative measures are taken.
The cause of death of stranded marine mammals (including bycatch) is being investigated. There are only few Belgian fishing vessels using static gear, the types of net where bycatch mainly occurs, so on-board monitoring does not contribute significantly to the estimation of bycatch at population level (CFP – DCF). Fishermen are encouraged to report bycatch.
Abundance of harbour seals at the more or less permanently used haul-out sites is monitored since 2019. Since no colonies are present in Belgian waters, this monitoring is not relevant for population size estimation but gives an indication of occurrence and suitability of resting places.
Regional cooperation exists for the assessment of abundance and distribution of harbour porpoise (SCANS projects and SCANS-type national surveys) and seals (ICES database). |
Das Monitoring der Biodiversität von marinen Säugetieren erfasst im Wesentlichen Abundanz, Verteilung und weitere ausgewählte biologische Parameter der drei regelmäßig im Hoheitsgebiet vorkommenden Säugetierarten (Seehund, Kegelrobbe, Schweinswal). Das Monitoring erfasst somit hauptsächlich Zustä...
|
Formålet med overvågningen af havpattedyr er, at skabe vidensgrundlag for en løbende vurdering af tilstanden, så det kan vurderes om biodiversiteten opretholdes, og om tætheden er på et niveau svarende til det naturlige under de givne fysiske, geografiske og klimatiske forhold i havmiljøet.
Overv...
|
El descriptor 1.Biodiversidad- Mamíferos marinos y tortugas marinas, se evaluará mediante una estrategia de seguimiento con los siguientes objetivos principales:
•Proporcionar datos que permitan la evaluación del estado ambiental de los cetáceos y las tortugas marinas en cada una de las demarcaci...
|
Le programme de surveillance « Mammifères marins - Tortues marines » définit la surveillance nécessaire à l'évaluation permanente de l'état écologique des eaux marines et à la mise à jour périodique des objectifs environnementaux (OE) au titre du descripteur 1 « Biodiversité » pour les composante...
|
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to
undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and
habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject
to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of
the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species
assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information)
and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species, four of these collect data relating to D1-Biodiversity-mammals. |
The principal purpose of the MSFD monitoring programme is to review the progress that has been made towards achieving good environmental status prescribed for each criterion in the Marine Strategy Part I (2018). This review is based on established indicators. The monitoring can also be used to evaluate the environmental targets defined for each descriptor. The environmental targets are operational in nature and are linked to specific actions and/or measures in the Marine Strategy Part 3. The effects of individual measures cannot generally be linked directly to environmental status or the criteria. Monitoring data can, however, indirectly give an indication of the effectiveness of measures.
The monitoring (methods, spatial and temporal coverage) aims to achieve sufficient statistical confidence in the assessment. The risk of not achieving GES or deterioration from GES is addressed in the Marine Strategy, Parts 1 and 3.
The European Commission requests that the electronic reports explain how the DPSIR cycle is monitored and to which part of the cycle the monitoring surveys are linked. The MSFD monitoring programme helps to generate better insight into the relationships between the use of the sea and the marine ecosystem. This can be accomplished by monitoring pressures and the underlying activities (D1C1: incidental bycatch, D2: non-indigenous species, D3C1: fish mortality, D5: eutrophication, D6C1/D6C4: physical loss of seabed/habitats and D6C2: fisheries intensity and sand extraction, D8 and D9: pollutants, D10: litter, D11: underwater noise), and by monitoring species and habitats (D1: biodiversity (with the exception of D1C1), D3C2: spawning stock biomass, D4: food web, D6C3/D6C5: habitats ) and hydrographical characteristics (D7). The numerous relationships between the various elements of the marine ecosystem are complex, and many are still not known. Consequently, it is often only possible to give an indication of the impact of specific activities on the marine ecosystem.
Experts generally derive DPSIR relationships from the monitoring of pressures/activities and of species and habitats (from the MSFD monitoring programme), in combination with data derived from permits and research programmes. However, some surveys have been established to measure pressures and their effects and/or to learn more about the effectiveness of measures. In designing the monitoring survey for benthic animals (habitats), the Netherlands explicitly took account of the need to |
Considerando os resultados da atualização da avaliação inicial e as metas estabelecidas, bem como as medidas constantes no Programa de Medidas definido no 1º ciclo de implementação da DQEM, identificaram-se como relevantes para a definição dos programas de monitorização os Eixos Estratégicos I “M...
|
Marine mammals are found high up in the marine food web and are affected both directly and indirectly by human activities. Monitoring of seals (gray seals, harbor seals and ringed seals) and porpoises provides a basis for assessing environmental conditions, based on population size and growth rate, as well as trends in population distribution and health status. These parameters can be affected by a variety of human activities. Hazardous substances can be enriched in the food chain and lead to lower growth rates and reduced population sizes. Underwater noise and other physical disturbance can have both direct effects at the individual level and diffuse effects at the population level. Top predators can also be affected by changes down the food chain that have effects on, for example, different fish species that make up the seals' prey, so-called bottom-up effect as a result of overfishing or other antrophogenic pressures. The monitoring of by-catch and hunting provides a basis for assessing direct impact, while other human activities and pressures that may affect marine mammals and therefore are concidered when assessing mammals, such as underwater noise, fishing activities and hazardous substances, are included in other monitoring strategies.
Except for E.2, there are no targets in place specifically linked to marine mammals, however, the targets for hazardous substances, eutrophication, marine litter and fishing activities are indirectly relevant to acheive good status also for mammals.
The related measures may cause positive changes in the marine mammals populations, but just as for the targets the linkage between the human activities and pressures and how they may impact the populations are not always crystal clear. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coverage of GES criteria |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaps and plans |
International coordination is required to fully implement bycatch and abundance targets, given the mobility of marine mammals, their area of distribution and the surface of Belgian waters. Due to the very low number of Belgian vessels using static gear and/or logistic limitations for additional observers, bycatch monitoring onboard for this type of fisheries is not possible. |
Einige der deutschen Umweltziele und die GES-Kriterien des Beschlusses EU 2017/848 setzen eine genaue Vorstellung von Zielzuständen, die bisher noch nicht genauer spezifiziert sind, voraus. Eine nationale Abstimmung dieser Lücken wird durch die Fortschritte in den internationalen Übereinkommen (T...
|
Overvågningsprogrammet er tilstrækkeligt.
|
Criterios D1C2, D1C3, D1C4 (Primarios):La puesta en marcha de los PdS MT1 y MT2 aportarán datos para estimar la abundancia, características demográficas, y rango de distribución de las poblaciones de mamíferos y tortugas. Además, el PdS MT6 de datos adicionales contribuirá con información extra q...
|
Principales perspectives du programme de surveillance « Mammifères marins - Tortues marines », centrées sur les mammifères marins : - Améliorer la surveillance concernant les espèces peu visibles au large (grands plongeurs). En particulier, poursuivre le développement de la surveillance par acous...
|
Principales perspectives du programme de surveillance « Mammifères marins - Tortues marines », centrées sur les mammifères marins : - Améliorer la surveillance concernant les marsouins au niveau côtier et les espèces peu visibles au large (grands plongeurs). En particulier, poursuivre le développ...
|
Coordinated and consistent regional systems for (1) risk assessment and robust targeted
monitoring of commercial fisheries in European waters, (2) standardised observation,
recording and reporting of mortality/injury interactions, and (3) the setting of
scientifically coherent threshold values for non-target species’ mortality rates, should be
investigated further and advanced to full operability where this is practically possible.
Practical cost-effective methods to deter non-target marine vertebrates around identified
problematic interactions with fisheries should be comprehensively investigated and fieldtested, with the aim of significantly reducing and resolving incidental by-catch mortality
and/or injury of non-target species.
Coordinated efforts should be made to scientifically evaluate and test methodologies for
the assessment of habitat condition across a range of habitat types (e.g. pelagic broad
habitat types), such that the condition of natural habitats for key criteria elements can be
analysed and inform future assessments of environmental status.
Knowledge of the breeding ecology and the aquatic ecology of Harbour seals in Ireland is very
limited. Both should be studied in detail to inform the species’ conservation. |
There are no monitoring gaps for assessment of D1C2 (population size marine mammals), D1C3 (pupproduction seals), D1C4 (distribution marine mammals) and D1C5 (habitats marine mammals). However, the monitoring (and assessment) of incidental bycatch of marine mammals (D1C1) is still under development. At international level, a system for monitoring incidental bycatch of protected species, including marine mammals, is being developed as required by the CFP. |
A abundância (D1C2) é um parâmetro importante para informar sobre o estado das populações de mamíferos marinhos e sua viabilidade a longo prazo (D1C3). A nível nacional, a informação e dados disponíveis para avaliar este parâmetro são, contudo, reduzidos e resultam de um esforço de monitorização ...
|
The monitoring is sufficient enough to assess D1C2, and partly D1C4. The current monitoring of seals focus on monitoring already known population sites, and only partly covers areas outside the known range.
The monitoring of harbour porpoises have recently been improved, so the time series is not yet long enough to provide a baseline. However, the assessment of abundance will be improved in 2024 compared to 2018.
By improving monitoring of different human activities and pressures the aim is to use these data together with data on mobile species to be able to assess D1C5.
Specific plans of improvements:
Grey seals and harbor seals – In addition to visual observations from airplanes we started using cameras during 2020 in several locations to improve the abundance calculations.
We are also expanding the areal coverage of monitoring to improve the assessment of D1C4.
Ringed seal – We are developing an alternative method to monitor the numbers of seals and also the genetic structure within the population in the Bothnian bay, based on individual seals genetics (close-kin mark-recapture).
Harbour porpoise – In 2019 we expanded the areal coverage of monitoring with more click detectors and an additional aerial survey in Kattegat and Skagerrak during 2020 together with Denmark.
Health status - There is ongoing work in Sweden to improve and adjust the monitoring of health status of seals and to include also harbour porpoises (D1C3). The aim is to be able to distinguish health issues caused by different pressures. This is done in close collaboration with other Baltic countries in the expert group HELCOM MAMA.
