Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D10 / North East Atlantic

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D10 Litter
Region/subregion North East Atlantic
Reported by Member state
Member state
Sweden
Denmark
Germany
Netherlands
Belgium
France
United Kingdom
Ireland
Spain
Portugal
Member state report
Marine reporting units MRUs used
  • ANS-SE-AA-B_Kattegatt
  • ANS-SE-AA-B_Oresund
  • ANS-SE-AA-B_Skagerrak
  • DK-TOTAL-part-ANS
  • ANSDE_MS
  • L1.2
  • ANS-BE-MS-1
  • L2.2.5
  • ABI-FR-MS-GDG-NORD
  • ABI-FR-MS-GDG-SUD
  • ACS-FR-MS-MC
  • ANS-FR-MS-MMN
  • ACS-IE-AA-001
  • ABI-ES-SD-NOR
  • ABI-ES-SD-SUD
  • AMA-ES-SD-CAN
  • ABI-PT-AA-CONT_AT
  • ABI-PT-AA-CONT_BT1
  • ABI-PT-AA-CONT_CT
  • AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Great_Meteor
  • AMA-PT-AA-PCE_Josephine
  • AMA-PT-SD-AZO
  • AMA-PT-SD-MAD
Features Species
  • Marine species (1)
Features Chemical
  • Litter in the environment (6)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (3)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (2)
  • Litter in the environment (2)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (2)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (1)
  • Litter in the environment (3)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (1)
  • Litter in the environment (12)
  • Litter in the environment (15)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (8)
  • Litter in the environment (104)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (10)
  • Litter in the environment (90)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (1)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (2)
  • Litter in the environment (9)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (6)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (9)
  • Litter in the environment (75)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (3)
Element Litter in the environment
  • D10C1 (12)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • None (1)
Element Artificial polymer materials
  • D10C2 (2)
  • D10C3 (2)
  • D10C3 (1)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • D10C3 (1)
  • D10C1 (8)
  • D10C3 (4)
  • D10C1 (9)
  • D10C2 (2)
  • D10C3 (2)
  • D10C4 (2)
Element Artificial polymer materials (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Ceramics/pottery
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Chemicals
  • D10C1 (4)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Cloth
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Cloth/textile
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (4)
  • D10C1 (8)
Element Cloth/textile (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Food waste
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Glass
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Glass/ceramics
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (4)
  • D10C1 (9)
Element Glass/ceramics (IBTS)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Glass/ceramics (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Machined wood
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Macrolitter (all)
  • D10C1 (6)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • D10C1 (3)
  • D10C1 (9)
Element Medical waste
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Metal
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • D10C1 (12)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Metal (IBTS)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Metal (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Micro-litter - Artificial polymer materials
  • D10C2 (6)
  • D10C2 (1)
Element Micro-litter - Other
  • D10C2 (4)
Element Microlitter (all)
  • D10C2 (3)
  • None (1)
Element Other litter/ micro-litter
  • D10C3 (4)
  • D10C3 (2)
  • D10C4 (2)
  • None (1)
Element Other materials
  • D10C1 (6)
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Paper/cardboard
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (8)
  • D10C1 (6)
  • D10C1 (9)
Element Plastic/polystyrene
  • D10C1 (4)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Processed/worked wood
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • D10C1 (4)
  • D10C1 (8)
Element Processed/worked wood (IBTS)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Processed/worked wood (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Rubber
  • D10C1 (1)
  • D10C1 (2)
  • D10C1 (8)
  • D10C1 (8)
Element Rubber (IBTS)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Rubber (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Sanitary waste
  • D10C1 (4)
Element Sanitary waste (beach)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element Undefined
  • D10C1 (4)
  • D10C1 (3)
  • D10C1 (8)
  • D10C3 (2)
  • D10C1 (5)
Element Undefined (IBTS)
  • D10C1 (6)
Element2
  • Fulmarus glacialis
  • Element: Ceramic pottery; ElementCode: OSPAR ID 413.
  • Element: Medical; ElementCode: OSPAR ID 415.
  • Element: Sanitary; ElementCode: OSPAR ID 414.
  • Elementcode =OSPAR ID 406; Element: Plastic polystyrene.
