Member State report / Art8 / 2018 / D5 / Mediterranean

Report type Member State report to Commission
MSFD Article Art. 8 Initial assessment (and Art. 17 updates)
Report due 2018-10-15
GES Descriptor D5 Eutrophication
Region/subregion Mediterranean
Reported by Member state
Member state
United Kingdom
Spain
France
Italy
Malta
Slovenia
Croatia
Greece
Cyprus
Member state report
Marine reporting units MRUs used
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL-ALBC1(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL-ALBC2(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL-ALBO1(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL-ALBO2(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL-ALBP1(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-ESAL-ALBP2(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVC1(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVC2(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVDE(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVMM(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVON(D5)
  • MWE-ES-SD-LEV-LEVOS(D5)
  • MWE-FR-MS-MO-LARGE
  • MWE-FR-MS-MO-MEC2016
  • MWE-FR-MS-MO-ZI
  • IT-CAS-0001
  • IT-ISCMS-0001
  • IT-NAS-0001
  • IT-SAS-0001
  • IT-WMS-0001
  • MIC-MT-MS-01
  • MAD-SI-MRU-11
  • MAD-SI-MRU-12
  • MAD-HR-MRU_2
  • MAD-HR-MRU_3
  • MAD-HR-MRU_4
  • MAD-HR-MRU_5
  • MAL-CY-MS
Features Chemical
  • Eutrophication (128)
  • Eutrophication (20)
  • Eutrophication (20)
  • Eutrophication (6)
  • Eutrophication (16)
  • Eutrophication (20)
  • Eutrophication (7)
Element Transparency
  • D5C4 (3)
  • D5C4 (2)
Element Nutrients (N, P)
  • D5C1 (4)
Element Dissolved oxygen
  • D5C5 (12)
  • D5C5 (3)
  • D5C5 (5)
  • D5C5 (1)
  • D5C5 (2)
  • D5C5 (4)
  • D5C5 (1)
Element Benthic habitats - macrophyte communities
  • D5C7 (1)
Element Chlorophyll-a
  • D5C2 (12)
  • D5C2 (3)
  • D5C2 (5)
  • D5C2 (1)
  • D5C2 (2)
  • D5C2 (4)
  • D5C2 (1)
Element DIN
  • D5C1 (12)
  • D5C1 (5)
  • D5C1 (2)
  • D5C1 (4)
Element DIP
  • D5C1 (12)
  • D5C1 (1)
  • D5C1 (2)
  • D5C1 (4)
Element Macrophyte communities
  • D5C7 (4)
Element Opportunistic macro-algae
  • D5C6 (3)
Element Photic limit
  • D5C4 (1)
Element TN
  • D5C1 (10)
  • None (2)
  • D5C1 (1)
  • D5C1 (2)
Element TP
  • D5C1 (10)
  • None (2)
  • D5C1 (5)
  • D5C1 (1)
  • D5C1 (2)
  • D5C1 (4)
Element WFD assessment nutrients - WFD assessment nutrients
  • D5C1 (2)
  • D5C1 (5)
Element2
Element sources No. of elements per level
  • BARCON (0)
  • EU (48)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (25)
  • BARCON (0)
  • EU (20)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • BARCON (0)
  • EU (10)
  • MS in (sub)region (10)
  • National (0)
  • BARCON (3)
  • EU (3)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • BARCON (0)
  • EU (16)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • BARCON (0)
  • EU (20)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (0)
  • BARCON (0)
  • EU (1)
  • MS in (sub)region (0)
  • National (6)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5 Eutrophication
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C1 Nutrient concentrations (5.1, 5.1.1)
  • Concentration in water (49)
  • Other - Concentration of DIN in water (2)
  • Other - Concentration of DIP in water (2)
  • Concentration in water (10)
  • Concentration in water (3)
  • Concentration in water (10)
  • Concentration in water (12)
  • Other - Water column NH4+ concentration (mol L-1) (1)
  • Other - Water column NO2- concentration (1)
  • Other - Water column NO3- concentration (mol L-1) (1)
  • Other - Water column PO43- concentration (mol L-1) (1)
  • Other - Water column Si44- concentration (mol L-1) (1)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C2 Chlorophyll-a concentration (5.2.1)
  • Concentration in water (11)
  • Concentration in water (3)
  • Concentration in water (5)
  • Concentration in water (1)
  • Concentration in water (2)
  • Concentration in water (4)
  • Concentration in water (1)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C3 Harmful algal blooms (5.2.4)
  • Extent (6)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C4 Photic limit (5.2.2)
  • Transparency in water (6)
  • Other - Turbidity of the water column (3)
  • Transparency in water (1)
  • Transparency in water (2)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C5 Dissolved oxygen concentration (5.3.2)
  • Concentration in water (12)
  • Concentration in water (3)
  • Concentration in water (5)
  • Concentration in water (1)
  • Concentration in water (2)
  • Concentration in water (4)
  • Concentration in water (1)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C6 Opportunistic macroalgae of benthic habitats (5.2.3)