Bycatch – Monitoring is being improved thanks to a number of ongoing projects in the Baltic Sea, the Sound, Kattegat and Skagerrak. These projects are complementing the regular monitoring of commersial fisheries discards, where bycaught mammals are noted by human observers onboard, but where numbers are to low to enable a confident assessment of D1C1. Cameras onboard are now being tested as a complement to the observers. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coverage of targets |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coverage of measures |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring is in place by July 2020 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring was in place in 2014 |
Adequate monitoring will be in place by 2024 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related monitoring programmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Programme code |
ANSBE-P4-Mammals |
ANSDE_MPr_025_MP_181 |
ANSDE_MPr_025_MP_186 |
ANSDE_MPr_026_MP_182 |
ANSDE_MPr_026_MP_187 |
ANSDE_MPr_029_MP_181 |
ANSDE_MPr_029_MP_186 |
DK-D01.2-01 |
DK-D01.2-02 |
DK-D01.2-03 |
DK-D01.2-04 |
DK-D01.2-05 |
DK-D01.2-06 |
DK-D01.2-07 |
DK-D01.2-08 |
DK-D01.2-09 |
DK-D01.2-10 |
DK-D01.2-11 |
ES-MT6_DadicionalesMamTort |
ES-MT‐1_MamTortCosteros |
ES-MT‐2_MamTortOceanicos |
ES-MT‐4_InteraccionPescaMamTort |
ES-MT‐5_Varamientos |
ES-OA-A |
ES-OA-C |
FR-ABI-D1.2-03 |
FR-ABI-D1.2-04 |
FR-ABI-D1.2-05 |
FR-ACS-D1.2-01 |
FR-ACS-D1.2-02 |
FR-ACS-D1.2-03 |
FR-ACS-D1.2-04 |
FR-ACS-D1.2-05 |
FR-ANS-D1.2-01 |
FR-ANS-D1.2-02 |
FR-ANS-D1.2-03 |
FR-ANS-D1.2-04 |
FR-ANS-D1.2-05 |
ACS-IE-D01-01 |
ANSNL-D1-Mammals-mortality/injury-01 |
ANSNL-D1-Mammals-state of habitats-02 |
ANSNL-D1346-Sub8-Mammals |
ANSNL-D1346-Sub9-SealPop |
PT-AMA-MO-D1-MM-ST |
PT-AZO-CONT-MO-D1-DadosAdicionais |
PT-CONT-MO-D1-MM |
PT-MO-Arrojamentos |
PT-MO-D1-BYC |
SE-D1-hunting |
SE-D1D3-bycatch |
SE-D1D4-harbourporpoise |
SE-D1D4-seals |
SE-D1D4D8-mammalhealth |
Programme name |
Mammals – population abundance & strandings |
Mobile Arten (Meeressäuger) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Akustik |
Mobile Arten (Meeressäuger) - Abundanz und/oder Biomasse: Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Flugerfassung |
Mobile Arten (Meeressäuger) - Gesundheitszustand: Gesundheitszustand marine Säuger (Nordsee) - Lebendmonitoring Seehund |
Mobile Arten (Meeressäuger) - Gesundheitszustand: Gesundheitszustand marine Säuger (Nordsee) - Totfunde |
Mobile Arten (Meeressäuger) - Bestandsmerkmale: Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Akustik |
Mobile Arten (Meeressäuger) - Bestandsmerkmale: Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Flugerfassung |
Mobile species - state of habitats - seals |
Mobile species - abundance - seals |
Mobile species - population characteristics - seals |
Mobile species - Nutritional status - seals |
Mobile species - state of habitats - porpoise |
Mobile species - abundance - porpoise |
Mobile species - population characteristics - porpoise |
Mobile species - Nutritional status - porpoise |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental)- CCTV projektet |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) - Fiskerikontrollen |
Mobile species - mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) - Observatørture |
Datos adicionales de mamíferos y tortugas marinos |
Mamíferos y tortugas marinos costeros |
Mamíferos y tortugas marinos oceánicos |
Interacción de mamíferos y tortugas marinos con la actividad pesquera |
Varamientos de mamíferos y tortugas marinos |
Objetivos ambientales de biodiversidad y ecosistemas (A) |
Objetivos ambientales sobre actividades y usos (C) |
Mammifères marins et tortues marines au large |
Echouage des mammifères marins et des tortues marines |
Interactions entre les activités humaines, les mammifères marins et les tortues marines |
Populations côtières de cétacés |
Populations de phoques gris et veaux-marins |
Mammifères marins et tortues marines au large |
Echouage des mammifères marins et des tortues marines |
Interactions entre les activités humaines, les mammifères marins et les tortues marines |
Populations côtières de cétacés |
Populations de phoques gris et veaux-marins |
Mammifères marins et tortues marines au large |
Echouage des mammifères marins et des tortues marines |
Interactions entre les activités humaines, les mammifères marins et les tortues marines |
Monitoring Programme for the Habitats Directive and Birds Directive Species |
Mobile species – mortality/injury rates from fisheries (targeted and/or incidental) |
Mobile species – state of habitats |
Mobile species – distribution, abundance and/or biomass |
Mobile species - population characteristics |
Monitorização da abundância e demografia de cetáceos e répteis |
Dados adicionais para avaliação do estado das populações de mamíferos marinhos, répteis marinhos e aves marinhas |
Monitorização de populações de mamíferos marinhos na subdivisão do continente |
Redes de Arrojamento |
Monitorização das capturas acidentais de mamíferos, répteis, aves marinhas e peixes |
Hunting of birds and seals |
Bycatch |
Harbour porpoise |
Seals |
Marine mammals health status |
Update type |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Same programme as in 2014 |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
New programme |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Modified from 2014 |
Old programme codes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Programme description |
The programme combines data from different sources to estimate trends in bycatch. It uses data from:
- The assessment of the cause of death of stranded animals (seals and cetaceans);
- Reported incidental catches;
- Average number of harbour porpoises present in Belgian waters throughout the year estimated on the basis of aerial surveys;
- Use of rest areas along the coast by seals.
This programme contributes to environmental targets D1.1 and D1.2. (Former programme ANSBE-D1-4-Mammals-SP4) |
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || ANSDE_MP_181 || Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Akustik || Das Monitoring der Biodiversität von marinen Säugetieren erfasst im Wesentlichen Abundanz, Verteilung und weitere ausgewäh...
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || ANSDE_MP_186 || Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Flugerfassung || Das Monitoring der Biodiversität von marinen Säugetieren erfasst im Wesentlichen Abundanz, Verteilung und weitere au...
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || ANSDE_MP_182 || Gesundheitszustand marine Säuger (Nordsee) - Lebendmonitoring Seehund || Für die Ermittlung des Gesundheitszustandes werden Totfunde der drei einheimischen Meerssäugerarten obduziert und histologisch...
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || ANSDE_MP_187 || Gesundheitszustand marine Säuger (Nordsee) - Totfunde || Für die Ermittlung des Gesundheitszustandes werden Totfunde der drei einheimischen Meerssäugerarten obduziert und histologischen, bakteriologi...
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || ANSDE_MP_181 || Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Akustik || Das Monitoring der Biodiversität von marinen Säugetieren erfasst im Wesentlichen Abundanz, Verteilung und weitere ausgewäh...
|
Das Monitoring-Programm besteht aus den/dem folgenden Messprogramm/en (=MP): || ANSDE_MP_186 || Abundanz, Reproduktion und Verbreitung mariner Säuger (Nordsee) - Flugerfassung || Das Monitoring der Biodiversität von marinen Säugetieren erfasst im Wesentlichen Abundanz, Verteilung und weitere au...
|
Spættet sæl har været overvåget siden 1979 og gråsæl siden 2011.
Det forudsættes, at omfanget af det nuværende NOVANA 2017-21 program i al væsentlighed bibeholdes. Det angår dels aktiviteter målrettet havstrategidirektivet, men også aktiviteter der oprindelig baserer sig på behov relateret til h...
|
Spættet sæl har været overvåget siden 1979 og gråsæl siden 2011.
Det forudsættes, at omfanget af det nuværende NOVANA 2017-21 program i væsentlighed bibeholdes. Det angår dels aktiviteter målrettet havstrategidirektivet, men også aktiviteter der oprindelig baserer sig på behov relateret til habi...
|
I de danske farvande findes der fire populationer af spættet sæl og to af gråsæl. Nogle populationer overskrider landegrænser. Populationen af spættet sæl i Vadehavet er dermed delt med Tyskland og Holland, og populationen af gråsæl i Nordsøen er delt med de øvrige Nordsølande.
Spættet sæl har ...
|
Spæklagets tykkelse hos bl.a. sæler har siden 2015 været en del af det nationale overvågningsprogram (NOVANA). Der indsamles løbende levende og døde sæler til måling af spæklagstykkelse fra bifangede, regulerede og levende fangede dyr. Målingerne foretages for, at analysere bestandenes ernærings...
|
Marsvin findes i alle de danske farvande, og har været overvåget siden 2011.
Det nuværende nationale overvågningsprogram (NOVANA 2017-21) omfatter dels aktiviteter målrettet havstrategidirektivet, men omfatter især aktiviteter der oprindelig baserer sig på behov relateret til habitatdirektivet....
|
Marsvin findes i alle danske farvande, og har været overvåget siden 2011.
Der findes tre populationer af marsvin i Danmark: Nordsø-, Bælthavs- og Østersøbestanden. Undersøgelser for abundance bør ske på populationsniveau for, at imødekomme marsvins bevægelser mellem områder og over landegrænser...
|
Marsvin findes i alle danske farvande, og har været overvåget siden 2011.
Der findes tre populationer af marsvin i Danmark: Nordsø-, Bælthavs- og Østersøbestanden. Undersøgelser for populationernes karakteristika bør ske på populationsniveau for, at imødekomme marsvins bevægelser mellem områder...
|
Spæklagets tykkelse hos bl.a. marsvin har siden 2015 været en del af det nationale overvågningsprogram (NOVANA).
Der indsamles løbende levende og døde marsvin til måling af spæklagstykkelse fra bifangede og strandede dyr. Målingerne foretages for, at analysere bestandenes ernæringsmæssige tils...
|
CCTV projektet
DTU Aqua har siden 2018, for kontoret for Fiskeri i Miljø- og Fødevareministeriets departement, gennemført projektarbejde med CCTV (Closed-Circuit TeleVision system) kameraovervågning installeret om bord på fiskefartøjer i det danske garnfiskeri. Projektets formål er at indsamle da...
|
Fiskerikontrol
Fiskeristyrelsen indsamler oplysninger om bifangst af fugle, fra fiskernes logbøger, som led i den risikobaserede fiskerikontrol.
|
Observatørture
DTU Aqua foretager årligt omkring 200 observatørture, hvor observatører registrerer fangstsammensætningen på kommercielle fiskefartøjer. Derudover registreres bifangst af havpattedyr, fugle, fisk, der ikke udnyttes erhvervsmæssigt og marint affald indsamles og registreres.
|
La existencia de este programa se justifica por la necesidad de recopilar, analizar, revisar e integrar la información adicional que está siendo recogida en España. Esta información proviene de, por ejemplo, datos de avistamientos desde plataformas oportunistas (ferrys, embarcaciones recreativas,...
|
El presente programa aborda el seguimiento de la abundancia poblacional y la variabilidad temporal y espacial de las especies de cetáceos y tortugas de hábitat costero (entendiendo como hábitat costero aquel que incluye las aguas interiores, las aguas costeras y las aguas de la plataforma contine...
|
presente programa aborda el seguimiento de la abundancia poblacional y la variabilidad temporal y espacial de las especies de cetáceos y tortugas de hábitat oceánico (entendiendo como hábitat oceánico aquel que se extiende más allá de la plataforma continental). Independientemente de ello, el alc...
|
El programa de seguimiento MT-4 se ha concebido como un proyecto piloto que comprende una serie de pasos para poder abordar la problemática de las interacciones de la actividad pesquera con mamíferos y tortugas marinos:
• Determinación, a través de un análisis de riesgo de dónde se debe concentra...
|
Actualmente no existe un programa de seguimiento de los varamientos coordinado para todas las demarcaciones y por ello, este programa, basado en las redes existentes, propone la coordinación y recopilación de los datos de los programas existentes en las CCAA. De esta forma, se permitirá la obtenc...
|
⢠and operational objectives.