  • Fulmarus glacialis
  • Medical; ElementCode: OSPAR ID 415
  • Sanitary; ElementCode: OSPAR ID 414
  • Fulmarus glacialis
  • Animales orillados (mamíferos marinos)
  • Invertebrados (mejillón)
  • Calonectris borealis (Cory, 1881)
  • Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1978)
Element sources No. of elements per level
  • EU (0)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (9)
  • OSPAR (0)
  • EU (2)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • OSPAR (4)
  • EU (4)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • OSPAR (0)
  • EU (0)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • OSPAR (12)
  • EU (13)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • OSPAR (2)
  • EU (82)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • OSPAR (40)
  • EU (0)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (43)
  • OSPAR (48)
  • EU (0)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (11)
  • OSPAR (0)
  • EU (84)
  • MS in (sub)region (3)
  • National (0)
  • OSPAR (0)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D10 Litter
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D10C1 Litter (excluding micro-litter) (10.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2)
  • Amount on coastline (3)
  • Amount on seabed (3)
  • Amount on coastline (1)
  • Amount on seabed (1)
  • Amount on coastline (1)
  • Amount on seabed (1)
  • Amount on water surface (1)
  • Amount on coastline (10)
  • Amount on seabed (1)
  • Amount on water surface (1)
  • Amount on coastline (9)
  • Amount on seabed (5)
  • Amount on coastline (40)
  • Amount on seabed (24)
  • Amount on water surface (20)
  • Other - Trend in sediment (coastline) (4)
  • Other - Trend in sediment (seabed) (4)
  • Other - Trend in water (4)
  • Other - Amount on coastline 2013 (8)
  • Other - Amount on coastline 2014 (8)
  • Other - Amount on coastline 2015 (8)
  • Other - Amount on coastline 2016 (8)
  • Other - Amount on coastline 2017 (8)
  • Other - Amount on coastline 2018 (8)
  • Other - Amount on seabed 2012 (7)
  • Other - Amount on seabed 2013 (7)
  • Other - Amount on seabed 2014 (7)
  • Other - Amount on seabed 2016 (7)
  • Other - Amount on seabed 2017 (7)
  • Other - Amount on seabed 2018 (7)
  • Amount on coastline (3)
  • Amount on seabed (3)
  • Amount on water surface (3)
  • Amount on coastline (34)
  • Amount on seabed (35)
  • Amount on water surface (5)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D10C2 Micro-litter (10.1, 10.1.3)
  • Other - Not specified (3)
  • Other - Amount per kg seabed sediment (1)
  • Other - Amount per square metre for surface layer of the water column (1)
  • Other - Not specified (1)
  • Amount on water surface (2)
  • Other - Trend in water (2)
  • Amount on coastline (1)
  • Amount on coastline (3)
  • Amount on water surface (2)
  • Other - Microplásticos en sedimentos (1)
  • Amount on coastline (1)
  • Amount on water surface (1)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D10C3 Litter ingested (10.1, 10.2.1)
  • Other - Amount ingested in fish (1)
  • Other - Amount ingested in fulmars (1)
  • Mass (1)
  • Amount in biota (ingested) (1)
  • Amount in biota (ingested) (1)
  • Other - abundancia microplasticos (1)
  • Other - concentracion microplasticos (1)
  • Other - weight of litter items in digestive system (4)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D10C4 Adverse effects of litter (10.2)
  • Other - Not specified (1)
Threshold values % of parameters with values (no. of parameters)
11% (1)
0% (0)
16% (1)
100% (12)
6% (1)
0% (1)
0% (0)
0% (0)
0% (0)
Threshold value sources D10 Litter
Threshold value sources D10C1 Litter (excluding micro-litter) (10.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2)
  • National (6)
  • Other (2)
  • OSPAR (3)
  • Other (12)
  • OSPAR (9)
  • Other (12)
  • National (2)
Threshold value sources D10C2 Micro-litter (10.1, 10.1.3)
  • Other (2)
  • Other (2)
Threshold value sources D10C3 Litter ingested (10.1, 10.2.1)
  • Other (2)
  • OSPAR (1)
  • OSPAR (1)
  • OSPAR (1)
Threshold value sources D10C4 Adverse effects of litter (10.2)
Value achieved upper % of parameters with values (no. of parameters)
33% (3)
50% (3)
0% (0)
8% (1)
100% (15)
77% (78)
94% (86)
52% (9)
92% (74)
Value achieved lower % of parameters with values (no. of parameters)
0% (0)
50% (3)
0% (0)
0% (0)
13% (2)
30% (31)
6% (6)
41% (7)
5% (4)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D10 Litter
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D10C1 Litter (excluding micro-litter) (10.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2)
  • Trend of number of items per 100 metre (3)
  • Trend of number of items per square kilometre (3)
  • number of items per 100 metres on the coastline (1)
  • number of items per square kilometre (1)
  • Trend indicator (12)
  • number of items per 100 meters (9)
  • number of items per square kilometre (5)
  • no unit (12)
  • number of items per 100 meters (40)
  • number of items per square kilometre (44)
  • Items/100m (48)
  • number of items per square kilometre (42)
  • Densidad en peso (kg/km2) (1)
  • Promedio del numero de objetos por playa (3)
  • number of items per square kilometre (2)
  • items/10km2 (1)
  • number of items per 100 meters (27)
  • number of items per 100 meters (7)
  • number of items per hectare (2)
  • number of items per square kilometre (37)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D10C2 Micro-litter (10.1, 10.1.3)
  • number of items per kilogram of dry weight (1)
  • number of items per square metre (1)
  • no unit (2)
  • units/ha (2)
  • micro plastic items per kg dry weight (1)
  • Concentración promedio (mps/m2) (2)
  • number of items per kilogram (1)
  • number of items per kilogram of dry weight (3)
  • number of items per kilogram of dry weight (1)
  • number of items per square kilometer (1)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D10C3 Litter ingested (10.1, 10.2.1)
  • Amount of litter and microlitter in grams and number per individual (2)
  • gram per individual (1)
  • g (1)
  • g/individual (1)
  • gram per 1000 grams individual (2)