  • Abundance (6)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C7 Macrophyte communities of benthic habitats (5.3.1)
  • Abundance (4)
  • Extent (2)
  • Other - EQR - Intertidal/mediolittoral macroalgae (1)
  • Other - EQR - Meadows (1)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) D5C8 Macrofaunal communities of benthic habitats
  • Abundance (4)
  • Extent (2)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) 5.1.2 Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus)
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) 5.2 Direct effects of nutrient enrichment
Criteria and parameters used (number of parameters) 5.3 Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment
Threshold values % of parameters with values (no. of parameters)
17% (18)
73% (11)
75% (15)
100% (6)
62% (10)
100% (20)
14% (1)
Threshold value sources D5 Eutrophication
Threshold value sources D5C1 Nutrient concentrations (5.1, 5.1.1)
  • Other (22)
  • WaterFD (6)
  • National (4)
  • National (5)
  • Other (3)
  • Other (12)
  • National (4)
Threshold value sources D5C2 Chlorophyll-a concentration (5.2.1)
  • Other (10)
  • National (2)
  • WaterFD (1)
  • WaterFD (5)
  • WaterFD (1)
  • WaterFD (4)
  • WaterFD (1)
Threshold value sources D5C3 Harmful algal blooms (5.2.4)
Threshold value sources D5C4 Photic limit (5.2.2)
  • National (2)
  • WaterFD (1)
  • Other (1)
Threshold value sources D5C5 Dissolved oxygen concentration (5.3.2)
  • National (1)
  • WaterFD (3)
  • National (5)
  • WaterFD (1)
  • Other (4)
Threshold value sources D5C6 Opportunistic macroalgae of benthic habitats (5.2.3)
Threshold value sources D5C7 Macrophyte communities of benthic habitats (5.3.1)
  • WaterFD (2)
Threshold value sources D5C8 Macrofaunal communities of benthic habitats
Threshold value sources 5.1.2 Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus)
Threshold value sources 5.2 Direct effects of nutrient enrichment
Threshold value sources 5.3 Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment
Value achieved upper % of parameters with values (no. of parameters)
26% (27)
86% (13)
45% (9)
100% (6)
56% (9)
100% (20)
0% (0)
Value achieved lower % of parameters with values (no. of parameters)
0% (0)
80% (12)
0% (0)
100% (6)
56% (9)
90% (18)
0% (0)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5 Eutrophication
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C1 Nutrient concentrations (5.1, 5.1.1)
  • micromole per litre (29)
  • micromole per litre (4)
  • micromole per litre (10)
  • micromole per litre (3)
  • microgram per litre (6)
  • micromole per litre (12)
  • micromole per litre (4)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C2 Chlorophyll-a concentration (5.2.1)
  • microgram per litre (10)
  • microgram per litre (3)
  • microgram per litre (5)
  • microgram per litre (1)
  • microgram per litre (2)
  • microgram per litre (4)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C3 Harmful algal blooms (5.2.4)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C4 Photic limit (5.2.2)
  • NTU (3)
  • metre (1)
  • metre (2)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C5 Dissolved oxygen concentration (5.3.2)
  • milligram per litre (10)
  • milligram per litre (3)
  • milligram per litre (5)
  • percentage (1)
  • milligram per litre (2)
  • milligram per litre (4)
  • milligram per litre (1)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C6 Opportunistic macroalgae of benthic habitats (5.2.3)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C7 Macrophyte communities of benthic habitats (5.3.1)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) D5C8 Macrofaunal communities of benthic habitats
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) 5.1.2 Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus)
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) 5.2 Direct effects of nutrient enrichment
Value unit/Value unit other (count of use per criterion) 5.3 Indirect effects of nutrient enrichment
Proportion threshold values Range of % values (no. of parameters)
Range: 100-100% (10 of 20 parameters)
Proportion values achieved Range of % values (no. of parameters)
Range: 3-100% (15 of 15 parameters)
Range: 93-100% (6 of 6 parameters)
Range: 75-100% (12 of 16 parameters)
Range: 100-100% (20 of 20 parameters)
Proportion threshold value units
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% of samples achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
% area of MRU achieving threshold value
Trends No. of trends per category
  • Deteriorating (4 or 3.9%)
  • Improving (2 or 2.0%)
  • Stable (24 or 23.5%)
  • Unknown (72 or 70.6%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (15 or 100.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (5 or 25.0%)