The operational objectives and their associated indicators relate to concrete implementation measures that facilitate the achievement of the other objectives and address issues that are not measurable through sampling, censuses and campaigns that are part of the th...
|
By Resolution of 11 June 2019 of the State Secretariat for the Environment, the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 7 June 2019 approving the environmental targets for the second cycle of Spanish marine strategies was published. These environmental objectives were divided into three categories:
⢠status objectives
|
Ce sous-programme vise à cartographier la répartition et la densité des mammifères marins et des tortues au large. Il contribue à l'évaluation de l'état écologique des mammifères marins et des tortues marines ainsi qu'à l'analyse du fonctionnement et de l'état du réseau trophique. En parallèle de...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre les échouages des mammifères marins et des tortues marines sur le littoral français. Les échouages sur le littoral représentent la principale source d'accès à des prélèvements de tissus et d'organes permettant d'évaluer l'état écologique des prédateurs ...
|
Ce sous-programme vise à observer et suivre les interactions in situ entre les activités humaines en mer, les mammifères marins et les tortues marines, pour caractériser en particulier l'état des populations au regard des pressions (captures accidentelles par les engins de pêche, dérangement lié ...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre l'état écologique des groupes côtiers de grands dauphins et de la population de marsouins communs, et à l'évaluation du fonctionnement et de la dynamique du réseau trophique. Il permettra aussi de mieux connaître et de tenir à jour la localisation des z...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre l'état écologique des phoques gris et des phoques veaux marins. A noter cependant que les populations françaises (particulièrement de phoques gris) ne constituent que de petites parties, fortement connectées, des populations des mers celtiques – Manche ...
|
Ce sous-programme vise à cartographier la répartition et la densité des mammifères marins et des tortues au large. Il contribue à l'évaluation de l'état écologique des mammifères marins et des tortues marines ainsi qu'à l'analyse du fonctionnement et de l'état du réseau trophique. En parallèle de...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre les échouages des mammifères marins et des tortues marines sur le littoral français. Les échouages sur le littoral représentent la principale source d'accès à des prélèvements de tissus et d'organes permettant d'évaluer l'état écologique des prédateurs ...
|
Ce sous-programme vise à observer et suivre les interactions in situ entre les activités humaines en mer, les mammifères marins et les tortues marines, pour caractériser en particulier l'état des populations au regard des pressions (captures accidentelles par les engins de pêche, dérangement lié ...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre l'état écologique des groupes côtiers de grands dauphins et de la population de marsouins communs, et à l'évaluation du fonctionnement et de la dynamique du réseau trophique. Il permettra aussi de mieux connaître et de tenir à jour la localisation des z...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre l'état écologique des phoques gris et des phoques veaux marins. A noter cependant que les populations françaises (particulièrement de phoques gris) ne constituent que de petites parties, fortement connectées, des populations des mers celtiques – Manche ...
|
Ce sous-programme vise à cartographier la répartition et la densité des mammifères marins et des tortues au large. Il contribue à l'évaluation de l'état écologique des mammifères marins et des tortues marines ainsi qu'à l'analyse du fonctionnement et de l'état du réseau trophique. En parallèle de...
|
Ce sous-programme a pour objectif de suivre les échouages des mammifères marins et des tortues marines sur le littoral français. Les échouages sur le littoral représentent la principale source d'accès à des prélèvements de tissus et d'organes permettant d'évaluer l'état écologique des prédateurs ...
|
Ce sous-programme vise à observer et suivre les interactions in situ entre les activités humaines en mer, les mammifères marins et les tortues marines, pour caractériser en particulier l'état des populations au regard des pressions (captures accidentelles par les engins de pêche, dérangement lié ...
|
Implementation of the 1992 EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) requires Member States to undertake surveillance (i.e. monitoring) of a wide range of Annex-listed flora, fauna and habitat types that are earmarked for conservation. The status of these features is then subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years, in accordance with Article 17 of the Directive. In this regard, the fundamental parameters underlying individual species assessments are the Range, Habitat for the species, Population (including trend information) and Future Prospects (including evaluation of pressures, threats and conservation measures).
Similar to requirements under the Habitats Directive, implementation of the EU Birds Directive (Directive 2009/147/EC), that was first enacted in 1979, brings with it measures and actions for the conservation, protection and monitoring of populations of wild birds, including marine birds and their habitats. Following a recent revision to reporting requirements by the European Commission, the status of Ireland’s wild birds is now subject to detailed re-assessment and reporting once every six years. This provides an improved and more coherent alignment with Member State reporting requirements under the Habitats Directive. |
Monitoring aims to provide insight into both the size and composition of the bycatch. The data collection is designed to help achieve the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The necessary monitoring of incidental bycatch is prescribed at EU level in Regulation 2017/1004, by virtue of which the monitoring of bycatch of all species, and particularly protected species, falls under the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF) since 2017.
The incidental bycatch of harbour porpoises must not exceed the threshold value adopted by ASCOBANS of 1 percent of the most recent best estimate of the population in the North Sea region. No indicator or threshold value has yet been formulated for bycatch of seals, but it is also likely to be a maximum percentage of the seal population.
Incidental bycatch of marine mammals in Dutch waters is monitored in two ways: through data collection under the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF) and through research into the cause of death of stranded harbour porpoises.
The monitoring under the DCF is covered by the protocols for the sampling of the catch on board commercial fishing vessels in the pelagic fisheries, active demersal fisheries and passive fisheries. The sampling under DCF is carried out by observers on board commercial fishing vessels or by trained crew members. Aside from discards, they keep record of incidental bycatch of marine mammals, seabirds, turtles and protected fish species. They explicitly keep a record of how much time is actually spent inspecting the incidental bycatch.
For the active demersal fisheries, a reference fleet of twenty vessels is used. The vessel’s crew carries out sampling on a hundred and sixty trips every year and observers take samples on ten trips. The vessels for the sampling are randomly selected from the reference fleet. For the pelagic fisheries, observers make twelve trips on board trawlers of four fishing companies in the course of a year. For the passive fisheries, observers make ten trips every year. These trips are made on an ad hoc basis, not selected at random. Recreational gillnet fishing is excluded.
In addition to the direct records of bycatch in nets, data on the cause of death of stranded marine mammals can also provide information about bycatch. Accordingly, since 2016 autopsies have been performed every year on 50 harbour porpoises found stranded along the entire coast of the Netherlands as part of the WOT programme. The autopsies are performed on a random basis, exclus |
The extent and the condition of the habitats of marine mammals must be at least maintained. The assessment is linked to reporting on habitat quality for the Habitats Directive and is based on expert judgement. In that context, as far as possible data on population trends (see D1C2), ecological key factors (such as availability of food) and important pressure factors (see D1C1, D6C2, D8, D10 and D11) are used. There is still considerable uncertainty regarding the quality of the habitats, mainly because the impact of various pressures, both now and in the future, is unknown. Studies are being carried out as part of a number of major projects, such as the Offshore Wind Ecological Programme (Wozep), to increase knowledge of the effects of offshore windfarms. Also, there is a monitoring survey (for the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) to ascertain the cause of death of a subset of stranded porpoises, which may be extended to encompass seals in future. International efforts are also underway to further develop a system of monitoring incidental bycatch of protected species, including harbour porpoises and seals (see D1C1), as required by the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). |
D1C2
The population trends for harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) must at least be stable at Greater North Sea level (OSPAR indicator) and their population abundance at national level must correspond with the Favourable Reference Population (FRP) in the Habitats Directive (D1C2). For the monitoring of cetaceans, including harbour porpoise, OSPAR and ASCOBANS are in the process of developing a SCANS survey programme (Small Cetaceans in European Atlantic waters and the North Sea) for the entire North Sea with measurements at least once every six years. Three large-scale censuses of cetaceans have been carried out in the North Sea and adjacent areas before, since 1994. The purpose of these surveys from ships and from airplanes is to determine the numbers and the distribution of cetaceans. They involve standardised line-transect counts carried out using distance-sampling methods (Buckland et al., 2001). The counts on the DCS fall into two SCANS blocks, with six and eight line transects, respectively. The Netherlands supplements this monitoring with surveys at DCS level. The number of harbour porpoises on the DCS has been counted from a plane almost every summer since 2010. These surveys will be arranged differently (over the years and within a year) in order to produce a better estimate of the population. The method used is the same as for the SCANS surveys, but in this case the DCS is divided into four sub-areas with a total of thirty line transects. The observations extend over a total distance of approximately 3,000 km of transects, which means that over 1 percent of the DCS is covered. Germany and Belgium also use this method. The monitoring of cetaceans follows the requirements agreed on and developed in the CEMP Guideline for M4 Abundance cetaceans (OSPAR, 2018). In addition to this survey, RWS waterbird monitoring (see D1C2 population size of birds) provides valuable information. Marine mammals are also counted during these flights. Statistical analysis by Statistics Netherlands showed that although no estimates of populations can be made, trends can be clearly identified. Innovative techniques are not foreseen in near future, but developments will be followed closely. The monitoring of seals is part of OSPAR and the Habitats Directive and also adheres to the agreements under the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation. The population trends for common seal (Phoca vitulina) and grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) must be at least stable at Greater North Sea lev |
The average number of pups must not decline by more than 1 per cent a year. For the grey seal, this indicator corresponds with the OSPAR indicator for the North Sea. There is no OSPAR indicator for pup production of the common seal. However, the production of common seal pups in Dutch territory is included as a national supplement to the OSPAR indicator, since this information provides insight into the extent to which GES is achieved. Furthermore, it ties in with assessments for the Habitats Directive and the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation. The monitoring and assessment of the common seal in Dutch territory is the same as for the grey seal and at least meets OSPAR’s requirements. However, the level of assessment is different: it is the national level for the common seal and the North Sea region for the grey seal. The counting of seal pups is linked to the pupping period. For grey seals, that is December and January; for common seals it is June and July.
Seals in the Wadden area are counted from an airplane for the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. The counts cover the haul-out sites in the entire area. Common seals and grey seals are counted every year on the sandbars at low tide. There are at least three counts during the pupping period and two during the moulting period. Aerial counts are carried out for grey seals in the winter (November–January) and spring (March–April), and for the common seal in the summer (June–August). During every census, all of the adults and any pups of both species are registered.
Common seals and grey seals (including pups) are also counted on sandbars in the Delta area on behalf of Rijkswaterstaat and the Province of Zeeland. Seals have been counted in the Delta area since the end of the 1990s, but the MWTL counts in their current form date from 2014. Counts in the Delta waters are carried out throughout the year. They are combined with the counts of waterbirds in the area and are carried out from a plane at low tide in the Voordelta, Oosterschelde and Westerschelde, and often from a ship on Lake Grevelingen. During every count, the two species and any pups are registered at specific haul-out sites.
There are no changes in the monitoring programmes compared with the MSFD monitoring programme in 2014. Innovative techniques are not foreseen in near future, but developments will be followed closely so that, when opportune, adjustments can be made. |
Este programa tem como objetivo a monitorização da abundância e demografia de populações de mamíferos e répteis marinhos que ocorrem nas regiões portuguesas da Macaronésia (subdivisões dos Açores e da Madeira). O programa divide-se em duas componentes: costeira e oceânica, que asseguram a recolha...
|
Este programa reúne informação recolhida para mamíferos, répteis e aves marinhas, no âmbito de programas e projetos em curso que, por si só, não permitem avaliar os critérios definidos na Decisão de 2017, mas poderão constituir fontes de informação acessória relevantes. Na subdivisão Continente, ...
|
Este programa tem como objetivo a monitorização da abundância e distribuição de populações de diferentes espécies de mamíferos marinhos que ocorrem na ZEE de Portugal continental e sua variação no espaço e no tempo. Pode ainda dar resposta ao critério D1C5, embora as metodologias para avaliar est...
|
O programa de monitorização PT-MO-Arrojamentos será implementado para mamíferos marinhos e répteis através das Redes de Arrojamento em curso nas três subdivisões: Rede Nacional de Arrojamentos (no Continente), Rede de Arrojamentos de Cetáceos dos Açores e, na subdivisão da Madeira, a Direção Regi...
|
O programa tem como objetivo a monitorização das capturas acidentais de mamíferos, répteis, aves marinhas e peixes em diferentes segmentos da frota pesqueira nacional.