  • gram per 100cm individual (2)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D10C4 Adverse effects of litter (10.2)
Proportion threshold values Range of % values (no. of parameters)
Range: 10-10% (1 of 6 parameters)
Range: 100-100% (12 of 12 parameters)
Range: 90-90% (1 of 15 parameters)
Range: 100-100% (1 of 101 parameters)
Proportion values achieved Range of % values (no. of parameters)
Range: 60-60% (1 of 6 parameters)
Range: 58-58% (1 of 15 parameters)
Proportion threshold value units
% of species group adversely affected
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% of population achieving threshold value
Trends No. of trends per category
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (9 or 100.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (6 or 100.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (3 or 50.0%)
  • Unknown (3 or 50.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (12 or 100.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (1 or 6.7%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (9 or 60.0%)
  • Unknown (5 or 33.3%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (101 or 100.0%)
  • Deteriorating (32 or 35.2%)
  • Improving (36 or 39.6%)
  • Not relevant (16 or 17.6%)
  • Stable (7 or 7.7%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (1 or 5.9%)
  • Not relevant (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (3 or 17.6%)
  • Unknown (13 or 76.5%)
  • Deteriorating (7 or 8.8%)
  • Improving (5 or 6.2%)
  • Not relevant (7 or 8.8%)
  • Stable (37 or 46.2%)
  • Unknown (24 or 30.0%)
Parameters achieved No. of parameters per category
  • No (4 or 44.4%)
  • Not assessed (5 or 55.6%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (6 or 100.0%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (4 or 66.7%)
  • Not assessed (2 or 33.3%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (10 or 83.3%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (1 or 8.3%)
  • Yes (1 or 8.3%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (9 or 60.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (6 or 40.0%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (11 or 10.9%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (90 or 89.1%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (51 or 56.0%)
  • Yes (22 or 24.2%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (18 or 19.8%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (6 or 35.3%)
  • Unknown (11 or 64.7%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (54 or 67.5%)
  • Unknown (24 or 30.0%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes, based on low risk (2 or 2.5%)
Related indicators
  • ANSSE-10.1A_Skräp_stränder
  • ANSSE-10.1B_Skräp_havsbotten
  • ANS-OSPAR-BEACH_LITTER
  • ANS-OSPAR-LITTER_SEAFLOOR
  • ANS-OSPAR-PLASTIC_FULMAR
  • DK-MICRO-LITTER_FISH
  • DK-MICROPLASTIC_SEDIMENT_INNER_WATERS
  • DK-MICROPLASTIC_SURFACE_WATER
  • OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • OSPAR-COMP_SPDIST_SFLITTER
  • OSPAR-PLASTIC_FUL_STMCHS
  • ANSNL-OSPAR-D10-Plastic in stormvogels
  • ANSNL-OSPAR-D10C1 strandafval
  • ANSNL-OSPAR-D10C1-zeebodem
  • ANS-BE-COMP_SPDIST_SFLITTER
  • OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • OSPAR-PLASTIC_FUL_STMCHS
  • FR-D10-Ingestion-Birds
  • FR-D10-MicroLitter-Surface
  • OSPAR/FR-D10-Litter-Beach
  • OSPAR/FR-D10-Litter-Seafloor
  • OSPAR/FR-D10-Litter-Surface
  • D10el1
  • D10el2
  • D10el3
  • BM-flo->Basuras flotantes
  • BM-fon->Basuras en el fondo marino
  • BM-pla->Basuras en playas
  • AMA-OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
  • AMA-PT-AZO_LT_SP
  • AMA-PT-AZO_MacroLT_SB
  • AMA-PT-AZO_MacroLT_WS
  • AMA-PT-AZO_MicroLT_C
  • AMA-PT-AZO_MicroLT_WS
  • ICES_MacroLT_SB
  • OSPAR-ABU_COMP_BLITTER
Criteria status No. of criteria per category
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (5 or 55.6%)
  • Not good (4 or 44.4%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (6 or 100.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (1 or 16.7%)
  • Not good (5 or 83.3%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (12 or 100.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (15 or 100.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (21 or 17.2%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (101 or 82.8%)
  • Good (48 or 52.7%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (43 or 47.3%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (9 or 52.9%)
  • Unknown (8 or 47.1%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (2 or 2.4%)
  • Not assessed (58 or 69.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (24 or 28.6%)
Element status No. of elements per category
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (5 or 55.6%)
  • Not good (4 or 44.4%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (6 or 100.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (4 or 100.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (12 or 100.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (14 or 93.3%)
  • Unknown (1 or 6.7%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (21 or 17.2%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (101 or 82.8%)
  • Good (48 or 52.7%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (43 or 47.3%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (9 or 81.8%)
  • Unknown (2 or 18.2%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good, based on low risk (2 or 2.3%)
  • Not assessed (54 or 62.1%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (31 or 35.6%)
Integration rule type for parameters
OOAO (9 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (6 or 100.0%)
OTH (12 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (1 or 6.7%)
OOAO (14 or 93.3%)
Not relevant (4 or 3.5%)
OTH (110 or 96.5%)
Not relevant (90 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (5 or 100.0%)
Integration rule description for parameters
No integration
Based on AMO-C
Methods for integrating the parameters for assessing the status of the D10C1 criterion will be discussed at the European level during the next MSFD assessment cycle.