  • Stable (7 or 35.0%)
  • Unknown (8 or 40.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (3 or 50.0%)
  • Unknown (3 or 50.0%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (2 or 12.5%)
  • Stable (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (14 or 87.5%)
  • Deteriorating (0 or 0.0%)
  • Improving (0 or 0.0%)
  • Stable (20 or 100.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Deteriorating (5 or 71.4%)
  • Improving (2 or 28.6%)
  • Stable (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
Parameters achieved No. of parameters per category
  • No (19 or 18.6%)
  • Not assessed (43 or 42.2%)
  • Unknown (8 or 7.8%)
  • Yes (32 or 31.4%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (15 or 100.0%)
  • Yes (0 or 0.0%)
  • No (4 or 20.0%)
  • Not assessed (6 or 30.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (10 or 50.0%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (6 or 100.0%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (4 or 25.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (12 or 75.0%)
  • No (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (20 or 100.0%)
  • No (5 or 71.4%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Yes (2 or 28.6%)
Related indicators
  • EUT-CLORO
  • EUT-NUTRI
  • EUT-O2
  • FR-D5-Chlorophyll_a
  • FR-D5-DissolvedOxygen
  • FR-D5-Nutrients
  • FR-D5-Turbidity
  • MED-WFD/FR-D5-CARLIT
  • MED-WFD/FR-D5-PREI
  • National
  • CI 13
  • CI 14
  • Water column Chlorophyll a concentration (g L-1)
Criteria status No. of criteria per category
  • Good (32 or 25.8%)
  • Not assessed (66 or 53.2%)
  • Not good (19 or 15.3%)
  • Unknown (7 or 5.6%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (5 or 25.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (15 or 75.0%)
  • Good (10 or 50.0%)
  • Not assessed (6 or 30.0%)
  • Not good (4 or 20.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (6 or 100.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (12 or 75.0%)
  • Not assessed (4 or 25.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (20 or 100.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (2 or 28.6%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (5 or 71.4%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
Element status No. of elements per category
  • Good (31 or 42.5%)
  • Not assessed (19 or 26.0%)
  • Not good (15 or 20.5%)
  • Unknown (8 or 11.0%)
  • Good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not assessed (5 or 25.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (15 or 75.0%)
  • Good (10 or 50.0%)
  • Not assessed (6 or 30.0%)
  • Not good (4 or 20.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (6 or 100.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (12 or 75.0%)
  • Not assessed (4 or 25.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (20 or 100.0%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (0 or 0.0%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
  • Good (2 or 28.6%)
  • Not assessed (0 or 0.0%)
  • Not good (5 or 71.4%)
  • Unknown (0 or 0.0%)
Integration rule type for parameters
THRES (128 or 100.0%)
OTH (20 or 100.0%)
OTH (20 or 100.0%)
THRES (16 or 100.0%)
Integration rule description for parameters

For the rest of the assessment area (non-DMA), the baseline values defined in the previous Marine Strategy Framework Directive initial assessment were used as a threshold.

For criterion D5C5, it was considered to be BEPS when values higher than 5 mg L-1 were reached in more than 90 % of the records.
The assessment of criterion D5C7 is carried out at the scale of the individual coastal water body. The status of the water body under D5C7 is obtained by a 'One Out, All Out' integration between the two parameters 'Quality Index - Intertidal/mid-littoral macro-algae' and 'Quality Index - Seagrasses'. For the other criteria, the state of the parameter directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is necessary ("Not relevant" type).
The assessment of the status of criterion D5C1, at the scale of each grid cell, is obtained by integrating the two parameters relating to the NID and PID concentration. The integration method used is "One Out, All Out", which means that if one of the two parameters is not reached then the D5C1 criterion is not in good condition in the mesh considered. For the other criteria, the parameter status directly informs the corresponding criterion, no integration rule is required ("Not relevant" type).
Type-specific threshold values for D5C1 and D5C2 (annual geometric mean over the monitoring cycle) are being applied to offshore waters (waters beyond WFD water bodies, up to 12 nm offhore) . For coastal waters, WFD classification (BQE 'phytoplankton') applies.