No Continente, o programa será implementado através do Programa Nacional de Recolha de Dados (PNRD) do Data Collection Framework ...
|
In Sweden, hunting for seals and certain species of seabirds is regulated by the Hunting Act, the Hunting Ordinance and various supplementary regulations as well as other legally binding documents. The hunt can be carried out either as predator control, license hunting or general hunting. The different types of hunting have partly different purposes and conditions linked to the conduct of the hunt.
The main purpose of the predator control is to limit the damage that wildlife causes to human activities and interests and in some cases the damage that a species causes to other animals and plants. In license hunting, the kills and thus the development of the game stock in question must be adapted to the availability of game and with regard to public and private interests. The hunt must also have a clear purpose, e.g. to prevent the damage caused by wildlife. In the case of general hunting, the hunting right holder has the opportunity to hunt an unlimited number of animals of the permitted type during the permitted hunting period, however, the hunting must be adapted to the availability of game.
Predator control and license hunting is conducted following a decision by an authority. General hunting seasons are regulated in the Hunting Ordinance. The Hunting Ordinance also contains provisions that certain species may be hunted on the hunters own initiative to prevent the damage caused by wildlife.
Historically, intensive hunting has been a contributing factor to some species being endangered, but today hunting is regulated so that it does not cause a negative impact on the viability of stocks. Hunting, however, is one of several human activities that must be monitored in order to be able to follow the development of different populations of birds and seals. |
In the regular sampling carried out on board commercial fishing vessels in accordance with EU data collection regulations ((EU) 2017/1004, (EU) 2016/1251), as well as the regulation on the conservation of fishery resources and the protection of marine ecosystems (EU ) 2019/1241, information regarding by-catch is obtained. All fish species, commercial shellfish, mammals and birds are noted. Sampling takes place mainly on vessels fishing with various bottom trawls.
Data collection carried out according to the EU data collection regulations is coordinated internationally between Member States in regional data collection coordination groups. Sweden participates in two such groups RCG Baltic and RCG North Sea and Eastern Arctic (to which the Skagerrak and Kattegat belong). Furthermore, a lot of international coordination and development work is done within ICES´s various expert groups (for by-catches mainly WGBYC). Sweden participates actively in these groups.
Pilot studies were carried out in 2017-2019 with the aim of conducting by-catch sampling in 2020 in fisheries that use passive gear (nets and hooks).
The purpose is to increase knowledge about by-catches in these fisheries, to test whether it is possible to estimate by-catches by having observers on board fishing boats, and if this is an effective method.
Sampling of nets in the Sound and in the Kattegat will be included in the regular sampling from 2020. However, no ongoing monitoring of passive gear is currently planned in the Baltic Proper as previous pilots observed fewer by-catches there. So based on risk, monitoring in the Sound and Kattegatt are therefore prioritized. The Skagerrak could possibly be added after the pilot study there is completed in 2021.
The pilot studies have shown that it also works to monitor the fish with passive gear with the help of observers (the challenge is that the vessels are small). However, the question remains whether this is the most effective way of estimating the total amount of by-catches in the fisheries. The problem is that observers can only cover a small part of the total fishing effort and that by-catches of many species (such as harbour porpoises and various birds) are relatively uncommon. This means that there will be few observations and thus uncertainty in the estimates of the total amount of by-catches. In 2020, therefore, a new pilot project was initiated where surveillance with the help of cameras is tested and compared with surveillance with the help |
There are three populations of Harbour porpoise in Swedish waters: the North Sea, the Belt Sea (western Baltic Sea) and the Baltic Sea population, that are monitored using different methods.
The aim of the monitoring is to follow up population trends in abundance and distribution in international and Swedish waters as these can be affected by e.g. hazardous substances, bycatch, ship traffic and food availability. The large scale airial monitoring is coordinated within OSPAR or trilateral (SE, DK, DE) surveys of the North Sea and the Belt Sea poulations. Static acoustic monitoring of the Baltic Sea and the Belt Sea poulations are performed offshore and in N2000 areas is partially coordinated with neighbouring states.
The monitoring of abundance and distribution is performed in combination with studies of disease and health through surveys of stranded and bycatched individuals.
Harbour porpoise monitoring in the Baltic Sea started 2016.
SE has been part of several internationally coordinated surveys in the North Sea (SCANS 1994, SCANS II 2005, SCANS III 2016) and Baltic Sea (SAMBAH 2011-2013) |
In Sweden, there are three species of seals - grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) and ringed seal (Pusa hispida). Each species have a custumized national monitoring programme for estimating the poulation abundance. The aim of monitoring the abundance and distribution of seals is to detect long-term effects of human activities affecting seals as a result of hunting, bycatch, hazardous substances and changes in the food web.
Grey seal monitoring started in 1989
Harbour seal monitoring started in 1988
Ringed seal monitoring started in 1995 |
Marine mammals are top predators in the food chain, which increases the probability of detecting changes in ecosystems and high levels of hazardous substances. Substances found in low levels in fish can be enriched and detected in high levels in seals and porpoises, which makes them suitable as indicator organisms for early detection of changes in the environment.
The primary aim of the monitoring is to study the long-term effects of hazardous substances and other human activities affecting the marine environment by documenting population development for grey seals, harbor seals, ringed seals and harbor porpoises in combination with studies of cause of death, health, diseases and chemical analyzes.
Marine mammals (bycatch, hunted or found dead for unknown reasons) are collected and investigated each year. Monitoring of Baltic seal healths started in 1975 and was expanded with ongoing health and disease monitoring of marine mammals in 2020.
During 2020-2021, the monitoring of the effects of hazardous substances will be evaluated in order to be able to optimize the monitoring programmes both in terms of coverage and costs and to provide a better basis for state assessment and determining the causes of the effects.
Comment: D8C2 was not in the list for the feature Adverse effects on species and habitats, but this criteria is relevant for this programme. |
Monitoring purpose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other policies and conventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Regional cooperation - coordinating body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Regional cooperation - countries involved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional cooperation - implementation level |
Joint data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Joint data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Agreed data collection methods |
Common monitoring strategy |
Coordinated data collection |
Agreed data collection methods |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
Coordinated data collection |
||||||||||
Monitoring details |
Marine mammal general:
- Strandings investigation (a.o. for cause of death)
(cooperation in the preparation of an international database on strandings in the North Sea basin)
Harbour porpoise:
- Aerial surveys for the determination of distribution, abundance and effects of human activities (since 2008)
(cooperation to collate data with those of other countries for an assessment on a wider scale; this is possible as the same methodology is used)
- Decadal survey to determine the distribution and numbers in a wider area (SCANS I – II - III)
Seals:
- Abundance estimate at only regularly used haul-out site – contribution to ICES seal database
Frequency: weekly till 6-monthly.
Note: the list of species below is not exhaustive. |
|| MP_181 || Kontinuierliche POD Messung
|
|| MP_186 || --
#Flugzeuggestütze Transekt- (Schweinswale) und Komplett-Zählungen (Robben) in AWZ und Hoheitsgewässern
#Observerflüge in niedriger Flughöhe (183 m)
#digitale Erfassungsflüge in größeren Flughöhe (> 400 m)
|
|| MP_182 ||
|
|| MP_187 ||
|
|| MP_181 || Kontinuierliche POD Messung
|
|| MP_186 || --
#Flugzeuggestütze Transekt- (Schweinswale) und Komplett-Zählungen (Robben) in AWZ und Hoheitsgewässern
#Observerflüge in niedriger Flughöhe (183 m)
#digitale Erfassungsflüge in größeren Flughöhe (> 400 m)
|
Data til vurdering af kriterie D1C5 (arternes habitats udstrækning og tilstand) er hentet fra overvågning ifm. kriterie D1C2 (populationstæthed) og D1C4 (udbredelsesområde).
|
Se Monitoring methods.
|
Se Monitoring methods
|
Se propone realizar un seguimiento sobre las siguientes cuatro especies y trece unidades de gestión de cetáceos (UG) y tres especies de tortuga marina:
Demarcación noratlántica y sudatlántica
• UG1 - marsopas comunes (Phocoena phocoena - 137117) de la población ibérica
• UG2 - delfines mulares (T...
|
Se propone realizar un seguimiento sobre las siguientes nueve especies y diecisiete unidades de gestión (UG) de cetáceos y dos especies de tortuga:
Demarcación noratlántica y sudatlántica
• UG21 - rorcuales comunes (Balaenoptera physalus - 137091) de la población atlántica (NOR)
• UG22 - rorcuale...
|
El muestreo debe ser rutinario, con una frecuencia adecuada al funcionamiento y la temporalidad de las pesquerías evaluadas.
|
There are nine survey campaigns within the Monitoring Programme for Habitats Directive & Birds Directive species. Several of these campaigns’ sampling regimes are interwoven. For example, two campaigns may provide data for national and international assessments of one species. Additionally, some campaigns may provide resources (in the form of funding or personnel) for targeted scientific data collection for a particular species. The campaigns that support this monitoring programme are:
I. ObSERVE Programme
II. NPWS Seal Monitoring
III. Cetacean Monitoring
IV. IWDG Cetacean Sighting and Stranding Schemes
V. Turtle Sightings & Strandings
VI. NPWS Breeding Seabird Monitoring
VII. Seabirds at Sea Surveys
VIII. Irish Wetland Bird Survey (I-WeBS)
IX. IFI Monitoring of Diadromous Species & Habitats |
Cetacean monitoring by pelagic trawlers started in 2005. From 2017 this monitoring is also operational for other fisheries (DCF obligation). |
D1C2 Seals:
Seals in the Wadden area are counted from an airplane for the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. The counts cover the haul-out sites in the entire area. Common seals and grey seals are counted every year on the sandbars at low tide. There are at least three counts during the pupping period and two during the moulting period. Aerial counts are carried out for grey seals in the winter (November–January) and spring (March–April), and for the common seal in the summer (June–August). During every census, all of the adults and any pups of both species are registered.