Methods for integrating the parameters for assessing the status of the D10C2 criterion will be discussed at the European level during the next MSFD assessment cycle.
Integration rule type for criteria
Not relevant (9 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (6 or 100.0%)
OTH (12 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (15 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (122 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (90 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (14 or 100.0%)
Integration rule description for criteria
Not relevant.
No integration
GES extent threshold
  • 100.00 (12 of 12, or 100.0%)
GES extent achieved
GES extent unit
  • Proportion of litter categories in good status (12 of 12, or 100.0%)
  • Not relevant (1 of 15, or 6.7%)
  • Proportion of litter categories in good status (14 of 15, or 93.3%)
  • Proportion of litter categories in good status (91 of 91, or 100.0%)
  • Proportion of litter categories in good status (18 of 18, or 100.0%)
GES achieved Litter in the environment
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (4)
  • Not assessed (2)
  • Unknown (2)
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (3)
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (12)
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (15)
  • Unknown (104)
  • GES achieved (90)
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (9)
  • GES achieved (2)
  • Not assessed (55)
  • Unknown (18)
GES achieved Micro-litter in the environment
  • Not assessed (3)
  • Unknown (2)
  • Not assessed (1)
  • Not assessed (4)
  • Unknown (6)
  • Unknown (1)
  • Unknown (6)
  • Not assessed (1)
  • Unknown (2)
GES achieved Litter and micro-litter in species
  • Unknown (2)
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (1)
  • Not assessed (6)
  • Unknown (2)
  • Unknown (2)
  • Not assessed (1)
  • Unknown (8)
GES achieved Marine species
  • Not assessed (1)
Assessment period
2012-2016 (9 or 100.0%)
2011-2016 (6 or 100.0%)
2009-2016 (3 or 50.0%)
2010-2015 (1 or 16.7%)
2013-2018 (1 or 16.7%)
2014-2015 (1 or 16.7%)
2009-2015 (12 or 100.0%)
2011-2016 (15 or 100.0%)
2010-2016 (86 or 70.5%)
2011-2017 (30 or 24.6%)
2013-2016 (6 or 4.9%)
2012-2018 (90 or 98.9%)
2019 (1 or 1.1%)
2012-2018 (2 or 11.8%)
2013-2018 (9 or 52.9%)
2016-2018 (6 or 35.3%)
2012-2018 (30 or 34.5%)
2013-2017 (54 or 62.1%)
2014-2018 (3 or 3.4%)
Related pressures
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (9 or 50.0%)
  • Litter in the environment (9 or 50.0%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (6 or 50.0%)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (2 or 16.7%)
  • Litter in the environment (2 or 16.7%)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (2 or 16.7%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (6 or 100.0%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (12 or 100.0%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (15 or 100.0%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (91 or 50.3%)
  • Litter in the environment (90 or 49.7%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (17 or 43.6%)
  • Input of other substances (e.g. synthetic substances, non-synthetic substances, radionuclides) - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition, acute events (11 or 28.2%)
  • Newly-introduced non-indigenous species (11 or 28.2%)
  • Input of litter (solid waste matter, including micro-sized litter) (74 or 47.4%)
  • Litter and micro-litter in species (8 or 5.1%)
  • Litter in the environment (72 or 46.2%)
  • Micro-litter in the environment (2 or 1.3%)
Related targets
1
7
3
1
4
2
52
11