Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D1-F / Baltic
Report type | Member State report to Commission |
MSFD Article | Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates) |
Report due | 2018-10-15 |
GES Descriptor | D1 Fish |
Region/subregion | Baltic |
Reported by | Member state |
Member state | Finland |
Estonia |
Latvia |
Lithuania |
Poland |
Germany |
Denmark |
Sweden |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member state report | |||||||||
Marine reporting units | MRUs used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Features | Species |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element | Abramis brama |
|
|||||||
Element | Acipenser oxyrinchus |
|
|||||||
Element | Alosa fallax |
|
|||||||
Element | Amblyraja radiata |
|
|||||||
Element | Anguilla anguilla |
|
|
||||||
Element | Belone belone |
|
|||||||
Element | Clupea harengus |
|
|||||||
Element | Clupea harengus membras |
|
|||||||
Element | Coastal fish community |
|
|
|
|
||||
Element | Coregonus albula |
|
|||||||
Element | Coregonus lavaretus |
|
|||||||
Element | Coregonus maraena |
|
|||||||
Element | Cyclopterus lumpus |
|
|||||||
Element | Demersal fish community |
|
|
||||||
Element | Enchelyopus cimbrius |
|
|||||||
Element | Esox lucius |
|
|||||||
Element | Gadus morhua |
|
|
||||||
Element | Lampetra fluviatilis |
|
|||||||
Element | Leuciscus aspius |
|
|||||||
Element | Limanda limanda |
|
|||||||
Element | Lumpenus lampretaeformis |
|
|||||||
Element | Perca fluviatilis |
|
|||||||
Element | Petromyzon marinus |
|
|||||||
Element | Platichthys flesus |
|
|
|
|||||
Element | Pleuronectes platessa |
|
|
||||||
Element | Psetta maxima (Scophthalmus maximus) |
|
|||||||
Element | Salmo salar |
|
|
|
|||||
Element | Salmo trutta trutta |
|
|
|
|||||
Element | Sander lucioperca |
|
|||||||
Element | Scophthalmus maximus [Psetta maxima] |
|
|||||||
Element | Scophthalmus rhombus |
|
|
||||||
Element | Solea solea (sin. vulgaris) |
|
|||||||
Element | Sprattus sprattus |
|
|
||||||
Element | Thymallus thymallus |
|
|||||||
Element | Trachinus draco |
|
|||||||
Element | Vimba vimba |
|
|||||||
Element | Zoarces viviparous |
|
|||||||
Element2 |
|
||||||||
Element sources | No. of elements per level |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1 Fish | ||||||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|
|
|||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
|
|
|||||
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
|
||||||
Threshold values | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
100% (2) |
100% (7) |
100% (5) |
100% (11) |
4% (5) |
0% (0) |
69% (27) |
Threshold value sources | D1 Fish | ||||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch |
|
|||||||
Threshold value sources | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Threshold value sources | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
|
|||||
Threshold value sources | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
|
|
|||||
Threshold value sources | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
|
||||||
Value achieved upper | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
100% (2) |
100% (7) |
100% (5) |
100% (11) |
10% (12) |
0% (0) |
25% (10) |
Value achieved lower | % of parameters with values (no. of parameters) | 0% (0) |
0% (0) |
28% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
7% (3) |
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1 Fish | ||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C1 Mortality rate from incidental by-catch | ||||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C2 Population abundance (1.2, 1.2.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C3 Population demographic characteristics (1.3, 1.3.1) |
|
|
||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C4 Population distributional range and pattern (1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3) |
|
|
||||||
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) | D1C5 Habitat for the species |
|
|||||||
Proportion threshold values | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 100-100% (5 of 5 parameters) |
|||||||
Proportion values achieved | Range of % values (no. of parameters) | Range: 100-100% (2 of 5 parameters) |
|||||||
Proportion threshold value units | % of population achieving threshold value |
||||||||
Trends | No. of trends per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parameters achieved | No. of parameters per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Criteria status | No. of criteria per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element status | No. of elements per category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration rule type for parameters | Not relevant (4 or 100.0%) |
THRES (7 or 100.0%) |
OOAO (3 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (2 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (6 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (39 or 100.0%) |
|||
Integration rule description for parameters |
Two Parameters were used to assess the state of the marine environment according to the D1C4 criterion: 1) Fish Community Diversity Index (Shanon Index), 2) Fish Community Trophic Index. The environmental status of the marine area was good according to the indicator “Fish Community Diversity Index (Shanon Index)” and did not achieve good according to the indicator “Fish Community Trophic Index”. After the application of the OOAO rule, the general environmental condition of the Lithuanian sea area (BAL-LT-AA-01) according to the D1C4 criterion is not good.
|
No integration rule has been applied. |
|||||||
Integration rule type for criteria | OTH (3 or 100.0%) |
OOAO (4 or 100.0%) |
OOAO (7 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (11 or 100.0%) |
OOAO (110 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (6 or 100.0%) |
Not relevant (19 or 48.7%) OOAO (20 or 51.3%) |
||
Integration rule description for criteria | No rule agreed but as all criteria indicate non-GES, it is assumed that GES is not achieved. |
There is one indicator corresponding to 2 different criteria D1C2 and D1C3. |
No integration rule has been applied. |
No integration between criteria, GES definition for coastal fish is only based on abundance. |
|||||
GES extent threshold |
|
|
|||||||
GES extent achieved |
|
||||||||
GES extent unit |
|
|
|
||||||
GES achieved | Coastal fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GES achieved | Demersal shelf fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
GES achieved | Pelagic shelf fish |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Assessment period | 2011-2016 (3 or 100.0%) |
2011-2016 (4 or 100.0%) |
2011-2016 (7 or 100.0%) |
2000-2018 (2 or 40.0%) 2012-2017 (3 or 60.0%) |
2011-2016 (11 or 100.0%) |
2012-2018 (110 or 100.0%) |
2002-2016 (2 or 33.3%) 2008-2015 (4 or 66.7%) |
2011-2016 (19 or 48.7%) 2016 (20 or 51.3%) |
|
Related pressures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related targets | 4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
11 |
3 |
9 |