Common seals and grey seals (including pups) are also counted on sandbars in the Delta area on behalf of Rijkswaterstaat and the Province of Zeeland. Seals have been counted in the Delta area since the end of the 1990s, but the MWTL counts in their current form date from 2014. Counts in the Delta waters are carried out throughout the year. They are combined with the counts of waterbirds in the area and are carried out from a plane at low tide in the Voordelta, Oosterschelde and Westerschelde, and often from a ship on Lake Grevelingen. During every count, the two species and any pups are registered at specific haul-out sites. |
No habitat costeiro, a monitorização será dirigida aos cetáceos, através de campanhas de mar, será realizada foto-identificação “Capture-Mark-Recapture” e serão recolhidos dados biológicos e genéticos e ainda dados ambientais. Pretende-se, ainda, capturar e amostrar um número adequado de indivídu...
|
Os censos dedicados aéreos decorrerão em avião, seguindo desenhos de amostragem adotados em projetos nacionais e internacionais e suportados por metodologias de "Distance Sampling". A monitorização de cetáceos seguindo esta metodologia dará continuidade à informação anteriormente reportada para o...
|
No âmbito deste programa serão recolhidos dados espaciais e temporais dos animais arrojados, por espécie, e, sempre que possível, será feita a avaliação das causas de morte e serão recolhidos parâmetros biológicos. A realização de necropsias e recolha de amostras dependerá da espécie e do estado ...
|
No Continente, o PNAB/DCF recolhe regularmente informação sobre capturas acessórias através do embarque de observadores em embarcações de pesca comercial ao longo da ZEE, em particular nas frotas de cerco, arrasto e polivalente (redes de emalhar e de tresmalho e palangre). Adicionalmente, neste p...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grazing birds |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wading birds |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface-feeding birds |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic-feeding birds |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benthic-feeding birds |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small toothed cetaceans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Deep-diving toothed cetaceans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baleen whales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Turtles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal fish |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pelagic shelf fish |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demersal shelf fish |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deep-sea fish |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercially exploited fish and shellfish |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal/shelf cephalopods |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deep-sea cephalopods |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benthic broad habitats |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other benthic habitats |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal ecosystems |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shelf ecosystems |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oceanic/deep-sea ecosystems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Input or spread of non-indigenous species |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disturbance of species (e.g. where they breed, rest and feed) due to human presence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of, or mortality/injury to, wild species (by commercial and recreational fishing and other activities) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newly introduced non-indigenous species |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Established non-indigenous species |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminants - non UPBT substances |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contaminants - UPBT substances |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Litter and micro-litter in species |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coastal defence and flood protection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore structures (other than for oil/gas/renewables) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of minerals (rock, metal ores, gravel, sand, shell) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of oil and gas, including infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of salt |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction of water |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable energy generation (wind, wave and tidal power), including infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmission of electricity and communications (cables) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish and shellfish harvesting (professional, recreational) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fish and shellfish processing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marine plant harvesting |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hunting and collecting for other purposes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aquaculture – marine, including infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agriculture |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transport – shipping |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Waste treatment and disposal |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure infrastructure |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tourism and leisure activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research, survey and educational activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Species affected by incidental by-catch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse effects on species or habitats |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring of seabed morphology, including dredging and depositing of materials |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial scope |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine reporting units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporal scope (start date - end date) |
1995-9999 |
2010-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1991-9999 |
1991-9999 |
2010-9999 |
1975-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1979-9999 |
1979-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2011-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2010-9999 |
1983-9999 |
1995-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2015-9999 |
2020-2026 |
2020-2026 |
1994-9999 |
1969-9999 |
2008-9999 |
2000-9999 |
2000-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1969-9999 |
2008-9999 |
2000-9999 |
2000-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1969-9999 |
2008-9999 |
1980-9999 |
2005-9999 |
2014-9999 |
1960-9999 |
1960-9999 |
2020-2026 |
2020-9999 |
2021-2026 |
1996-9999 |
2020-9999 |
1939-9999 |
1996-9999 |
1994-9999 |
1988-9999 |
1975-9999 |
Monitoring frequency |
Weekly |
Continually |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Continually |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Continually |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
As needed |
Other |
Other |
Other |
As needed |
6-yearly |
6-yearly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Continually |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Continually |
Monthly |
Monthly |
Yearly |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Continually |
Other |
Yearly |
Yearly |
Other |
Other |
Other |
Continually |
Yearly |
Yearly |
3-monthly |
Yearly |
Yearly |
As needed |
Monitoring type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring method other |
- Aerial surveys: line transect distance methodology (cfr. SCANS)
- Necropsies performed using well established protocols |
|| MP_181 || BSH, 2013: Standard - Untersuchung der Auswirkungen von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen auf die Meeresumwelt (StUK 4) |
|| MP_186 || |
|| MP_182 || |
|| MP_187 || |
|| MP_181 || BSH, 2013: Standard - Untersuchung der Auswirkungen von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen auf die Meeresumwelt (StUK 4) |
|| MP_186 || |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M16_Artsovervaagning_af_saeler_ver2.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M16_Artsovervaagning_af_saeler_ver2.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M16_Artsovervaagning_af_saeler_ver2.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M31_Spaeklagets_tykkelse_hos_danske_marsvin_og_saeler_ver1.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M15_Artsovervaagning_af_marsvin_ver2.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M15_Artsovervaagning_af_marsvin_ver2.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M15_Artsovervaagning_af_marsvin_ver2.pdf |
The national monitoring program (NOVANA) is described (in Danish) at:
https://bios.au.dk/fileadmin/bioscience/Fagdatacentre/MarintFagdatacenter/TekniskeAnvisninger2011_2015/TA_M31_Spaeklagets_tykkelse_hos_danske_marsvin_og_saeler_ver1.pdf |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua.
https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/. |
Er beskrevet på Fiskeristyrelsens hjemmeside.
https://fiskeristyrelsen.dk/ |
Link to particular guideline/protocols is not available, but can be accessed on request to DTU Aqua. https://www.aqua.dtu.dk/. |
Las actividades que se engloban dentro de este programa son muy variadas. A continuación, se describe brevemente su metodología:
1. Avistamientos sistemáticos mediante visitas regulares a determinados puntos a lo largo de la costa. Estos permiten evaluar las variaciones estacionales, además de las interanuales, en lo que se refiere a presencia y abundancia relativa.
2. Avistamientos oportunistas de cetáceos y tortugas cuya información asociada será recopilada por diversas instituciones. Como por ejemplo los posibles avistamientos de cetáceos realizados desde las aeronaves de Inspección Pesquera del MAPA.
3. Marcado, utilizando varios tipos de marcas que permiten el seguimiento de los individuos, desde las que archivan la información y luego deben ser recuperadas, a las de posicionamiento por satélite que permiten un seguimiento de los ejemplares en tiempo casi real.
4. Biopsias, que a diferencia de la toma de muestras de animales varados (recogida en MT-5) permiten controlar en el tiempo y el espacio el muestreo y la calidad de las muestras, al ser obtenidas de individuos vivos. Los protocolos de análisis del material genético, contaminantes, ácidos grasos, isótopos estables y otros marcadores naturales obtenidos a partir de esta técnica han sido ya desarrollados y consensuados internacionalmente.
5. Como complemento a las metodologías de foto-identificación y “distance sampling”, se utilizarán métodos de acústica pasiva, en coordinación con las labores de seguimiento del ruido submarino (D11) encuadradas en los programas de seguimiento RS. Los dispositivos utilizados serán hidrófonos con un dispositivo de grabación asociado y un software que permite procesar e identificar las señales bioacústicas recibidas en el mar. El fondeo de hidrófonos es una técnica no invasiva que puede ser utilizada para clasificar los mamíferos marinos presentes, detectar patrones de migración o estimar la densidad de población de diferentes especies de cetáceos. |
Se utilizarán dos técnicas para determinar la abundancia absoluta de las poblaciones:
a. Captura-marca-recaptura (utilizando marcas naturales) basada en la foto-identificación individual de los ejemplares y siguiendo el diseño de muestreo denominado “Robust Design approach”.
b. Campañas de conteo de individuos a lo largo de transectos lineares predefinidos, utilizando la metodología “distance sampling” para estima de abundancia y densidad, usando como plataforma de observación embarcaciones o aeronaves.
La elección de una técnica u otra depende de la extensión del área a monitorizar, el tamaño de la población y el grado de residencia de los individuos.
En el caso de las tortugas, estas campañas se realizarán preferiblemente con aeronave y será necesario disponer además de información sobre el tiempo que pasan en superficie para cada demarcación marina (zona nerítica) mediante telemetría satelital.
En el caso de la tortuga verde (Chelonia mydas), en la demarcación canaria, se realizarán campañas específicas en las localidades conocidas por presencia de esta especie, que podrán requerir inmersiones (equipo autónomo o snorkel). También se utilizará la foto-identificación, mediante la toma de fotos de las escamas cefálicas durante las inmersiones. Así mismo, se podrá explorar el uso de drones para el conteo de ejemplares.
La foto-identificación será la técnica a utilizar en las unidades de gestión UG2, UG4, UG6, UG8 y UG24 (Tursiops truncatus) y UG18 (Orcinus orca). Para el resto de las UG se realizarán campañas basadas en el conteo de individuos a lo largo de transectos predefinidos. En ambos casos, se recopilará información sobre la presencia y número de tortugas.
Además, y teniendo en cuenta la frecuencia de muestreo (trienal) de las campañas dedicadas a lo largo de transectos y los requerimientos temporales de la Directiva, se hará uso de la información de avistamientos sistemáticos proporcionada por el equipo de observadores a bordo de las campañas oceanográficas del IEO de prospección de recursos marinos. El análisis de esta información proporcionará estimas de densidad de las especies en las demarcaciones marinas, a mayores de entender qué factores determinan los patrones de distribución y el solapamiento con presiones antropogénicas como puede ser la pesca, ruido, etc.
Ver información completa en https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/costas/temas/proteccion-medio-marino/estrategias-marinas/ |
Se utilizarán dos técnicas para determinar la abundancia absoluta de las poblaciones:
a. Captura-marca-recaptura basada en la foto-identificación individual de los ejemplares y siguiendo el diseño de muestreo denominado “Robust Design approach”.
b. Campañas de conteo de individuos a lo largo de transectos lineares predefinidos, utilizando la metodología “distance sampling” para estima de abundancia y densidad, usando como plataforma de observación embarcaciones o aeronaves.
La elección de una técnica u otra depende de la extensión del área a monitorizar, el tamaño de la población y el grado de residencia de los individuos. La foto-identificación será la técnica a utilizar en las unidades de gestión UG15 (Globicephala melas), UG20 (Physeter macrocephalus), UG26 (Globicephala macrorhynchus) y UG27 y UG28 (Ziphius cavirostris).
Para el resto de las unidades se realizarán campañas basadas en el conteo de individuos a lo largo de transectos predefinidos. Estas campañas serán llevadas a cabo desde embarcación o aeronave basando la decisión entre una u otra plataforma en criterios de accesibilidad y económicos.
En el caso de las tortugas, será necesario disponer además de información sobre el tiempo que pasan en superficie para cada demarcación (zonas oceánicas) mediante telemetría satelital.
Además, y teniendo en cuenta la frecuencia de muestreo (trienal) de las campañas dedicadas a lo largo de transectos y los requerimientos temporales de la Directiva, se hará uso de la información de avistamientos sistemáticos proporcionada por el equipo de observadores a bordo de las campañas oceanográficas del IEO de prospección de recursos marinos. El análisis de esta información proporcionará estimas de densidad de las especies en las demarcaciones marinas, a mayores de entender qué factores determinan los patrones de distribución y el solapamiento con presiones antropogénicas como puede ser la pesca, ruido, etc.
También se incorporará la información resultante de las actividades de seguimiento realizadas sistemáticamente por los gobiernos y entidades de carácter autonómico o local que compartan sus datos con el MITERD. Tal es el caso del seguimiento mediante foto-identificación del rorcual común (Balaenoptera physalus) realizado por la Generalitat de Catalunya [...]
Ver información completa en https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/costas/temas/proteccion-medio-marino/estrategias-marinas/ |
Siguiendo las recomendaciones del ICES WG sobre bycatch, y otras iniciativas, se considera necesario realizar una evaluación de riesgo para identificar aquellos segmentos de la flota/áreas/períodos de tiempo con un mayor riesgo de captura accidental de cetáceos y tortugas. Esta evaluación de riesgo se llevará a cabo siguiendo la metodología empleada internacionalmente (e.g. ISO) e incluirá una determinación de la probabilidad de la interacción entre la actividad pesquera y los cetáceos/tortugas con base en:
a. el solapamiento espacial/temporal entre mapas de esfuerzo y de densidad de las diferentes especies;
b. y la información proveniente de otras fuentes (entrevistas, varamientos, bibliografía, observadores, diarios de pesca, etc.).