The rule is applied to the elements of the criteria for which the limit values are set at national level.
The rule only applies to the elements of the criteria for which we have certain limit values at national level.
Integration rule type for criteria
OTH (128 or 100.0%)
HIE_WEI (20 or 100.0%)
OTH (20 or 100.0%)
OOAO (6 or 100.0%)
OOAO (16 or 100.0%)
Not relevant (7 or 100.0%)
Integration rule description for criteria
Decision 2017/848/EC does not propose any method for integrating the evaluation of each of the criteria. Therefore, the integration criterion used in the first initial assessment based on the OSPAR Joint Procedure, which was also applied in the first cycle of the Member States, will be adopted. According to this scheme, the assessment area could be classified as “without eutrophication problems” if all the indicators (criteria) are in BEA. where the nutrient concentrations are not found in BEA but the rest of criteria are found, the zone is classified as “with potential eutrophication problems”. if the criteria of direct effect (chlorophyll) or indirect (oxygen concentration) are not found in BEA, the area would be classified as “With eutrophication problems”.
At the level of each coastal water body (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of criteria is carried out in two stages:1/ The first stage consists in assigning a mark for each criterion as to whether or not good status has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the good condition is reached receives a score of 0, a criterion for which the good condition is not reached receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be assigned as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, for each coastal water body, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 5, then the coastal water body in question is not in good condition. Note that if good status is not achieved for criterion D5C6, then the coastal water body in question is systematically downgraded.

At the level of each grid box (geographical unit of assessment), the integration of the criteria is done in two steps:1/ The first step is to give a score for each criterion on whether the GES has been achieved. Thus, a criterion for which the GES is met receives a score of 0; a criterion for which the GES is not met receives a score of 2 if it is a primary criterion and a score of 1 if it is a secondary criterion. For criterion D5C1, a score of 2 shall be given as soon as one of the phosphate or nitrate elements is downgraded ("One Out All Out").2/ The integration of the criteria is achieved, at the level of each grid cell, by adding up the scores for each criterion. Thus, if the sum of the scores is greater than or equal to 3, then the mesh considered does not reach the GES.
2 out of 3 criteria have to be in good status
An integration method has not as yet been regionally agreed for the Mediterranean. However Malta has tentatively adopted the OOAO approach as per methodologies outlined in the Article 8 guidance document and since all indicators and criteria are in good status, the overall status is considered to be good.
GES extent threshold
  • 67.00 (20 of 20, or 100.0%)
GES extent achieved
  • 100.00 (7 of 20, or 35.0%)
  • 81.00 (6 of 20, or 30.0%)
  • 99.00 (7 of 20, or 35.0%)
  • 33.00 (4 of 20, or 20.0%)
  • 67.00 (16 of 20, or 80.0%)
  • 100.00 (16 of 16, or 100.0%)
  • 100.00 (20 of 20, or 100.0%)
  • 100.00 (7 of 7, or 100.0%)
GES extent unit
  • Proportion of area in good status (20 of 20, or 100.0%)
  • Proportion of area in good status (20 of 20, or 100.0%)
  • Proportion of area in good status (16 of 16, or 100.0%)
  • Proportion of area in good status (20 of 20, or 100.0%)
  • Proportion of area in good status (7 of 7, or 100.0%)
GES achieved Eutrophication
  • GES achieved (56)
  • GES expected to be achieved by 2020 (66)
  • Not assessed (6)
  • Unknown (20)
  • GES expected to be achieved by 2020 (8)
  • GES expected to be achieved later than 2020, no Article 14 exception reported (12)
  • GES achieved (6)
  • GES achieved (16)
  • GES achieved (20)
  • GES achieved (7)
Assessment period
2011-2016 (128 or 100.0%)
2010-2015 (6 or 30.0%)
2010-2016 (14 or 70.0%)
2012-2017 (20 or 100.0%)
2012-2018 (6 or 100.0%)
2011-2016 (16 or 100.0%)
2013-2018 (20 or 100.0%)
2012-2018 (7 or 100.0%)
Related pressures
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition (128 or 50.0%)
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources (128 or 50.0%)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition (20 or 50.0%)
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources (20 or 50.0%)
  • Eutrophication (6 or 33.3%)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition (6 or 33.3%)
  • Input of organic matter - diffuse sources and point sources (6 or 33.3%)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition (16 or 100.0%)
  • Input of nutrients - diffuse sources, point sources, atmospheric deposition (7 or 100.0%)
Related targets
33
6
2
4
1