Tomando como base los resultados obtenidos en esta evaluación, se diseñará un programa de muestreo que consistirá en:
1. La monitorización de la actividad de la flota mediante observadores a bordo (coordinación con el Programa Nacional de Datos Básicos y mediante observadores específicos con un objetivo doble, obtener información del nivel de interacción a escala global y obtener estimas fiables en aquellos métiers identificados como prioritarios). El programa de observadores se adaptará para cubrir aquellas flotas pesqueras con mayor incidencia de capturas adicionales, de acuerdo al análisis del riesgo realizado.
2. Los datos procedentes de las anotaciones en los diarios de pesca y la evaluación de la posibilidad de establecer sistemas de cámaras a bordo, para lograr una mayor cobertura del esfuerzo (con su eficacia testada mediante el proyecto piloto).
3. Entrevistas a patrones y pescadores, para establecer una cooperación efectiva con el sector, identificar flotas/artes adicionales con altos niveles de interacciones y facilitar la búsqueda de medidas de mitigación.
El diseño de muestreo pretende asegurar una cobertura suficiente para ser representativo y obtener estimas fiables de captura accidental en el conjunto de la demarcación. |
El programa contará con:
1. una base de datos a nivel estatal para la recopilación y unificación de los datos relacionados con varamientos que hayan sido notificados a los sistemas regionales de gestión de varamientos;
2. un protocolo consistente de respuesta ante un varamiento y sus posibles respuestas (reflote, rehabilitación, eutanasia, necropsia y/o recolección de muestras) basado en directrices internacionales;
3. la recolección, almacenamiento y análisis de las muestras;
4. y el asesoramiento científico a las autoridades relevantes.
El programa de toma de muestras se estructura con diferentes niveles de muestreo, dependiendo del estado |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Se recopilará la información entre las unidades administrativas competentes en cada uno de los indicadores asociadas a los objetivos. |
Ce programme consiste à recenser les échouages de mammifères marins ainsi qu'à collecter des données biométriques et des échantillons de tissus par les correspondants du RNE. L'échantillonnage se fait de manière continue tout au long de l'année et sur l'ensemble du littoral des quatre sous-régions marines. En fonction de l'état de l'animal, un examen externe (pour relever des traces de captures accidentelles par exemple), des prélèvements ou une autopsie vétérinaire peuvent être réalisés et ainsi renseigner sur les causes probables de la mort. Pour le deuxième cycle, les travaux de développement méthodologique à partir de ces données se poursuivront, notamment pour affiner l'estimation des mortalités liées aux captures accidentelles. Il est également prévu de mettre en place une stratégie d'analyse des causes de mortalité au moyen d'un protocole d'autopsie applicable aux animaux échoués frais afin notamment d'identifier les causes de mortalité autres que les captures accidentelles. |
Pour ce sous-programme, un seul dispositif de surveillance existant dans le cadre de la politique commune des pêches (PCP) permet de collecter des données ponctuelles de captures accidentelles de mammifères marins et tortues marines : le dispositif « Observation des captures en mer (OBSMER) ». Mis en œuvre par la Direction des pêches maritimes et de l'aquaculture, ce suivi consiste en des observations d'animaux capturés accidentellement effectuées tout au long de l'année par des observateurs embarqués sur des navires de pêche volontaires de plus de 12m, sur l'ensemble des côtes métropolitaines, selon une stratégie d'échantillonnage élaborée pour l'évaluation des captures et rejets d'espèces commerciales. Les données ponctuelles de captures accidentelles d'oiseaux marins, de mammifères marins et de tortues marines, relevées en parallèle, pourraient alimenter l'évaluation de l'impact de la pêche sur l'état des populations |
Ce programme consiste à recenser les échouages de mammifères marins ainsi qu'à collecter des données biométriques et des échantillons de tissus par les correspondants du RNE. L'échantillonnage se fait de manière continue tout au long de l'année et sur l'ensemble du littoral des quatre sous-régions marines. En fonction de l'état de l'animal, un examen externe (pour relever des traces de captures accidentelles par exemple), des prélèvements ou une autopsie vétérinaire peuvent être réalisés et ainsi renseigner sur les causes probables de la mort. Pour le deuxième cycle, les travaux de développement méthodologique à partir de ces données se poursuivront, notamment pour affiner l'estimation des mortalités liées aux captures accidentelles. Il est également prévu de mettre en place une stratégie d'analyse des causes de mortalité au moyen d'un protocole d'autopsie applicable aux animaux échoués frais afin notamment d'identifier les causes de mortalité autres que les captures accidentelles. |
Pour ce sous-programme, un seul dispositif de surveillance existant dans le cadre de la politique commune des pêches (PCP) permet de collecter des données ponctuelles de captures accidentelles de mammifères marins et tortues marines : le dispositif « Observation des captures en mer (OBSMER) ». Mis en œuvre par la Direction des pêches maritimes et de l'aquaculture, ce suivi consiste en des observations d'animaux capturés accidentellement effectuées tout au long de l'année par des observateurs embarqués sur des navires de pêche volontaires de plus de 12m, sur l'ensemble des côtes métropolitaines, selon une stratégie d'échantillonnage élaborée pour l'évaluation des captures et rejets d'espèces commerciales. Les données ponctuelles de captures accidentelles d'oiseaux marins, de mammifères marins et de tortues marines, relevées en parallèle, pourraient alimenter l'évaluation de l'impact de la pêche sur l'état des populations |
Ce programme consiste à recenser les échouages de mammifères marins ainsi qu'à collecter des données biométriques et des échantillons de tissus par les correspondants du RNE. L'échantillonnage se fait de manière continue tout au long de l'année et sur l'ensemble du littoral des quatre sous-régions marines. En fonction de l'état de l'animal, un examen externe (pour relever des traces de captures accidentelles par exemple), des prélèvements ou une autopsie vétérinaire peuvent être réalisés et ainsi renseigner sur les causes probables de la mort. Pour le deuxième cycle, les travaux de développement méthodologique à partir de ces données se poursuivront, notamment pour affiner l'estimation des mortalités liées aux captures accidentelles. Il est également prévu de mettre en place une stratégie d'analyse des causes de mortalité au moyen d'un protocole d'autopsie applicable aux animaux échoués frais afin notamment d'identifier les causes de mortalité autres que les captures accidentelles. |
Pour ce sous-programme, un seul dispositif de surveillance existant dans le cadre de la politique commune des pêches (PCP) permet de collecter des données ponctuelles de captures accidentelles de mammifères marins et tortues marines : le dispositif « Observation des captures en mer (OBSMER) ». Mis en œuvre par la Direction des pêches maritimes et de l'aquaculture, ce suivi consiste en des observations d'animaux capturés accidentellement effectuées tout au long de l'année par des observateurs embarqués sur des navires de pêche volontaires de plus de 12m, sur l'ensemble des côtes métropolitaines, selon une stratégie d'échantillonnage élaborée pour l'évaluation des captures et rejets d'espèces commerciales. Les données ponctuelles de captures accidentelles d'oiseaux marins, de mammifères marins et de tortues marines, relevées en parallèle, pourraient alimenter l'évaluation de l'impact de la pêche sur l'état des populations |
Use of opportunistic public sighting and stranding records for marine reptiles and mammals |
Monitoring aims to provide insight into both the size and composition of the bycatch. The data collection is designed to help achieve the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The necessary monitoring of incidental bycatch is prescribed at EU level in Regulation 2017/1004, by virtue of which the monitoring of bycatch of all species, and particularly protected species, falls under the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF) since 2017. |
The assessment is linked to reporting for the Habitats Directive and is based on expert judgement. In that context, as far as possible data on population trends (see D1C2), ecological key factors (such as availability of food) and important pressure factors (see D1C1, D6C2, D8, D10 and D11) are used. |
Metodologias acordadas e validadas no âmbito dos projetos MISTIC SEAS e MISTIC SEAS II |
Na subdivisão do Continente, a recolha de dados de mamíferos marinhos em plataformas de oportunidade seguirá a metodologia "Distance Sampling" ou "European Seabirds At Sea". Os dados acústicos serão adquiridos por estações sísmicas de fundo oceânico (OBS), através da detecção da vocalização de algumas espécies. Relativamente aos censos de aves marinhas a partir da costa, estes baseiam-se na observação e registo de indivíduos a partir de terra, em locais fixos e estratégicos da costa continental. Os dados obtidos são expressos em número de aves/hora.
Na subdivisão dos Açores, a recolha de dados no âmbito do projeto LIFE IP Azores Natura e do programa de observação de megafauna baseia-se na realização de transetos visuais estandardizados de 15min para os grupos funcionais cetáceos e répteis e 10min para as aves, várias vezes ao dia, aleatoriamente, tendo esta metodologia sido adaptadas das metodologias Distance sampling (cetáceos+répteis) e ESAS (aves marinhas). Relativamente às observações a partir de vigias em terra serão utilizados binóculos, câmaras digitais e teodolitos para registo georreferenciado de observações no mar, com base em protocolos definidos por peritos. Relativamente às estimativas de abundância de tartaruga-verde (Chelonia mydas) pretende-se desenhar e implementar uma metodologia baseada em ciência cidadã, através de i) a aplicação de inquéritos a utilizadores do Mar dos Açores de todas as ilhas (ex. mergulhadores e caçadores submarinos) que reportem avistamentos da espécie e ii) a capacitação de utilizadores do Mar dos Açores para participarem num programa de marcação (marcas convencionais) de tartaruga-verde.
A campanha SOS Cagarro contribui com dados adicionais tais como: georreferenciação das quedas de aves para identificar locais de maior impacto; registo de presença de predadores introduzidos nos locais de queda; identificação da condição corporal das aves caídas; registos biométricos e anilhagem, que contribuem para o conhecimento da ecologia da espécie. |
Line transect sampling, distance sampling.
No caso do D1C5, adotar-se-á a metodologia seguida no relatório do 2º ciclo em que, para espécies com pouca informação, se assumiu que a área do habitat é equivalente à área de distribuição da espécie, uma vez que apresentam uma mobilidade muito elevada. |
Ver "Monitoring Details" |
https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wp/2020-2021 |
The collection of huntingstatistics is largely based on feedback from the hunters themselves. For example, decisions on predator control and license hunting often require reporting to the decision-making authority as soon as possible after animals have been shot in connection with the hunt. The compilation of statistics in the database ”Viltdata” is largely based on the hunters voluntarily reporting killed animals to the database. |
Catches and by-catches are monitored with the help of observers who accompany the fishing vessels during commercial fishing. The regular sampling is divided into area, fisheries and quarters. This means that observations are made every quarter from different types of bottom trawls (shrimp trawl, crayfish trawl with grate, trawl without grate). Usually, in the order of 0.5-2% (different for different types of fisheries) of commercial fishing trips are observed. The fishing trips observed are selected at random. Observations of by-catch within the framework of the pilot studies are carried out in the same manner. The observers examine the entire process during which the fishing gear is hauled so that also by-catches that do not follow on board but fall out of the nets can be registered. Furthermore, the observers examine the entire sorting of the catch. The observers then measure and weigh the catch and take samples for biological analysis. Remote surveillance using cameras onboard is being tested during 2020, and may supplement the monitoring in the future. |
Monitoring of Harbour porpoises in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, is performed with two major methods - line transect through aircraft monitoring and a static acoustic methods. The monitoring methods used will be described in 2020.
Aircraft are used to count the number of porpoises along predetermined transects. The method is suitable for high densities. With acoustic methods, Harbour porpoise sounds are recorded either by stationary click detectors that are placed in specific places during a specific period to collect sound, or by hydrophones that are towed after a ship.
Within SCANS and SCANS II projects, line taxation was mainly used by aircraft and boat, while SCANS III was only carried out with flight inventory in Swedish waters. Acoustic methods were used to complement the visual observations during SCANS and SCANS-II.
The SAMBAH project used static acoustic methods with click detectors (C-POD) to monitor the distribution and occurrence of Harbour porpoises in the Baltic Sea. |
All three seal species are monitored using either helicopter (grey seal) or fixed wing aircrafts (Harbour seal and Ringed seal) in combination with surveylance camera and visual observation. Al three monitoring methods will be described in 2020. |
"https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/vagledningar/ovriga-vagledningar/undersokningstyper-for-miljoovervakning/undersokningstyper/patologi-hos-grasal-vikaresal-och-knubbsal.html
Selected harbour porpoises are examined at the laboratories of the Swedish Veterinary Institute in collaboration with the staff of the Swedish Museum of Natural History.
During inspection before autopsy, the following biological data are noted:
Sex, external dimensions, weight, any damage to the body,
During autopsy the following biological data are noted:
Nutrient condition / blubber thickness, sexual maturity, pregnancy, external damage, including any damage from human activities (eg fishing nets), organ damage, including microscopic examination and X-ray if necessary, infectious substances, parasites and other diseases, stomach contents, age
" |
|||||||||
Quality control |
Unknown
|
|| MP_181 || BSH, 2013: Standard - Untersuchung der Auswirkungen von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen auf die Meeresumwelt (StUK 4)
|
|| MP_186 || Methoden-Standards TWSC
|
|| MP_182 || Methoden-Standards TWSC
|
|| MP_187 || Methoden-Standards TWSC
|
|| MP_181 || BSH, 2013: Standard - Untersuchung der Auswirkungen von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen auf die Meeresumwelt (StUK 4)
|
|| MP_186 || Methoden-Standards TWSC
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
I Danmark kvalitetssikres størstedelen af de danske overvågningsdata i den nationale database (VanDa) ved tre kvalitetssikringsniveauer:
1. Elektronisk kontrol – den automatiske kontrol alle indtastninger undergår, når der registreres data i VanDa
2. Faglig kontrol – automatisk/manuel vurdering a...
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af metoder for indsamling af fiskeriafhængige data. DTU Aqua har ansvar for en fornøden grad af kvalitetssikring, deres projekter.
Alt data indsamlet bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
Fiskerikontrollen varetager kvalitetssikring af indrapporterede bifangster.
|
DTU Aqua deltager i internationale arbejdsgrupper omkring kvalitetssikring og ensretning af de standard moniteringstogter som der gennemføres. Det er altid personale fra DTU Aqua der deltager på togterne og kvalitetssikre data. Alt data indsamlet på togterne bliver indtastet og gemt i DTU Aquas databaser.
|
Otros estándares: muy variable, desde avistamientos oportunistas a dependiendo del tipo de estudio, otro tipo de metodología.
Otros controles de calidad: desde avistamientos oportunistas a dependiendo del tipo de estudios, a otro tipo de metodología.
|
Otros estándares: uso de metodología estandarizada que sigue las recomendaciones de los grupos de expertos internacionales, por ejemplo, el ICES.
Otros controles de calidad: seguimiento de los resultados y monitorización continuada.
|
Otros estándares: uso de metodología estandarizada que sigue las recomendaciones de los grupos de expertos internacionales, por ejemplo, el ICES.
Otros controles de calidad: seguimiento de los resultados y monitorización continuada.
|
Otros estándares: uso de metodología estandarizada que sigue las Recomendaciones de los grupos de expertos internacionales, p. ej. ICES.
Otros controles de calidad: seguimiento de los resultados y monitorización continuada.
|
Otros estándares: uso de metodología estandarizada que sigue las Recomendaciones de los grupos de expertos internacionales, p. ej. ICES.
Otros controles de calidad: seguimiento de los resultados y monitorización continuada.
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Internal controls will be implemented to review documentation by the Responsible Authority (MITERD, through the Subdirectorate-General for the Protection of the Sea).
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-011). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont collectées dans le cadre du réseau national échouages coordonné par Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Harmonie et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-011). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-004 et OPS-005). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-011). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont collectées dans le cadre du réseau national échouages coordonné par Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Harmonie et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-011). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-004 et OPS-005). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont contrôlées annuellement selon la méthode OSPAR (voir OSP-011). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins) et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont collectées dans le cadre du réseau national échouages coordonné par Pelagis (Observatoire des mammifères et oiseaux marins). Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Pelagis et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Les données sont bancarisées dans la base de données Harmonie et sont contrôlées/qualifiées.
|
Monitoring data is quality controlled by experts in the statutory nature conservation authority (National Parks and Wildlife Service [NPWS], Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage) and partner agencies (e.g. Inland Fisheries Ireland, Marine Institute), by their external contractor organisations as commissioned, and by regional reporting domains (e.g. OSPAR). |
EU Data Collection Framework (DCF)
|
"Various monitoring networks are operational for monitoring marine mammals, for which quality control is organized in different ways. For the aircraft counts carried out under the MWTL, certified contractors (ISO 9001) are used. The counts are therefore performed in accordance with the established protocols. In addition, trend calculations are performed on the basis of the data, whereby the plausibility of the data obtained is assessed. Every year a report is drawn up on the monitoring carried out.
The aircraft counts on the DCS on behalf of LNV are carried out by WMR. These counts are performed by experienced researchers according to strict protocols. This guarantees the quality of the collected data as well as possible.
Seal counts are carried out in the Wadden Sea and the Delta. Both measurement programs are carried out by experienced researchers. The counting results form the basis for trend calculations. The collected data is assessed for plausibility. The quality of the data is guaranteed as well as possible with this process. |
Various monitoring surveys are operational for marine mammals, for which quality control is organized in different ways. For the aircraft counts carried out under the MWTL, certified contractors (ISO 9001) are used. The counts are therefore performed in accordance with the established protocols. In addition, trend calculations are performed on the basis of the data, whereby the plausibility of the data obtained is assessed. Every year a report is drawn up on the monitoring carried out.
The aircraft counts on the DCS on behalf of LNV are carried out by WMR. These counts are performed by experienced researchers according to strict protocols. This guarantees the quality of the collected data as well as possible.
Seal counts are carried out in the Wadden Sea and the Delta. Both measurement programs are carried out by experienced researchers. The counting results form the basis for trend calculations. The collected data are assessed for plausibility. The quality of the data is guaranteed as well as possible with this process.
Geelhoed S.C.V. & Scheidat M. (2013) Monitoring harbour porpoise abundance and distribution in Dutch waters. Report C162/13, IMARES, The Netherlands.
Hammond P.S., Lacey C., Gilles A., Viquerat S., Börjesson P., Herr H., Macleod K., Ridoux V., Santos M.B., Scheidat M., Teilmann J., Vingada J. & Øien N. (2017) Estimates of cetacean abundance in European Atlantic waters in summer 2016 from the SCANS-III aerial and shipboard surveys. |
Seal counts are carried out in the Wadden Sea and the Delta. Both programs are carried out by experienced researchers. The counting results form the basis for trend calculations. The collected data are assessed for plausibility.
reference:
Galatius A., Brasseur S., Cremer J., Czeck R., Jensen L.F., Armin J., Körber P., Pund R., Siebert U., Teilmann J. & Klöpper S. (2018)
Trilateral Seal Expert Group (TSEG). Aerial surveys of Harbour Seals in the Wadden Sea in 2018. Another record year for pups. CWSS,
Willemshaven. |
Validação dos dados por peritos; aplicação de protocolos uniformizados e comuns entre subdivisões.
|
Revisão e validação por peritos.
|
De acordo com protocolos internacionais. Revisão e validação por peritos.
|
A recolha de dados segue protocolos pré-estabelecidos a nível sub-regional.
|
https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ars/2019
|
In order to assess the reliability of the hunting statistics, the responsible authority can check that the statistics do not deviate in any improbable way. Furthermore, the various reporting requirements and the design of the decisions constitute a quality assurance in itself. |
Sampling takes place through a random selection of ships/voyages. The observers bring with them a manual for determining the species of birds and also photograph captured birds as much as possible. Data is registered in the national database Fiskdata2 according to the updated manual. Data is examined and checked in several respects. Quality assurance includes control reading routines of entered data against protocols, automatic quality control of data within the database and manual quality control of data (identification of outliers). |
As harbour porpoises move over large areas, coordinated monitoring is a prerequisite for obtaining a correct assessment of the population's distribution and abundance. The monitoring of harbour porpoise is therefore coordinated between the countries concerned. |
As seals move over large areas, coordinated monitoring is a prerequisite for obtaining a correct assessment of the population's distribution and abundance. The monitoring of seals is therefore coordinated between the countries concerned. |
Autopsies or organ examinations are performed by a veterinarian or biologist with experience in the field of veterinary medical pathology and, if necessary, in collaboration with the Swedish National Veterinary Institute (SVA). Laboratory analyzes are performed by Swedac-accredited laboratories. |
Data management |
The data is registered in ICES' seal database and transmitted annually via BMDC's Data Tracking System, which makes it publicly accessible via RBINS' metadata catalogue (http://metadata.naturalsciences.be). |
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), wei...
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data t...
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), wei...
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), wei...
|
Die Bund/Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nord- und Ostsee (BLANO) erarbeitet gerade ein nationales Konzept zum Datenmanagement, um insbesondere die Berichterstattung und Umsetzung der MSRL zu unterstützen. Dabei werden bestehende Zielsysteme, wie die Datenabgabe an den ICES (für OSPAR und HELCOM), wei...
|
The Federal Government/Länder Working Group on the North Sea and the Baltic Sea (BLANO) is currently developing a national data management plan to support, in particular, the reporting and implementation of the MSFD. It takes into account existing target systems, such as the submission of data t...
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
I Danmark udvikles der lige nu en ny national database, som har til formål at samle og opbevare data fra vandmiljøovervågningen – herunder også overvågningen under havstrategien. Databasen forventes færdigudviklet i første halvår 2021. Efter en kvalitetssikring vil data blive gjort offentligt tilgængelige.
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
Afin de référencer les dispositifs de collecte et de surveillance, les données répertoriées dans le cadre de la DCSMM sont intégrées dans les systèmes d'information de la DCSMM (en particulier le référencement des métadonnées). Elles sont également remises à disposition (sous réserve des droits d...
|
The NPWS and Inland Fisheries Ireland actively conduct, and also commission, the majority of data acquisition under the Habitats Directive & Birds Directive Monitoring Programme. External contractor organisations play an important role in data collection and data management, including the quality control and quality assurance processes associated with such data. The NPWS and Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage encourage the free dissemination of biodiversity data and aim to publish their data holdings into the future, where possible, as Open Data licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. Publicly available datasets are available via the NPWS website (see below).
Summary discovery metadata for Government data-related projects are also published and updated at the following public sector online data catalogues: . Irish Spatial Data Exchange . Irish Government Open Data Portal |
www.ices.dk
|
Marine Information and Data Centre
|
Marine Information and Data Centre
|
Statistics on killed animals in predator control and license hunting are available from the respective responsible authority and can be made available on request. Statistics on license and general hunting can be found in the Swedish Hunters' Association's database ”Viltdata”. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Data access |
www.ices.dk,www.ospar.org |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related indicator/name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact |
Jan Haelters, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Science (RBINS) |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Geschäftsstelle Meeresschutz, geschaeftsstelle-meeresschutz@mu.niedersachsen.de |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
Miljøstyrelsen Fyn
lotkn@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
lotkn@mst.dk
masjo@mst.dk |
Fiskeristyrelsen
mail@fiskeristyrelsen.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
lotkn@mst.dk
masjo@mst.dk |
DTU Aqua
aqua@aqua.dtu.dk
Miljøstyrelsen
lotkn@mst.dk
masjo@mst.dk |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
GUICHARD Benjamin |
Oliver Ó Cadhla, Oliver.OCadhla@housing.gov.ie |
https://www.informatiehuismarien.nl/uk/secundaire-navigatie/contact/ |
https://www.informatiehuismarien.nl/uk/secundaire-navigatie/contact/ |
Subdivisão da Madeira: Secretaria Regional de Mar e Pescas / Direção Regional do Mar (SRMar/DRM)
Subdivisão dos Açores: Secretaria Regional do Mar e das Pescas / Direção Regional dos Assuntos do Mar (SRMP/DRAM) |
Subdivisão do Continente: Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, I.P. (ICNF), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. (IPMA)
Subdivisão dos Açores: Secretaria Regional do Mar e das Pescas/Direção Regional dos Assuntos do Mar (SRMP/DRAM) |
Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, I.P. (ICNF)
Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. (IPMA) |
Subdivisão dos Açores: Direção Regional dos Assuntos do Mar (DRAM) - Secretaria Regional do Mar e das Pescas (SRMP)
Subdivisão do Continente: Rede Nacional de Arrojamentos (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, ICNF)
Subdivisão da Madeira: Secretaria Regional de Mar e Pescas / Direção Regional do Mar (SRMar/DRM); Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e Alterações Climáticas/ Instituto das Florestas e Conservação da Natureza, IP-RAM (IFCN); Museu da Baleia da Madeira (MBM); Estação de Biologia do Funchal – Câmara Municipal do Funchal |
Subdivisão da Madeira: Secretaria Regional de Mar e Pescas/Direção Regional do Mar (SRMar/DRM)
Subdivisão dos Açores: Secretaria Regional do Mar e das Pescas/Direção Regional dos Assuntos do Mar (SRMP/DRAM)
Subdivisão do Continente: Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P. (IPMA), Direção Geral de Recursos Naturais, Segurança e Serviços Marítimos (DGRM), Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, I.P. (ICNF) |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
miljoovervakning@havochvatten.se |
|||||||||
References |
|| MP_181 || --# https://www.bsh.de/DE/PUBLIKATIONEN/_Anlagen/Downloads/Offshore/Standards/Standard-Auswirkungen-Offshore-Windenergieanlagen-Meeresumwelt.html #-- |
|| MP_186 || --# https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/sites/default/files/2018-22_Seal%20management%20plan.pdf #-- |
|| MP_182 || --# https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/sites/default/files/2018-22_Seal%20management%20plan.pdf #-- |
|| MP_187 || --# https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/sites/default/files/2018-22_Seal%20management%20plan.pdf #-- |
|| MP_181 || --# https://www.bsh.de/DE/PUBLIKATIONEN/_Anlagen/Downloads/Offshore/Standards/Standard-Auswirkungen-Offshore-Windenergieanlagen-Meeresumwelt.html #-- |
|| MP_186 || --# https://www.waddensea-worldheritage.org/sites/default/files/2018-22_Seal%20management%20plan.pdf #-- |
Laran, S., Authier, M., Blanck, A., Dorémus, G., Falchetto, H., Monestiez, P., et al. (2017b). Seasonal distribution and abundance of cetaceans within French waters: Part II: the Bay of Biscay and the English channel. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 141, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.012 |
Dars C., Dabin W., Demaret F., Meheust E., Méndez-Fernandez P., Peltier H., Spitz J., Caurant F. & Van Canneyt O. 2019. Les échouages de mammifères marins sur le littoral français en 2019. Rapport scientifique de l'Observatoire Pelagis, La Rochelle Université et CNRS. 41 pages. |
Peltier, H., Beaufils, A., Cesarini, C., Dabin, W., Dars, C., Demaret, F., Dhermain, F., Doremus, G., Labach, H., Van Canneyt, O. & J. Spitz (2019) Monitoring of Marine Mammal Strandings Along French Coasts Reveals the Importance of Ship Strikes on Large Cetaceans: A Challenge for the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:486. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00486 Peltier, H., Authier, M., Dabin, W., Dars, C., Demaret, F., Doremus, G., Van Canneyt, O., Laran, S., Mendez-Fernandez, P, Spitz, J., Daniel, P. & V. Ridoux (2020). Can modelling the drift of bycaught dolphin stranded carcasses help identify involved fisheries? An exploratory study. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21: e00843. |
Gally F, Couet P, de Riedmatten L (2018) Suivi de la population des grands dauphins sédentaires en mer de la Manche. |
Vincent, C., Huon, M., Caurant, F., Dabin, W., Deniau, A., Dix-neuf, S., Dupuis, L., Elder, J.-F., Fremau, M.-H., Hassani, S., Hemon, A., Karpouzopoulos, J., Lefeuvre, C., McConnell, B.J., Moss, S.E.W., Provost, P., Spitz, J., Turpin, Y. & V. Ridoux (2017) Grey and harbour seals in France: distribution at sea, connectivity and trends in abundance at haulout sites. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 141:294-305. |
Laran, S., Authier, M., Blanck, A., Dorémus, G., Falchetto, H., Monestiez, P., et al. (2017b). Seasonal distribution and abundance of cetaceans within French waters: Part II: the Bay of Biscay and the English channel. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 141, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.012 |
Dars C., Dabin W., Demaret F., Meheust E., Méndez-Fernandez P., Peltier H., Spitz J., Caurant F. & Van Canneyt O. 2019. Les échouages de mammifères marins sur le littoral français en 2019. Rapport scientifique de l'Observatoire Pelagis, La Rochelle Université et CNRS. 41 pages. |
Peltier, H., Beaufils, A., Cesarini, C., Dabin, W., Dars, C., Demaret, F., Dhermain, F., Doremus, G., Labach, H., Van Canneyt, O. & J. Spitz (2019) Monitoring of Marine Mammal Strandings Along French Coasts Reveals the Importance of Ship Strikes on Large Cetaceans: A Challenge for the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:486. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00486 Peltier, H., Authier, M., Dabin, W., Dars, C., Demaret, F., Doremus, G., Van Canneyt, O., Laran, S., Mendez-Fernandez, P, Spitz, J., Daniel, P. & V. Ridoux (2020). Can modelling the drift of bycaught dolphin stranded carcasses help identify involved fisheries? An exploratory study. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21: e00843. |
Gally F, Couet P, de Riedmatten L (2018) Suivi de la population des grands dauphins sédentaires en mer de la Manche. |
Vincent, C., Huon, M., Caurant, F., Dabin, W., Deniau, A., Dix-neuf, S., Dupuis, L., Elder, J.-F., Fremau, M.-H., Hassani, S., Hemon, A., Karpouzopoulos, J., Lefeuvre, C., McConnell, B.J., Moss, S.E.W., Provost, P., Spitz, J., Turpin, Y. & V. Ridoux (2017) Grey and harbour seals in France: distribution at sea, connectivity and trends in abundance at haulout sites. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 141:294-305. |
Laran, S., Authier, M., Blanck, A., Dorémus, G., Falchetto, H., Monestiez, P., et al. (2017b). Seasonal distribution and abundance of cetaceans within French waters: Part II: the Bay of Biscay and the English channel. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 141, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.012 |
Dars C., Dabin W., Demaret F., Meheust E., Méndez-Fernandez P., Peltier H., Spitz J., Caurant F. & Van Canneyt O. 2019. Les échouages de mammifères marins sur le littoral français en 2019. Rapport scientifique de l'Observatoire Pelagis, La Rochelle Université et CNRS. 41 pages. |
Peltier, H., Beaufils, A., Cesarini, C., Dabin, W., Dars, C., Demaret, F., Dhermain, F., Doremus, G., Labach, H., Van Canneyt, O. & J. Spitz (2019) Monitoring of Marine Mammal Strandings Along French Coasts Reveals the Importance of Ship Strikes on Large Cetaceans: A Challenge for the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:486. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00486 Peltier, H., Authier, M., Dabin, W., Dars, C., Demaret, F., Doremus, G., Van Canneyt, O., Laran, S., Mendez-Fernandez, P, Spitz, J., Daniel, P. & V. Ridoux (2020). Can modelling the drift of bycaught dolphin stranded carcasses help identify involved fisheries? An exploratory study. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21: e00843. |
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2013) Seal depredation and bycatch in set net fisheries in Irish waters. BIM Fisheries Resource Series, Vol. 10.
Cosgrove, R., Cronin, M., Reid, D., Gosch, M., Sheridan, M., Chopin, N. & Jessopp, M. (2016) Seal bycatch in gillnet and entangling net fisheries in Irish waters. Fisheries Research 183: 192-199.
Cummins, S., Lauder, C., Lauder, A. & Tierney, T. D. (2019) The Status of Ireland’s Breeding Seabirds: Birds Directive Article 12 Reporting 2013 – 2018. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 114. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. 89pp.
Doyle, T. K. (2007) Leatherback Sea Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Irish waters. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 32. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland.
ICES. (2018) Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland. ICES CM 2018/ACOM:25. 128 pp.
ICES. (2019) Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 1:51. 163 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5563
NPWS. (2019a) The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 1: Summary Overview. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. 99pp.
NPWS (2019b). The Status of EU Protected Habitats and Species in Ireland. Volume 3: Species Assessments. Unpublished NPWS report. Edited by: Deirdre Lynn and Fionnuala O’Neill. |
Galatius A., Brasseur S., Cremer J., Czeck R., Jensen L.F., Armin J., Körber P., Pund R., Siebert U., Teilmann J. & Klöpper S. (2018) Trilateral Seal Expert Group (TSEG). Aerial surveys of Harbour Seals in the Wadden Sea in 2018. Another record year for pups. CWSS, Willemshaven. |
Buckland, S. T. T., Rexstad, E. A. A., Marques, T. A. A., and Oedekoven, C. S. S. 2015. Distance Sampling: Methods and Applications. Springer International Publishing.
Hammond, P. S. 2009. Mark–recapture. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals (Second Edition). 705-709.
Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T., Rexstad, E. A., Laake, J. L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S. L., Bishop, J. R. B., et al. 2010. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47: 5–14. |
Buckland et al 1993 Distance Sampling: estimating abundance of biological population. Oxford university press, Oxford.
Mark L. Tasker, Peter Hope Jones, Tim Dixon, Barry F. Blake, Counting Seabirds at Sea from Ships: A Review of Methods Employed and a Suggestion for a Standardized Approach, The Auk, Volume 101, Issue 3, July 1984, Pages 567–577, https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/101.3.567
https://www.lifeazoresnatura.eu/
http://www.azores.gov.pt/gra/dram-soscagarro |
INDICIT (2018). Monitoring marine litter impacts on sea turtles. Protocol for the collection of data on ingestion and entanglement in the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta Linnaeus, 1758). Deliverable D2.6 of the European project "Implementation of the indicator of marine litter impact on sea turtles and biota in Regional Sea conventions and Marine Strategy Framework Directive areas" (indicit-europa.eu). Grant agreement 11.0661/2016/748064/SUB/ENV.C2. Bruxelles. 22 pp |